推荐微信扫码登录以获得更好的体验!另:🎉建议更新到最新版,以体验新功能!🎉 版本更新记录→

【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价

12

剧集目录

标题时长
P1【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价54:56
P3【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价20:50
P4【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价55:08
P5【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价54:59
P6【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价55:07
P7【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价55:01
P8【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价55:10
P9【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价55:04
P10【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价55:14
P11【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价54:46
P12【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价54:52
P13【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价54:49

P1 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p01 1. 1.谋杀的道德侧面 (P1)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:03Funding for this program is provided by...本方案的经费由.
0:07Additional funding provided by...由.提供的额外资金。
0:33This is a course about justice and we begin with a story.这是一个关于正义的课程 我们从一个故事开始。
0:37Suppose you're the driver of a trolley car假设你是一辆推车的司机
0:40and your trolley car is hurtling down the track at 60 miles an hour你的推车以60英里的时速在轨
0:44and at the end of the track you notice five workers working on the track.在赛道的尽头,你注意到有五个工人在赛道上工作。
0:49You try to stop, but you can't.你试图停止,但你不能。
0:52Your brakes don't work.你的刹车不起作用。
0:54You feel desperate because you know that if you crash into these five workers你感到绝望 因为你知道 如果你撞上这五个工人
0:59they will all die.他们都会死
展开字幕全文(844 条)
序号英文中文
1Funding for this program is provided by...本方案的经费由.
2Additional funding provided by...由.提供的额外资金。
3This is a course about justice and we begin with a story.这是一个关于正义的课程 我们从一个故事开始。
4Suppose you're the driver of a trolley car假设你是一辆推车的司机
5and your trolley car is hurtling down the track at 60 miles an hour你的推车以60英里的时速在轨
6and at the end of the track you notice five workers working on the track.在赛道的尽头,你注意到有五个工人在赛道上工作。
7You try to stop, but you can't.你试图停止,但你不能。
8Your brakes don't work.你的刹车不起作用。
9You feel desperate because you know that if you crash into these five workers你感到绝望 因为你知道 如果你撞上这五个工人
10they will all die.他们都会死
11Let's assume you know that for sure.让我们假设你肯定知道这一点。
12And so you feel helpless until you notice that there is, off to the right, a side track.因此,你感到无助 直到你注意到, 有一个右侧的轨道。
13And at the end of that track there's one worker working on the track.在赛道的尽头 有一个工人在赛道上工作
14Your steering wheel works.你的方向盘工作。
15So you can turn the trolley car, if you want to,所以,你可以转 推车,如果你想,
16onto the side track, killing the one, but sparing the five.在侧道上,杀死一个, 但省下5。
17Here's our first question.这是第一个问题。
18What's the right thing to do?何等为善.
19What would you do?你会怎么做?
20Let's take a poll.我们来投票吧
21How many would turn the trolley car onto the side track?有多少人会把推车开到侧轨?
22Raise your hands.举手曰.
23How many wouldn't?有多少不会?
24How many would go straight ahead?有多少人会直接前进?
25Keep your hands up, those of you who would go straight ahead.举起手来 你们中那些会直走的人
26A handful of people would.少数人会的
27The vast majority would turn.绝大多数人会变成这样。
28Let's hear first.先说.
29Now we need to begin to investigate the reasons why you think现在我们需要开始调查你为什么认为
30it's the right thing to do.这是正确的事情。
31Let's begin with those in the majority我们从多数人开始
32who would turn to go onto the side track.谁会转身去 侧轨。
33Why would you do it?你为什么要这么做?
34What would be your reason?你有什么理由吗?
35Who's willing to volunteer a reason?谁愿意自愿一个理由?
36Go ahead, stand up.来吧,站起来。
37Because it can't be right to kill five people when you can only kill one person instead.因为杀五个人是不对的 当你只能杀一个人的时候
38It wouldn't be right to kill five if you could kill one person instead.如果你能杀了一个人 杀了五个人是不对的
39That's a good reason.这是很好的理由。
40Who else?还有谁?
41Does everybody agree with that reason?大家都同意这个理由吗?
42Go ahead.来吧。
43Well, I think it's the same reason on 9-11.我想9 -11也是这个原因
44We regard the people who flew the plane我们尊重那些驾驶飞机的人
45into the Pennsylvania field as heroes because they chose to kill the people in the plane作为英雄进入宾夕法尼亚州 因为他们选择杀死飞机上的人
46and not kill more people in big buildings.而不是在大建筑物里杀更多人
47So the principle there was the same on 9-11 to tragic circumstance,所以在9 -11的悲剧情况上 原则是一样的
48but better to kill one so that five can live.但最好杀了一个人 好让五个人活着
49Is that the reason most of you had those of you who would turn?这就是你们中多数人 愿意转身的原因吗?
50Yes.
51Let's hear now from those in the minority, those who wouldn't turn.现在让我们听听少数派的人, 那些不肯转身的人。
52Yes.
53Well, I think that's the same type of mentality that justifies genocide and totalitarianism.我想那也是种族屠杀和极权主义的理由
54In order to save one type of race, you wipe out the other.为了拯救一种种族,你消灭另一种种族.
55So what would you do in this case?这件案子你会怎么做?
56You would, to avoid the horrors of genocide,为了避免种族灭绝的恐怖
57you would crash into the five and kill them?你会撞到五个人并杀死他们?
58Presumably, yes.估计是的
59You would?你会吗?
60Yeah.
61Okay, who else?好吧,还有谁?
62It's a brave answer.谓勇猛答言.
63Thank you.谢谢
64Let's consider another trolley car case我们再考虑另一件赛车案
65and see whether those of you in the majority want to adhere to the principle看看你们大多数人是否愿意遵守原则
66better that one should die so that five should live.最好让一个人死 好让五个人活着
67This time you're not the driver of the trolley car, you're an onlooker.这次你不是特快车的司机 你是旁观者
68You're standing on a bridge overlooking a trolley car track,你站在一座桥上 俯瞰着一辆拖车轨道
69and down the track comes a trolley car.跑道上还有一辆推车
70At the end of the track are five workers.赛道尽头有5名工人.
71The brakes don't work.刹那无功用.
72The trolley car is about to careen into the five and kill them.推车即将关照到五人之中并杀死他们.
73And now you're not the driver.现在你不是司机了
74You really feel helpless until you notice, standing next to you, leaning over,你真的觉得无助,直到你注意到, 站在你旁边,倾斜,
75the bridge is a very fat man.桥是一个非常胖的人。
76And you could give him a shove.你可以给他一个推力。
77He would fall over the bridge, under the track, right in the way of the trolley car.他会掉到桥上,在赛道下, 在车道上。
78He would die, but he would spare the five.他会死,但他会饶了五人
79Now, how many would push the fat man over the bridge?有多少人会把胖子推到桥上?
80Raise your hand.举手曰.
81How many wouldn't?有多少不会?
82Most people wouldn't.大多数人不会。
83Here's the obvious question.这里有一个明显的问题。
84What became of the principle,原则是什么?
85better to save five lives even if it means sacrificing one,最好救五个人 即使牺牲一个
86what became of the principle that almost everyone endorsed in the first case?在第一个案例中,几乎所有人都赞同的原则是什么?
87I need to hear from someone who was in the majority in both cases.我需要听到一个人 谁在多数 在这两种情况。
88How do you explain the difference between the two?如何解释二者之别.
89Yes.
90The second one, I guess, involves an active choice of pushing the person down,第二种,我想, 涉及积极的选择 推一个人下来,
91which I guess that person himself would otherwise not have been involved in the situation at all.我猜他本人本来根本不会参与这件事
92And so to choose on his behalf, I guess,所以我想代表他选择
93to involve him in something that he otherwise would have escaped将他卷入他本会逃脱的东西
94is, I guess, more than what you have in the first case,我想,比你第一件案子的要多
95where the three parties, the driver and the two sets of workers,在那里,三方,驾驶员和两组工人,
96are already, I guess, in the situation.已经是,我猜,在这种情况下。
97But the guy working, the one on the track, off to the side,但是那个在跑道上工作的人 直接走到一边
98he didn't choose to sacrifice his life any more than the fat man did, did he?他没有比胖子更选择牺牲自己的生命 是吗?
99That's true, but he was on the tracks.没错 但他在铁轨上
100This guy was on the bridge.这家伙在桥上
101Go ahead.来吧。
102You can come back if you want.你可以回来,如果你想要的。
103All right.好吧,我们走。
104It's a hard question.难问.
105You did well.你表现得很好
106You did very well.你表现得很好
107It's a hard question.难问.
108Who else can find a way of reconciling the reaction of the majority in these two cases?还有谁能够找到一种方法来调和多数人在这两种情况下的反应?
109Yes.
110Well, I guess in the first case, where you have the one worker and the five,好吧,我想在第一种情况下, 你有一个工人和五个,
111it's choice between those two, and you have to make a certain choice,是这两个人之间的选择, 你必须做出一定的选择,
112and people are going to die because of the trolley car,人们会因为推车而死
113not necessarily because of your direct actions.不一定是因为你的直接行动
114The trolley car is a runaway thing, and you're making a split-second choice.跑车是逃跑的东西,你正在做一个分两秒的选择.
115Whereas pushing the fat man over is an actual act of murder on your part,而把胖子推过来是真正的谋杀行为
116you have control over that, whereas you may not have control over the trolley car.你控制着它,而你可能无法控制 推车。
117So I think it's a slightly different situation.所以我觉得情况有点不同
118All right.好吧,我们走。
119Who has a reply?谁有答复?
120No, that's good.不,这是很好的。
121Who has a way, who wants to reply?谁有办法,谁想回答?
122Is that a way out of this?这是一条出路吗?
123I don't think that's a very good reason because you choose to,我不认为这是一个很好的理由 因为你选择,
124it's either way you have to choose who dies because you either choose to turn and kill the person,无论是哪种方式,你必须选择谁死 因为你要么选择转身和杀死这个人,
125which is an act of conscious thought to turn, or you choose to push the fat man over,这是一种自觉的转变行为, 或者你选择把胖子推过来,
126which is also an act of conscious action.这也是一种自觉行动的行为。
127So either way, you're making a choice.所以不管怎么样,你都在做一个选择。
128Do you want to reply?你想回答吗?
129Well, I'm not really sure if that's the case.我不确定是不是这样
130It just still seems kind of different, the act of actually pushing someone over onto the tracks and killing him.这似乎还是有点不同, 实际上把某人推到铁轨上并杀死他。
131You are actually killing him yourself.你实际上是杀了他自己。
132You're pushing him with your own hands.你在亲手推他
133你在推他,他不会有事的 You're pushing him.
134And that's different than steering something that is going to cause death into another, you know,这和把会导致死亡的东西 引向另一个不同
135it doesn't really sound right saying it now.听起来不太对劲
136No, it's good.不,这是很好的。
137It's good.不错
138What's your name?你叫什么来着?
139Andrew.安德鲁
140Let me ask you this question, Andrew.让我问你这个问题,安德鲁。
141Yes.
142Suppose standing on the bridge next to the fat man, I didn't have to push him.假如站在那个胖子旁边的桥上 我不必推他
143Suppose he were standing over a trap door that I could open by turning a steering wheel like that.假设他站在一个陷阱的门上 我可以打开 通过转动方向盘 这样。
144Would you turn?你会转身吗?
145For some reason, that still just seems more wrong.出于某种原因,这似乎更错了。
146Right?对吧?
147I mean, maybe if you accidentally like leaned into the steering wheel or something like that,我的意思是,也许如果你不小心喜欢 倾斜到方向盘或类似的东西,
148or say that the car is hurtling towards a switch that will drop the trap, then I could agree with that.或者说这辆车正在向一个开关开动 开关会掉下陷阱 我同意
149Fair enough.不错
150It still seems wrong in a way that it doesn't seem wrong in the first case to turn, you say.你说,在第一个案子里 似乎还是不对的
151And in another way, I mean, in the first situation, you're involved directly with the situation.还有一种方式,我是说,在第一种情况下,你直接卷入了这种情况.
152In the second one, you're an onlooker as well.在第二个,你也是一个旁观者。
153All right.好吧,我们走。
154So you have the choice of becoming involved or not by pushing the fat man.所以你有选择参与与否 通过推胖子。
155Let's forget for the moment about this case.暂时忘记这个案子吧
156That's good.这是很好的。
157Let's imagine a different case.让我们设想一个不同的情况。
158This time you're a doctor in an emergency room and six patients come to you.这次你是急诊室的医生 六位病人来找你
159They've been in a terrible trolley car wreck.他们遭遇了可怕的车祸
160Five of them sustained moderate injuries.其中5人受轻伤。
161One is severely injured.其中一人受重伤。
162You could spend all day caring for the one severely injured victim.你可以花一整天时间 照顾一个严重受伤的受害者。
163But in that time, the five would die.但在那段时间,五人会死。
164Or you could look after the five, restore them to health.或者你可以照顾五个人,恢复他们的健康。
165But during that time, the one severely injured person would die.但在这期间,一名重伤者将死亡。
166How many would save the five?多少人能救五个人?
167Now is the doctor.现在的医生。
168How many would save the one?有多少人能救那个?
169Very few people.甚少众生.
170Just a handful of people.只是几个人
171Same reason, I assume.我想也是一样的原因
172One life versus five.一命对五.
173Now consider another doctor case.现在考虑另一个医生病例。
174This time you're a transplant surgeon.这次你是移植外科医生
175And you have five patients, each in desperate need of an organ transplant in order to survive.你们有五个病人,每个病人都急需器官移植才能生存。
176One needs a heart, one a lung, one a kidney, one a liver, and the fifth a pancreas.一者须心,一者肺,一者肾,一者肝,五者胰.
177And you have no organ donors.而你没有器官捐献者。
178You are about to see them die.你即将看到他们死去。
179And then it occurs to you that in the next room, there's a healthy guy who came in for a checkup.然后你想到,在隔壁的房间, 有一个健康的家伙 谁进来检查。
180And he's, you like that?他,你喜欢吗?
181And he's taking a nap.他正在睡觉
182You could go in very quietly, yank out the five organs, that person would die.你可以悄悄地进去 挖出五个器官 那个人会死的
183But you could save the five.但你可以救五个人
184How many would do it?有多少人会这么做?
185Anyone?有人吗?
186How many?多少个?
187Put your hands up if you would do it.如果你愿意的话,举起手来
188Anyone in the balcony?有人在阳台吗?
189You would?你会吗?
190Be careful, don't lean over too much.小心点,别靠得太紧
191What?你说什么?
192How many wouldn't?有多少不会?
193All right, what do you say?好吧,怎么样?
194Speak up in the balcony, you who would yank out the organs.在阳台上说话,谁会挖出器官。
195Why?为什么?
196I'd actually like to explore a slightly alternate possibility of just taking the one of the five who needs an organ who dies first,我其实想探索一种 稍稍交替的可能性 就把需要先死器官的五个人中的一个带走
197using their four healthy organs to save the other four.用他们四个健康的器官来拯救另外四个
198That's a pretty good idea.这主意不错
199That's a great idea, except for the fact that you just wrecked the philosophical point.这是一个伟大的想法,除了 你刚刚破坏了哲学的观点。
200Well, let's step back from these stories and these arguments好吧,让我们退一步 从这些故事和这些争论
201to notice a couple of things about the way the arguments have begun to unfold.注意一些关于争论开始展开的方式
202Certain moral principles have already begun to emerge from the discussions we've had.我们的讨论已经开始产生一些道德原则。
203And let's consider what those moral principles look like.让我们来看看这些道德原则是什么样子。
204The first moral principle that emerged in the discussion said,讨论中出现的第一项道德原则是:
205the right thing to do, the moral thing to do, depends on the consequences that will result from your action.正确的事情做,道德的事情做, 取决于后果 由你的行动。
206At the end of the day, better that five should live even if one must die.最后,最好让五个人活着 即使一个人必须死。
207That's an example of consequentialist moral reasoning.这是间接道德推理的例子.
208Consequentialist moral reasoning locates morality in the consequences of an act,随之而来的道德推理将道德定位于行为的后果中,
209in the state of the world that will result from the thing you do.发生在世界的状态, 将因你的行为。
210Then we went a little further, we considered those other cases,然后我们走得更远 我们考虑了其他案件
211and people weren't so sure about consequentialist moral reasoning.人们不这么确定 后果论道德推理。
212When people hesitated to push the fat man over the bridge当人们犹豫不决地把胖子推到桥上
213or to yank out the organs of the innocent patient,或拔出无辜病人的器官,
214people gestured toward reasons having to do with the intrinsic quality of the act itself.人们对与行为本身的内在质量有关的原因表态。
215Consequences be what they may.后果是可能发生的。
216People were reluctant, people thought it was just wrong, categorically wrong,人们很不情愿 人们觉得这是错误的 绝对是错误的
217to kill a person, an innocent person, even for the sake of saving five lives.杀死一个人,一个无辜的人, 即使为了挽救五个生命。
218At least people thought that in the second version of each story we considered.至少在我们考虑的每个故事的第二个版本中,人们都这样认为.
219So this points to a second categorical way of thinking about moral reasoning.因此,这指出了第二个对道德推理的断然思考方式.
220Categorical moral reasoning locates morality in certain absolute moral requirements,分类道德推理 定位道德在某些绝对道德要求,
221certain categorical duties and rights, regardless of the consequences.某些明确的义务和权利,不论后果如何。
222We're going to explore in the days and weeks to come以后几天和几周我们再去探索
223the contrast between consequentialist and categorical moral principles.必然和绝对道德原则的对比。
224The most influential example of consequential moral reasoning is utilitarianism,影响最大的道德推理例子是功利主义,
225a doctrine invented by Jeremy Bentham, the 18th century English political philosopher.一种由18世纪英国政治哲学家杰里米·本特姆发明的学说.
226The most important philosopher of categorical moral reasoning绝对道德推理最重要的哲学家
227is the 18th century German philosopher Immanuel Kant.是18世纪德国哲学家伊曼纽尔·康德.
228So we will look at those two different modes of moral reasoning, assess them, and also consider others.因此,我们将研究这两种不同的道德推理模式,评估它们,并审议其他模式。
229If you look at the syllabus you'll notice that we read a number of great and famous books.如果你看看教学大纲,你会注意到 我们读了很多伟大和著名的书籍。
230Books by Aristotle, John Locke, Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, and others.著有亚里士多德,约翰·洛克,伊曼纽尔·坎特,约翰·斯图尔特·米尔等人的书.
231You'll notice too from the syllabus that we don't only read these books.你也会从教学大纲中注意到 我们不只是看这些书
232We also take up contemporary political and legal controversies that raise philosophical questions.我们还处理引起哲学问题的当代政治和法律争议。
233We will debate equality and inequality, affirmative action, free speech versus hate speech,我们将讨论平等和不平等、平权行动、言论自由与仇恨言论,
234same-sex marriage, military conscription, a range of practical questions.同性婚姻 征兵 一系列实际问题
235Why?为什么?
236Not just to enliven these abstract and distant books,不只是为这些抽象和遥远的书注入活力,
237but to make clear, to bring out what's at stake in our everyday lives, including our political lives, for philosophy.但为了说明 揭示我们日常生活中 包括政治生活中的利害关系 为了哲学
238And so we will read these books, and we will debate these issues,所以,我们将阅读这些书, 我们将辩论这些问题,
239and we'll see how each informs and illuminates the other.我们看看每个人如何向对方提供信息和照明
240This may sound appealing enough, but here I have to issue a warning.也许这听起来很吸引人 但我得发出警告
241And the warning is this, to read these books in this way, as an exercise in self-knowledge,警告是,用这种方式阅读这些书,作为自我认知的练习,
242to read them in this way carries certain risks, risks that are both personal and political,以这种方式阅读它们会带来某些风险,风险既包括个人风险,也包括政治风险,
243risks that every student of political philosophy has known.每一个政治哲学学生都知道的风险。
244These risks spring from the fact that philosophy teaches us and unsettles us这些风险源于哲学教导我们,使我们不安
245by confronting us with what we already know.通过面对我们 已经知道的东西。
246There's an irony.有讽刺意味。
247The difficulty of this course consists in the fact that it teaches what you already know.这个课程的难度在于它教授你已经知道的东西。
248It works by taking what we know from familiar unquestioned settings and making it strange.它的工作原理是,从熟悉的无疑问的场合中吸取我们的知识,使它变得奇怪。
249That's how those examples worked, the hypotheticals with which we began, with their mix of playfulness and sobriety.这些例子就是这样起作用的, 我们开始的假设, 和他们玩耍和清醒的组合。
250It's also how these philosophical books work.这也是这些哲学著作是如何运作的.
251Philosophy estranges us from the familiar, not by supplying new information,哲学让我们远离熟悉的人 而不是提供新的信息
252but by inviting and provoking a new way of seeing.但通过邀请和激起新的观察方式。
253But, and here's the risk, once the familiar turns strange, it's never quite the same again.但是,这里的风险是, 一旦熟悉的人变得奇怪, 它不再完全一样了。
254Self-knowledge is like lost innocence.自知如是失净.
255However unsettling you find it, it can never be unthought or unknown.无论你多么不安地找到了它,它永远不可能是无意识的或未知的。
256What makes this enterprise difficult, but also riveting, is that moral and political philosophy is a story,使这个事业困难重重 但也令人兴奋的是 道德和政治哲学是一个故事
257and you don't know where the story will lead, but what you do know is that the story is about you.你不知道故事会走向何处 但你知道的是故事是关于你的
258Those are the personal risks.这些是个人风险。
259Now what of the political risks?现在的政治风险呢?
260One way of introducing a course like this would be to promise you that by reading these books and debating these issues,引入这样的课程的方法之一 就是向你保证 通过阅读这些书和辩论这些问题
261you will become a better, more responsible citizen.你会成为一个更好,更负责任的公民。
262You will examine the presuppositions of public policy, you will hone your political judgment,你将研究公共政策的预设, 你将发挥你的政治判断,
263you will become a more effective participant in public affairs.你将更有效地参与公共事务。
264But this would be a partial and misleading promise.但这将是一个部分和误导性的承诺。
265Political philosophy, for the most part, hasn't worked that way.政治哲学,在多数情况下,还没有这样发挥作用.
266You have to allow for the possibility that political philosophy may make you a worse citizen,你必须允许政治哲学 让你成为更糟糕的公民
267rather than a better one, or at least a worse citizen, before it makes you a better one.而不是一个更好的人, 或者至少一个更糟糕的公民, 在它让你成为一个更好的人。
268And that's because philosophy is a distancing, even debilitating activity.这是因为哲学是一种疏远甚至削弱的活动.
269And you see this going back to Socrates.你会看到这个回到苏格拉底。
270There's a dialogue, the Gorgias, in which one of Socrates' friends,有一个对话,Gorgias, 其中苏格拉底的朋友之一,
271Chalicles, 试图说服他脱离哲学。
272Chalicles tells Socrates, philosophy is a pretty toy if one indulges in it with moderation at the right time of life,查利克利斯告诉苏格拉底 哲学是一个相当的玩具 如果有人在生命的正确时刻温和地沉浸其中
273but if one pursues it further than one should, it is absolute ruin.但如果有人继续追求它,那它绝对是毁灭。
274Take my advice, Chalicles says, abandon argument.接受我的建议 查利克利斯说 放弃争论
275Learn the accomplishments of active life.学习积极生活的成绩.
276Take for your models not those people who spend their time on these petty quibbles,做你的模特 而不是那些花时间玩这些小花样的人
277but those who have a good livelihood and reputation and many other blessings.他们有良好的生计和声望,并享受许多福利。
278So Chalicles is really saying to Socrates, quit philosophizing, get real, go to business school.因此,查利克利斯真的在对苏格拉底说, 戒掉哲理, 变得真实, 去商学院。
279And Chalicles did have a point.查利克利斯说得有道理
280He had a point because philosophy distances us from conventions, from established assumptions, and from settled beliefs.他之所以有道理,是因为哲学使我们远离公约、既定的假设和既定的信仰。
281Those are the risks, personal and political.这些是个人和政治风险。
282And in the face of these risks, there is a characteristic evasion.面对这些风险,存在着典型的逃避现象。
283The name of the evasion is skepticism.逃者名曰疑论.
284It's the idea, oh, let go something like this.这是想法,哦,放过类似的东西。
285We didn't resolve, once and for all,我们没有一劳永逸地决定
286either the cases or the principles we were arguing when we began.要么是案件 要么是我们开始时争论的原则
287And if Aristotle and Locke and Kant and Mill haven't solved these questions after all of these years,如果亚里士多德、洛克、康特和米尔 这么多年没解决这些问题
288who are we to think that we here in Sanders Theater over the course of a semester can resolve them?谁会认为我们在桑德斯 一个学期的戏剧可以解决吗?
289And so maybe it's just a matter of each person having his or her own principles所以也许这只是每个人 有自己的原则的问题
290and there's nothing more to be said about it, no way of reasoning.也没什么可说的了 没有推理方法
291That's the evasion, the evasion of skepticism, to which I would offer the following.这就是逃避,逃避怀疑,对此我提出以下建议.
292It's true, these questions have been debated for a very long time.确实,这些问题已经辩论了很长时间.
293But the very fact that they have recurred and persisted但事实上,他们不断重演
294may suggest that though they're impossible in one sense, they're unavoidable in another.可能暗示,虽然从某种意义上说,它们是不可能的,但从另一种意义上说,它们是不可避免的。
295And the reason they're unavoidable, the reason they're inescapable,和他们不可避免的原因, 和他们无法逃避的原因,
296is that we live some answer to these questions every day.我们每天都有这些问题的答案
297So skepticism, just throwing up your hands and giving up on moral reflection, is no solution.所以怀疑主义,只是举起手来,放弃道德反思,不是办法.
298Immanuel Kant described very well the problem with skepticism when he wrote,伊曼纽尔·康德(Immanuel Kant)在写到怀疑主义时非常清楚地描述了这个问题,
299skepticism is a resting place for human reason, where it can reflect upon its dogmatic wanderings,怀疑主义是人类的安息之所, 它可以反思它的教条游荡,
300but it is no dwelling place for permanent settlement.但这里不是永久居民点。
301Simply to acquiesce in skepticism, Kant wrote,康德写道:
302can never suffice to overcome the restlessness of reason.永远无法克服理性的不安。
303I've tried to suggest through these stories and these arguments我试图通过这些故事和争论来建议
304some sense of the risks and temptations of the perils and the possibilities.某些风险和诱惑感 风险和可能性。
305I would simply conclude by saying that the aim of this course我最后只想说,这一课程的目的
306is to awaken the restlessness of reason and to see where it might lead.就是唤醒理智的不安 并看看它可能走向何方
307Thank you very much.谢谢
308In a situation that desperate, you have to do what you have to do to survive.在如此绝望的情况下,你必须做你必须做的事才能生存.
309You have to do what you have to do.须作如是事.
310You gotta do what you gotta do, pretty much.你得做你该做的, 相当多。
311If you've been going 19 days without any food, someone just has to take the sacrifice,如果你19天没吃东西 就得有人去牺牲
312someone has to make the sacrifice and people can survive.得有人去牺牲 人民才能生存
313Alright, that's good.好吧,这是很好的。
314What's your name?你叫什么来着?
315Marcus.马库斯
316What do you say to Marcus?你对马库斯怎么说?
317Last time, we started out last time with some stories,上次,我们开始 一些故事,
318with some moral dilemmas about trolley cars and about doctors与一些道德困境 关于推车和医生
319and healthy patients vulnerable to being victims of organ transplantation.健康病人很容易成为器官移植的受害者。
320We noticed two things about the arguments we had.我们注意到两件事 关于我们的争论。
321One had to do with the way we were arguing.一个和我们争论的方式有关
322We began with our judgments in particular cases.我们首先对特定案件作出判决。
323We tried to articulate the reasons or the principles我们试图阐明原因或原则
324lying behind our judgments.站在我们判决的后面
325And then, confronted with a new case,然后,面对一个新的案件,
326we found ourselves reexamining those principles,我们重新审视了这些原则,
327revising each in the light of the other.分别根据对方修改。
328And we noticed the built-in pressure to try to bring into alignment我们注意到内在的压力 试图实现对齐
329our judgments about particular cases我们对于特定案件的判决
330and the principles we would endorse on reflection.我们赞同思考的原则。
331We also noticed something about the substance of the arguments我们也注意到了争论的实质
332that emerged from the discussion.讨论中出现的问题。
333We noticed that sometimes we were tempted to locate the morality of an act我们注意到,有时候我们想找到一个行为的道德
334and the consequences in the results,以及结果的后果,
335in the state of the world that it brought about.在它带来的世界状态。
336And we called this consequentialist moral reasoning.我们称之为必然的道德推理。
337But we also noticed that in some cases,但我们也注意到,在某些情况下,
338we weren't swayed only by the result.我们不只是因为结果而摇摆不定
339Sometimes, many of us felt,有时,我们许多人觉得,
340that not just consequences but also the intrinsic quality不仅后果,而且内在质量
341or character of the act matters morally.行为或行为的性质在道义上很重要。
342Some people argued that there are certain things有人说有些事情
343that are just categorically wrong,这完全是错误的,
344even if they bring about a good result,即使他们带来了佳果,
345even if they save five people at the cost of one life.即使他们以一命的代价拯救了五个人。
346So we contrasted consequentialist moral principles所以我们对比了后果主义的道德原则
347with categorical ones.与绝对的。
348Today, and in the next few days,今天 接下来的几天
349we will begin to examine one of the most influential versions我们开始研究最有影响力的版本之一
350of consequentialist moral theory.道德理论。
351And that's the philosophy of utilitarianism.这就是功利主义的哲学.
352Jeremy Bentham, the 18th century English political philosopher,杰里米·本特姆,18世纪英国政治哲学家,
353gave first the first clear systematic expression第一个清晰的系统表达
354to the utilitarian moral theory.对功利主义的道德理论。
355And Bentham's idea, his essential idea,而本塔姆的想法,他的基本想法,
356is a very simple one,很简单
357with a lot of morally intuitive appeal.与很多道德直观的吸引力。
358Bentham's idea is the following.本特姆的想法如下.
359The right thing to do, the just thing to do,正确的事情, 正义的事情,
360is to maximize utility.目的是最大限度地发挥效用。
361What did he mean by utility?他是什么意思的效用吗?
362He meant by utility the balance of pleasure over pain,他是指快乐和痛苦的平衡
363happiness over suffering.幸福胜过痛苦
364Here's how he arrived at the principle of maximizing utility.这就是他如何达到最大效用的原则.
365He started out by observing that all of us, all human beings,他开始观察我们所有的人
366are governed by two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure.受两个主权主人的支配 痛苦和快乐
367We human beings like pleasure and dislike pain.我们人类喜欢快乐 不喜欢痛苦
368And so we should base morality,所以我们应该把道德作为基础
369whether we're thinking about what to do in our own lives,我们是否在想我们自己的生活中该做什么
370or whether, as legislators or citizens,或作为立法者或公民,
371we're thinking about what the laws should be.我们在考虑法律应该是什么
372The right thing to do individually or collectively单独或集体做正确的事情
373is to maximize, act in a way that maximizes尽最大可能,以最大方式采取行动
374the overall level of happiness.幸福的整体水平。
375Bentham's utilitarianism is sometimes summed up with the slogan,班瑟姆的功利主义有时以口号概括,
376the greatest good for the greatest number.对人数来说最有利
377With this basic principle of utility on hand,有了这一基本实用原则,
378let's begin to test it and to examine it我们开始测试 检查一下
379by turning to another case, another story,转而谈另一个案子,另一个故事,
380but this time not a hypothetical story, a real life story,但这次不是一个假想的故事 一个真实的故事,
381the case of the Queen versus Dudley and Stephens.女王诉杜德利和史蒂芬的案子
382This was a 19th century British law case that's famous这是19世纪著名的英国法律案
383and much debated in law schools.和很多争论 在法学院。
384Here's what happened in the case.案件是这样的
385I'll summarize the story.我将总结这个故事。
386Then I want to hear how you would rule,那么我想听听你如何统治
387imagining that you're the jury.想象你是陪审团
388A newspaper account of the time described the background.一份当时的报纸报道描述了背景.
389A sadder story of disaster at sea was never told海上灾难的悲惨故事从未传出去
390比游艇Minunet的幸存者,
391the ship founded in the South Atlantic,在南大西洋建立的船,
3921300 miles from the Cape.距开普1300英里.
393There were four in the crew.船员中有四个
394Dudley was the captain.达德利是船长.
395Stephens was the first mate.斯蒂芬斯是大副。
396Brooks was a sailor.布鲁克斯是个水手
397All men of excellent character,所有品格优秀的人,
398or so the newspaper account tells us.报纸的账号告诉我们了
399The fourth crew member was the cabin boy,第四名船员是小船舱男孩
400Richard Parker, 17 years old.理查德·帕克,17岁.
401He was an orphan.他是个孤儿。
402He had no family,他没有家人
403and he was on his first long voyage at sea.他第一次在海上远航
404He went, the news account tells us,他去了,新闻账户告诉我们,
405rather against the advice of his friends,更违背他朋友的建议,
406he went in the hopefulness of youthful ambition,他怀着青春的抱负
407thinking the journey would make a man of him.以为旅途会让他成为男人
408Sadly, it was not to be.可悲的是,它不是那样的。
409The facts of the case were not in dispute.该案的事实没有争议。
410A wave hit the ship and Minunet went down.一波波击中舰只,米努内特下水.
411The four crew members escaped to a lifeboat.四名船员逃到救生艇.
412The only food they had他们唯一的食物
413were two cans of preserved turnips.是两罐保存好的萝卜
414No fresh water.没有淡水。
415For the first three days they ate nothing.头三天他们什么都没吃
416On the fourth day,在第四天的时候,
417they opened one of the cans of turnips and ate it.他们打开一个罐子,吃了它。
418The next day they caught a turtle.第二天他们抓到一只乌龟
419Together with the other can of turnips,加上另一罐萝卜
420the turtle enabled them to subsist乌龟使他们得以生存
421for the next few days,接下来几天
422and then for eight days they had nothing.过了八天 他们一无所有
423No food, no water.无食无水.
424Imagine yourself in a situation like that.想象自己在这样的情况下。
425What would you do?你会怎么做?
426Here's what they did.这就是他们所做的。
427By now, the cabin boy, Parker,现在,小木屋男孩,帕克,
428is lying at the bottom of the lifeboat in the corner躺在转角救生艇底部
429because he had drunk seawater因为他喝过海水
430against the advice of the others,违抗他人的劝告,
431and he had become ill,他病了,
432and he appeared to be dying.他看起来快死了
433So on the 19th day, Dudley,所以在19日,达德利,
434the captain suggested that they should all have a lottery,船长建议他们应该都有一个彩票,
435that they should draw lots to see who would die to save the rest.他们应该抽签,看看谁会为了拯救其他人而死。
436Brooks refused.布鲁克斯拒绝了
437He didn't like the lottery idea.他不喜欢彩票的想法。
438We don't know whether this was because不知道是不是因为...
439he didn't want to take the chance他不想冒险
440or because he believed in categorical moral principles.或者因为他相信绝对的道德原则
441But in any case,但无论如何,
442no lots were drawn.没有抽签。
443The next day, there was still no ship in sight,第二天,仍然没有船在望
444so Dudley told Brooks to advert his gaze,杜德利让布鲁克斯转告他的目光
445and he motioned to Stevens他向史蒂文斯提议
446that the boy Parker had better be killed.帕克的男孩最好被杀了
447Dudley offered a prayer.达德利提出祈祷.
448He told the boy his time had come,他告诉那个男孩 他的时间到了,
449and he killed him with a penknife,他用小刀杀了他,
450stabbing him in the jugular vein.刺其颈脉.
451Brooks emerged from his conscientious objection布鲁克斯出于良心拒服兵役
452to share in the gruesome bounty.分享可怕的赏金
453For four days, the three of them四天,他们三个
454fed on the body and blood of the cabin boy.以小屋男孩的身体和血液为食。
455True story.真实的故事。
456And then they were rescued.后被救出.
457Dudley describes their rescue达德利描述他们的营救情况
458in his diary在他的日记中
459with staggering euphemism.与惊人的委婉。
460Quote,引文为
461On the 24th day,在第24天,我们...
462as we were having our breakfast,我们吃早餐的时候
463a ship appeared at last.船终于出现了
464The three survivors were picked up by a German ship.三名幸存者被一艘德国船只接走.
465They were taken back to Falmouth in England,他们被带回英国的法茅斯
466where they were arrested and tried.在那里他们被逮捕和审判。
467Brooks turned state's witness.布鲁克斯成为州证人
468Dudley and Stevens went to trial.达德利和史蒂文斯受审.
469They didn't dispute the facts.他们并没有质疑事实。
470They claimed they had acted out of necessity.他们声称他们出于必要采取行动。
471That was their defense.那是他们的辩护
472They argued, in effect,他们辩称,实际上,
473better that one should die,最好让一个人死,
474so that three could survive.使三个人能够生存。
475The prosecutor检察官
476wasn't swayed by that argument.并没有被那个论点动摇。
477He said murder is murder,他说谋杀就是谋杀
478and so the case went to trial.案子也开始审理了
479Now imagine you are the jury.现在想象一下你是陪审团
480And just to simplify the discussion,为了简化讨论
481put aside the question of law.把法律问题搁置一边。
482Let's assume that you as the jury我们假设你是陪审团
483are charged with deciding负责决定
484whether what they did was morally permissible or not.他们的所作所为在道德上是否允许。
485How many would vote not guilty有多少人投无罪票
486that what they did was morally permissible?他们的所作所为在道德上是允许的?
487And how many would vote guilty和多少人会投 有罪
488that what they did was morally wrong?他们的所作所为在道德上是错误的?
489A pretty sizable majority.相当的多数
490Now let's see what people's reasons are,现在让我们看看人们的理由是什么
491and let me begin with those who are in the minority.首先让我谈谈那些属于少数的人。
492Let's hear first from the defense我们先从辩方听
493of Dudley and Stevens.达德利和史蒂文斯
494Why would you morally exonerate them?你为什么在道义上免除他们的罪责?
495What are your reasons?你的理由为何?
496Yes?是吗?
497I think it is morally reprehensible,我认为这是道德上应受谴责的,
498but I think that there is a distinction但我觉得有区别
499between what's morally reprehensible道德上应受谴责的东西
500and what makes someone legally accountable.是什么使一个人 法律责任。
501In other words, as the judge said,换句话说,正如法官所说,
502what's always moral isn't necessarily against the law.总是道德的东西不一定违法.
503And while I don't think that necessity虽然我觉得没必要
504justifies theft or murder or any illegal act,* 为盗窃、谋杀或任何非法行为辩护,
505at some point your degree of necessity在某个时候,你的需要程度
506does in fact exonerate you from any guilt.其实你已经无罪释放了
507Okay, good.好吧,不错。
508Other defenders, other voices for the defense.其他维权者 其他维权者的声音
509Moral justifications for what they did.道德解释 他们做了什么。
510Yes?是吗?
511Alright, thank you.好吧,谢谢。
512I just feel like in a situation that desperate,我只是觉得自己很绝望
513you have to do what you have to do to survive.你必须做你必须做的 生存。
514You have to do what you have to do.须作如是事.
515You gotta do what you gotta do, pretty much.你得做你该做的, 相当多。
516If you've been going 19 days without any food,如果你19天没吃东西了
517someone just has to take the sacrifice,总得有人去牺牲
518someone has to make the sacrifice, and people can survive.得有人做出牺牲 人们才能生存
519And furthermore, from that, let's say they survive,而且,从这个开始,让我们假设他们活了下来,
520and then they become productive members of society然后他们成为社会的有生产力的成员
521who go home and start like a million charity organizations他们回家 开始像一百万个慈善组织
522and this and that and this and that.和这个,那个,这个,那个。
523I mean, they benefit everybody in the end.我是说,他们最终对每个人都有好处。
524I mean, I don't know what they did afterwards.我不知道他们后来做了什么
525They might have gone and like, I don't know,他们可能走了 喜欢,我不知道,
526killed more people, whatever.杀了更多的人,不管什么。
527What?你说什么?
528What if they went home and they turned out to be assassins?要是他们回家 成了刺客怎么办?
529What if they went home and turned out to be assassins?如果他们回家 变成刺客怎么办?
530You'd want to know who they assassinated.你会想知道他们暗杀了谁
531That's true, too.亦如是说.
532That's fair.这很公平。
533Okay.摆
534All right, that's good.好吧,这是很好的。
535What's your name?你叫什么来着?
536Marcus.马库斯
537All right.好吧,我们走。
538We've heard a defense, a couple of voices for the defense.我们已经听到一个辩护, 几个声音的辩护。
539Now we need to hear from the prosecution.现在我们需要检方的消息
540Most people think what they did was wrong.大多数人认为他们的所作所为是错误的.
541Why?为什么?
542One of the first things that I was thinking was,我最初想到的一件事是,
543oh, if they haven't been eating for a really long time,哦,如果他们还没有吃 很久,
544maybe they're mentally, like, affected.也许他们是精神上,喜欢,受到影响。
545And so then that could be used as a defense,因此,可以用来作为辩护,
546a possible argument that, oh, they weren't in the proper state of mind.一个可能的论点,哦, 他们是不是在正常的头脑状态。
547They weren't making decisions they might otherwise be making.他们不是在做他们可能要做的决定
548And if that's an appealing argument,如果这是个有吸引力的争论
549that you have to be in an altered mindset to do something like that,你不得不改变心态 做这样的事情,
550it suggests that people who find that argument convincing这说明那些认为这个论点令人信服的人
551do think that they were acting immorally.认为他们的行为是不道德的。
552But I want to know what you think.但我想知道你的看法。
553You defend them.你为他们辩护。
554I'm sorry.对不起
555You vote to convict, right?你投给罪犯,对吧?
556Yeah.
557I don't think that they acted in a morally appropriate way.我认为他们的行为在道德上是不恰当的.
558And why not?为什么不呢?
559What do you say?你说什么?
560Here's Marcus.这是马库斯。
561He just defended them.他只是替他们辩护
562He said, you heard what he said.他说,你听到他说的。
563That you've got to do what you've got to do in a case like that.你必须做你必须做的 在类似的情况。
564Yeah.
565What do you say to Marcus?你对马库斯怎么说?
566That there's no situation that would allow human beings没有任何情况允许人类
567to take the idea of fate or the other people's lives in their own hands,将命运或他人生命的想法掌握在自己手中,
568that we don't have that kind of power.我们没有那种力量
569Good.不错
570Okay.摆
571Thank you.谢谢
572And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
573Britt?布丽特?
574Yes.
575Okay.摆
576Who else?还有谁?
577What do you say?你说什么?
578Stand up.站起来
579I'm wondering if Dudley and Stephen had asked for Richard Parker's consent in,我想知道杜德利和史蒂芬 是否要求理查德・帕克同意
580you know, dying.临终前
581If that would, would that exonerate them from an act of murder?如果这样,那会让他们免于谋杀吗?
582And if so, is that still morally justifiable?如果是这样,这在道义上还是有道理的?
583That's interesting.这很有趣。
584All right.好吧,我们走。
585Consent.同意 同意吗
586Wait, wait.单单
587Hang on.坚持住。
588What's your name?你叫什么来着?
589Kathleen.凯瑟琳
590Says, suppose they had asked.说,假设他们问。
591What would that scenario look like?那会是什么情况?
592So in the story, Dudley is there, penknife in hand.所以在故事里,杜德利就在那里,手持笔刀.
593But instead of the prayer, or before the prayer,与其祈祷,或祈祷之前,
594he says, Parker, would you mind?他说,帕克,你介意吗?
595We're desperately hungry, as Marcus empathizes with.马库斯很同情我们
596We're desperately hungry.我们快饿死了
597You're not going to last long anyhow.反正你撑不了多久的
598You can be a martyr.你可以当烈士
599Would you be a martyr?你会成为烈士吗?
600How about it, Parker?怎么样,帕克?
601Then, then what do you think?那你觉得呢?
602Would it be morally justified then?那么这在道义上是否合理?
603Suppose Parker, in his semi stupor, says, OK.假设Parker在半脑筋里说
604I don't think it would be morally justifiable, but I'm wondering.我觉得这在道德上是没有道理的 但我想知道
605Even then, even then it wouldn't be.即使那样,即使那样也不会是。
606No.没有
607You don't think that even with consent, it would be morally justified.你不认为,即使得到同意,这在道德上也是合理的。
608Are there people who think, who want to take up Kathleen's consent idea,有没有人想,谁想接受 凯瑟琳的同意想法,
609and who think that that would make it morally justified?谁会认为这在道德上是合理的呢?
610Raise your hand if it would, if you think it would.举起你的手,如果它会,如果你认为会。
611That's very interesting.这很有趣。
612Why would consent make a moral difference?为什么同意会改变道德?
613Why would it?为什么?
614Yes.
615Well, I just think that if he was making his own original idea,好吧,我只是觉得,如果他 做他自己的想法,
616and it was his idea to start with,而这是他的主意 首先,
617then that would be the only situation in which I would see it being appropriate in any way.那样的话,我就会认为这是唯一合适的情况。
618Because that way you couldn't make the argument that he was pressured, you know,因为那样你就不能 提出他的压力,你知道,
619it's three to one, or whatever the ratio was.3比1,或者说比例是多少
620Right.
621And I think that if he was making a decision to give his life,我认为如果他决定献出生命
622and he took on the agency to sacrifice himself,而他却为了牺牲自己而上当
623which some people might see as admirable,或有人以为是可敬的,
624and other people might disagree with that decision.其他人可能不同意这一决定。
625So if he came up with the idea,所以如果他想出这个主意
626that's the only kind of consent we could have confidence in morally,这是我们在道德上唯一可以信任的
627then it would be okay.那样就好了
628Otherwise, it would be kind of coerced consent under the circumstances, you think.否则,你认为,在这种情况下,那是一种强迫同意。
629Is there anyone who thinks that even the consent of Parker would not justify their killing him?有没有人认为即使得到帕克的同意也不足以证明杀害他是合理的?
630Who thinks that?谁这么认为?
631Yes.
632Tell us why.告诉我为什么。
633Stand up.站起来
634I think that Parker would be killed with the hope that the other crew members would be rescued.我想帕克会被杀 希望其他船员能获救
635So there's no definite reason that he should be killed,所以,没有明确的理由 他应该被杀,
636because you don't know when they're going to get rescued.因为你不知道他们何时会获救
637So if you kill him, it's killing him in vain.故若杀之,乃枉杀之.
638Do you keep killing the crew member until you're rescued,你继续杀死船员直到你获救为止
639and then you're left with no one, because someone's going to die eventually?然后你就一个人也没有了 因为有人终究会死?
640Well, the moral logic of the situation seems to be that,事情的道德逻辑是
641that they would keep on picking off the weakest, maybe, one by one, until they were rescued.他们会继续捕捉最弱者, 也许,一个接一个,直到他们获救。
642And in this case, luckily, they were rescued when three, at least, were still alive.在此情况下,幸运的是,他们被救出,至少三个人还活着。
643Now, if Parker did give his consent, would it be all right, do you think, or not?现在,如果Parker真的同意了, 会不会没事, 你觉得呢?
644No.没有
645It still wouldn't be right.这还是不对的
646And tell us why it wouldn't be all right.告诉我们为什么不好。
647First of all, cannibalism, I believe, is morally incorrect.首先,我认为食人主义在道德上是不正确的。
648So you shouldn't be eating a human anyway.所以,你不应该吃一个人类反正。
649So cannibalism is morally objectionable.所以食人主义在道德上是令人厌恶的.
650So then, even on the scenario of waiting until someone died, still it would be objectionable.因此,即便在等待某人死亡的情况下,它仍然会引起反对。
651Yes, to me personally.是的,我个人。
652I feel like it all depends on one's personal morals.我觉得一切取决于个人道德
653And, like, we can't sit here and just, like, this is just my opinion.我们不能坐在这里,而这只是我的看法
654Of course, other people are going to disagree.当然,其他人会不同意。
655Well, we'll see.好吧,我们会看到。
656Let's see what their disagreements are,看看他们的分歧是什么
657and then we'll see if they have reasons that can persuade you or not.然后我们再看看他们是否有理由说服你
658Let's try that.让我们试试。
659All right.好吧,我们走。
660Now, is there someone who can explain, those of you who are tempted by consent,现在,有没有人可以解释, 你们中那些被同意诱惑的人,
661can you explain why consent makes such a moral difference?你能解释为什么同意会改变道德吗?
662What about the lottery idea?那彩票的点子呢?
663Does that count as consent?这算不算同意?
664Remember, at the beginning, Dudley proposed a lottery.记住,一开始,杜德利提出彩票.
665Suppose that they had agreed to a lottery.假设他们同意了彩票
666Then, how many would then say it was all right?那么,有多少人会说它没事?
667Suppose there were a lottery, cabin boy lost, and the rest of the story unfolded.假设有一个彩票,小屋男孩输了, 其他的故事展开。
668Then, how many people would say it was morally permissible?那么,有多少人会说 这是道德允许的?
669So, the numbers are rising if we add a lottery.所以,如果我们加上彩票,数字就会上升。
670Let's hear from one of you, for whom the lottery would make a moral difference.让我们听听你们中的一个, 彩票会给谁带来道德上的改变。
671Why would it?为什么?
672I think the essential element in my mind that makes it a crime我觉得我脑海里的基本要素 使它成为一种犯罪
673is the idea that they decided at some point that their lives were more important than his,他们认为他们的生命比他更重要
674and that, I mean, that's kind of the basis for really any crime, right?我的意思是,这是真正犯罪的基础,对不对?
675It's like, my needs, my desires are more important than yours, and mine take precedent.就像,我的需要,我的欲望 比你更重要, 我的先例。
676And if they had done a lottery where everyone consented that someone should die,如果他们投过彩票 大家都同意有人会死
677and it's sort of like they're all sacrificing themselves to save the rest,他们好像都在牺牲自己来拯救剩下的人
678then it would be all right.那就没事了
679A little grotesque, but...有点奇怪,但是...
680But morally permissible?但道德上允许?
681Yes.
682And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
683Matt.马特。
684So, Matt, for you, what bothers you is not the cannibalism, but the lack of due process.所以,马特,对你来说,你烦恼的不是食人,而是缺乏正当程序。
685I guess you could say that.我想你可以这么说
686Right?对吧?
687And can someone who agrees with Matt say a little bit more同意马特的人可以多说一点
688about why a lottery would make it, in your view, morally permissible?在你看来,为什么彩票 会在道德上允许?
689Go ahead.来吧。
690The way I understood it originally was that that was the whole issue,我最初的理解是,这就是整个问题,
691is that the cabin boy was never consulted about whether or not something was going to happen to him,船舱男孩从未被咨询 关于他是否会出事,
692even with the original lottery, whether or not he would be a part of that.即使是原彩票, 他是否将参与其中。
693It was just decided that he was the one that was going to die.刚决定他就是那个要死的人
694Right.
695That's what happened in the actual case.实案亦如此.
696Right.
697But if there were a lottery and they had all agreed to the procedure, you think that would be okay?但是,如果有一个彩票 他们都同意这个程序, 你觉得这可以吗?
698Right, because then everyone knows that there's going to be a death,是的,因为那时每个人都知道 会有死亡,
699whereas, you know, the cabin boy didn't know that this discussion was even happening.但是,你知道,小屋男孩不知道 这个讨论甚至正在发生。
700There was no, you know, forewarning for him to know that, hey, I may be the one that's dying.没有,你知道,前警告 他知道,嘿,我可能是那个正在死亡的人。
701All right.好吧,我们走。
702Now suppose everyone agrees to the lottery, they have the lottery,现在假设每个人都同意彩票, 他们有彩票,
703the cabin boy loses, and he changes his mind.木屋男孩输了,他改变了主意。
704You've already decided.你已经决定了
705It's like a verbal contract.如是语约.
706You can't go back on that.你不能再这样了
707You've decided the decision was made.你已经决定了
708You know, if you know that you're dying for the, you know, the reason for others to live,你知道,如果你知道 你正在死 为,你知道,
709you would, if someone else had died, you know that you would consume them.你会的,如果有人死了, 你知道你会消耗他们。
710Right.
711But then he could say, I know, but I lost.但他可以说,我知道,但我输了。
712I just think that that's the whole moral issue is that there was no consulting of the cabin boy我只是觉得这是整个道德问题... ... ......
713and that that's what makes it the most horrible is that he had no idea what was even going on.而这就是最可怕的是 他根本不知道发生了什么
714That had he known what was going on, it would be a bit more understandable.如果他知道发生了什么事情,那会比较容易理解。
715All right.好吧,我们走。
716Good.不错
717Now I want to hear, so there are some who think it's morally permissible,现在我想听,所以有些人认为 这是道德允许的,
718but only about 20% led by Marcus.但只有约20%的马库斯领导。
719Then there are some who say the real problem here is the lack of consent,还有一些人说真正的问题就是没有同意
720whether the lack of consent to a lottery, to a fair procedure,是否未同意彩票、公平程序,
721or Kathleen's idea, lack of consent at the moment of death.或者凯瑟琳的想法, 在死亡时刻缺乏同意。
722And if we add consent, then more people are willing to consider the sacrifice morally justified.如果我们加上同意,那么更多的人愿意认为这种牺牲在道德上是合理的。
723I want to hear now, finally, from those of you who think even with consent,现在,我终于想听听 你们中那些即使同意的人
724even with a lottery, even with a final murmur of consent by Parker at the very last moment,即使是彩票, 即使最后的默默同意 帕克在最后一刻,
725it would still be wrong.那还是不对的
726And why would it be wrong?为什么会这样?
727That's what I want to hear.这就是我想听到的。
728Yes.
729Well, the whole time I've been leaning all towards the categorical moral reasoning.嗯,一直以来,我一直倾向于 绝对的道德推理。
730And I think that there's a possibility I'd be okay with the idea of a lottery我觉得我可能会接受彩票的想法
731and then the loser taking into their own hands to kill themselves然后输家自己动手自杀
732so that there wouldn't be an act of murder.这样就不会有谋杀行为
733But I still think that even that way it's coerced.但我仍然认为,即使这种方式是胁迫的。
734And also I don't think that there is any remorse.我也不觉得有什么悔恨
735We were eating our breakfast.我们在吃早餐
736It seems as though he's just sort of like, you know, the whole idea of not valuing someone else's life.看起来他就像,你知道的, 不珍惜别人生命的整个想法。
737So that makes me feel like I have to take the categorical...这让我感觉我必须接受...
738You want to throw the book at him.你想把书扔给他
739When he lacks remorse or a sense of having done anything wrong.当他缺乏悔恨感或者没有做错任何事的感觉时.
740Right.
741So, all right, good.所以,没事,很好。
742Any other defenders who say it's just categorically wrong, with or without consent?有其他维权者说这是完全错误的,无论是否同意?
743Yes.
744Stand up.站起来
745Why?为什么?
746I think undoubtedly the way our society's shaped murder is murder.我认为我们社会的定型谋杀无疑是谋杀。
747Murder is murder in every way.谋杀就是谋杀
748And our society looks at murder down on it in the same light.我们的社会从同样的角度看待谋杀案
749And I don't think it's any different in any case.亦不思议一切差别.
750Good.不错
751Let me ask you a question.让我问你一个问题。
752There were three lives at stake versus one.有三条生命处于危险之中,对一。
753Okay.摆
754The one, the cabin boy, he had no family.那个小木屋男孩 他没有家人
755He had no dependents.他没有家属
756These other three had families back home in England.这三人在英国有家人
757They had dependents.他们有家属。
758They had wives and children.他们有妻子和孩子。
759Think back to Bentham.回想本达姆.
760Bentham says we have to consider the welfare, the utility, the happiness of everybody.本特姆说我们必须考虑每个人的福利,效用,幸福.
761We have to add it all up.我们必须加起来。
762So it's not just numbers three against one.所以它不只是第3对1。
763It's also all of those people at home.在家的那些人也是这样
764In fact, the London newspaper at the time and popular opinion sympathized with them.事实上,当时的伦敦报纸和大众舆论都同情他们.
765Dudley and Stevens.达德利和史蒂文斯。
766And the paper said if they weren't motivated by affection and concern报纸上说 如果他们不是出于爱和关心
767for their loved ones at home and their dependents, surely they wouldn't have done this.他们在家里的亲人和家属,必定不会这样做。
768Yeah.
769And how is that any different from people on the corner和街角的人有什么不同吗?
770trying to have the same desire to feed their family?想要养家糊口?
771I don't think it's any different.亦无分别.
772I think in any case, if I'm murdering you to advance my status, that's murder.我认为无论如何,如果我谋杀你 提升我的地位,这就是谋杀。
773And I think that we should look at that all in the same light.我认为我们应该从同一个角度来看待这些。
774Instead of criminalizing certain activities而不是将某些活动定为刑事犯罪
775and making certain things seem more violent and savage,使某些东西看起来更暴力更野蛮,
776when in the same case it's all the same.当在同一件事情上,一切都是一样的。
777It's all the same act and mentality that goes into murder,这都是同样的行为和心态 进入谋杀,
778the necessity to feed your family.养家糊口
779Suppose it weren't three.假设不是三个
780Suppose it were 30.假设是30岁
781Three hundred.三百块
782One life to save three hundred.一命救三百众.
783We're in wartime.我们在战时
784Three thousand.三千户.
785Suppose the stakes are even bigger.如果赌注更大的话
786I think it's still the same deal.我觉得还是一样
787Do you think Bentham is wrong to say the right thing to do你觉得本特姆不该说正确的话
788is to add up the collective happiness?将集体幸福加起来?
789Do you think he's wrong about that?你觉得他错了吗?
790I don't think he's wrong, but I think murder is murder in any case.我不认为他错了 但我认为谋杀是谋杀
791Well, then Bentham has to be wrong.那么本塔姆一定错了
792If you're right, he's wrong.如果你是对的 他就错了
793Okay, he's wrong.好吧,他错了。
794All right.好吧,我们走。
795Thank you.谢谢
796Well done.干得不错
797All right.好吧,我们走。
798Let's step back from this discussion让我们从讨论后退一步
799and notice how many objections have we heard to what they did.注意我们听到多少反对 他们做了什么。
800We heard some defenses of what they did.我们听到一些辩护 他们做了什么。
801The defenses had to do with necessity, their dire circumstance,被告的辩护与危急情况有关
802and, implicitly at least, the idea that numbers matter.以及至少暗含着数字很重要的想法。
803And not only numbers matter, but the wider effects matter.不仅数字重要,而且更广泛的影响也重要。
804Their families back home, their dependents.其家人归家,其眷属也.
805Parker was an orphan.帕克是一个孤儿。
806No one would miss him.没有人会想念他。
807So if you add up, if you try to calculate the balance of happiness and suffering,所以,如果你加起来, 如果你试图计算 幸福和痛苦的平衡,
808you might have a case for saying what they did was the right thing.你可能有一个理由说 他们做了什么是正确的事情。
809Then we heard at least three different types of objections.然后我们至少听到三种不同的反对。
810We heard an objection that said what they did was categorically wrong.我们听到有人反对说,他们的所作所为绝对是错误的。
811Well, Mike here at the end, categorically wrong.嗯,迈克在这里 结尾,绝对错误。
812Murder is murder.谋杀就是谋杀
813It's always wrong,总是不对劲
814even if it increases the overall happiness of society.即使它能增加社会的整体幸福
815A categorical objection.绝对反对。
816But we still need to investigate why murder is categorically wrong.但我们仍然需要调查为什么谋杀绝对是错误的。
817Is it because even cabin boys have certain fundamental rights?是因为连小屋男孩都有某些基本权利吗?
818And if that's the reason, where do those rights come from,如果这就是原因 这些权利从何而来
819if not from some idea of the larger welfare or utility or happiness?如果不是从某种 更大的福利或效用或幸福的想法?
820Question number one.问曰.
821Others said a lottery would make a difference.其他人说彩票会有所改变
822A fair procedure, Matt said.马特说,公平程序
823But, and some people were swayed by that.但是,有些人为此摇摆不定。
824That's not a categorical objection exactly.这不是绝对的反对
825It's saying everybody has to be counted as an equal,意思是每个人都得被算作平等
826even though at the end of the day one can be sacrificed for the general welfare.尽管在一天结束时,人们可以为了一般的福利而牺牲。
827That leaves us with another question to investigate.这就让我们有另一个问题要调查。
828Why does agreement to a certain procedure, even a fair procedure,为什么同意某种程序,甚至公平程序,
829justify whatever result flows from the operation of that procedure?说明该程序运作所产生的任何结果是合理的吗?
830Question number two.第二问.
831And question number three, the basic idea of consent.第三问题,同意的基本思想。
832Kathleen got us on to this.凯瑟琳让我们知道这事
833If the cabin boy had agreed himself and not under duress, as was added,如果小木屋男孩同意 而不是在胁迫之下 加上,
834then it would be all right to take his life to save the rest.那样的话,就完全可以夺走他的性命来拯救剩下的人了.
835And even more people signed on to that idea.更多的人同意这个想法。
836But that raises a third philosophical question.但这提出了第三个哲学问题。
837What is the moral work that consent does?同意的道德工作是什么?
838Why does an act of consent make such a moral difference为什么同意的行为 使这样的道德差异
839that an act that would be wrong, taking a life without consent,在未经同意的情况下夺走生命的行为,
840is morally permissible with consent?道德上是否允许同意?
841To investigate those three questions, we're going to have to read some philosophers.为了调查这三个问题,我们要读一些哲学家.
842And starting next time, we're going to read Bentham and John Stuart Mill, utilitarian philosophers.从下次开始,我们要读本特姆和约翰·斯图尔特·米尔,功利主义哲学家.
843Funding for this program is provided by...本方案的经费由.
844Additional funding provided by...由.提供的额外资金。
该视频共有字幕 850 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格

P3 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p03 2. 2.为生命标价 (P3)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:03Funding for this program is provided by...本方案的经费由.
0:07Additional funding provided by...由.提供的额外资金。
0:29Last time we argued我们上次吵架
0:34about the case of the Queen versus Dudley and Stevens.关于王后对杜德利和史蒂文斯的案子
0:39The lifeboat case.那个救生艇的案子
0:41The case of cannibalism at sea.海上食人现象.
0:44And with the arguments about和争论 关于
0:48the lifeboat in mind, the arguments for and against what Dudley救生艇, 辩论和反对什么Dudley
0:52and Stevens did in mind, let's turn back to the而史蒂文斯的想法, 让我们回到
0:56philosophy, the utilitarian philosophy of Jeremy Bentham.哲学,杰里米·本塔姆的功利主义哲学.
展开字幕全文(389 条)
序号英文中文
1Funding for this program is provided by...本方案的经费由.
2Additional funding provided by...由.提供的额外资金。
3Last time we argued我们上次吵架
4about the case of the Queen versus Dudley and Stevens.关于王后对杜德利和史蒂文斯的案子
5The lifeboat case.那个救生艇的案子
6The case of cannibalism at sea.海上食人现象.
7And with the arguments about和争论 关于
8the lifeboat in mind, the arguments for and against what Dudley救生艇, 辩论和反对什么Dudley
9and Stevens did in mind, let's turn back to the而史蒂文斯的想法, 让我们回到
10philosophy, the utilitarian philosophy of Jeremy Bentham.哲学,杰里米·本塔姆的功利主义哲学.
11Bentham was born in England in 1748.本特姆1748年出生于英国.
12At the age年纪
13of 12, he went to Oxford.12岁的时候,他去了牛津
14At 15, he went to law school.15岁就读于法学院.
15He was admitted to the bar at age 19, but he never practiced他19岁时被酒吧录取 但他从未练习过
16law.诸法.
17Instead, he devoted his life相反,他奉献了他的生命
18to jurisprudence and moral philosophy.法律学和道德哲学
19Last time上次见
20we began to consider Bentham's version of utilitarianism.我们开始考虑本塔姆的功利主义
21The main idea is simply stated and it's this.主要思想只是简单地陈述,就是这个.
22The highest principle of morality, whether personal道德的最高原则,无论个人
23or political morality, is to maximize或政治道德,就是最大限度地
24the general welfare or the collective一般福利或集体福利
25happiness or the overall balance of pleasure over pain.快乐或快乐与痛苦的平衡
26In a phrase, maximize utility.在一个短语中,最大化效用.
27Bentham arrives at this principle by the following line of reasoning.本特姆通过以下推理得出了这一原则.
28We're all governed by pain and pleasure.皆受苦乐所化.
29They are他们是
30our sovereign masters and so any moral system has to take account of them.任何道德制度都必须考虑到他们
31How best to take account?如何最好地考虑?
32By maximizing.通过最大化。
33And this leads to the principle of the greatest good for the这导致了最大利益的原则
34greatest number.最伟大的数字。
35What exactly should we maximize?我们究竟应该最大限度地做些什么?
36Bentham tells us, happiness or more preciselyBentham告诉我们,幸福或更确切
37utility.实用性。
38Maximizing utility is a principle最大限度地发挥效用是一项原则
39not only for individuals, but also for communities and for legislators.不仅针对个人,而且针对社区和立法者。
40What after all is a community?什么是社区?
41Bentham asks.本答问.
42It's the sum of the individuals who comprise it.是组成它的个体的总和.
43And that's why in deciding the best policy, in deciding这就是为什么在决定 最好的政策, 在决定
44what the law should be, in deciding what's just, citizens法律应该是什么, 在决定什么是正义,公民
45and legislators should ask themselves the question, if we add立法者应该问自己一个问题 如果我们加上
46up all of the benefits of this policy and subtract增加这项政策的所有好处,并减去
47all of the costs, the right thing to do所有的代价,正确的做法
48is the one that maximizes the balance是使平衡最大化的
49of happiness over suffering.快乐战胜苦难
50That's what it means这就是它的意思
51to maximize utility.最大限度地发挥效用。
52Now today, I want to现在,我想
53see whether you agree or disagree with it.看你同意还是不同意
54And it often goes, this utilitarian logic, under the name of cost benefit这种实用主义的逻辑 常常以成本效益为名
55analysis, which is used by companies and by分析,供公司使用
56governments all the time.政府总是这样
57And what it involves和它涉及
58is placing a value, usually a dollar value, to stand正在放置一个值,通常是美元值,以维持
59for utility on the costs and the benefits成本和效益的效用
60of various proposals.各种建议。
61Recently in the Czech Republic最近在捷克共和国
62there was a proposal to increase the excise tax有人建议增加消费税
63on smoking.在吸烟。
64Philip Morris,烟草公司
65does huge business in the Czech Republic.在捷克共和国做大生意。
66They commissioned他们委托
67a study, a cost benefit analysis of研究、成本效益分析
68smoking in the Czech Republic.在捷克共和国吸烟。
69And what their cost benefit他们的成本效益是什么?
70analysis found was分析发现
71the government gains by having政府通过获得
72Czech citizens smoke.捷克公民抽烟.
73Now, how do they gain?现在,他们有什么好处?
74It's true that there are negative effects确实有负面效应
75to the public finance of the Czech government捷克政府的公共财政
76because there are increased health care costs for people who develop因为发展的人的保健费用增加
77smoking related diseases.与吸烟有关的疾病。
78On the other hand, there were另一方面,还有
79positive effects.积极效果。
80And those were added up这些是加起来的
81on the other side of the ledger.在分类账的另一边。
82The positive effects included, for the积极效果包括:
83most part, various tax revenues that the government大部分是政府的各种税收
84derives from the sale of cigarette products, but it also included health care源自香烟产品的销售,但也包括保健
85savings to the government when people die early, pension当人们早死时,养老金给政府的储蓄
86savings, you don't have to pay pensions for as long, and also储蓄,你不必支付养老金 长久,还有
87savings in housing costs for the elderly.老年人住房费用的节省。
88And还有
89when all of the costs and benefits were added up, the当所有成本和效益加起来时,
90Philip Morris study found that菲利普·莫里斯的研究发现
91there is a net public finance gain in the Czech Republic捷克共和国的公共财政净收益
92of $147 million.1.47亿美元。
93And given the savings in housing and health care而且考虑到在住房和医疗方面的节省
94and pension costs, the government enjoys a saving of养恤金和养老金费用,
95savings of over $1200 for each每笔节余1 200美元以上
96person who dies prematurely due to smoking.因吸烟而过早死亡的人。
97Cost benefit analysis.成本效益分析。
98Now, those among you现在,你们中的那些
99who are defenders of utilitarianism may think that this is an unfair作为功利主义的捍卫者,他们可能认为这是不公平的。
100test.测试。
101Philip Morris被媒体打得头晕眼花
102issued an apology for this heartless calculation.为这个无情的计算结果道歉
103You may say that what's missing here is something that the utilitarian你可以说这里缺少的是功利主义者的东西
104can easily incorporate, namely, the value to the很容易纳入,即:
105person and to the families of those who die from lung cancer.以及死于肺癌者的家人。
106What about the value of life?那生命的价值呢?
107Some cost benefit一些成本效益
108analyses incorporate a measure分析包括一项措施
109for the value of life.为了生命的价值。
110One of the most famous of these其中最著名的一个
111involved the Ford Pinto case.和福特·平托的案子有关
112Did any of you read about that?你们有看过吗?
113This这个
114was back in the 1970s.回到1970年代。
115Do you remember what the Ford Pinto was, a kind of你还记得福特平托是什么吗?
116car?车?
117Anybody?有人吗?
118It was a small car, a sub是个小车,潜水艇
119compact car, very popular.紧凑的车 非常受欢迎
120But it had one但它有一个
121problem, which is the fuel tank was at the back of the car问题在于燃料箱在车尾
122and in rear collisions the fuel tank exploded.燃料箱在后方碰撞中爆炸
123And some people were killed and some severely injured有些人被杀,有些人受重伤
124victims of these injuries took Ford to court to sue.这些伤害的受害者将福特告上法庭。
125And in the court case it turned out that Ford had在法庭上,发现福特...
126long since known about the vulnerable fuel很久没有知道易燃燃料了
127tank and had done a cost benefit analysis to determine并进行了成本效益分析,以确定
128whether it would be worth it to put in a special要不要放个特别的?
129shield that would protect the fuel tank and prevent it from exploding.保护燃料箱并防止其爆炸的防护罩。
130They did a cost benefit analysis, the cost他们做了成本效益分析,成本
131per part to increase the safety of the Pinto提高平托号的安全性
132they calculated at $11 per part.它们按每部分11美元计算。
133And here's, this was the cost benefit analysis这是成本效益分析
134that emerged in the trial.在审判中出现。
135$11 per part每部分11美元
136at 12.5 million cars and trucks1 250万辆汽车和卡车
137came to a total cost of $137总费用为137美元
138million to improve the safety.百万来改善安全
139But then they calculated the benefits of spending但后来他们计算出支出的好处
140all this money on a safer car and they counted这些钱都用在更安全的车上 他们算了
141180 deaths and they assigned a dollar value.180人死亡 他们给了一美元价值
142$200,000 per death.每死20万块
143180 injuries180人受伤
144$67,000 and then the cost67,000美元,然后是费用
145to repair, the replacement cost for 2,000 vehicles that would be destroyed2 000辆将销毁的车辆的更换费用
146without the safety device, $700 per没有安全装置,每台700美元
147vehicle.车辆。
148So the benefits turned out to be原来好处是
149only $49.5 million and so they只有4 950万美元,所以他们
150didn't install the device.没有安装设备。
151Needless to say不用说
152when this memo of the Ford当这份福特人的备忘录
153motor company's cost benefit analysis came out in the trial机车公司的成本效益分析在试验中出来了
154it appalled the jurors who awarded a huge settlement.它震惊了陪审员 谁授予一个巨大的和解。
155Is this a counter example to the utilitarian idea of这是与功利主义思想相反的一个例子吗?
156calculating?计算?
157Because Ford included a measure因为福特包含一个措施
158of the value of life.生命的价值。
159Now who here wants to defend现在,谁想在这里辩护
160cost benefit analysis from成本效益分析
161this apparent counter example?这个明显的反例?
162Who has a defense?谁有辩护权?
163Or do you think this completely destroys the whole utilitarian或者你认为这完全摧毁了整个功利主义者
164calculus?算术?
165Yes?是吗?
166Well I think that once我曾经觉得
167again they've made the same mistake the previous case did, that they assigned a dollar value他们犯了同样的错误 之前的案子, 他们分配了一个美元价值
168to human life and once again they failed to take account things like suffering人类的生命,他们再次没有考虑 诸如痛苦
169and emotional losses by the families.和家人的感情损失。
170I mean families lost earnings but they我的意思是,家庭失去了收入,但他们
171also lost a loved one and that is more value than也失去了一个爱人 这比
172$200,000.20万美元。
173Right and wait, wait, wait.右等经.
174That's good.这是很好的。
175What's your name?你叫什么来着?
176Julia Roto.朱莉娅·罗托.
177So if 200,000 Julie is所以,如果20万朱莉是
178too low a figure because it doesn't include the loss of a loved数字太低 因为它不包括失去亲人
179one and the loss of those years of life, what would be以及那些生命的丧失 将会是什么
180what do you think would be a more accurate number?你觉得更准确的数字是什么?
181I don't believe I could give a number.我不相信我能给出一个数字。
182I think that this sort of analysis shouldn't be我认为这种分析不应该是
183applied to issues of human life.适用于人的生命问题。
184I think it can't be used monetarily.我认为它不能被金钱使用。
185So they didn't just put too low a number, Julie says,所以他们不只是把数字放太低,朱莉说,
186they were wrong to try to put any number at all.他们把任何号码都放错
187Alright let's好吧,让我们
188hear someone who you have to adjust for inflation.听到有人 谁你必须调整 通货膨胀。
189Fair公平
190enough.够了。
191So what would the number be now?号码是多少?
192This was 30这是30
193this was 35 years ago.这是35年前。
194$2,000,000.两百万
195You would put $2,000,000 and what's your name?你会加200,000美元,你叫什么名字?
196Wojtek says沃伊特克说
197we have to allow for inflation.我们必须允许通货膨胀。
198We should be more generous.我们应该更加慷慨
199Then would you be satisfied that this is the right way of thinking about the question?那你会满意吗? 这是思考这个问题的正确方式?
200I guess unfortunately it is for我想这是很不幸的
201there needs to be a number put somewhere.一定有个数字
202Like喜欢
203I'm not sure what that number would be but I do agree that there could possibly我不确定那号码会是多少 但我确实同意有可能
204be a number put on human life.成为人的生命中的一个数字。
205Alright罢
206so Wojtek says and here he disagrees with所以Wojtek说他不同意
207Julie.朱丽
208Julie says we can't put a number on human lifeJulie说我们不能把数字写在人的生命上
209for the purpose of a cost benefit analysis.为了成本效益分析的目的。
210Wojtek says we have to becauseWojtek说我们必须这么做 因为
211we have to make decisions somehow.我们必须做决定
212What do other people别人怎么办?
213think about this?考虑一下?
214Is there anyone prepared to defend cost benefit analysis有没有人愿意为成本效益分析辩护
215here?这里?
216As accurate?准确吗?
217As desirable?需要吗?
218Yes?是吗?
219Go ahead.来吧。
220I think that if Ford and other car companies didn't use我想如果福特和其他汽车公司不使用
221cost benefit analysis they'd eventually go out of business because they wouldn't成本效益分析 他们最终会 退出业务,因为他们不会
222be able to be profitable and millions of people wouldn't be able to use their cars to get能够赚钱 数百万人无法使用他们的车去获得
223the jobs to put food on the table to feed their children.将食物放在桌上喂养孩子的工作。
224So I think that所以我觉得
225if cost benefit analysis isn't employed the greater good如果成本效益分析没有应用 最大的好处
226is sacrificed in this case.被牺牲在这种情况下。
227Alright let me, what's好吧,让我,是什么
228your name?你的名字吗?
229Raoul.拉乌尔
230There was recently a study最近有个研究
231done about cell phone use by drivers when people are driving a car司机开车时用手机的事
232and there's a debate whether that should be banned.讨论是否应该禁止
233And the figure was that some two thousand数字是大约两千
234people die as a result of accidents事故造成人员死亡
235each year using cell phones.每年使用手机。
236And yet the cost benefit analysis which was done by the center for然而,中心为下列目的进行的成本效益分析:
237risk analysis at Harvard found that if you look at the benefits哈佛大学的风险分析发现,如果你看看好处
238of the cell phone use and you put some手机用量,你放点
239value on the life it comes out about the same在生命中的价值,它出来 大约相同的
240because of the enormous economic benefit of enabling people to take advantage of因为使人们能够利用
241their time not waste time, be able to make deals and talk to friends and so on他们的时间不浪费时间, 能够做交易 和朋友交谈等等
242while they're driving.他们开车的时候
243Doesn't that suggest that it's a mistake这不表明这是个错误吗?
244to try to put monetary figures on questions of human life?试图把金钱数字 对人类生活的问题?
245Well I think that if the great majority of people我想如果大多数人
246try to derive maximum utility out of a service like using cell phones尝试从服务中获取最大功能, 如使用手机
247and the convenience that cell phones provide that sacrifice is necessary而手机提供的方便 牺牲是必要的
248for satisfaction to occur.以达到满意。
249You're an outright utilitarian.你是个纯粹的功利主义者
250Alright then one last question Raoul.好吧,那么最后一个问题拉乌尔。
251我把这个给Voightek。
252What dollar什么钱
253figure should be put on human life to decide whether to ban the use数字应放在人的生命上,以决定是否禁止使用
254of cell phones?手机吗?
255Well I don't want to arbitrarily好吧,我不想任意
256calculate a figure I mean right now I think that计算一个数字,我的意思 现在,我认为
257You want to take it under advisement?你想接受建议吗?
258Yeah I'll take it under advisement.是啊,我会接受它的建议。
259But what roughly speaking would it be?但是说来话长会是什么?
260You've got你已经有了
26123 hundred deaths.2300人丧生.
262You've got to assign a dollar value to know whether you want to你必须要分配一个美元价值 才能知道是否想要
263prevent those deaths by banning the use of cell phones in cars.通过禁止在汽车中使用手机来防止这些死亡。
264So what would your hunch be?那你的直觉是什么?
265How much?多少钱?
266A million?一百万吗?
267Two million?两百万?
268两百万是Voightek的数字。
269Is that about right?是吗?
270Maybe a million.也许一百万。
271A million?一百万吗?
272You know that's good thank you.谢谢
273So these are some of the controversies that arise these days from cost benefit所以这些是最近一些 由成本收益引起的争议
274analysis especially those that involve placing a dollar value分析,特别是涉及美元价值的分析
275on everything to be added up.关于所有要加起来。
276Well now I want to现在我想
277turn to your objections.转向你的反对。
278To your objections not necessarily对你的反对并不一定
279to cost benefit analysis specifically because that's just one特别是成本效益分析 因为这只是一个
280version of the utilitarian logic in practice today.今天实用主义逻辑的版本。
281But to the theory as a whole, to the idea但对于整个理论,对于思想
282that the right thing to do, the just做正确的事情,正义
283basis for policy and law is to maximize utility.政策和法律的基础是最大限度地发挥效用。
284How many disagree with the utilitarian有多少人不同意功利主义者的意见
285approach to law and to the commonA. 对法律和普遍人权的
286good?怎么样?
287How many agree with it?有多少人同意这个说法?
288So more agree than所以,更多的同意比
289disagree.意见不一。
290So let's hear from the critics.因此,让我们听听批评者。
291Yes?是吗?
292My main issue with it is that I feel like you can't say我的主要问题是我觉得你不能说
293that just because someone's in the minority, what they want那只是因为某人在少数, 他们想要什么
294and need is less valuable than someone who's in the majority.需要的价值比多数人少
295So I guess I have an issue with the idea that the greatest good for the greatest所以,我想我有一个问题 的想法是,最大的好为最
296number is okay because there's still, what about people号码是好的,因为还有人, 那人呢?
297who are in the lesser number, like it's not fair to them, they didn't have人数较少,好像对他们不公平 他们没有
298any say in where they wanted to be.随便说说他们想去哪儿
299That's an interesting objection.这是一个有趣的反对。
300You're worried about the effect on the minority.你担心对少数民族的影响
301What's your name你叫什么来着?
302by the way?顺便说一句?
303Anna.安娜,请问安娜
304Who has an answer to谁有答案
305Anna's worry about the effect on the minority?安娜担心对少数民族的影响?
306What do you say to Anna?你怎么跟安娜说?
307She said that the minorities value less.她说,少数群体的价值较低。
308I don't think我不觉得
309that's the case because individually the minorities value is just the same as之所以如此,是因为个人的少数民族价值与
310the individual of the majority.多数人的个人。
311It's just that the numbers outweigh the只是数字超过了
312minority.少数民族。
313And I mean at a certain point you have我的意思是,在某个时刻,你有
314to make a decision and I'm sorry for the minority but sometimes做决定,我很抱歉 少数但有时
315it's for the general, for the greater good.为了将军,为了大局
316For the greater good.为大利益.
317Anna, what's your name?安娜,你叫什么来着?
318Youngda.杨达.
319What do you say to你怎么说
320Youngda?杨达?
321Youngda says you just have to add up people's preferences杨达说,你只需要把人们的喜好加起来
322and those in the minority do have their preferences weighed.少数群体的偏好确实得到了考虑。
323Can you你能吗?
324give an example of the kind of thing you're worried about when you say you're worried about举个例子,你担心什么?
325utilitarianism violating the concern or respect违反关切或尊重的功利主义
326due the minority?是少数派吗?
327Can you give an example?你能举个例子吗?
328Well with any of the cases that we've talked about, like for the shipwreck one,任何我们讨论过的案子 比如沉船案
329I think the boy who was eaten still had我觉得那个被吃掉的男孩
330as much of a right to live as the other people and和别人一样有生存的权利
331just because he was只是因为他是
332the minority in that case, the one who在这种情况下,少数人,谁
333maybe had less of a chance to keep living, that doesn't mean可能没有多少机会活下去, 这并不意味着
334that the others automatically have a right to eat him其他人当然有权吃他
335just because it would give a greater amount of people a chance to因为它会给更多的人机会
336live.活着
337So there may be certain rights that the minority因此,可能有一些权利 少数
338members have, that the individual has, that shouldn't be成员, 个人, 这不应该是
339traded off for the sake of utility?为了实用而交换?
340Yes, Anna?什么事,安娜吗?
341Youngda, this would be a test永田,这是个考验
342for you.给你的
343Back in ancient Rome, they回到古罗马,他们
344threw Christians to the lions in the Colosseum for sport.将基督徒扔到教堂里的狮子那里去参加运动。
345If you think how the utilitarian calculus would go, yes,如果你认为功用微积分会怎样,是的,
346the Christian thrown to the lions suffers enormous excruciating被扔到狮子身上的基督徒遭受了巨大的痛苦
347pain.伤痛。
348But look at the collective ecstasy of the Romans!但看看罗马人的集体狂喜!
349Youngda?杨达?
350Well, in that那个嘛
351time, in modern day time,在现代时代
352to value, to give a number to the happiness给一个数字给幸福
353given to the people watching, I don't think给观众看,我不认为
354any policy maker would say任何决策者都会说
355the suffering of one person is much, much一个人的痛苦是很多,很多
356in comparison to the happiness gained.与获得的幸福相比
357No, but you have to不,但你必须
358admit that if there were enough Romans delirious enough with happiness,承认如果有足够的罗马人 精神错乱和幸福
359it would outweigh even the most excruciating pain of a handful它会超过最痛苦 即使是一小撮人
360of Christians thrown to the lion.被扔在狮子身上的基督徒
361So we really have所以我们真的有
362here two different objections to utilitarianism.这里有两个不同的反对功利主义。
363One has to do with whether utilitarianism adequately功利主义是否充分
364respects individual rights or minority尊重个人权利或少数群体
365rights, and the other has to do with the whole权利,另一个则与整体有关
366idea of aggregating utility集合工具的想法
367or preferences or values.或偏好或价值。
368Is it是吗?
369possible to aggregate all values to translate可能合并所有值以翻译
370them into dollar terms?以美元计价?
371There was曾经
372in the 1930s a psychologist在1930年代 心理学家
373who tried to address试图解决
374this second question.这个第二个问题。
375He tried to prove what utilitarianism他试图证明什么是功利主义
376assumes that it is possible假设这是可能的
377to translate all goods, all values, all human翻译所有商品,所有价值,所有人类
378concerns into a single uniform measure.将关切纳入一项统一措施。
379And he did他这样做了
380this by conducting a survey of young recipients通过对年轻受助人进行调查,
381of relief.解脱。
382This was in the 1930s.这是在1930年代。
383And he asked他问
384them, he gave them a list of unpleasant experiences.他们,他给他们 一份不愉快的经历清单。
385And he还有他
386asked them, how much would you have to be paid to undergo the following问他们,你要付多少钱才能完成以下任务
387experiences?经历?
388And he kept track.他一直追踪着
389For example,举例来说,
该视频共有字幕 390 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格

P4 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p04 3. 3.选择的自由 (P4)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:03Funding for this program is provided by...本方案的经费由.
0:07Additional funding provided by...由.提供的额外资金。
0:30We were looking at John Stuart Mill's attempt to reply to the critics of Bentham's utilitarianism.我们在看约翰·斯图尔特·米尔试图回应对本塔姆功利主义的批评.
0:48In his book, Utilitarianism, Mill tries to show that, critics to the contrary,米尔在他的著作"乌蒂利塔主义"中试图表明,相反的批评者们,
0:55it is possible, within the utilitarian framework, to distinguish between higher and lower pleasures.在功利主义框架内,可以区分上下游乐.
1:03It is possible to make qualitative distinctions of worth.可以作出价值的定性区分。
1:07And we tested that idea with the Simpsons and the Shakespeare excerpts.我们用辛普森夫妇和莎士比亚节选来测试这个想法。
1:16And the results of our experiment seem to call into question Mill's distinction.我们实验的结果 似乎让人怀疑米尔的区别
1:26Because a great many of you reported that you prefer the Simpsons,因为很多人都报告说 你喜欢辛普森一家
1:34but that you still consider Shakespeare to be the higher or the worthier pleasure.但你仍然认为莎士比亚是 更高或更有价值的快乐。
展开字幕全文(735 条)
序号英文中文
1Funding for this program is provided by...本方案的经费由.
2Additional funding provided by...由.提供的额外资金。
3We were looking at John Stuart Mill's attempt to reply to the critics of Bentham's utilitarianism.我们在看约翰·斯图尔特·米尔试图回应对本塔姆功利主义的批评.
4In his book, Utilitarianism, Mill tries to show that, critics to the contrary,米尔在他的著作"乌蒂利塔主义"中试图表明,相反的批评者们,
5it is possible, within the utilitarian framework, to distinguish between higher and lower pleasures.在功利主义框架内,可以区分上下游乐.
6It is possible to make qualitative distinctions of worth.可以作出价值的定性区分。
7And we tested that idea with the Simpsons and the Shakespeare excerpts.我们用辛普森夫妇和莎士比亚节选来测试这个想法。
8And the results of our experiment seem to call into question Mill's distinction.我们实验的结果 似乎让人怀疑米尔的区别
9Because a great many of you reported that you prefer the Simpsons,因为很多人都报告说 你喜欢辛普森一家
10but that you still consider Shakespeare to be the higher or the worthier pleasure.但你仍然认为莎士比亚是 更高或更有价值的快乐。
11That's the dilemma with which our experiment confronts Mill.我们的实验正面临这种困境
12So, what about Mill's attempt to account for the specially weighty character of individual rights and justice那么,关于米尔试图说明 个人权利和正义的特殊重要性
13in Chapter 5 of Utilitarianism?在"乌蒂利亚主义"第5章中?
14He wants to say that individual rights are worthy of special respect.他想说,个人权利值得特别尊重。
15In fact, he goes so far as to say that justice is the most sacred part事实上,他甚至说正义是最神圣的部分
16and the most incomparably binding part of morality.以及道德中最无法比拟的部分
17But the same challenge could be put to this part of Mill's defense.但同样的挑战 也可能是米尔的辩护
18Why is justice the chief part in the most binding part of all morality?为什么正义是所有道德中最有约束力的部分的主要部分?
19Well, he says because in the long run, if we do justice and if we respect rights,他说,因为从长远来看, 如果我们做正义,如果我们尊重权利,
20society as a whole will be better off in the long run.从长远来看,整个社会会更好。
21Well, what about that?那怎么样?
22What if we have a case where making an exception and violating individual rights如果我们有破例 侵犯个人权利
23actually will make people better off in the long run?实际上,从长远来看,会让别人好过点?
24Is it all right then to use people?那用人可以吗?
25And there's a further objection that could be raised against Mill's case for justice and rights.并且还有人可以反对米尔的正义和权利诉讼.
26Suppose the utilitarian calculus in the long run works out as he says it will,假设功利分子的微积分 长期来说是可行的
27such that respecting people's rights is a way of making everybody better off in the long run.因此,从长远来看,尊重人民的权利是改善所有人生活的一种方式。
28Is that the right reason?这是正确的理由吗?
29Is that the only reason to respect people?这是尊重人的唯一理由吗?
30If the doctor goes in and yanks the organs from the healthy patient who came in for a checkup to save five lives,如果医生进去 抽取健康病人的器官 来做个检查 挽救五条生命
31there would be adverse effects in the long run.从长远来看,将会产生不利影响。
32Eventually, people would learn about this and would stop going in for checkups.最终,人们会知道这一点 并停止去检查。
33Is it the right reason?这是正确的理由吗?
34Is the only reason that you as the doctor won't yank the organs out of the healthy patient唯一的原因就是你作为医生 不会把器官从健康的病人身上拔出来
35that you think, well, if I use him in this way, in the long run, more lives will be lost?你觉得,如果我用他的方式, 从长远来看, 会有更多的人丧生?
36Or is there another reason having to do with intrinsic respect for the person as an individual?或是否有另一个理由与个人固有的尊重有关?
37And if that reason matters, then it's not so clear that even Mill's utilitarianism can take account of it.如果这个原因很重要,那就不那么清楚,即使米尔的功利主义也能考虑它.
38Fully to examine these two worries or objections to Mill's defense, we need to push further.要充分审视这两个担心或反对米尔的辩护,我们需要进一步推进.
39And we need to ask, in the case of higher or worthier pleasures,我们需要问, 对于更高或更值得的乐趣,
40are there theories of the good life that can provide independent moral standards for the worth of pleasures?有没有关于美好生活的理论可以为快乐的价值提供独立的道德标准?
41If so, what do they look like?如果是的话,它们长什么样?
42That's one question.这是一个问题。
43In the case of justice and rights, if we suspect that Mill is implicitly leaning on notions of human dignity就正义和权利而言,如果我们怀疑米尔含蓄地倾向于人类尊严的概念
44or respect for a person that are not, strictly speaking, utilitarian,或尊重严格说来不是实用主义者的人,
45we need to look to see whether there are some stronger theories of rights that can explain the intuition,我们需要看看是否有更强大的权利理论 可以解释直觉,
46which even Mill shares, the intuition that the reason for respecting individuals and not using them连米尔都认同的直觉 就是尊重个人而不利用个人的原因
47goes beyond even utility in the long run.从长远来看,甚至超出了效用。
48Today we turn to one of those strong theories of rights.今天,我们谈谈这些强有力的权利理论之一。
49Strong theories of rights say individuals matter not just as instruments to be used for a larger social purpose强有力的权利理论说,个人不仅仅是用于更大社会目的的工具。
50or for the sake of maximizing utility.或为尽功用故.
51Individuals are separate beings with separate lives worthy of respect.个人是不同的人,有不同的生活值得尊重。
52And so it's a mistake, according to strong theories of rights,因此,根据强有力的权利理论,这是一个错误,
53it's a mistake to think about justice or law by just adding up preferences and values.仅仅把偏好和价值观加起来,来考虑正义或法律,是错的.
54The strong rights theory we turn to today is libertarianism.我们今天转向的强烈的权利理论是自由主义.
55Libertarianism takes individual rights seriously.自由主义严肃对待个人权利.
56It's called libertarianism because it says the fundamental individual right is the right to liberty.这被称为自由主义,因为它说基本的个人权利是自由的权利.
57Precisely because we are separate individual beings,正是因为我们是不同的个体
58we're not available to any use that the society might desire or devise.我们无法利用社会想要或设计的用途
59Precisely because we are individual separate human beings,正是因为我们是单独分开的人
60we have a fundamental right to liberty.我们享有自由的基本权利。
61And that means a right to choose freely, to live our lives as we please,也就是说,我们有权自由选择, 自由地生活,
62provided we respect other people's rights to do the same.只要我们尊重其他人同样的权利
63That's the fundamental idea.这就是基本的想法。
64Robert Nozick, one of the libertarian philosophers we read for this course, puts it this way.罗伯特·诺兹克(Robert Nozick),我们为这个课程读过的自由主义哲学家之一,这样说.
65Individuals have rights, so strong and far-reaching are these rights个人拥有权利,这些权利如此强大和深远
66that they raise the question of what, if anything, the state may do.他们提出了一个问题,如果有什么,国家可以做什么。
67So what does libertarianism say about the role of government or of the state?自由主义对政府或国家的作用有何看法?
68Well, there are three things that most modern states do现代国家有三件事要做
69that, on the libertarian theory of rights, are illegitimate, are unjust.根据自由主义的权利理论,是非法的,是不公正的。
70One of them is paternalist legislation.其中之一是家长立法。
71That's passing laws that protect people from themselves.也就是通过法律来保护人们不受伤害.
72Seatbelt laws, for example, or motorcycle helmet laws.例如,安全带法或摩托车头盔法。
73The libertarian says it may be a good thing if people wear seatbelts,自由主义者说如果人们戴安全带 也许是件好事
74but that should be up to them and the state, the government,但这应该取决于他们 和州,政府,
75has no business coercing them, us, to wear seatbelts by law.我们没有生意强迫他们 依法系安全带
76It's coercion.这是强迫。
77So no paternalist legislation, number one.所以没有家长立法,第一。
78Number two, no morals legislation.第二,没有道德立法。
79Many laws try to promote the virtue of citizens许多法律试图促进公民的美德
80or try to give expression to the moral values of the society as a whole.或试图表达整个社会的道德价值。
81Libertarians say that's also a violation of the right to liberty.自由主义者说这也侵犯了自由权.
82Take the example of, well, a classic example of legislation举一个典型的立法例子
83offered in the name of promoting morality.以提倡道德的名义提供。
84Traditionally have been laws that prevent sexual intimacy between gays and lesbians.传统上是防止男同性恋者与女同性恋者发生性关系的法律.
85The libertarian says nobody else is harmed, nobody else's rights are violated,自由主义者说没有人受到伤害 没有人的权利受到侵犯
86so the state should get out of the business entirely所以国家应该完全退出
87of trying to promote virtue or to enact morals legislation.试图促进美德或颁布道德立法。
88And the third kind of law or policy that is ruled out on the libertarian philosophy在自由主义哲学上被排除的第三种法律或政策
89is any taxation or other policy that serves the purpose* 任何税务政策或其他政策符合目的;
90of redistributing income or wealth from the rich to the poor.将收入或财富从富人再分配给穷人。
91Redistribution, if you think about it, says the libertarian, is a kind of coercion.重新分配,如果你考虑它, 说自由主义者,是一种强迫。
92What it amounts to is theft by the state or by the majority,国家或大多数人的盗窃行为,
93if we're talking about a democracy, from people who happen to do very well and earn a lot of money.如果我们在谈论一个民主, 从那些碰巧做得很好,赚了很多钱的人。
94Now, Nozick and other libertarians allow that there can be a minimal state现在,诺兹克和其他自由主义者 允许有一个最低限度的状态
95that taxes people for the sake of what everybody needs,为了每个人都需要的东西 向人们征税
96the national defense, police force, judicial system to enforce contracts and property rights, but that's it.国防 警力 司法体系 执行合同和财产权 但就是这样
97Now, I want to get your reactions to this third feature of the libertarian view.现在,我想得到你对 自由主义观点的第三个特征的反应。
98I want to see who among you agree with that idea and who disagree and why.我想看看你们中间谁同意这个想法,谁不同意,为什么。
99But just to make it concrete and to see what's at stake,但为了让事情变得具体 并且看看有什么关系
100consider the distribution of wealth in the United States.考虑美国的财富分配。
101The United States is among the most inegalitarian societies美国是最无产阶级社会之一
102as far as the distribution of wealth of all the advanced democracies.就所有先进民主国家的财富分配而言。
103Now, is this just or unjust?现在,这是正义还是不公正?
104Well, what does the libertarian say?自由主义者怎么说?
105The libertarian says you can't know just from the facts I've just given you.自由主义者说,你不能仅仅从我给你的事实中知道。
106You can't know whether that distribution is just or unjust.你不可能知道分配是公正还是不公正的。
107You can't know just by looking at a pattern or a distribution or a result,你无法仅仅通过看一个图案 分布或结果,
108whether it's just or unjust.无论是公正还是不公正
109You have to know how it came to be.你必须知道它是如何来的。
110You can't just look at the end state or the result.不能只看结局状态或结果.
111You have to look at two principles.得观二法.
112The first he calls justice in acquisition or in initial holdings.首先,他称正义在获取或最初拥有。
113And what that means simply is,也就是说,
114did people get the things they used to make their money fairly?人们是否得到了他们用来赚钱的东西?
115So we need to know, was there justice in the initial holdings?所以我们要知道 最初的控股是否公正?
116Did they steal the land or the factory or the goods他们偷了土地、工厂或货物
117that enabled them to make all that money?让他们赚了那么多钱?
118If not, if they were entitled to whatever it was如果没有的话,如果他们有权获得什么
119that enabled them to gather the wealth,以便他们聚积财产,
120the first principle is met.第一条原则得到满足。
121The second principle is, did the distribution arise第二项原则是,是否出现分配
122from the operation of free consent?自由同意行动?
123People buying and trading on the market.人民群众在市场上购买和交易.
124As you can see, the libertarian idea of justice如你所见,自由主义的正义思想
125corresponds to a free market conception of justice.符合自由市场司法概念。
126Provided people got what they used fairly, didn't steal it,只要人们得到他们公平使用的东西, 没有偷它,
127and provided the distribution results from the free choice of individuals如果分配是个人自由选择的结果
128buying and selling things, the distribution is just.买卖东西,分配是公正的。
129And if not, it's unjust.然若无,则不公也.
130So let's, in order to fix ideas for this discussion,所以,为了为这次讨论确定想法,
131take an actual example.举个实际例子。
132Who's the wealthiest person in the United States?美国最富有的人是谁?
133Wealthiest person in the world?世界上最有钱的人?
134Bill Gates.比尔盖茨。
135It is.没错
136That's right.没错
137Here he is.他来了
138You'd be happy too.你也会高兴的
139Now, what's his net worth?现在,他的净值多少?
140Anybody have any idea?有人知道吗?
141That's a big number.这是一个很大的数字。
142During the Clinton years, remember there was a controversy?在克林顿的岁月里,还记得有争论吗?
143Donors, big campaign contributors, were invited to stay overnight捐助者、大型运动捐助者应邀过夜
144in the Lincoln bedroom at the White House.在林肯卧室 在白宫。
145I think if you contributed $25,000 or above,我认为如果你捐了25,000美元或更多
146someone figured out at the median contribution有人在中位数中发现了
147that got you invited to stay a night in the Lincoln bedroom,让你在林肯卧室呆一晚
148Bill Gates could afford to stay in the Lincoln bedroom every night比尔·盖茨每晚都能住在林肯卧室
149for the next 66,000 years.接下来的66,000年。
150Somebody else figured out how much does he get paid on an hourly basis.别人知道他每小时挣多少钱
151And so they figured out since he began Microsoft,所以他们想通了 自从他开始微软,
152suppose he worked, what, 14 hours per day.假设他每天工作14小时
153Reasonable guess.合理猜测.
154And you calculate this net wealth,你计算这种财富,
155it turns out that his rate of pay结果发现他的薪水
156is over $150, not per hour, not per minute.超过150美元,不是每小时,不是一分钟。
157$150, more than $150 per second.150元,每秒超过150元.
158Which means that if on his way to the office,这意味着如果他在去办公室的路上
159Gates noticed a $100 bill on the street,盖茨注意到街上有100美元的帐单
160it wouldn't be worth his time to stop and pick it up.不值得他停下来捡起来
161Now, most of you will say, someone that wealthy,现在,你们大多数人会说,一个有钱的人,
162surely we can tax them to meet the pressing needs我们当然可以收税,满足迫切的需要
163of people who lack an education or lack enough to eat or lack decent housing.缺乏教育或缺乏足够食物或缺乏体面住房的人。
164They need it more than he does.他们比他更需要这个
165And if he were a utilitarian, what would you do?如果他是功利主义者 你会怎么做?
166What tax policy would you have?你会有什么税收政策?
167You'd redistribute in a flash, wouldn't you?你会一瞬间重新分配,不是吗?
168Because you would know, being a good utilitarian,因为你会知道,作为一个好的功利主义者,
169that taking some, a small amount, he's scarcely going to notice it.他很少会注意到的
170But it will make a huge improvement in the lives但它会大大改善生活
171and in the welfare of those at the bottom.和下层人的福利。
172But remember, the libertarian theory says,但记住,自由主义理论说,
173we can't just add up and aggregate preferences and satisfactions.我们不能把喜好和满意加起来
174That way, we have to respect persons.这样,我们必须尊重人。
175And if he earned that money fairly,如果他能公平赚到钱
176without violating anybody else's rights,不侵犯任何人的权利,
177in accordance with the two principles of justice in acquisition根据获得公正的两项原则
178and justice in transfer, then it would be wrong.和正义的转移, 那么这将是错误的。
179It would be a form of coercion to take it away.把它带走是一种胁迫。
180Michael Jordan is not as wealthy as Bill Gates.迈克尔·乔丹没有比尔·盖茨那么富有.
181But he did pretty well for himself.但是他表现得很好
182You want to see Michael Jordan?你想见迈克尔・乔丹吗?
183There he is.他来了
184His income alone, in one year, was $31 million.仅他一年的收入就有3 100万美元。
185And then he made another $47 million in endorsements然后他又做了4700万的背书
186for Nike and other companies.给耐克公司和其他公司
187So his income was, in one year, $78 million.所以,他的收入,在一年,7800万美元。
188To require him to pay, let's say, a third of his earnings要求他支付他三分之一的收入
189to the government to support good causes,政府支持好事业,
190like food and health care and housing and education for the poor.譬如为穷人提供食物和保健、住房和教育。
191That's coercion.这是强迫。
192That's unjust.这是不公正的。
193That violates his rights.这侵犯了他的权利。
194And that's why redistribution is wrong.这就是为什么再分配是错误的。
195Now, how many agree with that argument?现在,有多少人同意这个论点?
196Agree with the libertarian argument同意自由主义的论点
197that redistribution for the sake of trying to help the poor is wrong?为了帮助穷人而进行的再分配是错误的吗?
198And how many disagree with that argument?有多少人不同意这一论点?
199All right, let's begin with those who disagree.好吧,让我们从不同意的人开始。
200What's wrong with the libertarian case against redistribution?利伯塔利反再分配案有什么问题?.
201Yes?是吗?
202I think these people like Michael Jordan have received,我想这些人像迈克尔・乔丹已经得到了,
203we're talking about working within a society,我们说的是在社会中工作,
204and they received a larger gift from the society,他们收到了社会上更大的礼物,
205and they have a larger obligation in return他们有更大的义务,
206to give that through redistribution.以再分配的方式给予它。
207You can say that Michael Jordan may work just as hard你可以说迈克尔·乔丹也一样努力
208as someone who works doing laundry 12 hours, 14 hours a day,做一个每天12小时14小时的洗衣工
209but he's receiving more.但他得到了更多的东西。
210I don't think it's fair to say that it's all on his inherent hard work.我觉得说这都是他固有的辛勤工作是不公平的.
211All right, let's hear from defenders of libertarianism.好吧,让我们听听自由主义的捍卫者。
212Why would it be wrong in principle to tax the rich to help the poor?为帮助穷人而向富人征税在原则上为何是错误的?
213Go ahead.来吧。
214My name's Joe, and I collect skateboards.我叫乔 我收集滑板
215I've since bought 100 skateboards.之后我买了100块滑板
216I live in a society of 100 people.我生活在一个有100人的社会。
217I'm the only one with skateboards.我是唯一一个有滑板的人。
218Suddenly, everyone decides they want a skateboard.突然,每个人都决定要滑板
219They come into my house, they take 99 of my skateboards.他们进入我家,拿走了我的99块滑板
220I think that is unjust.我认为这不公平。
221Now, I think in certain circumstances,我觉得在某些情况下
222it becomes necessary to overlook that injustice,必须忽略这种不公正,
223perhaps condone that injustice,也许可以宽恕这种不公正,
224as in the case of the cabin boy being killed for food.就像小木屋男孩为了食物被杀一样
225If people are on the verge of dying,如果人们濒临死亡
226perhaps it is necessary to overlook that injustice,也许有必要忽略这种不公正,
227but I think it's important to keep in mind但我认为必须记住
228that we're still committing injustice说我们仍在犯不公正
229by taking people's belongings or assets.拿走别人的财物或资产
230Are you saying that taxing Michael Jordan,你是说对迈克尔·乔丹征税
231say at a 33% tax rate,以33%的税率,
232for good causes to feed the hungry is theft?给饥饿的人喂饱的好理由就是偷窃?
233I think it's unjust.我觉得这不公平
234Yes, I do believe it's theft,是的,我相信这是偷窃,
235but perhaps it is necessary to condone that theft.但也许有必要宽恕这起盗窃案
236But it's theft.却作是盗.
237Yes.
238Why is it theft, Joe?为什么是偷窃,乔?
239Because...因为...
240Why is it like your collection of skateboards?为什么就像你收集的滑板?
241It's theft because, at least in my opinion这是偷窃,因为,至少在我看来
242and by the libertarian opinion,和自由主义者的意见,
243he earned that money fairly,他得到的钱是公平的,
244and it belongs to him.它属于他。
245So to take it from him is, by definition, theft.因此,从他那里夺走它,顾名思义,就是偷窃.
246All right.好吧,我们走。
247Let's see if there's...看看有没有...
248Who wants to reply to Joe?谁想回复乔?
249Yes, go ahead.说吧
250I don't think this is necessarily a case我觉得这不一定是案子
251in which you have 99 skateboards您有99个滑板
252and the government, or you have 100 skateboards,和政府,或你有100个滑板,
253and the government's taking 99 of them.政府要带走其中的99个
254It's like you have more skateboards就像你有更多的滑板一样
255than there are days in a year.比一年有几天的时间。
256You have more skateboards than you're going to be able to use滑板比用来滑板还多
257in your entire lifetime,在你整个一生中,
258and the government is taking part of those.并且政府正在参与其中。
259And I think that if you're operating in a society我认为如果你在社会中运作
260in which the government doesn't redistribute wealth,政府不会重新分配财富
261that that allows for people to amass so much wealth让人们聚集这么多财富
262that people who haven't started from this very...那些还没开始的人...
263the equal footing in our hypothetical situation我们假设中的平等地位
264that doesn't exist in our real society这在我们真正的社会中并不存在
265get undercut for the rest of their lives.下半辈子都被割伤了
266So you're worried that if there isn't some degree of redistribution,所以你担心如果没有某种程度的再分配
267if some are left at the bottom,如果有人留在底部,
268there will be no genuine equality of opportunity.没有真正的机会平等。
269All right.好吧,我们走。
270The idea that taxation is theft.税收就是偷窃
271Nozick takes that point one step further.诺兹克更进一步了
272He agrees that it's theft.他同意这是盗窃
273He's more demanding than Joe.比乔更苛求.
274Joe says it is theft.乔说这是偷窃
275Maybe in an extreme case it's justified.也许在极端的情况下是有理由的
276Maybe a parent is justified in stealing a loaf of bread也许父母偷面包有道理
277to feed his or her hungry family.供养饥饿的家庭。
278So Joe is a, what would you call yourself,所以乔是个,你会怎么称呼自己,
279a compassionate quasi-libertarian?一个富有同情心的准文学家?
280Nozick says, if you think about it,诺兹克说,如果你考虑一下
281taxation amounts to the taking of earnings.征税等于收取收入。
282In other words, it means taking the fruits of my labor.换句话说,这意味着夺走我劳动的成果.
283But if the state has the right to take my earnings但是如果国家有权拿走我的收入
284or the fruits of my labor,或我劳动的果实,
285isn't that morally the same as according to the state这在道德上是不是和州政府一样
286the right to claim a portion of my labor?有权要求我的一部分劳动?
287So taxation actually is morally equivalent所以税收在道德上是相当的
288to forced labor,强制劳动,
289because forced labor involves the taking of my leisure,因为强迫劳役需要我闲暇
290my time, my efforts,我的时间,我的努力,
291just as taxation takes the earnings that I make with my labor.就像税收占用了我的劳动收入一样
292And so for Nozick and for the libertarians,对诺兹克和自由主义者来说
293taxation for redistribution is theft, as Joe says,重新分配税就是偷窃,正如乔所说,
294but not only theft,不只是偷窃,
295it's morally equivalent to laying claim这在道德上相当于索赔
296to certain hours of a person's life and labor.一个人生命和劳动的某些时间。
297So it's morally equivalent to forced labor.所以在道德上相当于强迫劳动.
298If the state has a right to claim the fruits of my labor,如果国家有权要求 我劳动的成果,
299that implies that it really has an entitlement to my labor itself.这意味着它真的有权利 我的工作本身。
300And what is forced labor?什么是强制劳动?
301Forced labor, Nozick points out, is what?强迫劳动,诺兹克指出,是什么?
302Is slavery.是奴隶制。
303Because if I don't have the right, the sole right, to my own labor,因为如果我没有权利,唯一的权利 做自己的工作,
304then that's really to say that the government也就是说政府
305or the political community is a part owner in me.或者政治团体是我的一部分
306And what does it mean for the state to be a part owner in me?州里成为我的主人是什么意思?
307If you think about it, it means that I'm a slave,如果你考虑一下,这意味着我是奴隶,
308that I don't own myself.我并不拥有自己。
309So what this line of reasoning brings us to所以,这条推理线 带给我们
310is the fundamental principle基本原则
311that underlies the libertarian case for rights.这是自由主义主张权利的理由。
312What is that principle?这一原则是什么?
313It's the idea that I own myself.这是我自己的想法。
314It's the idea of self-possession.即是自负之念.
315If you want to take rights seriously,如果你想认真对待权利
316if you don't want to just regard people as collections of preferences,如果你不想只把人们当作喜好的收藏
317the fundamental moral idea to which you will be led你将走向的基本道德思想
318is the idea that we are the owners or the proprietors of our own person.是认为我们是自己的主人或主人
319And that's why utilitarianism goes wrong.所以功利主义是错的
320And that's why it's wrong to yank the organs from that healthy patient.这就是为什么把器官从那个健康的病人身上挖出来是错误的。
321You're acting as if that patient belongs to you or to the community,你表现得好像那个病人属于你或社区
322but we belong to ourselves.但我们属于自己
323And that's the same reason这也是同样的原因
324that it's wrong to make laws to protect us from ourselves制定法律来保护我们自己是错误的
325or to tell us how to live,或者告诉我们如何生活,
326to tell us what virtues we should be governed by.告诉我们我们应当遵循什么美德。
327And that's also why it's wrong to tax the rich,这也是为什么对富人征税是错误的
328to help the poor, even for good causes,帮助穷人,即使为好的原因,
329even to help those who are displaced by the Hurricane Katrina.甚至帮助那些因卡特里娜飓风而流离失所的人。
330Ask them to give charity.请他们施舍
331But if you tax them, it's like forcing them to labor.但是,如果你向他们征税, 这就像强迫他们劳动。
332Could you tell Michael Jordan he has to skip the next week's games你能告诉迈克尔乔丹 他必须跳过下周的比赛吗?
333and go down to help the people displaced by Hurricane Katrina?去帮助因卡特里娜飓风而流离失所的人?
334Morally, it's the same.道德无异.
335So the stakes are very high.因此利害关系非常高.
336So far, we've heard some objections to the libertarian argument.到目前为止,我们已经听到一些反对 自由主义的论点。
337But if you want to reject it,但如果你想拒绝
338you have to break into this chain of reasoning, which goes,你必须突破这个推理链, 说,
339taking my earnings is like taking my labor,夺走我的收入就像夺走我的劳动
340but taking my labor is making me a slave.但夺走我的劳动让我成为奴隶
341And if you disagree with that,如果你不同意这一点,
342you must believe in the principle of self-possession.你必须相信自我占有的原则。
343Those who disagree, gather your objections,谁不同意,谁反对,谁反对,
344and we'll begin with them next time.我们下次从他们开始
345Anyone like to take up that point?有人愿意接受吗?
346Yes.
347I feel like when you live in a society, you give up that right.我觉得当你生活在一个社会, 你放弃的权利。
348I mean, technically, if I want to personally go out and kill someone我的意思是,从技术上讲,如果我想亲自出去杀人的话
349because they offend me, that is self-possession.因为他们冒犯了我 这就是自负
350Because I live in a society, I cannot do that.因为我生活在一个社会, 我不能这样做。
351Victoria, are you questioning the fundamental premise of self-possession?Victoria 你在质疑自我占有的基本前提吗?
352Yes.
353I think that you don't really have self-possession if you choose to live in a society我认为,如果你选择生活在一个社会里, 你并没有真正的自负
354because you cannot just discount the people around you.因为你不能轻视周围的人
355We were talking last time about libertarianism.我们上次谈的是自由主义
356I want to go back to the arguments for and against the redistribution of income.我想回到支持和反对收入再分配的论点上来。
357But before we do that, just one word about the minimal state.但是在我们这样做之前, 只需要一个字 关于最低状态。
358Milton Friedman, a libertarian economist,米尔顿·弗里德曼 自由主义经济学家
359he points out that many of the functions that we take for granted他指出,我们认为许多职能是理所当然的。
360as properly belonging to government, don't.属于政府,不要。
361They are paternalist.他们是家长
362One example he gives is Social Security.他举的一个例子是社会保障。
363He says it's a good idea for people to save for their retirement他说为了退休而存钱是好主意
364during their earning years, but it's wrong.在他们挣钱的岁月里 但这是错误的
365It's a violation of people's liberty for the government to force everyone,这是对人民自由的侵犯 政府强迫每个人
366whether they want to or not, to put aside some earnings today不论他们是否愿意 今天把一些收入放在一边
367for the sake of their retirement.为了他们的退休。
368If people want to take the chance, or if people want to live big today如果人们想冒这个险,或者人们想过大日子
369and live a poor retirement, that should be their choice.过着贫穷的退休生活 这应该是他们的选择
370They should be free to make those judgments and take those risks.他们应当能够自由地作出这些判决和承担这些风险。
371So even Social Security would still be at odds with the minimal state所以连社保都和最低的状态相矛盾
372that Milton Friedman argued for.米尔顿·弗里德曼为他辩护
373It's sometimes thought that collective goods like police protection有时人们会认为 集体商品如警察保护
374and fire protection will inevitably create the problem of free riders消防工作将不可避免地造成自由骑手的问题
375unless they're publicly provided.除非是公开提供的
376But there are ways to prevent free riders.但有办法阻止自由骑手
377There are ways to restrict even seemingly collective goods like fire protection.有一些方法可以限制,即使是看似集体的东西,比如防火.
378I read an article a while back about a private fire company,我读过一篇关于私人消防公司的文章
379the Salem Fire Corporation in Arkansas.阿肯色州的萨利姆消防公司
380You can sign up with the Salem Fire Corporation, pay a yearly subscription fee,你可以和萨利姆消防公司签约, 支付每年的订阅费,
381and if your house catches on fire, they will come and put out the fire.如果你的房子着火了 他们会来灭火
382But they won't put out everybody's fire.但他们不会扑灭每个人的火
383They will only put it out if it's a fire in the home of a subscriber只有订户家里起火,他们才会熄灭
384or if it starts to spread and to threaten the home of a subscriber.或者它开始扩散 并威胁一个用户的家。
385The newspaper article told the story of a homeowner报纸上的文章讲述了房主的故事
386who had subscribed to this company in the past,曾经与这家公司签约,
387but failed to renew his subscription.但没有续约
388His house caught on fire.他的房子着火了
389The Salem Fire Corporation showed up with its trucks萨利姆消防队的卡车来了
390and watched the house burn, just making sure that it didn't spread.看着房子被烧了 只是确保它不会扩散
391The fire chief was asked.有人问消防队长
392Well, he wasn't exactly the fire chief.他不是消防队长
393I guess he was the CEO.我猜他是首席执行官
394He was asked, how can you stand by with fire equipment有人问他,你怎么会有消防器材?
395and allow a person's home to burn?允许一个人的家被烧毁?
396He replied, once we verified there was no danger to a member's property,他回答说,一旦我们核实一个成员的财产没有危险,
397we had no choice but to back off according to our rules.我们别无选择,只能按照我们的规则退缩。
398If we responded to all fires, he said, there would be no incentive to subscribe.他说,如果我们对所有的火灾作出反应,就不会有订阅的积极性。
399The homeowner, in this case, tried to renew his subscription at the scene of the fire,屋主试图在火灾现场续约
400but the head of the company refused.但公司负责人拒绝了
401You can't wreck your car, he said, and then buy insurance for it later.他说你不能毁了你的车 然后以后再买保险
402So even public goods that we take for granted as being within the proper province of government因此,即使公共物品,我们认为理所当然 属于适当的政府省
403can, many of them, in principle, be isolated, made exclusive to those who pay.原则上,其中许多人可以被孤立,被排斥在支付者之外。
404That's all to do with the question of collective goods这都与集体商品问题有关
405and the libertarian's injunction against paternalism.自由主义者禁止家长制
406But let's go back now to the arguments about redistribution.但是,让我们回到关于再分配的争论。
407Now, underlying the libertarian's case for the minimal state现在,自由主义者的 理由为最低状态
408is a worry about coercion, but what's wrong with coercion?是担心强迫, 但强迫有什么错?
409The libertarian offers this answer.自由主义者给出了这个答案.
410To coerce someone, to use some person for the sake of the general welfare,强迫某人,为了一般福利而利用某人,
411is wrong because it calls into question the fundamental fact that we own ourselves,这是错的,因为它让人质疑 我们自己的根本事实,
412the fundamental moral fact of self-possession or self-ownership.自有或自有的基本道德事实。
413The libertarian's argument against redistribution自由主义者反对再分配的论点
414begins with this fundamental idea that we own ourselves.从这个我们自己拥有的根本思想开始。
415Nozick says that if the society as a whole can go to Bill Gates or go to Michael Jordan诺兹克说,如果全社会可以去比尔盖茨,也可以去迈克尔乔丹
416and tax away a portion of their wealth,并分舍一部分财产,
417what the society is really asserting is a collective property right社会真正主张的是集体财产权
418in Bill Gates or in Michael Jordan.在比尔盖茨或迈克尔乔丹。
419But that violates the fundamental principle that we belong to ourselves.但这违反了我们属于我们自己的基本原则。
420Now, we've already heard a number of objections to the libertarian argument.现在,我们已经听到一些反对 自由论的论点。
421What I would like to do today is to give the libertarians among us今天我想做的是 给我们中间的自由主义者
422a chance to answer the objections that have been raised.有机会回答提出的反对意见。
423And some have already identified themselves and have agreed to come也有人已经认清自己,同意前来
424and make the case for libertarianism to reply to the objections that have been raised.让自由主义对提出的反对作出答复。
425So raise your hand if you are among the libertarians who's prepared to stand up所以,举手,如果你是 自由主义者谁准备站起来
426for the theory and respond to the objections.对于理论,并回应反对。
427Alex Harris 在网络博客上是明星
428Alex, come here.亚历克斯 过来
429Stand up.站起来
430We'll create a libertarian corner over here.我们在这里建立一个自由的角落。
431And who else?还有谁?
432Other libertarians who will join?其他自由主义者谁会加入?
433What's your name?你叫什么来着?
434John?约翰?
435John Sheffield.约翰·谢菲尔德.
436Who else wants to join?还有谁想加入?
437Other brave libertarians who are prepared to take on...其他勇敢的解放主义者 他们准备承担...
438Yes.
439What's your name?你叫什么来着?
440Julia Roto.朱莉娅·罗托.
441Julia, come join us over there.茱莉亚,过来那边
442Now, while Team Libertarian, Julia, John, Alex,现在,自由队,朱莉娅,约翰,亚历克斯,
443while Team Libertarian is gathering over there,当自由队在那边集合时
444let me just summarize the main objections that I've heard in class and on the website.让我总结一下在课堂和网站上听到的主要反对意见。
445Objection number one.反对第一。
446And here, I'll come down to it.在这里,我会下来的。
447I want to talk to Team Libertarian over here.我想跟自由队谈谈
448So, objection number one is that the poor need the money more.所以,第一反对意见是穷人需要更多的钱。
449That's an obvious objection.这显然是一个反对意见。
450A lot more than do Bill Gates and Michael Jordan.比比尔·盖茨和迈克尔·乔丹要多得多
451Objection number two.二号反对
452It's not really slavery to tax because, at least in a democratic society,这不是真正的奴隶税 因为,至少在民主社会,
453it's not a slave holder.这不是一个奴隶持有者。
454It's Congress.这是国会。
455It's a democratic... You're smiling, Alex, already.这是一个民主的... 你在笑,亚历克斯,已经。
456You're confident you can reply to all of these?你能回答这些吗?
457So, taxation by consent of the governed is not coerced.因此,经被统治者同意的征税不是强制性的。
458Third, some people have said, don't the successful, like Gates,第三,有些人说,不要成功, 像盖茨,
459owe a debt to society for their success that they repay by paying taxes?欠社会一笔债,因为他们靠交税还债?
460Who wants to respond to the first one?谁想回应第一个?
461The poor need the money more.穷人更需要钱。
462John.约翰
463All right, John.好吧,约翰。
464Let's see.让我看看。
465Here, I'll hold it.在这里,我拿着它。
466All right.好吧,我们走。
467The poor need the money more.穷人更需要钱。
468That's quite obvious.这很明显
469I could use the money.我可以用这笔钱
470You know, I certainly wouldn't mind if Bill Gates gave me a million dollars.我当然不介意比尔·盖茨给我一百万
471I mean, I'd take a thousand.我的意思是,我会采取一千。
472But at some point, you have to understand that the benefits of redistribution of wealth但有时,你必须明白 财富再分配的好处
473don't justify the initial violation of the property right.不要为最初侵犯财产权的行为辩解.
474If you look at the argument, the poor need the money more,如果你看看争论,穷人需要更多的钱,
475at no point in that argument do you contradict the fact that we've extrapolated from这个论点中,你从未反驳过 我们推断出
476agreed upon principles that people own themselves.商定了人民自主的原则。
477We've extrapolated that people have property rights.我们已经推断,人们有财产权。
478And so whether or not it would be a good thing or a nice thing所以,无论它是好事还是好事
479or even a necessary thing for the survival of some people,甚至是某些人生存所必需的东西,
480we don't see that that justifies the violation of the right that we've logically extrapolated.我们不认为这证明 侵犯我们逻辑推断的权利是正当的
481And so that also, I mean, there still exists this institution of like individual philanthropy.所以,同样,我的意思是, 这个机构仍然存在, 类似于个人慈善事业。
482Milton Friedman makes this argument.米尔顿·弗里德曼提出这个论点.
483So Bill Gates can give to charity if he wants to.所以比尔·盖茨如果愿意可以给慈善.
484Right.
485But it would still be wrong to coerce him.但胁迫他还是不对的
486Exactly.没错
487To meet the needs of the poor.满足穷人的需要。
488Exactly.没错
489Are the two of you happy with that reply?你们两个对答复满意吗?
490Anything to add?还有什么要补充的吗?
491All right.好吧,我们走。
492Go ahead, Julie.继续,朱莉。
493I think, Julia, yes.我想,朱莉娅,是的。
494I think I could also add, I guess I could whole add that我想我也可以补充, 我想我可以完全补充
495there's a difference between needing something and deserving something.需要的东西和值得的东西是不同的
496I mean, in an ideal society, everyone's needs be met.我的意思是,在一个理想的社会里,每个人都需要得到满足.
497But here we're arguing, what do we deserve as a society?但是我们在这里争论,我们作为一个社会应该得到什么?
498And the poor don't deserve the benefits that would flow from taxing Michael Jordan to help them.穷人不值得从向迈克尔·乔丹征税来帮助他们得到好处。
499Based on what we've come up with here, I don't think you deserve something like that.根据我们想出的办法 我认为你不该有这种事
500All right.好吧,我们走。
501Let me push you a little bit on that, Julia.让我推你一点,朱莉娅。
502The victims of Hurricane Katrina are in desperate need of help.卡特里娜飓风的受害者迫切需要帮助。
503Would you say that they don't deserve help that would come from the federal government through taxation?你会说他们不值得通过税收来帮助联邦政府吗?
504Okay.摆
505That's a difficult question.这是一个困难的问题。
506I think this is a case where they need help, not deserve it.我认为这是他们需要帮助,而不是应该得到帮助的情况。
507But I think, again, if you hit a certain level of requirements to reach sustenance, you're going to need help.但我还是觉得,如果你达到一定的要求 才能达到供养,你需要帮助。
508Like if you don't have food or a place to live, that's a case of need.就像你没有食物或住的地方, 这就是需要。
509So need is one thing and dessert is another.所以需求是一回事,甜点是另一回事。
510Exactly.没错
511All right.好吧,我们走。
512Who would like to reply?谁想回答?
513Yes.
514Going back to the first point that he made about the property rights of the individual,回到他关于个人产权的第一点
515the property rights are established and enforced by the government, which is a democratic government,财产权利由作为民主政府的政府确定和执行,
516and we have representatives who enforce those rights.并且我们有代表执行这些权利。
517If you live in a society that operates under those rules,如果你生活在一个遵循这些规则的社会里
518then it should be up to the government to decide how those resources that come out through taxation are distributed因此,应该由政府决定如何分配通过税收产生的资源。
519because it is through the consent of the government.因为这是通过政府的同意。
520If you disagree with it, you don't have to live in that society where that operates.如果你不同意, 你不必生活在那个社会 在那里运作。
521All right, good.好吧,不错。
522And tell me your name.告诉我你的名字。
523Raoul.拉乌尔
524Raoul is pointing out, actually, Raoul is invoking point number two.拉乌尔指出,实际上拉乌尔援引了第二点.
525If the taxation is by the consent of the governed, it's not coerced.如果税收是经被管理者同意的,则不是强迫的.
526It's legitimate.谓之正法.
527Bill Gates and Michael Jordan are citizens of the United States.比尔·盖茨和迈克尔·乔丹是美国公民.
528They get to vote for Congress.他们可以投票给国会。
529They get to vote their policy convictions, just like everybody else.他们可以投票 政策信念, 就像其他人一样。
530Who would like to take that one on?谁愿意穿上这个?
531John?约翰?
532All right.好吧,我们走。
533Basically, what the libertarians are objecting to in this case is the middle 80 percent deciding基本上,自由派反对的是 中间80%决定
534what the top 10 percent are doing for the bottom 10 percent.排名前10%的人为排名前10%的人所做的一切。
535Well, wait, wait, wait, wait, John.单单单单揩
536Majority.多数
537Don't you believe in democracy?你不相信民主吗?
538Well, right.没错
539Don't you believe in, I mean, you say 80 percent, 10 percent majority.难道你不相信,我的意思是,你说80%,10%多数。
540Majority rule is what?多数规则是什么?
541Majority.多数
542Exactly.没错
543In a democracy.在一个民主国家。
544Aren't you for democracy?你不赞成民主吗?
545Yes, I'm for democracy, but hang on, hang on, hang on.是的,我支持民主,但坚持住,坚持住,坚持住。
546Democracy and mob rule aren't the same thing.民主和暴民统治不是一回事。
547Mob rule.黑帮规则。
548Exactly.没错
549But in an open society, you have a recourse to address that through your representatives.但是,在一个开放的社会里,你可以通过你的代表来解决这个问题。
550And if the majority of the consent of those who are governed doesn't agree with you, then如果被统治者的多数同意 不同意你的话
551you know you're choosing to live in a society and you have to operate under what the majority你知道你选择 生活在一个社会, 你必须运行 在多数人
552of society concludes.社会的结论。
553All right.好吧,我们走。
554Alex, on democracy.亚历克斯,关于民主。
555Democracy.民主报.
556What about that?怎么样?
557The fact that I have won, you know, 500,000th of a vote for one representative in Congress我赢得了50万的国会代表
558is not the same thing as my having the ability to decide for myself how to use my property这和我决定自己如何使用地产不一样
559rights.权利。
560I'm a drop in the bucket.我是一个滴水桶。
561You might lose the vote.你可能会失去选票。
562Exactly.没错
563And I might take.我可能会接受
564And I will.我会的。
565I mean, I don't have the decision right now whether or not to pay taxes.我的意思是,我现在没有决定 是否交税。
566If I don't, I get locked in jail.如果我不这样做,我会被关在监狱里。
567Or they tell me to get out of the country.或者他们叫我离开这个国家
568But Alex, Alex, let me make a small case for democracy and see what you would say.但亚历克斯,亚历克斯, 让我做一个小理由 民主,并看你会说什么。
569Why can't you?为什么不行?
570We live in a democratic society with freedom of speech.我们生活在一个言论自由的民主社会中。
571Why can't you take to the hustings, persuade your fellow citizens that taxation is unjust为什么你不能去胡思乱想, 说服你的同胞,税收是不公正的
572and try to get a majority?并试图获得多数?
573I don't think the people should be, should have to convince 280 million others simply我不认为人民应该如此, 应该说服其他2.8亿
574in order to exercise their own rights, in order to not have their self-ownership violated.为了行使自己的权利,为了不侵犯他们的自我所有权。
575I think people should be able to do that without having to convince 280 million people.我认为人们应该能够做到这一点,而不必说服2.8亿人。
576Does that mean you're against democracy as a whole?这是否意味着你反对整个民主?
577No.没有
578I just believe in a very limited form of democracy whereby we have a constitution that severely我只是相信一种非常有限的民主形式 我们的宪法是严重的
579limits the scope of what decisions can be made democratically.限制可以民主作出决定的范围。
580All right.好吧,我们走。
581So you're saying that democracy is fine, except where fundamental rights are involved.所以,你的意思是,民主是好的, 除非涉及到基本权利。
582And I think you could win.我想你能赢
583If you're going on the hustings, let me add one element to the argument you might make.如果你在胡思乱想,让我给你可能提出的论点增加一个要素。
584Maybe you could say, put aside the economic debates, taxation.也许你可以说,把经济辩论,税收放在一边。
585Suppose the individual right to religious liberty were at stake.假设个人享有宗教自由的权利受到威胁。
586Then, Alex, you could say on the hustings, surely you would all agree that we shouldn't那么,亚历克斯,你可以说 在胡思乱想, 你们肯定都同意,我们不应该
587put the right to individual liberty up to a vote?将个人自由权付诸表决?
588Yeah, that's exactly right.对,没错
589And that's why we have constitutional amendments and why we make it so hard to amend our constitution.这也是为什么我们有宪法修正案,为什么我们让宪法如此难以修正.
590So you would say that the right to private property, the right of Michael Jordan to keep所以你会说私有财产的权利 迈克尔·乔丹保留的权利
591all the money he makes, at least to protect it from redistribution, is the same kind of他所有赚的钱,至少是为了保护它不被再分配,都是一样的
592right, with the same kind of weight, as the right to freedom of speech, the right to religious与言论自由、宗教
593liberty, rights that should trump what the majority wants.自由,权利应该凌驾于大多数人想要的之上。
594Absolutely.当然
595The reason why we have a right to free speech is because we have a right to own ourselves,我们之所以有言论自由权 是因为我们有权自己
596to exercise our voice in any way that we choose.以任何我们选择的方式表达我们的声音。
597All right.好吧,我们走。
598Good.不错
599All right.好吧,我们走。
600So there we are.我们到了
601Who would like to respond to that argument about democracy being...谁愿意回应关于民主是...
602Okay, up there.好,上楼
603Stand up.站起来
604I think comparing religion and economics, it's not the same thing.我认为比较宗教和经济学,不是一回事.
605The reason why Bill Gates was able to make so much money is because we live in an economically比尔·盖茨之所以能赚这么多钱 是因为我们生活在经济上
606and socially stable society.社会和社会稳定。
607And if the government didn't provide for the poorest 10%, as you say, through taxation,如果政府不提供 最穷的10%,就像你说的, 通过税收,
608then we would need more money for police to prevent crime.然后我们需要更多的钱 警方预防犯罪。
609And so either way, there would be more taxes taken away to provide what you guys call the所以无论怎样, 更多的税收被拿走 提供你们所谓的
610necessary things that the government provides.政府提供的必需品
611What's your name?你叫什么来着?
612Anna.安娜,请问安娜
613Anna, let me ask you this.安娜,让我问你
614Why is the fundamental right to religious liberty different from the right Alex asserts为什么宗教自由的基本权利与亚历克斯认为的权利不同?
615as a fundamental right to private property and to keep what I earn?作为拥有私有财产和保留我所得收入的基本权利?
616What's the difference between the two?二者有何分别.
617Because you wouldn't be able to make money.因为你不会赚钱。
618You wouldn't be able to own property if society wasn't stable.如果社会不稳定,你就不能拥有财产.
619And that's completely different from religion.这与宗教完全不同。
620That's something personal, something that you can practice on your own in your own home.这是私人的事,你可以在自己的家里单独练习。
621Whereas me practicing, my religion is not going to affect the next person.当我练习时 我的宗教不会影响下一个人
622But if I'm poor and I'm desperate, I might commit a crime to feed my family.但如果我贫穷,我绝望,我可能会犯罪养家糊口.
623And that can affect others.这会影响到其他人。
624Okay, good.好吧,不错。
625Thank you.谢谢
626Would it be wrong for someone to steal a loaf of bread to feed his starving family?有人偷面包喂他饿死的家人 是不是不对?
627Is that wrong?这样不对吗?
628I believe that it is.我认为是的。
629Let's take a quick poll of the three of you.我们来快速调查一下你们三个
630You say yes.你说是的。
631It is wrong.这是错误的。
632It violates property rights.它侵犯了财产权。
633It's wrong.这是错误的。
634Even to save a starving family?甚至为了拯救一个饥饿的家庭?
635I mean, there are definitely other ways around that.我的意思是,肯定还有其他方法 围绕这一点。
636And by justifying...通过证明...
637No, hang on, hang on.不,坚持住,坚持住。
638Before you laugh at me.在你笑我之前 说吧
639That didn't work.没用的
640Before justifying the act of stealing, you have to look at violating the right that we've already agreed exists.在为偷窃行为辩护之前 你得看看是否违反了我们已经同意的权利
641The right of self-possession and the possession of, I mean, your own things.拥有和拥有自己的东西的权利
642We agree on property rights.我们同意财产权。
643We agree on stealing.我们同意偷东西
644So property rights is not the issue.所以产权不是问题所在
645So why is it wrong to steal even to feed your starving family?那么,为什么偷东西甚至养活你饿死的家人是错误的呢?
646Sort of the original argument that I made in the very first question you asked.算是我在你问的第一个问题中提出的最初论点
647The benefits of an action don't justify, don't make the action just.行动的好处是没有道理的, 不要让行动公正。
648What would you say, Julia?你会说什么,朱莉娅?
649Is it all right to steal a loaf of bread to feed a starving family or to steal a drug that your child needs to survive?偷面包来养活一个饥饿的家庭 还是偷你孩子需要生存的毒品
650I think I'm okay with that, honestly.老实说,我觉得我不介意
651Even from a libertarian standpoint, I think that, okay, saying that you can just take money arbitrarily from people who have a lot to go to this pool of people who need it.即使从自由主义的观点来看,我还是认为,好吧,说你可以任意地从那些有很多需要钱的人那里拿钱。
652But you have an individual who's acting on their own behalf to kind of save themselves.但你有个人 以他们自己的名义 来拯救自己
653I mean, I think you said they, from the idea of like self-possession, they're also in charge of protecting themselves and keeping themselves alive.我的意思是,我认为你说, 从像自我占有的想法, 他们也负责保护自己 和保持自己的生命。
654So therefore, even from a libertarian standpoint, that might be okay.因此,即使从自由主义的观点来看,这也可能是好的。
655All right.好吧,我们走。
656That's good.这是很好的。
657All right.好吧,我们走。
658What about number three up here?三号呢?
659Isn't it the case that the successful, the wealthy, owe a debt?成功者,富人,欠债,岂不如此?
660They didn't do that all by themselves.他们不是全靠自己
661They had to cooperate with other people.他们不得不和其他人合作。
662That they owe a debt to society and that that's expressed in taxation.他们欠了社会一笔债,这表现在税收上。
663You want to take that on, Julia?茱莉亚,你想接吗?
664Okay.摆
665This one, I believe that there is not a debt to society in the sense that how did these people become wealthy?这个,我相信,在这些人如何变得富有的意义上,社会没有债务?
666They did something that society valued highly.他们做了社会高度评价的事情。
667I think that society has already been providing for them.我认为,社会已经为他们提供了帮助。
668If anything, I think everything's canceled out.如果有什么,我觉得一切都取消了。
669They provided a service to society and society responded by somehow they got their wealth.他们以某种方式获得财富,为社会提供了服务,社会作出了回应。
670So be concrete.所以,要具体。
671In the case of Michael Jordan, some, I mean to illustrate your point,就迈克尔·乔丹而言 有些 我想说明你的观点
672there were people who helped him make the money, the teammates, the coach, people who taught him how to play.有人帮助他挣钱,队友,教练,有人教他打球.
673But they, you're saying that they've all been paid for their services.但他们,你的意思是 他们都得到了报酬 他们的服务。
674Exactly.没错
675And society derived a lot of benefit and pleasure from watching Michael Jordan play.而社会从观看迈克尔·乔丹的演奏中获得了很多好处和乐趣.
676I think that that's how he paid his debt to society.我想他就是这样向社会还债的
677All right.好吧,我们走。
678Good.不错
679Who would anyone like to take up that point?谁愿意接受这一点?
680Yes.
681I think that there's a problem here with that we're assuming that a person has self-possession when they live in a society.我认为这里有一个问题,我们假设一个人在社会里生活的时候有自负.
682I feel like when you live in a society, you give up that right.我觉得当你生活在一个社会, 你放弃的权利。
683I mean, technically, if I want to personally go out and kill someone because they offend me, that is self-possession.我的意思是,从技术上来说,如果我想亲自出去杀了一个人,因为他们冒犯了我,那就是自负.
684Because I live in a society, I cannot do that.因为我生活在一个社会, 我不能这样做。
685I think it's kind of equivalent to say because I have more money, I have resources that can save people's lives.我认为这相当于说 因为我有更多的钱, 我有资源可以拯救人们的生命。
686Is it not okay for the government to take that from me?政府能从我这里拿走吗?
687It's self-possession only to a certain extent because I'm living in a society where I have to take account of the people around me.它只是某种程度上的自我占有,因为我生活在一个我必须顾及周围的人的社会里.
688So are you questioning, what's your name?你在问,你叫什么名字?
689Victoria.维多利亚
690Victoria, are you questioning the fundamental premise of self-possession?Victoria 你在质疑自我占有的基本前提吗?
691Yes.
692I think that you don't really have self-possession if you choose to live in a society because you cannot just discount the people around you.我认为,如果你选择生活在一个社会里,你并不真正有自负感,因为你不能仅仅低估周围的人.
693All right.好吧,我们走。
694I want to quickly get the response of the libertarian team to the last point.我想迅速得到自由派团队对最后一点的反应.
695The last point builds on, well, maybe it builds on Victoria's suggestion that we don't own ourselves.最后一点是建立在,嗯,也许它建立在维多利亚的建议之上,即我们不拥有自己。
696Because it says that Bill Gates is wealthy, that Michael Jordan makes a huge income.因为上面写着比尔·盖茨富有,迈克尔·乔丹收入巨大.
697Isn't holy their own doing.不是神圣的他们自己的行为。
698It's the product of a lot of luck.这是很多运气的产品。
699And so we can't claim that they morally deserve all the money they make.所以我们不能声称 他们从道德上应该得到他们赚的钱
700Who wants to reply to that?谁想回答这个问题?
701Alex?亚历克斯?
702You certainly could make the case that it is not, their wealth is not appropriate to the goodness in their hearts.你必定知道,他们的财产,对于他们的心中的善,是不适当的。
703But that's not really the morally relevant issue.但这不是道德问题
704The point is that they have received what they have through the free exchange of people who have given them their holdings, usually in exchange for providing some other service.问题是,他们通过自由交换他们拥有的财产而得到了他们所拥有的财产,通常是为了换取提供某些其他服务。
705Good enough.够好了
706I want to try to sum up what we've learned from this discussion.我想总结一下我们从这次讨论中学到了什么.
707But first, let's thank John, Alex and Julia for an excellent, really wonderful job.但是,首先,让我们感谢约翰,亚历克斯和茱莉亚的出色,非常出色的工作.
708Toward the end of the discussion just now, Victoria challenged the premise of this line of reasoning, this libertarian logic.在刚刚讨论结束时,维多利亚挑战了这种推理的前提,这种自由主义逻辑.
709Maybe she suggested we don't own ourselves after all.也许她暗示我们毕竟不是自己的
710If you reject the libertarian case against redistribution,如果你拒绝自由主义者反对再分配的案子
711there would seem to be an incentive to break into the libertarian line of reasoning at the earliest, at the most modest level.似乎有动力 突破自由主义的推理线 最早, 在最温和的水平。
712Which is why a lot of people disputed that taxation is morally equivalent to forced labor.这就是为什么很多人对税收在道德上等同于强迫劳动提出质疑。
713But what about the big claim, the premise, the big idea underlying the libertarian argument?但大主张,前提,自由主义论点背后的大思想呢?
714Is it true that we own ourselves?我们拥有自己是真的吗?
715Or can we do without that idea and still avoid what libertarians want to avoid,或者我们可以不这样做 没有这个想法,仍然避免 自由主义者想要避免,
716creating a society and an account of justice where some people can be just used for the sake of other people's welfare or even for the sake of the general good?建立一个社会 和一个正义的叙述 在那里,一些人可以 仅仅用来为他人的福利, 甚至为了普遍的利益?
717So, libertarians combat the utilitarian idea of using people as means for the collective happiness因此,自由主义者与功利主义思想作斗争,把人当作集体幸福的手段.
718by saying the way to put a stop to that utilitarian logic of using persons停止利用人的实用主义逻辑
719is to resort to the intuitively powerful idea that we are the proprietors of our own person.利用直觉强大的思想,即我们是自己人的主人。
720That's Alex and Julia and John and Robert Nozick.这是亚历克斯和茱莉亚 约翰和罗伯特·诺兹克
721What are the consequences for a theory of justice and an account of rights of calling into question the idea of self-possession?正义理论和权利陈述对自我占有思想提出质疑的后果是什么?
722Does it mean that we're back to utilitarianism and using people and aggregating preferences and pushing the fat man off the bridge?这是否意味着我们回到了功利主义,利用人们,集聚喜好,把胖子推下桥?
723Nozick doesn't himself fully develop the idea of self-possession.诺兹克本人并没有充分发展自负的思想.
724He borrows it from an earlier philosopher, John Locke.他从早期哲学家约翰·洛克那里借来的.
725John Locke accounted for the rise of private property from the state of nature约翰·洛克(John Locke)为来自自然状态的私有财产上升负责.
726by a chain of reasoning very similar to the one that Nozick and the libertarians use.与诺兹克和自由主义者使用的逻辑非常相似
727John Locke said, private property arises because when we mix our labor with things, unowned things,约翰·洛克说 私人财产的产生 是因为当我们把劳动和事物混为一谈
728we come to acquire a property right in those things.我们来获得这些东西的财产权。
729And the reason?为什么?
730The reason is that we own our own labor.原因是我们拥有自己的劳动力。
731And the reason for that?原因为何?
732We are the proprietors, the owners of our own person.我们是业主 我们自己的主人
733And so in order to examine the moral force of the libertarian claim that we own ourselves,为了审查自由主义者声称我们拥有自己的道德力量
734we need to turn to the English political philosopher John Locke and examine his account of private property and self-ownership.我们需要向英国政治哲学家约翰·洛克(John Locke)倾诉, 并审查他关于私有财产和自有财产的叙述。
735And that's what we'll do next time.我们下次也会这么做的
该视频共有字幕 738 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格

P5 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p05 4. 4.这是我的土地 (P5)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:03Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
0:07Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
0:32Today we turn to John Locke.今天我们找约翰洛克
0:39On the face of it, Locke is a powerful ally of the libertarian.表面上看,洛克是自由主义者的强大盟友.
0:47First, he believes, as libertarians today maintain,首先,他相信, 今天自由主义者认为,
0:55that there are certain fundamental individual rights某些基本的个人权利
1:00that are so important that no government,如此重要,以至于没有政府,
1:03even a representative government, even a democratically elected government,甚至一个有代表性的政府, 甚至一个民主选举的政府,
1:08can override them.能够覆盖它们。
1:12Not only that, he believes that those fundamental rights include不仅如此,他认为这些基本权利包括:
展开字幕全文(596 条)
序号英文中文
1Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
2Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
3Today we turn to John Locke.今天我们找约翰洛克
4On the face of it, Locke is a powerful ally of the libertarian.表面上看,洛克是自由主义者的强大盟友.
5First, he believes, as libertarians today maintain,首先,他相信, 今天自由主义者认为,
6that there are certain fundamental individual rights某些基本的个人权利
7that are so important that no government,如此重要,以至于没有政府,
8even a representative government, even a democratically elected government,甚至一个有代表性的政府, 甚至一个民主选举的政府,
9can override them.能够覆盖它们。
10Not only that, he believes that those fundamental rights include不仅如此,他认为这些基本权利包括:
11a natural right to life, liberty and property.生命、自由和财产的自然权利。
12And furthermore, he argues, that the right to property他还指出,财产权
13is not just the creation of government or of law.不仅仅是建立政府或法律。
14The right to property is a natural right财产权是一项自然权利
15in the sense that it is pre-political.也就是说,这是政治性的。
16It is a right that attaches to individuals as human beings,这是个人作为人的权利,
17even before government comes on the scene,甚至在政府出现之前
18even before parliaments and legislatures enact laws甚至在议会和立法机构颁布法律之前
19to define rights and to enforce them.界定权利并执行这些权利。
20Locke says, in order to think about what it means to have a natural right,洛克说,为了想着拥有自然权利的意义,
21we have to imagine the way things are before government, before law.我们必须想象政府面前,法律面前的状态。
22And that's what Locke means by the state of nature.而这就是洛克根据自然状态的含义.
23He says, the state of nature is a state of liberty.他说,自然状态是一种自由状态.
24Human beings are free and equal beings.人类是自由平等的。
25There is no natural hierarchy.没有自然的等级。
26It's not the case that some people are born to be kings有些人生来就是为了当国王
27and others are born to be serfs.其他人生来就是农奴
28We are free and equal in the state of nature.我们在自然状态下是自由和平等的。
29And yet, he makes the point that there's a difference然而,他却说,有区别
30between a state of liberty and a state of license.自由状态和许可证状态之间。
31And the reason is that even in the state of nature, there is a kind of law.而因缘虽在自然境界亦有种法.
32It's not the kind of law that legislatures enact.这不是立法机关颁布的法律.
33It's a law of nature.谓自然之法.
34And this law of nature constrains what we can do,而这种自然法则制约了我们所能做的事情,
35even though we're free, even though we're in the state of nature.尽管我们自由了 尽管我们处于自然状态
36Well, what are the constraints?那么,是什么限制?
37The only constraint given by the law of nature is that the rights we have,自然法则给予的唯一限制是,我们拥有的权利,
38the natural rights we have, we can't give up,我们拥有的自然权利 我们不能放弃
39nor can we take them from somebody else.我们也不能把他们从别人那里带走。
40Under the law of nature, I'm not free to take somebody else's life根据自然法则,我不能随意夺走别人的生命
41or liberty or property.或自由或财产。
42Nor am I free to take my own life or liberty or property.我也不能自由地夺走自己的生命或自由或财产。
43Even though I'm free, I'm not free to violate the law of nature.虽自在无量无边无量无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边无边
44I'm not free to take my own life or to sell myself into slavery我无法自由夺去自己的生命 也无法出卖自己成为奴隶
45or to give to somebody else arbitrary absolute power over me.或者把绝对的权力交给别人
46So where does this constraint, you may think it's a fairly minimal constraint,所以,哪里有这种限制, 你可能会认为这是一个相当微小的限制,
47but where does it come from?但从哪里来的?
48Well, Locke tells us where it comes from.洛克告诉我们它从哪里来的
49And he gives two answers.他给出了两个答案。
50Here's the first answer.这是第一个答案。
51For men, being all the workmanship of one omnipotent and infinitely wise maker,对于男人来说,他是一个无能、无穷智慧的创造者,
52namely God, they are his property,即真主,那是他的财产,
53whose workmanship they are made to last during his, not one another's, pleasure.他们的作风是在他的喜悦中 而不是在对方的喜悦中延续下来的
54So one answer to the question is why can't I give up my natural rights所以问题的一个答案是 为什么我不能放弃我的自然权利
55to life, liberty and property is,生命、自由和财产,
56well, they're not strictly speaking yours.严格说来,它们不是你的
57After all, you are the creature of God.毕竟你是上帝的创造者
58God has a bigger property right in us, a prior property right.上帝对我们有更大的财产权利, 一种先前的财产权。
59Now you might say that's an unsatisfying, unconvincing answer,现在你可能说 这是一个不满意, 令人信服的答案,
60at least for those who don't believe in God.至少对不相信上帝的人来说
61What did Locke have to say to them?洛克对他们说了什么?
62Well, here's where Locke appeals to the idea of reason.好吧,这是洛克呼吁理性的想法。
63And this is the idea that if we properly reflect on what it means to be free,这就是这个想法 如果我们正确思考自由的意义
64we will be led to the conclusion that freedom can't just be a matter of doing whatever we want.我们将得出这样的结论: 自由不能只是做我们想做的事
65I think this is what Locke means when he says,我想这是洛克的意思 当他说,
66the state of nature has the law of nature to govern it which obliges everyone.自然的状态有自然法则来支配它,它要求每个人.
67And reason, which is that law, teaches mankind who will but consult it理性,这就是法律, 教人类谁会去咨询它
68that all being equal and independent,人人平等独立,
69no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions.任何人都不应伤害他人的生命、健康、自由或财产。
70This leads to a puzzling paradoxical feature of Locke's account of rights.这导致了洛克对权利的描述中令人费解的矛盾特征.
71Familiar in one sense, but strange in another.一种意义上比较熟悉 但另一种意义上比较奇怪
72It's the idea that our natural rights are unalienable.我们的自然权利不可剥夺
73What does unalienable mean?不可剥夺是什么意思?
74It's not for us to alienate them or to give them up, to give them away, to trade them away, to sell them.岂非我们疏远他们或放弃他们,让出他们,交易他们,卖掉他们.
75Consider an airline ticket.考虑一张机票。
76Airline tickets are non-transferable, or tickets to the Patriots or to the Red Sox.航空公司的机票是不可转让的,或者给爱国者或红袜的机票.
77Non-transferable tickets are unalienable.不可转让车票不可转让.
78I own them in the limited sense that I can use them for myself, but I can't trade them away.有限意义上的我拥有它们,我可以自己使用,但我不能把它们换掉.
79So in one sense, an unalienable right, a non-transferable right,所以从某种意义上说,不可剥夺的权利,不可转让的权利,
80makes something I own less fully mine.使我拥有的东西不那么完全。
81But in another sense of unalienable rights,但在另一个不可剥夺的权利意义上,
82especially where we're thinking about life, liberty and property,尤其是我们想着生活 自由和财产的地方
83for a right to be unalienable makes it more deeply, more profoundly mine.一项不可剥夺的权利使它更深刻、更深刻地属于我。
84And that's Locke's sense of unalienable.这也是洛克不可剥夺的感觉.
85We see it in the American Declaration of Independence.我们在《美国独立宣言》中看到了这一点。
86Thomas Jefferson drew on this idea of Locke.托马斯·杰斐逊借鉴了洛克的这个想法.
87Unalienable rights to life, liberty, and as Jefferson amended Locke, to the pursuit of happiness.生命,自由的不可剥夺的权利,以及随着杰斐逊修正洛克,追求幸福.
88Unalienable rights, rights that are so essentially mine,不可剥夺的权利, 基本上属于我的权利,
89that even I can't trade them away or give them up.连我也不能交换他们 也不能放弃他们
90So these are the rights we have in the state of nature.这就是我们自然界所拥有的权利。
91Before there is any government, in the case of life and liberty,在政府之前,在生命和自由方面,
92I can't take my own life, I can't sell myself into slavery,我不能夺走自己的生命,我不能把自己出卖为奴隶,
93any more than I can take somebody else's life or take someone else's slave by force.我只能夺走别人的性命 或者用武力夺走别人的奴隶
94But how does that work in the case of property?但是,在财产方面,这有什么作用呢?
95Because it's essential to Locke's case that private property can arise even before there is any government.因为对于洛克来说,私人财产甚至在任何政府存在之前都可能出现,这一点至关重要.
96How can there be a right to private property even before there is any government?甚至在政府成立之前,怎么会有私有财产权?
97Locke's famous answer comes in Section 27.洛克的著名答案出现在第27节.
98Every man has a property in his own person.每个人都有自己的财产
99This nobody has any right to but himself.只有他自己才有这个权利
100The labor of his body and the work of his hands, we may say, are properly his.我们可以说,他身体的劳动和手的劳动是适当的。
101So he moves, as the libertarians later would move,所以他动了 自由主义者后来会动
102from the idea that we own ourselves, that we have property in our persons,从我们拥有自己的思想, 我们拥有自己的财产,
103to the closely connected idea that we own our own labor.与我们拥有自己的劳动力这个密切相关的想法。
104And from that to the further claim that whatever we mix our labor with that is unowned becomes our property.从那到进一步宣称,无论我们把劳动与无主劳动混为一谈,都变成了我们的财产.
105Whatever he removes out of the state that nature has provided and left it in,不管他把大自然提供的东西 都从状态中清除出来
106he has mixed his labor with and joined it to something that is his own and thereby makes it his property.他把自己的劳动与他的工作混为一谈,并加入了属于他自己的事物,从而使之成为他的财产。
107Why?为什么?
108Because the labor is the unquestionable property of the laborer.因为劳工是劳工无可置疑的财产.
109And therefore, no one but the laborer can have a right to what is joined to or mixed with his labor.因此,只有工人才有权利参与或与他的劳动混合。
110And then he adds this important provision,然后他又增加了这个重要条款,
111at least where there is enough and is good left in common for others.至少在足够和对他人有好处的地方。
112But we not only acquire a property in the fruits of the earth, in the deer that we hunt, in the fish that we catch,但我们不仅在大地的果实、猎杀的鹿和捕捉的鱼中 获得财产,
113but also if we till and plow and enclose the land and grow potatoes,如果我们能耕田 种土豆
114we own not only the potatoes but the land, the earth.我们不仅拥有马铃薯 而且拥有土地 土地
115As much land as a man tills, plants improves, cultivates, and can use,和男人一样多的土地 植物改良 栽培 可以使用
116the product of so much is his property.如此之多的产物是他的财产。
117He, by his labor, encloses it from the commons.他以他的劳绩,把它从公道中夺取。
118So, the idea that rights are unalienable seems to distance Locke from the libertarian.因此,权利是不可剥夺的观点似乎与洛克与自由主义者有距离.
119The libertarian wants to say we have an absolute property right in ourselves,自由主义者想说 我们拥有绝对的财产权
120and therefore we can do with ourselves whatever we want.因此,我们可以做我们自己想要的。
121Locke is not a sturdy ally for that view.洛克不是那种观点的坚定盟友
122In fact, he says if you take natural rights seriously,事实上,他说如果你认真对待自然权利
123you'll be led to the idea that there are certain constraints on what we can do with our natural rights,你会被引导到一个想法, 有一些限制 我们可以做我们的自然权利,
124constraints given either by God or by reason reflecting on what it means really to be free.由上帝或由理性 来思考自由的意义
125And really to be free means recognizing that our rights are unalienable.真正的自由意味着承认我们的权利是不可剥夺的权利。
126So, here's the difference between Locke and the libertarians,所以,这里的区别 洛克和自由主义者,
127but when it comes to Locke's account of private property,但是关于洛克的私人财产
128he begins to look again like a pretty good ally,他开始看起来像一个很好的盟友,
129because his argument for private property begins with the idea that we are the proprietors of our own person,因为他关于私有财产的争论 始于我们是自己人的主人
130and therefore of our labor, and therefore of the fruits of our labor,我们的劳动, 和我们劳动的果实,
131including not only the things we gather and hunt in the state of nature,不仅包括我们在自然状态下采集和猎杀的东西,
132but also we acquire property right in the land that we enclose and cultivate and improve.也获得我们土地的产权 土地的封存、耕种和改善
133There are some examples that can bring out the moral intuition有些例子可以说明道德的直觉
134that our labor can take something that is unowned and make it ours,我们的劳动可以拿走一些没有所有权的东西 使之成为我们的
135though sometimes there are disputes about this.虽然有时有争议
136There's a debate among rich countries and developing countries富国和发展中国家之间有争论
137about trade-related intellectual property rights.关于与贸易有关的知识产权。
138It came to a head recently over drug patent laws.药用专利法最近引起了人们的注意
139Western countries, and especially the United States, say,西方国家,特别是美国,说:
140that we have a big pharmaceutical industry that develops new drugs.我们有一个大型制药工业 开发新的药物。
141We want all countries in the world to agree to respect the patents.我们希望世界各国同意尊重专利。
142Then there came along the AIDS crisis in South Africa,后来南非的艾滋病危机爆发
143and the American AIDS drugs were hugely expensive,美国的艾滋病药物非常昂贵,
144far more than could be afforded by most Africans.远远超出了大多数非洲人所能提供的范围。
145So the South African government said,所以南非政府说,
146we are going to begin to buy a generic version of the AIDS antiretroviral drug我们将要开始购买艾滋病抗逆转录病毒药物的通用版本
147at a tiny fraction of the cost because we can find an Indian manufacturing company成本的一小部分 因为我们能找到一家印度制造公司
148that figures out how the thing is made and produces it,找出东西是如何制造和产生的,
149and for a tiny fraction of the cost we can save lives if we don't respect that patent.如果我们不尊重专利 我们就能挽救生命
150And then the American government said,然后美国政府说,
151no, here's a company that invested research and created this drug.不,这里的一家公司 投资研究并创造了这种药物。
152You can't just start mass producing these drugs without paying a licensing fee.你不能不付许可证费就开始大规模生产这些药物。
153So there was a dispute,所以发生了争执
154and the pharmaceutical companies sued the South African government制药公司起诉南非政府
155to try to prevent their buying the cheap, generic, as they saw it, pirated version.试图阻止他们购买廉价的,通用的, 他们看到的,盗版。
156Of an AIDS drug.一种艾滋病药物。
157And eventually the pharmaceutical industry gave in and said,最后制药业让步并说,
158all right, you can do that.好吧,你可以做到这一点。
159But this dispute about what the rules of property should be,但关于财产规则应该是什么的争议,
160of intellectual property, of drug patenting,知识产权,药物专利,
161in a way is the last frontier of the state of nature在某种程度上是自然状态的最后一线
162because among nations where there is no uniform law of patent rights and property rights,因为没有关于专利权和财产权的统一法律的国家,
163it's up for grabs until by some act of consent,直到得到某种同意
164some international agreement, people enter into some settled rules.有些国际协议,人们会遵守一些既定的规则。
165What about Locke's account of private property那洛克的私人财产账户呢?
166and how it can arise before government and before law comes on the scene?如何在政府和法律出现之前出现?
167Is it successful?成功了吗?
168How many think it's pretty persuasive?有多少人认为这很有说服力?
169Raise your hand.举手曰.
170How many don't find it persuasive?有多少人觉得没有说服力?
171All right, let's hear from some critics.好吧,让我们听听一些批评者。
172What is wrong with Locke's account of how private property can arise without consent?洛克关于私人财产如何不经同意而产生的说法有什么问题?
173Yes.
174Yeah, I think it justifies European cultural norms as far as,是的,我认为它证明 欧洲文化规范,因为,
175when you look at how Native Americans may not have cultivated American land,当你看着美国原住民 如何没有种植美国土地,
176but by their arrival in the Americas,但随着他们来到美洲
177because that contributed to the development of America,因为这有助于美国的发展,
178which wouldn't have otherwise necessarily happened then or by that specific group.如果不是那样的话,那就不一定发生 或者是那个特定群体干的
179So you think that this is a defense, this defense of private property in land.所以你认为这是对土地私有财产的辩护
180Yes, because it complicates original acquisition是的,因为它使原始购置变得复杂
181if you only cite the arrival of foreigners that cultivated the land.如果你只引用 外国人的到来 耕种土地。
182I see.原来如此
183And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
184Rochelle.罗谢尔
185Rochelle?罗谢尔?
186Yeah.
187Rochelle says this account of how property arisesRochelle说这是财产的产生方式
188would fit what was going on in North America和北美发生的事情相符
189during the time of the European settlement.在欧洲定居期间。
190Do you think, Rochelle, that it's a way of defending the appropriation of the land?罗谢尔,你觉得这是为土地的占有辩护吗?
191Indeed, because he's also justifying the Glorious Revolution,事实上 因为他也为光荣革命辩护
192so I don't think it's inconceivable that he's also justifying colonization as well.所以我不认为他也为殖民辩护是不可思议的。
193Well, it's an interesting historical suggestion,这是一个有趣的历史建议,
194and I think there's a lot to be said for it.我觉得有很多话要说
195What do you think of the validity of his argument, though?你觉得他的论点有效吗?
196Because if you're right that this would justify the taking of land in North America因为如果你是对的,这样就可以在北美夺取土地
197from Native Americans who didn't enclose it,从美洲原住民那里拿来的,他们没有带
198if it's a good argument, then Locke's given us a justification for that.如果这是个好理由 那洛克给我们一个理由
199If it's a bad argument, then Locke's given us a mere rationalization如果这是个糟糕的争论,那么洛克给了我们一个简单的合理化
200that isn't morally defensible.这在道德上是不合理的。
201I'm leaning to the second one, but that's my opinion as well.我倾向于第二个,但这也是我的看法。
202All right.好吧,我们走。
203Well, then let's hear if there's a defender of Locke's account of private property,那让我们听听洛克的私人财产账户是否有维护者
204and it would be interesting if they could address Rochelle's worry如果他们能解决罗谢尔的忧虑 那会很有趣
205that this is just a way of defending the appropriation of land这只是一种捍卫土地占有的方法
206by the American colonists from the Native Americans who didn't enclose it.由来自美洲原住民的 殖民者,他们没有把它。
207Is there someone who will defend Locke on that point?有没有人会为此为洛克辩护?
208Are you going to defend Locke?你要为洛克辩护吗?
209You're accusing him of justifying the European basically massacre of the Native Americans,你指控他为欧洲屠杀美洲原住民 辩护
210but who says he's defending it?但谁说他在捍卫它?
211Maybe the European colonization isn't right.也许欧洲殖民是不对的
212Maybe it's the state of war that he talked about in his second treatise.也许是他在第二部论文中谈到的战争状态.
213So the wars between the Native Americans and the colonists, the settlers,美洲原住民和殖民者 定居者之间的战争
214that might have been the state of war that we can only emerge from我们只能从战争状态中走出
215by an agreement or an act of consent, and that's what would have been required.根据协议或同意行为, 这就是需要的。
216Yeah, and both sides would have had to agree to it and carry it out and everything.是啊,双方都必须同意 并执行它和一切。
217But what about, and what's your name?但是,关于什么,你叫什么名字?
218Dan.丹语.
219But Dan, what about, Rochelle says this argument in Section 27 and then in 32但丹,关于什么,罗谢尔说这个论点 在27节,然后在32节
220about appropriating land, that argument, if it's valid,关于侵占土地, 如果它是正确的,
221would justify the settlers appropriating that land and excluding others from it.让定居者有理由侵占这块土地,将其他人排除在外。
222You think that argument's a good argument?你觉得这种争论很好吗?
223Well, doesn't it kind of imply that the Native Americans hadn't already done that?难道这不意味着 美洲原住民还没有这样做吗?
224Well, the Native Americans as hunter-gatherers didn't actually enclose land,美洲原住民作为猎人采集者 并没有真正封存土地
225so I think Rochelle is onto something there.所以,我认为罗谢尔 发现的东西在那里。
226But I want to, I'd like to, go ahead, Dan.但我想,我想,继续,丹。
227At the same time, he's saying that just by picking an acorn or taking an apple与此同时,他说,只是通过 摘下橡子或苹果
228or maybe killing a buffalo on a certain amount of land,或者在一定的土地上杀死水牛
229that makes it yours because it's your labor and that's, you know,因为它是你的劳动,你知道,
230your labor would enclose that land.你的劳动会吞噬那块土地
231So by that definition, maybe they didn't have fences around little plots of land but didn't...因此,根据这个定义,也许他们没有围在小块土地周围的栅栏,但是没有...
232They were using it.他们用它。
233Yeah, by Locke's definition.是的,根据洛克的定义。
234So maybe by Locke's definition, the Native Americans could have claimed the property right,所以也许根据洛克的定义 美洲原住民可以要求财产权
235in the land itself.在土地本身。
236But they just didn't have Locke on their side, as she points out.但他们只是没有洛克站在他们一边,正如她所指出的.
237Okay, that's good.好吧,这是很好的。
238One more defender of Locke.洛克的一位卫士
239Go ahead.来吧。
240Well, I mean, just defend Locke.嗯,我的意思是,只是为洛克辩护。
241He does say that there are some times in which you can't take another person's land.他确实说过,有时你不能夺走别人的土地。
242For example, you can't acquire land that is common property.例如,你不能获取作为共同财产的土地.
243See, people in terms of American Indians,看,从美国印第安人的角度来说,
244I feel like they already had civilizations themselves and they were using land in common.我觉得他们已经有文明了 他们正在使用共同的土地
245So it's kind of like an analogy to what he was talking about所以,这有点像一个类比 他所说的
246with like the common English property.和普通的英国财产一样
247You can't take land that everybody's sharing common.你不能夺走大家共享的土地
248Oh, that's interesting.哦,这很有趣。
249And also you can't take land unless you make sure that there's as much land as possible left也不能占地,除非你确保有尽可能多的土地
250for other people to take as well.其他人也一样。
251So if you're taking common...所以,如果你采取共同点...
252So you have to make sure that whenever you take land所以,你一定要确保 当你取得土地
253or that there's enough left for other people to use.或者说已经足够其他人使用。
254That's just as good as the land that you took.这和你夺走的土地一样好
255That's...这是...
256It's true.这是真的。
257Locke says there has to be this right to private property in the earth洛克说地球上必须有私有财产的权利
258is subject to the provision that there be as much and as good left for others.须遵守规定,即为他人留有同样多和同样多的剩余时间。
259What's your name?你叫什么来着?
260Right.
261I'm Feng.我叫冯
262So Feng in a way agrees with Dan that maybe there is a claim within Locke's framework所以冯从某种程度上同意丹的观点,也许洛克框架内有说法.
263that could be developed on behalf of the Native Americans.可以代表美国原住民发展
264Here's the further question.更问曰.
265If the right to private property is natural, not conventional,如果私有财产权是自然的,而不是常规的,
266if it's something that we acquire even before we agree to government,如果这是我们在同意政府之前 获得的东西
267how does that right constrain what a legitimate government can do?这个权利如何限制一个合法政府能做什么?
268In order finally to see whether Locke is an ally为了看洛克是不是盟友
269or potentially a critic of the libertarian idea of the state,也可能是国家自由主义思想的批评者,
270we have to ask what becomes of our natural rights once we enter into society.我们必须问,一旦我们进入社会,我们的自然权利将如何。
271We know that the way we enter into society is by consent, by agreement.我们知道,我们进入社会的方式是通过同意和协议。
272To lead the state of nature and to be governed by the majority领导自然状态,受多数人支配
273and by a system of laws, human laws.和通过一套法律、人文法律。
274But those human laws are only legitimate if they respect our natural rights,但是,这些人权法律只有尊重我们的自然权利才是合法的,
275if they respect our unalienable rights to life, liberty and property.如果他们尊重我们不可剥夺的生命、自由和财产权利。
276No parliament, no legislature,没有议会,没有立法机构,
277however democratic its credentials can legitimately violate our natural rights.无论它的资质多么民主,都可以合法地侵犯我们的自然权利。
278This idea that no law can violate our right to life, liberty and property认为任何法律都不能侵犯我们的生命权、自由和财产权的想法
279would seem to support the idea of a government so limited似乎支持这样一个政府的想法:
280that it would gladden the heart of the libertarian after all.它会高兴的 自由主义者的心脏毕竟。
281But those hearts should not be so quickly gladdened但那些心不应该这么快高兴
282because even though for Locke the law of nature persists once government arrives,因为即使对洛克来说,一旦政府到来,自然法则就一直存在,
283even though Locke insists on limited government,尽管洛克坚持有限政府,
284government limited by the end for which it was created,以创立政府的目的为限,
285namely the preservation of property,即保护财产,
286even so there's an important sense in which what counts as my property即便如此 也有一种重要的意义 那就是什么才是我的财产
287what counts as respecting my life and liberty are for the government to define.重要的是尊重我的生命和自由 由政府来定义
288That there be property, that there be respect for life and liberty is what limits government.有财产,尊重生命和自由是限制政府的因素。
289But what counts as respecting my life and respecting my property但重要的是尊重我的生命 尊重我的财产
290that is for governments to decide and to define.由各国政府决定和界定。
291How can that be?怎么会这样?
292Is Locke contradicting himself or is there an important distinction here?洛克是自相矛盾,还是在这里有重要的区别?
293In order to answer that question which will decide Locke's fit with the libertarian view,为了回答那个决定洛克 与自由主义观点相符的问题
294we need to look closely at what legitimate government looks like for Locke我们需要仔细观察洛克的合法政府是什么样子
295and we turn to that next time.下次再谈这个
296Nikolai, if you didn't think you'd get caught, would you pay your taxes?尼古拉,如果你不认为你会被抓到 你会交税吗?
297I have a system personally that I could give money to exactly those sections of the government that I support我个人有一个系统,我可以给钱 恰恰那些政府部门 我支持
298and not just blanket support everything.不只是毛毯支撑一切。
299You'd rather be in the state of nature at least on April 15th.你宁愿在4月15日进入自然状态.
300Last time we began to discuss Locke's state of nature,上次我们开始讨论洛克的自然状态
301his account of private property, his theory of legitimate government他对私人财产的叙述 他的合法政府理论
302which is government based on consent and also limited government.这是基于同意的政府 以及有限的政府。
303Locke believes in certain fundamental rights that constrain what government can do洛克相信某些基本权利 限制政府能做什么
304and he believes that those rights are natural rights, not rights that flow from law or from government.他认为,这些权利是自然权利,而不是来自法律或政府的权利。
305And so Locke's great philosophical experiment is to see if he can give an account所以洛克的伟大的哲学实验 就是看看他能不能说出
306of how there could be a right to private property without consent如何不经同意而享有私有财产权
307before government and legislators arrive on the scene to define property.在政府和立法者到达现场界定财产之前。
308That's his question, that's his claim.这是他的问题,这是他的主张。
309There is a way, Locke argues, to create property not just in the things we gather and hunt洛克认为,有办法创造财产 不只是我们收集的猎物
310but in the land itself, provided there is enough and is good luck for others.但是,在土地本身,只要有足够的,并为他人带来好运。
311Today I want to turn to the question of consent which is Locke's second big idea.今天我想谈谈同意问题,这是洛克的第二个大主意。
312Private property is one, consent is the other.私有财产为一,同意为二.
313What is the work of consent?同意有什么作用?
314People here have been invoking the idea of consent since we began, since the first week.自从我们开始,从第一个星期开始,这里的人们就一直在援引同意的想法。
315You remember when we were talking about pushing the fat man off the bridge,你还记得我们在谈论 把胖子推下桥的时候吗?
316you remember someone said, but he didn't agree to sacrifice himself.你记得有人说过 但他不同意牺牲自己
317It would be different if he consented.如果他同意,那会不同。
318Or when we were talking about the cabin boy, killing and eating the cabin boy.或者当我们谈论小屋男孩, 杀死和吃小屋男孩。
319Some people said, well, if they had consented to a lottery it would be different, then it would be alright.一些人说,如果同意彩票,那就不一样了,那就没事了。
320So consent has come up a lot and here in John Locke we have one of the great philosophers of consent.所以同意已经产生了很多, 在约翰洛克,我们有一个伟大的哲学家同意。
321Consent is an obvious familiar idea in moral and political philosophy.同意是道德和政治哲学中显然熟悉的想法。
322Locke says that legitimate government is government founded on consent and who nowadays would disagree with them.洛克说合法政府是建立在同意基础上的政府,
323Sometimes when the ideas of political philosophers are as familiar as Locke's ideas about consent,有时当政治哲学家的想法和洛克关于同意的想法一样熟悉时,
324it's hard to make sense of them or at least to find them very interesting.很难理解他们 或者至少发现他们非常有趣
325But there are some puzzles, some strange features of Locke's account of consent as the basis of legitimate government.但有一些谜题,一些奇怪的特征是洛克关于同意的说法是合法政府的基础.
326And that's what I'd like to take up today.而今欲举此.
327One way of testing the plausibility of Locke's idea of consent and also probing some of its perplexities一种检验洛克同意的想法是否合理的方法 也检验它的一些疑惑
328is to ask just what a legitimate government founded on consent can do.而是问一个建立在同意基础上的合法政府能做什么。
329What are its powers according to Locke?洛克认为它的威力是什么?
330Well, in order to answer that question it helps to remember what the state of nature is like.为了回答这个问题 它有助于记住大自然的状态
331Remember the state of nature is the condition that we decide to leave and that's what gives rise to consent.记住大自然的状态是我们决定离开的条件,而这正是引起同意的条件.
332Why not stay there?为什么不呆在那里?
333Why bother with government at all?为什么要烦政府?
334Well, what's Locke's answer to that question?那么,洛克的答案是什么?
335He says there are some inconveniences in the state of nature, but what are those inconveniences?他说自然界有些不便,但有什么不便?
336The main inconvenience is that everyone can enforce the law of nature.主要的不便在于每个人都可以执行自然法则.
337Everyone is an enforcer or what Locke calls the executor of the state of nature.每个人都是执行者 或者洛克所说的自然状态的执行者
338And he means executor literally.他的意思是执行者
339If someone violates the law of nature, he's an aggressor, he's beyond reason, and you can punish him.如果有人违反自然法则,他是一个侵略者,他是没有理智的,你可以惩罚他.
340And you don't have to be too careful or fine about gradations of punishment in the state of nature.而自然状态下的处罚等级,也不必过于谨慎或罚款.
341You can kill him.你可以杀了他。
342You can certainly kill someone who comes after you, tries to murder you.你当然可以杀死一个追杀你的人 试图谋杀你
343That's self-defense.这是自卫
344But the enforcement power, the right to punish, everyone can do the punishing in the state of nature.但执法权,惩罚权,每个人都可以在自然状态下进行惩罚.
345And not only can you punish with death people who come after you, seeking to take your life,你不仅能惩罚那些追杀你 想要夺走你生命的人
346you can also punish a thief who tries to steal your goods.你也可以惩罚一个偷你东西的小偷
347Because that also counts as aggression against the law of nature.因为这也构成对自然法则的侵犯。
348If someone has stolen from a third party, you can go after him.如果有人偷了第三方的东西 你可以去追他
349Why is this?为什么?
350Well, violations of the law of nature are an act of aggression.违反自然法则是侵略行为
351There is no police force.没有警察部队。
352There are no judges, no juries.没有法官 没有陪审团
353So everyone is the judge in his or her own case.所以每个人都是自己案件的法官。
354And Locke observes that when people are the judges of their own cases, they tend to get carried away.而洛克观察到,当人们成为自己案件的裁判时,他们往往会变得心烦意乱.
355And this gives rise to the inconvenience in the state of nature.这引起了自然状态的不便.
356People overshoot the mark.人射过目标
357There's aggression.有侵犯.
358There's punishment.有罚.
359And before you know it, everybody is insecure in the enjoyment of his or her unalienable rights to life, liberty and property.在你们知道之前,每个人都在享受其不可剥夺的生命、自由和财产权利方面不安全。
360Now he describes in pretty harsh and even grim terms what you can do to people who violate the law of nature.现在他用非常严酷,甚至严酷的语气,描述你能对违反自然法则的人做些什么.
361One may destroy a man who makes war upon him for the same reason that he may kill a wolf or a lion.人们可以摧毁一个为杀死狼或狮子而对他开战的人.
362Such men have no other rule but that of force and violence.这些人除了武力和暴力之外没有其他规则。
363Listen to this.听这个。
364And so may be treated as beasts of prey, those dangerous and noxious creatures that will be sure to destroy you if you fall into their power.也可能会被当成猎物的野兽 那些危险和有毒的生物 如果你落入他们的魔掌 一定会毁灭你
365So kill them first.先杀了他们
366So what starts out as a seemingly benign state of nature where everyone's free and yet where there is a law and the law respects people's rights因此,什么是 似乎良性 自然状态, 每个人的自由, 但有法律 和法律尊重人民的权利
367and those rights are so powerful that they're unalienable.这些权利是如此的强大,以至于不可剥夺。
368What starts out looking very benign once you look closer is pretty fierce and filled with violence.一旦你看起来更近 就会变得非常善良 并且充满暴力
369And that's why people want to leave.故众生欲离.
370How do they leave?他们怎么走?
371Well, here's where consent comes in.同意书在这里
372The only way to escape from the state of nature is to undertake an act of consent where you agree to give up the enforcement power逃避自然状态的唯一办法 就是同意放弃执行权
373and to create a government or a community where there will be a legislature to make law* 建立一个政府或社区,由立法机构制定法律;
374and where everyone agrees in advance, everyone who enters, agrees in advance to abide by whatever the majority decides.在每个人都事先同意的情况下,进入的每个人都事先同意遵守多数人的决定。
375But then the question, and this is our question and here's where I want to get your views,但问题是,这是我们的问题 我想在这里得到你的看法,
376then the question is what powers, what can the majority decide?那么问题是,什么是权力,什么是多数能决定?
377Now here it gets tricky for Locke because you remember alongside the whole story about consent and majority rule,这对洛克来说很棘手 因为你记得关于同意和多数人规则的全说
378there are these natural rights, the law of nature, these unalienable rights.有这些自然权利,自然法则,这些不可剥夺的权利.
379And you remember they don't disappear when people join together to create a civil society.你还记得当人们联手创建公民社会时 他们不会消失的
380So even once the majority is in charge, the majority can't violate your inalienable rights,因此,即使多数人当权,多数人也不能侵犯你不可剥夺的权利,
381can't violate your fundamental right to life, liberty and property.不能侵犯你的基本生命、自由和财产权利。
382So here's the puzzle.这就是谜题。
383How much power does the majority have?多数人有多少权力?
384How limited is the government created by consent?经同意成立的政府有多么有限?
385It's limited by the obligation on the part of the majority to respect它受到多数人尊重的义务的限制
386and to enforce the fundamental natural rights of the citizens.并落实公民的基本自然权利。
387They don't give those up, we don't give those up when we enter government.他们不放弃这些,我们进入政府时不放弃这些.
388That's this powerful idea taken over from Locke by Jefferson in the declaration.这就是Jefferson在宣言中从洛克手中接管的强大想法.
389Unalienable rights.不可剥夺的权利。
390So let's go to our two cases.因此,让我们去我们的两个案件。
391Remember Michael Jordan, Bill Gates, the libertarian objection to taxation for redistribution?记得迈克尔・乔丹,比尔・盖茨, 自由主义者反对税收 重新分配?
392Well, what about Locke's limited government?那洛克的有限政府怎么办?
393Is there anyone who thinks that Locke does give grounds for opposing taxation for redistribution?是否有人认为洛克确实为反对再分配征税提供了理由?
394Anybody?有人吗?
395Go ahead.来吧。
396If the majority rules that there should be taxation,如果多数人裁定应征税,
397even if the minority should still not have to be taxed because that's taking away property,即使少数人仍不必纳税 因为那会夺走财产
398which is one of the rights of nature.这是自然的权利之一。
399Alright, so, and what's your name?好吧,那么,你叫什么来着?
400Ben.宾.
401So if the majority taxes the minority without the consent of the minority to that particular tax law,因此,如果多数人未经少数人同意而向该少数人征税,那么,
402it does amount to a taking of their property without their consent这确实等于未经他们同意而夺走他们的财产。
403and it would seem that Locke should object to that.洛克似乎应该反对
404Do you want some textual support for your view, for your reading of Locke, Ben?你想从文字上支持你的观点吗?
405Alright.还好
406I brought some along just in case you raised it.我带来了一些 以防你提起来
407If you have your texts, look at passage 138.如果你有短信,请看138段。
408The supreme power by which Locke means the legislature cannot take from any man any part of his property洛克的最高权力意味着立法机构不能从任何人手中夺走他财产的任何部分
409without his own consent for the preservation of property being the end of government在未经本人同意的情况下,保护财产是政府的终结;
410and that for which men enter into society, it necessarily supposes and requires that people should have property.以及男人进入社会,它必然设想和要求人们应该拥有财产。
411That was the whole reason for entering society in the first place, to protect the right to property.这就是首先进入社会保护财产权的整个原因。
412And when Locke speaks about the right to property, he often uses that as a kind of global term for the whole category,当洛克谈到财产权时 他经常用它作为整个范畴的全球术语
413the right to life, liberty and property.生命权、自由和财产权。
414So that part of Locke, that beginning of 138, seems to support Ben's reading.所以洛克的部分,即138开头,似乎支持本的阅读.
415But what about the part of 138, if you keep reading?如果你继续读的话,那138的那部分呢?
416Men therefore in society having property, they have such a right to the goods which by the law of the community are theirs.因此,在社会中,男人拥有财产,因此他们有权获得社区法律规定属于他们的财产。
417Look at this.看看这个。
418And that no one can take from them without their consent.未经他们同意,任何人不得夺走他们的财产。
419And then at the end of this passage he says,然后,在这个段落的结尾,他说,
420so it's a mistake to think that the legislative power can do what it will因此,认为立法权可以做它会做的是一个错误
421and dispose of the estates of the subject arbitrarily or take any part of them at pleasure.任意处置主体的遗产或随意占有其中任何一部分。
422Here's what's elusive.这是难以捉摸的
423On the one hand he says, the government can't take your property without your consent.一方面,他说,政府不能抢走你的财产 没有你的同意。
424He's clear about that.他很清楚这一点。
425But then he goes on to say, and that's the natural right to property,但是他接着说 这就是财产权
426but then it seems that property, what counts as property, is not natural but conventional, defined by the government.但是,财产, 重要的财产, 并不是自然的,而是传统的, 由政府定义。
427The goods which by the law of the community are theirs.根据社区法律属于他们的商品。
428And the plot thickens if you look ahead to section 140.如果你往前看140节 情节就会变厚
429In 140 he says, governments can't be supported without great charge.在140年,他说,没有伟大的指控,政府不能得到支持.
430Government is expensive.政府费用昂贵。
431And it's fit that everyone who enjoys his share of the protection should pay out of his estate.每一个享受他那份保护的人 都应该从他的庄园里付出代价
432And then here's the crucial line.接下来是关键线。
433But still it must be with his own consent, i.e.但还是得征得他本人的同意
434the consent of the majority,多数同意,
435giving it either by themselves or through their representatives.由自己或通过其代表给予。
436So what is Locke actually saying?洛克到底在说什么?
437Property is natural in one sense but conventional in another.财产在某种意义上是自然的,但在另一种意义上是传统的。
438It's natural in the sense that we have a fundamental unalienable right,从我们拥有不可剥夺的基本权利的意义上讲,这是自然的,
439that there be property, that the institution of property exist and be respected by the government.财产的存在和政府的尊重。
440So an arbitrary taking of property would be a violation of the law of nature and would be illegitimate.因此,任意夺取财产将违反自然法则,并且是非法的。
441But it's a further question.却再问.
442Here's the conventional aspect of property.这是财产的传统方面。
443It's a further question what counts as property, how it's defined and what counts as taking property.还有一个问题,什么是财产,什么是财产,什么是财产的定义,什么是夺取财产。
444And that's up to the government.这得由政府决定
445So the consent, here we're coming back to our question, what is the work of consent?所以,同意,这里我们回到我们的问题, 什么是同意的工作?
446What it takes for taxation to be legitimate is that it be by consent,税收必须经同意才能合法,
447not the consent of Bill Gates himself if he's the one who has to pay the tax,不是比尔·盖茨本人同意的 如果他是必须交税的人
448but by the consent that he and we, all of us within the society, gave但经他和我们社会所有人同意
449when we emerged from the state of nature and created the government.当我们从自然状态中崛起 并创建了政府。
450In the first place, it's the collective consent.首先,这是集体同意。
451And by that reading, it looks like consent is doing a whole lot读起来 似乎同意是大功告成了
452and the limited government consent creates isn't all that limited.而有限的政府同意 并不是所有的有限。
453Does anyone want to respond to that or have a question about?有没有人想回答这个问题或提出问题?
454Go ahead, stand up.来吧,站起来。
455I'm just wondering what Locke's view is on once you have a government that's already in place,我只是想知道洛克的观点是什么 一旦你有一个政府已经成立,
456whether it is possible for people who are born into that government出生于该政府的人是否可以
457to then leave and return to the state of nature.然后离开,回到自然状态
458I don't think that Locke mentioned that at all.我觉得洛克根本没提过
459What do you think?你觉得呢?
460Well, I think as the convention, it would be very difficult to leave the government我觉得作为大会 离开政府会很困难
461because you are no longer, because nobody else is just living in the state of nature,因为你不再是了 因为没有其他人只是生活在自然状态中
462everybody else is now governed by this legislature.其他人现在都由这个立法机构管理。
463What would it mean today, you're asking, and what's your name?今何谓,汝问之,何谓?
464Nicola.尼可拉 尼可拉 尼可拉
465Suppose you wanted to leave civil society today.假设你今天想离开公民社会
466You want to withdraw your consent and return to the state of nature.你想收回你的同意 回到自然状态
467Well, because you didn't actually consent to it, you were just born into it.嗯,因为你实际上没有同意它, 你只是出生在它。
468It was your ancestors who joined.是你祖先加入我们的
469Right.
470You didn't sign the social contract.你没有签署社会契约。
471I didn't sign it.我没有签
472Exactly.没错
473All right.好吧,我们走。
474So what does Locke say there?洛克怎么说?
475Yeah.
476I don't think Locke says that you have to sign anything.我不认为洛克说 你必须签署任何事情。
477I think that he says that it's kind of implied consent.我认为他说这是暗示同意
478By leaving and taking government services, you are implying that you are consenting to the government taking things from you.你离开和接受政府服务 意味着你同意政府拿走你的东西
479All right.好吧,我们走。
480So implied consent, that's a partial answer to this challenge.因此暗示同意,这是这个挑战的部分答案.
481Now, you may not think that implied consent is as good as the real thing.现在,你可能不认为 暗示同意是 与真实的一样好。
482Is that what you're shaking your head about, Nicola?这就是你摇头的原因吗,尼古拉?
483Speak up.说吧
484Stand up and speak up.起身说话.
485I don't think that necessarily just by utilizing the government's, you know, various resources that we are necessarily implying that we agree with the way that this government was formed or that we have consented to actually join into the social contract.我并不认为光是利用政府的各种资源, 我们必然意味着我们同意政府的组成方式, 或者同意加入社会契约。
486So you don't think the idea of implied consent is strong enough to generate any obligation at all to obey the government?所以,你不认为 暗示同意的想法 足够强大 产生任何义务 服从政府?
487Not necessarily, no.不一定,没有。
488Nicola, if you didn't think you'd get caught, would you pay your taxes?尼可拉,如果你没想到你会被抓 你会交税吗?
489I would rather have a system personally that I would that I could give money to exactly those sections of the government that I support and not just blanket support.我个人更希望有一套制度, 我可以给那些我支持的政府部门钱,
490You'd rather be in the state of nature, at least on April 15th.你宁愿进入自然状态 至少是在4月15日
491But what I'm trying to get at is, do you consider that you're under no obligation since you haven't actually entered into any act of consent?但是,我想得到的是,你是否认为 你没有义务 因为你没有真正达成任何同意行为?
492But for prudential reasons, you do what you're supposed to do according to the law.但出于谨慎之故,依律行其应.
493Exactly.没错
494If you look at it that way, then you're violating another one of Locke's treatises, which is that you can't take anything from anyone else.如果你这样看,那么你就违反了洛克的另外一本论文,那就是你不能从别人那里夺走任何东西.
495Like, you can't take the government services and then not give them anything in return.喜欢,你不能接受 政府部门,然后不给他们什么 作为回报。
496If you want to go live in the state of nature, that's fine, but you can't take anything for the government because by the government's terms,如果你想在自然状态下生活,那很好, 但你不能为政府拿任何东西 因为根据政府的规定,
497which are the only terms under which you can enter the agreement, say that you have to pay taxes to take those things.这是你唯一可以签订协议的条件, 说,你必须交税才能拿这些东西。
498So you're saying that Nicola can go back into the state of nature if she wants to, but she can't drive on Mass Ave.所以,你是说,尼古拉可以回到自然状态 如果她想要, 但她不能开车在弥撒Ave。
499Exactly.没错
500I want to raise the stakes beyond using Mass Ave and even beyond taxation.我想提高赌注 超越使用大众Ave 甚至超越税收。
501What about life?生活怎么办?
502What about military conscription?征兵怎么样?
503Yes.
504What do you say?你说什么?
505Stand up.站起来
506First of all, we have to remember that sending people to war is not necessarily implying that they'll die.首先,我们必须记住,送人参战并不一定意味着他们会死.
507I mean, obviously, you're not raising their chances here, but it's not a death penalty.我的意思是,很明显,你没有增加 他们的机会在这里, 但这不是死刑。
508So if you're going to discuss whether or not military conscriptions is equivalent to, you know, suppressing people right to life, you shouldn't approach it that way.所以,如果你要讨论 征兵是否相当于, 你知道, 压制人们的生命权, 你不应该这样做。
509Secondly, the real problem here is Locke has this view about consent and natural rights, but you're not allowed to give up your natural rights either.其次,这里真正的问题是洛克对同意和自然权利有这种观点,但是你也不能放弃自己的自然权利.
510So the real question is, you know, how does he himself figure it out between I agree to give up my life,所以,真正的问题是,你知道, 他如何自己想出 我同意放弃我的生活,
511give up my property when he talks about taxes or military conscription for the fact, but I guess Locke would be against suicide.放弃我的财产 当他谈论税收 或者征兵的事实, 但我猜洛克会反对自杀。
512And that's still, you know, my own consent.这也是我本人同意的
513I agree.и種
514Good.不错
515All right.好吧,我们走。
516What's your name?你叫什么来着?
517Eric.爱瑞克
518So Eric brings us back to the puzzle we've been wrestling with since we started reading Locke.Eric让我们回到了 我们从读洛克书开始就一直在玩的谜题。
519On the one hand, we have these unalienable rights to life, liberty and property, which means that even we don't have the power to give them up.一方面,我们拥有这些不可剥夺的生命,自由和财产权利,这意味着即使我们没有权力放弃这些权利.
520And that's what creates the limits on legitimate government.这也是对合法政府的限制。
521It's not what we consent to that limits government.这不是我们同意的 限制政府。
522It's what we lack the power to give away when we consent that limits government.这就是我们缺乏权力 放弃当我们同意 限制政府。
523That's the that's the point at the heart of Locke's whole account of legitimate government.这就是洛克整个合法政府说法的核心.
524But now you say, well, if we can't give up our own life, if we can't commit suicide, if we can't give up our right to property,但现在你说,如果我们不能放弃我们自己的生命, 如果我们不能自杀,如果我们不能放弃我们的财产权利,
525how can we then agree to be bound by a majority that will force us to sacrifice our lives or give up our property?那么,我们如何能够同意受多数人的约束,迫使我们牺牲生命或放弃财产?
526Does Locke have a way out of this?洛克有办法吗?
527Or is he basically sanctioning an all-powerful government despite everything he says about unalienable rights?或者他基本上是在制裁一个全能的政府,尽管他谈到不可剥夺的权利。
528Does he have a way out?他有出路吗?
529Who would speak here in defense of Locke or make sense, find a way out of this predicament?谁会在这里为洛克辩护 或者说有道理 想办法摆脱这种困境?
530All right, go ahead.好吧,继续。
531I feel like there's a general distinction we've made between the right to life that individuals possess and the and the fact that a government cannot take away a single individual's right to life.我觉得我们对个人拥有的生命权和政府不能剥夺一个人的生命权之间有一般性的区别.
532I think if you look at conscription as the government picking out certain individuals to go fight in war, then that would be a violation of their rights, their natural right to life.我认为,如果你把征兵看成是政府挑选某些人去打仗,那么这将侵犯他们的权利,他们的自然生命权。
533On the other hand, if you have conscription, let's say a lottery, for example, then in that case, I would view that as the population picking their representatives to defend them in the case of war.另一方面,如果你有征兵,比如说彩票,那么在这种情况下,我就会认为,当人们挑选他们的代表来保卫他们在战争的情况下。
534The idea being that since the whole population cannot go out there to defend its own right to property, it picks its own representatives through a process that's essentially random.其理念是,由于全体居民不能到那里去捍卫自己的财产权,所以它通过基本上是随机的过程来选择自己的代表.
535And then these these sort of elected representatives go out and fight for the rights of the people.然后这些选举出来的代表 出来争取人民的权利。
536It works very similar.它的工作非常类似。
537It works just like an elected government, in my opinion.我认为,这就像民选政府一样。
538All right, so an elected government can conscript citizens to go out and defend the way of life, the community that makes the enjoyment of rights possible?好吧,这样一个民选政府 可以征召公民 出去捍卫生活方式, 社区 使享受权利成为可能?
539I think I think it can, because to me it seems that it's very similar to the process of electing representatives to legislature.我认为这是可以的,因为对我来说,它似乎与选举立法机构代表的过程非常相似.
540Although here it's as if the government is electing by conscription certain citizens to go die for the sake of the whole.虽然这里似乎政府正通过征兵来选择某些公民去死,
541Is that consistent with respect for a natural right to liberty?这是否与尊重自由的自然权利相一致?
542Well, what I would say there is there's a distinction between picking out individuals and having a random choice of individuals.我想说的是 挑出个人和随机选择个人是有区别的
543Between picking out, let me make sure, between picking out individuals.在挑人之间,让我确定, 在挑人之间。
544What's your name?你叫什么来着?
545Gokul.高库尔.
546Gokul says there's a difference between picking out individuals to lay down their lives and having a general law.戈库尔说,挑出个人来放下自己的生命,与拥有一般法律是有区别的.
547I think this is the answer Locke would give, actually.我认为这是洛克会给出的答案
548Locke is against arbitrary government.洛克反对专制政府
549He's against the arbitrary taking, the singling out of Bill Gates to finance the war in Iraq.他反对任意夺取,独唱比尔·盖茨资助伊拉克战争.
550He's against singling out a particular citizen or group of people to go off and fight.他反对单独挑一个特定的公民或一群人去战斗.
551But if there's a general law such that the government's choice, the majority's action is non-arbitrary,但是,如果有一条一般的法律 这样政府的选择, 多数的行动是非任意的,
552it doesn't really amount to a violation of people's basic rights.这实际上并不等于侵犯人们的基本权利。
553What does count as a violation is an arbitrary taking because that would essentially say not only to Bill Gates but to everyone.构成违反的行为是任意的,因为这将不仅对比尔·盖茨,而且对每一个人都意味着。
554There is no rule of law.没有法治。
555There is no institution of property because at the whim of the king or for that matter of the parliament,没有任何财产制度,因为国王或议会的任意行为,
556we can name you or you to give up your property or to give up your life.我们可以给你起名 让你放弃你的财产 或者放弃你的生命
557But so long as there is a non-arbitrary rule of law, then it's permissible.但是只要有非任意的法治,那么是允许的.
558Now you may say this doesn't amount to a very limited government.现在你可以说这不等于 一个非常有限的政府。
559And the libertarian may complain that Locke is not such a terrific ally after all.而自由主义者可能会抱怨洛克毕竟不是那么伟大的盟友.
560The libertarian has two grounds for disappointment in Locke.自由主义者在洛克有两个失望的理由.
561First, that the rights are unalienable and therefore I don't really own myself after all.第一,权利不可剥夺,因此我毕竟并不真正拥有自己。
562I can't dispose of my life or my liberty or my property in a way that violates my rights.我不能以侵犯我权利的方式 处置我的生命 自由和财产
563That's disappointment number one.这是失望的第一。
564Disappointment number two, once there is a legitimate government based on consent,失望的第二, 一旦有一个合法政府 基于同意,
565the only limits for Locke are limits on arbitrary takings of life or of liberty or of property.对洛克的唯一限制是对任意夺取生命、自由或财产的限制。
566But if the majority decides, if the majority promulgates a generally applicable law但如果多数人决定,如果多数人颁布普遍适用的法律
567and if it votes duly according to fair procedures, then there is no violation,如果它按照公正程序进行投票,那么不存在违反规定的情况,
568whether it's a system of taxation or a system of conscription.无论是税收制度还是征兵制度。
569So it's clear that Locke is worried about the absolute arbitrary power of kings,所以很明显洛克对国王的绝对专断权力感到担忧,
570but it's also true, and here's the darker side of Locke,但这也是事实 洛克最黑暗的一面
571that this great theorist of consent came up with a theory of private property that didn't require consent,这个伟大的同意论者 提出一个私人财产理论 不需要同意,
572that may, and this goes back to the point Rochelle made last time,这也许, 这回回到罗谢尔上次说的,
573may have had something to do with Locke's second concern, which was America.可能和洛克的第二个关切有关 也就是美国
574You remember when he talks about the state of nature, he's not talking about an imaginary place.你还记得当他谈到自然状态时 他不是在说一个想象中的地方
575In the beginning he says all the world was America, and what was going on in America?一开始他说,全世界都是美国,美国到底发生了什么?
576The settlers were enclosing land and engaged in wars with the Native Americans.定居者包围土地,与美洲原住民开战。
577Locke, who is an administrator of one of the colonies,洛克是其中一个殖民地的管理者
578may have been as interested in providing a justification for private property可能同样有兴趣为私人财产提供理由
579through enclosure without consent, through enclosure and cultivation,未经同意,通过封锁和种植,
580as he was with developing a theory of government based on consent因为当时他正在发展一种基于同意的政府理论
581that would rein in kings and arbitrary rulers.统治着国王和统治者
582The question we're left with, the fundamental question we still haven't answered,我们留下的问题 根本的问题 我们还没有回答
583is what then becomes of consent?然后是同意吗?
584What work can it do?还能做什么?
585What is its moral force?它的道德力量是什么?
586What are the limits of consent?同意的限制是什么?
587Consent matters not only for governments, but also for markets,同意不仅对各国政府,而且对市场都很重要,
588and beginning next time we're going to take up questions of the limits of consent然后从下次开始 我们开始讨论同意的限度问题
589in the buying and selling of goods.在买卖商品。
590Join the conversation.加入对话。
591Take a pop quiz.做个流行测验
592Watch lectures you've missed and learn a lot more.看着你错过的讲座 学到更多
593请访问justiceharvard.org.
594It's the right thing to do.谓之正法.
595Funding for this program is provided by...本方案的经费由.
596Additional funding provided by...由.提供的额外资金。
该视频共有字幕 597 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格

P6 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p06 5. 5.公平的起点是什么 (P6)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:03Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
0:07Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
0:29Today, we turn to the question of distributive justice.今天,我们谈谈分配司法问题。
0:37How should income and wealth and power and opportunities be distributed?收入、财富、权力和机会应如何分配?
0:41According to what principles?根据什么原则?
0:44John Rawls offers a detailed answer to that question.约翰·罗尔斯详细回答了这个问题。
0:49And we're going to examine and assess his answer to that question today.我们今天将审查并评估他对该问题的回答。
0:53We put ourselves in a position to do so last time上次我们让自己有能力这么做
0:59by trying to make sense of why he thinks试图理解他为什么认为
1:06that principles of justice are best正义原则是最好的
展开字幕全文(961 条)
序号英文中文
1Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
2Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
3Today, we turn to the question of distributive justice.今天,我们谈谈分配司法问题。
4How should income and wealth and power and opportunities be distributed?收入、财富、权力和机会应如何分配?
5According to what principles?根据什么原则?
6John Rawls offers a detailed answer to that question.约翰·罗尔斯详细回答了这个问题。
7And we're going to examine and assess his answer to that question today.我们今天将审查并评估他对该问题的回答。
8We put ourselves in a position to do so last time上次我们让自己有能力这么做
9by trying to make sense of why he thinks试图理解他为什么认为
10that principles of justice are best正义原则是最好的
11derived from a hypothetical contract.来源于假设的合同。
12And what matters is that the hypothetical contract be carried out重要的是假想合同得到履行
13in an original position of equality处于最初平等地位
14behind what Rawls calls the veil of ignorance.罗尔斯所说的无知面纱背后
15So that much is clear.因此,这一点是明确的。
16Alright, then let's turn to the principles好吧,那我们来谈谈原则
17that Rawls says would be chosen罗尔斯说将会被选中
18behind the veil of ignorance.在无知的面纱后面
19First, he considers some of the major alternatives.首先,他考虑了一些主要的替代办法。
20What about utilitarianism?功利主义呢?
21Would the people in the original position原位的人会吗?
22choose to govern their collective lives选择管理他们的集体生活
23utilitarian principles, the greatest good for the greatest number?功利主义原则,对最多者最有利?
24No, they wouldn't, Rawls says.不,他们不会,罗尔斯说。
25And the reason is that behind the veil of ignorance原因是在无知的面纱后面
26everyone knows that once the veil goes up大家都知道,一旦面纱升起
27and real life begins, we will each want to be respected真正的生活开始,我们每个人都希望得到尊重
28with dignity, even if we turn out to be a member of a minority.即使我们是少数派成员 也要有尊严
29We don't want to be oppressed.我们不想被压迫.
30And so we would agree to reject utilitarianism所以我们同意拒绝功利主义
31and instead to adopt as our first principle转而采用第一原则
32equal basic liberties, fundamental rights to freedom of speech,平等的基本自由,言论自由的基本权利,
33freedom of assembly, religious liberty,集会自由、宗教自由、
34freedom of conscience and the like.良心自由之类的
35We wouldn't want to take the chance that we would wind up我们不想冒这个险
36as members of an oppressed or despised minority作为被压迫或鄙视的少数群体的成员
37with the majority tyrannizing over us.多数人强暴我们
38And so Rawls says utilitarianism would be rejected.所以罗尔斯说功利主义会被拒绝.
39Rawls写道:
40of forgetting or at least not taking seriously忘记或至少不认真对待
41the distinction between persons.人与人之间的区别。
42And in the original position behind the veil of ignorance在无知的面纱背后
43we would recognize that and reject utilitarianism.我们将承认这一点,并拒绝功利主义。
44We wouldn't trade off our fundamental rights and liberties我们不会交换我们的基本权利和自由
45for any economic advantages.对于任何经济利益。
46That's the first principle.这是第一个原则。
47Second principle has to do with social and economic inequalities.第二项原则涉及社会和经济不平等。
48What would we agree to?我们同意什么?
49Remember, we don't know whether we're going to wind up记住,我们不知道 我们是否要结束
50being rich or poor, healthy or unhealthy.贫富、健康或不健康。
51We don't know what kind of family we're going to come from,我们不知道我们来自什么样的家庭
52whether we're going to inherit millions我们是否要继承数百万
53or whether we will come from an impoverished family.或者我们是否来自一个贫穷的家庭。
54So we might, at first thought, say,因此,我们可能, 起初想,说,
55well, let's require an equal distribution of income and wealth我们要求收入和财富的平等分配
56just to be on the safe side.就是为了安全
57But then we would realize that we could do better than that但那样我们就会意识到 我们可以做得更好
58even if we're unlucky and wind up at the bottom.即使我们不走运 却在底部
59We could do better if we agree to a qualified principle of equality,如果我们同意一个合格的平等原则,我们可以做得更好,
60Rawls calls it the difference principle,罗尔斯称之为区别原则,
61a principle that says only those social and economic inequalities一项只说这些社会和经济不平等的原则
62will be permitted that work to the benefit of the least well-off.这项工作将有利于最不富裕的人。
63So we wouldn't reject all inequality of income and wealth.所以我们不会拒绝收入和财富的所有不平等。
64We would allow some, but the test would be,我们可以允许一些,但测试是,
65do they work to the benefit of everyone, including those,他们是否为所有人,包括那些
66or as he specifies the principle, especially those at the bottom.或如他规定的原则, 特别是那些在底部。
67Only those inequalities would be accepted behind the veil of ignorance,只有这些不平等才会被蒙上无知的面纱,
68and so Rawls argues, only those inequalities所以罗尔斯认为 只有那些不平等
69that work to the benefit of the least well-off are just.给最不富裕的人带来好处是公正的。
70We talked about the examples of Michael Jordan making $31 million a year,我们谈到了迈克尔・乔丹每年赚3100万美元的例子
71of Bill Gates having a fortune in the tens of billions.比尔·盖茨拥有数百亿的财富
72Would those inequalities be permitted under the difference principle?差别原则是否允许这些不平等?
73Only if they were part of a system, those wage differentials,除非他们属于一个制度,这些工资差别,
74that actually work to the advantage of the least well-off.这实际上有利于最不富裕的人。
75Well, what would that system be?那这个系统会是什么?
76Maybe it turns out that as a practical matter,也许事实上
77you have to provide incentives to attract the right people to certain jobs,您必须提供激励 吸引合适的人 一些工作,
78and when you do, having those people in those jobs当你这样做,让这些人 在那些工作
79will actually help those at the bottom.会帮助那些在底层的人。
80Strictly speaking, Rawls's argument for the difference principle严格地说,罗尔斯对区别原则的论点
81is that it would be chosen behind the veil of ignorance.这是在无知的面纱后面选择的。
82Let me hear what you think about Rawls's claim让我听听你对罗尔斯的主张的看法
83that these two principles would be chosen behind the veil of ignorance.在无知的面纱后面选择这两项原则。
84Is there anyone who disagrees that they would be chosen?有谁不同意选他们吗?
85All right, let's start up in the balcony, if that's all right.好吧,让我们开始 在阳台上,如果可以。
86Go ahead.来吧。
87Okay, your argument depends upon us believing that we would argue好吧,你的论点取决于我们相信 我们会争论
88and set policy or justice from a bottom, for the disadvantaged,并为处境不利者从下而立政策或公道,
89and I just don't see from a proof standpoint where we've proven that.我只是没有从证据的角度看到 我们已经证明了这一点。
90Why not the top?为什么不是顶部?
91Right.
92And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
93Mike.迈克
94Mike, all right, good question.迈克,好的,问得好
95Put yourself behind the veil of ignorance.置身无知之纱后.
96Enter into the thought experiment.进入思想实验.
97What principles would you choose?你会选择什么原则?
98How would you think it through?你怎么想出来的?
99Well, I would say things like even Harvard's existence好吧,我会说的东西 像哈佛的存在
100is an example of preaching toward the top,这是向上传教的一个例子,
101because Harvard takes the top academics,因为哈佛大学是顶尖的学者
102and I didn't know when I was born how smart I would be,我不知道当我出生的时候 我会有多聪明,
103but I worked my life to get to a place of this caliber.但我毕生都是为了找到这个口径的地方
104Now, if you'd said Harvard's going to randomly take如果你说哈佛会随机取走
1051,600 people of absolutely no qualification,1600人绝对不合格,
106we'd all be saying, well, there's not much to work for.我们都会说,嗯,没有什么可以工作的。
107And so what principle would you choose?那你选择什么原则?
108In that situation, I would say a merit-based one,在这种情况下,我要说,一个择优录取的人,
109one where I don't necessarily know what I have,我不一定知道自己有什么
110but I'd rather have a system that rewards me based on my efforts.但我宁愿有一个系统 奖励我的努力。
111So you, Mike, behind the veil of ignorance,所以,你,迈克, 在无知的面纱背后,
112would choose a merit-based system将选择择优制度
113where people are rewarded according to their efforts.在那里,人们将因自己的努力而获得报酬。
114All right, fair enough.好吧,公平点
115What would you say?你会说什么?
116Go ahead.来吧。
117My question is if the merit-based argument is based on我的问题是,基于功绩的论点是否基于
118when everyone is at a level of equality,当人人平等的时候,
119where from that position you're rewarded to where you get,从那个位置你得到的回报,
120or is it regardless of what advantages you may have或者不管你有什么好处
121when you began your education to get where you are here?当你开始你的教育 得到你在这里?
122I mean, I think the question you're asking is saying,我的意思是,我认为你问的问题 是说,
123you know, if you want to look at whatever utilitarianism policy it is,你知道,如果你想看看 无论实用主义政策是什么,
124do we want to maximize world wealth?我们想要最大限度地增加世界财富吗?
125And I think a system that rewards merit我认为一个奖励功绩的制度
126is the one that we've pretty much all established我们几乎都建立了
127is what is best for all of us,这是对我们所有人最好的,
128despite the fact that some of us may be in the second percentile尽管我们中有些人可能处于第二百分位
129and some may be in the 98th percentile,可能有人在九十八分之一,
130and at the end of the day it lifts that lowest base level,最终它升起最低的基数,
131a community that rewards effort as opposed to innate differences.一个奖励努力而不是内在差异的社区。
132I don't understand how you're rewarding someone's efforts我不明白你如何奖励别人的努力
133who clearly has had, not you, but maybe myself,谁显然有过,不是你, 但也许我自己,
134advantages throughout to get where I am here.整个优势 得到我在这里。
135I mean, I can't say that somebody else who maybe worked as hard as I did我的意思是,我不能说别人 谁也许工作像我一样辛苦
136would have had the same opportunity to come to a school like this.也会有同样的机会 来这样的学校。
137All right, let's look at that point.好吧,让我们来看看这一点。
138What's your name?你叫什么来着?
139Kate.凯特
140Kate, you suspect that the ability to get into top schools凯特,你怀疑进入顶尖学校的能力
141may largely depend on coming from an affluent family,可能很大程度上取决于来自富裕的家庭,
142having a favorable family background,家庭背景良好,
143social, cultural, economic advantages and so on?社会,文化,经济等优势?
144I mean, economic, but yes, social, cultural,我的意思是,经济,但 是的,社会,文化,
145all of those advantages for sure.所有这些好处都是肯定的。
146Someone did a study of the 146 selective colleges有人研究了146个精选学院
147and universities in the United States,美国的大学,
148and they looked at the students in those colleges and universities他们看着那些学院和大学的学生
149to try to find out what their economic background was.试图找出他们的经济背景。
150What percentage do you think come from the bottom quarter of the income scale?你认为收入表的下季度会占多少百分比?
151You know what the figure is?你知道是什么吗?
152Only 3% of students at the most selective colleges and universities最有选择的学院和大学中只有3%的学生
153come from poor backgrounds.出身贫苦
154Over 70% come from affluent families.70%以上来自富裕家庭。
155Let's go one step further then and try to address Mike's challenge.我们再走一步 试着解决迈克的挑战
156Rawls actually has two arguments, not one,Rawls实际上有两个论点 而不是一个
157in favor of his principles of justice,支持他的正义原则,
158and in particular of the difference principle.特别是区别原则。
159One argument is the official argument,一个论点是官方的论点,
160what would be chosen behind the veil of ignorance.愚昧的面纱后面会选择什么
161Some people challenge that argument saying,有些人质疑这个论点,
162maybe people would want to take their chances.也许人们会想冒险
163Maybe people would be gamblers behind the veil of ignorance,也许人们会在无知的面纱背后赌博
164hoping that they would wind up on top.希望他们能登上顶峰
165That's one challenge that has been put to Rawls.这是对罗尔斯的挑战
166But backing up the argument from the original position is a second argument,但支持原立场的论点是第二个论点,
167and that is a straightforwardly moral argument.这是直接的道德论点。
168And it goes like this.它是这样的。
169It says, the distribution of income and wealth and opportunities它说,收入和财富与机会的分配
170should not be based on factors for which people can claim no credit.不应基于人们不能要求信贷的因素。
171It shouldn't be based on factors that are arbitrary from a moral point of view.它不应该基于从道德角度来说武断的因素.
172Rawls illustrates this by considering several rival theories of justice.Rawls通过考虑几个相互竞争的司法理论来说明这一点。
173He begins with the theory of justice that most everyone these days would reject,他从正义的理论开始, 大部分人这些天会拒绝,
174a feudal aristocracy.一个封建贵族
175What's wrong with the allocation of life prospects in a feudal aristocracy?在封建贵族统治下分配生活前景有什么问题?.
176Rawls says, well, the thing that's obviously wrong about it罗尔斯说,嗯,那显然是错误的
177is that people's life prospects are determined by the accident of birth.人的生活前景是由出生事故决定的。
178Are you born to a noble family or to the family of peasants and serfs?你是出身于贵族家庭还是农民和农奴家庭?
179And that's it.且道.
180You can't rise.你不能站起来。
181It's not your doing where you wind up or what opportunities you have.这不是你做什么 在那里你结束了 或者你有什么机会。
182But that's arbitrary from a moral point of view.但从道德角度来看,这是武断的.
183And so that objection to a feudal aristocracy leads,因此,反对封建贵族统治,
184and historically has led people to say, careers should be open to talents.并且从历史上看,人们会说,事业应该向人才开放。
185There should be formal equality of opportunity.应有形式上的机会平等。
186Regardless of the accident of birth, every person should be free to strive,无论发生什么意外,每个人都应自由地努力,
187to work, to apply for any job in the society.工作,申请任何社会工作。
188And then if you open up jobs and you allow people to apply如果你打开工作 允许人们申请
189and to work as hard as they can, then the results are just.并尽可能努力工作,那么结果就是公正。
190So it's more or less the libertarian system that we've discussed in earlier weeks.因此,这或多或少是我们前几周讨论过的百合制度.
191What does Rawls think about this?罗尔斯对此有什么看法?
192He says it's an improvement.他说这是一个进步。
193It's an improvement because it doesn't take as fixed the accident of birth.这是一种改进,因为它并不认为是固定了出生的意外.
194But even with formal equality of opportunity,但即使形式上的机会平等,
195the libertarian conception doesn't extend that, doesn't extend its insight far enough.自由主义的概念没有扩展, 不够扩展它的洞察力。
196Because if you let everybody run the race,因为如果你让每个人都在比赛,
197everybody can enter the race, but some people start at different starting points,每个人都可以参加比赛 但有些人从不同的起点开始
198that race isn't going to be fair.那场比赛是不公平的
199Intuitively, he says, the most obvious injustice of this system他直觉地说,这个制度最明显的不公正
200is that it permits distributive shares to be improperly influenced它允许分配股票受到不当的影响
201by factors arbitrary from a moral point of view,从道德观点来看,
202such as whether you've got a good education or not,比如你是否受过良好教育
203whether you grew up in a family that supported you and developed in you你是否成长在一个支持你 并在你成长的家庭
204a work ethic and gave you the opportunities.工作道德,给你机会。
205So that suggests moving to a system of fair equality of opportunity.因此,这意味着向公平平等机会制度迈进。
206And that's really the system that Mike was advocating earlier on.而这正是迈克之前倡导的系统。
207What we might call a merit-based system, a meritocratic system.我们可能称之为择优制度,择优制度。
208In a fair meritocracy, the society sets up institutions在一个公平的精英管理中,社会建立了机构
209to bring everyone to the same starting point before the race begins.在比赛开始前把大家带到同一个起点
210Equal educational opportunities.平等教育机会。
211Head start programs, for example.例如头部启动程序.
212Support for schools in impoverished neighborhoods.支持贫困街区办学.
213So that everyone, regardless of their family background,所以,每个人,不管他们的家庭背景,
214has a genuinely fair opportunity.拥有真正公平的机会。
215Everyone starts from the same starting line.每个人都从同一个起点开始。
216Well, what does Rawls think about the meritocratic system?Rawls对功勋系统有什么看法?
217Even that, he says, doesn't go far enough in remedying即便如此,他说,在补救上还不够
218or addressing the moral arbitrariness of the natural lottery.或解决自然彩票的道德武断问题。
219Because if you bring everyone to the same starting point因为如果你把每个人都带到同一个起点
220and begin the race, who's going to win the race?开始比赛,谁能赢得比赛?
221Who would win?谁会赢?
222To use the runners example.以跑者为例.
223The fastest runners would win.最快的跑者会赢
224But is it their doing that they happen to be blessed但他们的作为 恰好使他们得到祝福
225with the athletic prowess to run fast?跑得快吗?
226So Rawls says, even the principle of meritocracy,所以罗尔斯说,即使是功勋原则,
227where you bring everyone to the same starting point,在那里,你带大家 在同一起点,
228may eliminate the influence of social contingencies and upbringing,消除社会突发事件和教养的影响,
229but it still permits the distribution of wealth and income但是它仍然允许财富和收入的分配
230to be determined by the natural distribution of abilities and talents.由能力和才能的自然分布决定。
231And so he thinks that the principle of eliminating morally arbitrary influences所以他认为消除道德武断影响的原则
232and the distribution of income and wealth requires going beyond收入和财富的分配需要超越
233what Mike favors, the meritocratic system.迈克喜欢什么,优异的系统。
234Now, how do you go beyond?现在,你如何超越?
235If you bring everyone to the same starting point如果你把大家带到同一个起点
236and you're still bothered by the fact that some are fast runners你仍然对有些人跑得很快
237and some are not fast runners, what can you do?有些不是跑得快的 你能怎么办?
238Well, some critics of a more egalitarian conception嗯,一些批评 更平等的概念
239say the only thing you can do is handicap the fast runners.说你唯一能做的就是 阻止快速跑者
240Make them wear lead shoes.让他们穿铅鞋
241But who wants to do that?但谁想这么做?
242That would defeat the whole point of running the race.这会击败比赛的全局
243But Rawls says you don't have to have a kind of leveling equality但罗尔斯说,你不必 有一种平平平等
244if you want to go beyond a meritocratic conception.如果你想超越一个优异的概念。
245You permit, you even encourage those who may be gifted你允许,你甚至鼓励那些有天赋的人
246to exercise their talents.来锻炼他们的才能
247But what you do is you change the terms on which people are entitled但你所做的是改变人们的权利条件
248to the fruits of the exercise of those talents.以发挥这些才能的成果。
249And that really is what the difference principle is.这才是区别原则所在。
250You establish a principle that says people may benefit from their good fortune,你确立了一条原则 说人们可以从他们的好运气中获益,
251from their luck in the genetic lottery,因为他们在遗传性彩票上的运气
252but only on terms that work to the advantage of the least well-off.但只能从有利于最不富裕的人的角度出发
253And so, for example, Michael Jordan can make $31 million,例如迈克尔·乔丹能赚到3100万美元
254but only under a system that taxes away a chunk of that但只有在一个制度下, 税收去掉其中的一小部分
255to help those who lack the basketball skills that he's blessed with.帮助那些缺乏篮球技巧的人 他的祝福。
256Likewise, Bill Gates.同样,比尔盖茨。
257He can make his billions,他能赚到几十亿
258but he can't think that he somehow morally deserves those billions.但他不能认为 他在某种程度上在道德上应该得到那些亿万。
259Those who have been favored by nature may gain from their good fortune,被自然所宠爱者,得享其福;
260but only on terms that improve the situation of those who have lost out.但只能改善那些输家的处境
261That's the difference principle.这就是区别原则。
262And it's an argument from moral arbitrariness.而从道德专断论辩.
263Rawls claims that if you're bothered by basing distributive sharesRawls声称,如果你被基于分配股份的困扰
264on factors arbitrary from a moral point of view,从道德观点来看,
265you don't just reject a feudal aristocracy for a free market.你不只是拒绝一个封建贵族 自由市场。
266You don't even rest content with a meritocratic system你甚至不满足于功勋制度
267that brings everyone to the same starting point.这让每个人都来到同一个起点。
268You set up a system where everyone, including those at the bottom,你建立了一个系统 每个人,包括那些在底层,
269benefit from the exercise of the talents held by those who happen to be lucky.受益于那些碰巧幸运的人发挥的才能。
270What do you think?你觉得呢?
271Is that persuasive?有说服力吗?
272Who finds that argument unpersuasive, the argument from moral arbitrariness?谁认为这一论点没有说服力,就是道德武断的论点?
273Yes.
274I think that in the egalitarian proposition, the more talented people,我认为,在平等的命题, 更有才华的人,
275I think it's very optimistic to think that they would still work really hard我觉得他们还是很努力的很乐观
276even if they knew that part of what they made would be given away.即使他们知道自己所造物的一部分,必定要被分舍。
277So I think that the only way for the more talented people to exercise their talents所以我觉得只有这样才有才华的人才能发挥才华
278to the best of their ability is in the meritocracy.尽他们的最大能力 是在功绩管理。
279And in a meritocracy, what's your name?在精英统治中 你叫什么名字?
280Kate.凯特
281Kate, does it bother you, and Mike, does it bother you,凯特,你烦不烦,麦克,你烦不烦?
282that in a meritocratic system, even with fair equality of opportunity,在一个优异的制度中,即使有公平的机会平等,
283people get ahead, people get rewards that they don't deserve人们先行一步,得到他们不配得到的奖励
284simply because they happen to be naturally gifted?就因为他们天生有天赋?
285What about that?怎么样?
286I think that it is arbitrary, and obviously it's arbitrary,我认为这是武断的 很明显是武断的
287but I think that correcting for it would be detrimental.但我认为纠正会有害的
288Because it would reduce incentives, is that why?因为这样会减少激励,这就是为什么?
289It would reduce incentives, yeah.这会减少激励,是的。
290Mike, what do you say?迈克,怎么样?
291We're all sitting in this room, and we have undeserved glory我们都坐在这间屋子里 我们拥有无耻的荣耀
292of some sorts, that you should not be satisfied with the process of your life某种程度上,你不应该满足 你的生活过程
293because you have not created any of this.因为你没有创造任何这些。
294And I think from a standpoint of not just this room, us being upset,我从不光是这间屋子的角度来看 我们很不高兴
295but from a societal standpoint, we should have some kind of a gut reaction但从社会角度看,我们应该有某种直觉的反应
296to that feeling that the guy who runs the race, he actually harms us那种感觉 跑车的那个人 他实际上伤害了我们
297as opposed to maybe makes me run that last 10 yards faster,而不是让我跑得更快
298and that makes the guy behind me run 10 yards faster,这让我后面的人跑得更快十码
299and the guy behind him 10 yards faster.和他后面的人更快10码。
300All right, so Mike, let me ask you, you talked about effort before.好吧,所以迈克,让我问你, 你之前谈到努力。
301Effort.奋发精进.
302Do you think when people work hard to get ahead and succeed,你认为当人们努力工作 取得领先和成功,
303that they deserve the rewards that go with effort?难道他们要受报应吗?
304Isn't that the idea behind your defense?这不是你辩护背后的想法吗?
305I mean, of course, bring Michael Jordan here, I'm sure you can get him,我的意思是,当然,带迈克尔 乔丹在这里, 我相信你可以得到他,
306and have him come and defend himself about why he makes $31 million,让他来为自己辩护 他为什么赚了3100万美元
307and I think what you're going to realize is his life was a very, very tough one我想你会意识到 他的生活是非常,非常艰难的
308to get to the top, and that we are basically being the majority oppressing the minority我们基本上是压迫少数的多数人
309in a different light.以不同的光线。
310It's very easy to pick on him, very easy.这很容易挑他,非常容易。
311All right, effort.好吧 努力点
312You know what, you've got, you've persuaded a lot of people.你知道,你有, 你说服了很多人。
313Effort.奋发精进.
314You know what Raul's answer to that is?你知道劳尔的答案是什么吗?
315Even the effort that some people expend, conscientious striving, the work ethic,甚至有些人付出的努力, 认真努力,工作道德,
316even effort depends a lot on fortunate family circumstances甚至努力都取决于幸运的家庭环境
317through which you, we, can claim no credit.通过它,你,我们,不能要求任何功劳。
318Now, let's, we're going to let, let's do the test.现在,让我们,我们要让,让我们做测试。
319Let's do a test here.我们来测试一下
320Never mind economic class, those differences are very significant.不论经济等级,这些差异都非常重要。
321Put those aside.把这些放在一边。
322Psychologists say that birth order makes a lot of difference心理学家说,出生顺序 有很多不同
323in work ethic striving effort.在职业道德努力。
324How many here?这里有多少人?
325Raise your hand, those of you here who are first in birth order.举起你的手,你们这些先出生的人
326I am too, by the way.顺便说一句,我也是
327Mike, I noticed you raised your hand.迈克,我注意到你举起手来了
328If the case for the meritocratic conception is that effort should be rewarded,如果功绩主义的概念是,应该奖励这种努力,
329doesn't Raul's have a point that even effort striving work ethic is largely shaped?劳尔的一点不就是 即使努力工作道德 也基本成型吗?
330Even by birth order.乃至以出生令为体.
331Is it your doing?是你干的吗?
332Is it your doing that you were first in birth order?是你先生的吗?
333Then why, Raul says, of course not.那为什么,劳尔说,当然不是。
334So why should income and wealth and opportunities in life因此,为什么收入和财富以及生活中的机会
335be based on factors arbitrary from a moral point of view?从道德角度来看,是否基于任意因素?
336That's a challenge that he puts to market societies,这是他对市场社会的挑战,
337but also to those of us at places like this.也是为了我们这些人
338A question to think about for next time.下次想个问题
339A justice of the United States Supreme Court.美国最高法院法官.
340What do they make?他们做的是什么?
341It's just under $200,000.刚刚不到二十万
342But there's another judge who makes a lot more than Sandra Day O'Connor.但有另一位法官比桑德拉·戴·奥康纳赚得更多.
343You know who it is?你知道是谁吗?
344Judge Judy, how did you know that?朱迪法官 你怎么知道这个的?
345Judge Judy, you know how much she makes?Judy法官 你知道她赚了多少钱吗?
346$25 million.2500万美元。
347Now, is that just?是这样吗?
348Is it fair?公平吗?
349We ended last time with that remarkable poll.上次的民意调查结束了
350Do you remember the poll about birth order?你还记得关于出生令的民意调查吗?
351What percentage of people in this room raised their hands这房间里有多少人举起手来
352to say that they were the first born?说他们是第一个出生的?
35375, 80 percent?75,80%吗?
354And what was the significance of that这有什么意义?
355if you're thinking about these theories of distributive justice?如果你在考虑这些分配正义的理论?
356Remember, we were discussing three different theories of distributive justice.记住,我们在讨论分配正义的三个不同理论。
357Three different ways of answering the question,有三种不同的回答方式,
358how should income and wealth and opportunities收入、财富和机会如何
359and the good things in life be distributed?生活中的佳物,是分配的。
360And so far we've looked at the libertarian answer目前为止,我们已经看 自由主义的答案
361that says the just system of distribution这说明 公正的分配系统
362is a system of free exchange, of free market economy,自由交换制度,自由市场经济,
363against a background of formal equality,在形式上平等的背景下,
364which simply means that jobs and careers are open to anyone.也就是说,工作和事业是向任何人开放的。
365Rawls says this represents an improvement罗尔斯说这是个进步
366over aristocratic and caste systems超越贵族和种姓制度
367because everyone can compete for every job,因为每个人都可以竞争每份工作,
368careers open to talents.职业向人才开放。
369And beyond that, the just distribution is the one that results此外,公正的分配是结果
370from free exchange, voluntary transactions.自由交换、自愿交易。
371No more, no less.无余无余.
372Then Rawls argues,然后罗尔斯说,
373if all you have is formal equality, jobs open to everyone,如果你只有形式上的平等, 工作向所有人开放,
374the result is not going to be fair.结果是不公平的。
375It will be biased in favor of those将偏向于那些
376who happen to be born to affluent families,他们是富裕家庭的后裔,
377who happen to have the benefit of good educational opportunities.享受良好教育机会。
378And that accident of birth is not a just basis和这个意外的出生 不只是根据
379for distributing life chances.分配生命的机会。
380And so many people who notice this unfairness, Rawls argues,如此多注意到这种不公平的人 Rawls认为
381are led to embrace a system of fair equality of opportunity.导致接受公平平等机会制度。
382That leads to the meritocratic system, fair equality of opportunity.这导致了优异的制度,公平的机会平等。
383But Rawls says, even if you bring everyone但罗尔斯说,即使你带大家来
384to the same starting point in the race,在比赛的同一个起点,
385what's going to happen?会发生什么事?
386Who's going to win?谁会赢?
387The fastest runners.跑得最快的选手
388So once you're troubled by basing distributive shares所以一旦你被分配股困扰
389on morally arbitrary contingencies,道德上任意的意外事件,
390you should, if you reason it through,你应该,如果你解释它通过,
391be carried all the way to what Rawls calls the democratic conception,被一路带到罗尔斯所说的民主概念,
392a more egalitarian conception of distributive justice更平等的分配公正概念
393that he defines by the difference principle.他用不同的原则来定义
394Now he doesn't say that the only way to remedy现在他没有说 唯一的补救方法
395or to compensate for differences in natural talents and abilities或补偿天赋和能力的差异;
396is to have a kind of leveling equality,这是一种平等,
397a guaranteed equality of outcome.保证结果平等。
398But he does say there's another way to deal with these contingencies.但他确实说有另一种方法 来处理这些突发事件
399People may gain, may benefit from their good fortune,人或许得益,或许得福。
400but only on terms that work to the advantage of the least well off.但只能从对最不富裕的人有利的条件出发
401And so we can test how this theory actually works所以我们可以测试这个理论是如何实际运作的
402by thinking about some pay differentials that arise in our society.想想我们社会中产生的一些工资差异。
403What does the average school teacher make in the United States, do you suppose?在美国,普通的老师能做什么?
404Roughly.大约吧
405It's a little more, 40,000, 42,000.多一点,四万,四万二千
406What about David Letterman?大卫·莱特曼呢?
407How much do you think David Letterman makes?你觉得大卫·莱特曼能赚多少钱?
408More than a school teacher?不只是老师?
409$31 million, David Letterman.3100万美元,大卫・莱特曼。
410Is that fair?公平吗?
411That David Letterman makes that much more than a school teacher?那个大卫·莱特曼做的不只是一个老师?
412Well, Rawls' answer would be,罗尔斯的回答是,
413it depends whether the basic structure of society is designed in such a way这取决于社会的基本结构是否以这种方式设计
414that Letterman's $31 million is subject to taxation莱特曼的3100万要缴税
415so that some of those earnings are taken to work for the advantage这样,这些收入中有一部分可以用来谋取利益。
416of the least well off.最不富裕的人
417One other example of a pay differential.另一个工资差别的例子。
418A Justice of the United States Supreme Court.美国最高法院法官。
419What do they make?他们做的是什么?
420It's just under $200,000.刚刚不到二十万
421Here's Sandra Day O'Connor, for example.例如桑德拉·戴·奥康纳
422There she is.她来了
423But there's another judge who makes a lot more than Sandra Day O'Connor.但有另一位法官比桑德拉·戴·奥康纳赚得更多.
424Do you know who it is?你知道是谁吗?
425Judge Judy.法官朱迪。
426How did you know that?你怎么知道这个的?
427You watch?你看吗?
428No, but you're right.不,但你说得对。
429Judge Judy.法官朱迪。
430Do you know how much she makes?你知道她赚多少钱吗?
431There she is.她来了
432$25 million.2500万美元。
433Now, is that just?是这样吗?
434Is it fair?公平吗?
435Well, the answer is it depends whether答案是,这取决于
436this is against a background system这是一个背景系统
437in line with the difference principle根据差别原则
438where those who come out on top in terms of income and wealth are taxed在那日,有收入和财富的人,将被课税。
439in a way that benefits the least well off members of society.给社会上最不富裕的人带来好处
440Now, we're going to come back to these wage differentials,现在,我们将回到这些工资差异,
441pay differentials between a real judge and a TV judge,真正的法官与电视法官的薪酬差别
442the one Marcus watches all the time.马库斯一直看着他
443What I want to do now is return to these theories我现在想做的是回到这些理论
444and to examine the objections并审查反对
445to Rawls's more egalitarian theory,对罗尔斯更平等的理论,
446the difference principle.区别原则。
447There are at least three objections至少有三个反对
448to Rawls's difference principle.到罗尔斯的区别原则。
449One of them came up last time in the discussion上次讨论的时候,他们中的一个出现了
450and a number of you raised this worry.你们中的一些人提出了这种忧虑。
451What about incentives?那奖励呢?
452Isn't there the risk if taxes reach 70, 80, 90 percent marginal rate如果税收达到70,80,90%的边际税率,那就没有风险吗?
453that Michael Jordan won't play basketball,迈克尔乔丹不会打篮球,
454that David Letterman won't do late night comedy,大卫莱特曼不会做深夜喜剧,
455or that CEOs will go into some other line of work?或者CEO会参与其他工作?
456Now, who among those who are defenders of Rawls,现在,谁是罗尔斯的维护者,
457who has an answer to this objection about the need for incentives?谁能回答这种关于需要奖励的反对意见?
458Yes, go ahead, stand up.是的,继续,站起来。
459Rawls's idea is that there should only be so much difference罗尔斯的想法是,应该只有这么多的区别
460that it helps the least well-off the most.帮助最不富裕的人
461So if there's too much equality,所以,如果有太多的平等,
462then the least well-off might not be able to watch late night TV那么,最不富裕的人 可能无法看深夜电视
463or might not have a job because their CEO doesn't want to work.或者没有工作 因为他们的CEO不想工作
464So you need to find the correct balance所以你需要找到正确的平衡
465where taxation still leaves enough incentive税收仍然有足够的激励
466for the least well-off to benefit from the talents.最不富裕的人能够从人才中获益
467Good.不错
468And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
469Tim.蒂姆 蒂姆 蒂姆 蒂姆
470All right, so Tim is saying in effect好吧,蒂姆说实际上
471that Rawls takes account of incentives罗尔斯会考虑奖励
472and could allow for pay differentials并且可以允许工资差异
473and for some adjustment in the tax rate税率调整
474to take account of incentives, but Tim points out不过蒂姆指出,
475the standpoint from which the question of incentivesB. 奖励问题所依据的观点
476needs to be considered需要考虑
477is not the effect on the total size of the economic pie,不是对经济派总规模的影响,
478but instead from the standpoint of the effect但从效果的角度来看
479of incentives or disincentives奖惩措施
480on the well-being of those at the bottom.保护底层人民的福祉。
481Right?对吧?
482Good, thank you.很好 谢谢
483I think that is what Rawls would say.我想罗尔斯会这么说
484In fact, if you look in section 17,事实上,如果你看看第17节
485where he describes the difference principle,在那里,他描述了区别原则,
486he allows for incentives他允许奖励
487the naturally advantaged are not to gain自然优势是不会得到的
488merely because they are more gifted,只是因为他们更有天赋,
489but only to cover the cost of training and education但只能支付培训和教育费用
490and for using their endowments和利用其捐赠
491in ways that help the less fortunate as well.帮助那些不幸的人
492So you can have incentives.所以,你可以有奖励。
493You can adjust the tax rate您可以调整税率
494if taking too much from David Letterman如果从大卫·莱特曼那里拿走太多钱
495or from Michael Jordan or from Bill Gates迈克尔・乔丹或比尔・盖茨
496winds up actually hurting those at the bottom.最终会伤到底部
497That's the test.这就是测试。
498So incentives, that's not a decisive objection所以奖励,这不是决定性的反对
499against Rawls' difference principle.违背罗尔斯的区别原则
500But there are two weightier, more difficult objections.但有两个更重,更困难的反对.
501One of them comes from defenders其中一个来自维权者
502{\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}一个有才华的概念
503The argument that says, what about effort?所谓努力的争论呢?
504What about people working hard,那么人们努力工作,
505having a right to what they earn他们有权挣钱
506because they've deserved it, they've worked hard for it?因为他们罪有应得 他们为此付出了很大努力?
507That's the objection from effort and moral desert.这就是来自努力和道德沙漠的反对.
508Then there's another objection还有另一个反对
509that comes from libertarians.这是来自自由主义者。
510And this objection has to do with而这个反对与
511reasserting the idea of self-ownership.重新树立自主自主的思想.
512Doesn't the difference principle,不同的原则,
513by treating our natural talents and endowments通过对待我们的天赋和天赋
514as common assets,作为共同资产,
515doesn't that violate the idea这不违反想法
516that we own ourselves?是我们自己的?
517Now, let me deal first现在,让我先交易
518with the objection that comes from与来自
519the libertarian direction.自由主义的方向。
520Milton Friedman writes in his book,米尔顿·弗里德曼在他的书中写道,
521Free to Choose, life is not fair.自由选择,生活是不公平的。
522And it's tempting to believe并且它诱人相信
523that government can rectify政府可以纠正
524what nature has spawned.大自然产生了什么。
525But his answer is,但他的答案是, ,
526the only way to try to rectify that唯一能纠正这种情况的方法
527is to have a leveling equality of outcome.实现结果的平等
528Everyone finishing the race at the same point大家都在同一个时间完成比赛
529and that would be a disaster.这将是一场灾难。
530This is an easy argument to answer.这是一个容易回答的论点。
531Rawls 处理它
532in one of the most powerful passages,在最强大的一段,
533I think, of the theory of justice.我认为,正义的理论。
534It's in section 17.在第十七节.
535The natural distribution,自然分布,
536and here he's talking about the natural distribution在这里,他谈论的是自然分布
537of talents and endowments,天赋和天赋,
538is neither just nor unjust.既不公正也不不公正。
539Nor is it unjust that persons are born人出生也不是不公正的
540into society at some particular position.以某种特殊地位进入社会。
541These are simply natural facts.这些只是自然的事实。
542What is just and unjust什么是正义和不公正
543is the way that institutions机构的方式
544deal with these facts.处理这些事实。
545That's his answer to这是他的回答
546libertarian laissez-faire economists自由放任经济学家
547like Milton Friedman who say,就像米尔顿・弗里德曼说的
548life is unfair, but get over it.生活是不公平的,但是要克服它。
549Get over it and let's see if we can克服它,让我们看看我们能不能
550at least maximize the benefits至少实现效益最大化
551that flow from it.从它流出。
552But the more powerful libertarian但更强大的自由主义者
553objection to Rawls is not对Rawls的反对不是
554from the libertarian economists来自自由主义经济学家
555like Milton Friedman.就像米尔顿·弗里德曼
556It's from the argument about self-ownership这是关于自有的争论
557developed, as we saw, in Nozick.正如我们在诺兹克所看到的那样
558And from that point of view,从这个角度看
559yes, it might be a good thing是的,这可能是一件好事
560to create Head Start programs创建“头开始”程序
561and public schools公立学校
562so that everyone can go to a decent school让每个人都能去一个体面的学校
563and start the race开始比赛
564at the same starting line.在同一条起点线上
565That might be good.这可能是很好的。
566But if you tax people但是如果你对人征税
567to create public schools,创建公立学校;
568if you tax people如果你对人征税
569against their will,违背他们的意志,
570you coerce them.你强迫他们。
571It's a form of theft.是一种盗窃形式.
572If you take some of Letterman's如果你拿一些莱特曼的
57331 million, tax it away3100万,收税
574to support public schools支持公立学校
575against his will,违背他的意志,
576the state is really doing国家真的在做
577no better than stealing不比偷东西好
578from him.从他。
579It's coercion.这是强迫。
580And the reason is原因是
581we have to think of ourselves我们必须为自己着想
582as owning our talents作为拥有我们的才华
583and endowments, because otherwise捐赠,因为否则
584we're back to just using people我们回到了利用别人
585and coercing people.和强迫人们。
586That's the libertarian reply.这是自由主义者的回答。
587What's Rawls' answer罗尔斯的答案是什么?
588to that objection?反对?
589He doesn't address the idea of他没说
590self-ownership directly.直接拥有。
591But the effect,但影响,
592the moral weight of his argument他的论点的道德价值
593for the difference principle is因为区别原则是
594maybe we don't own ourselves也许我们没有自我
595in that thoroughgoing sense after all.毕竟是那种彻底的观念
596Now, he says现在,他说
597this doesn't mean that the state这并不意味着国家
598is an owner in me我是一个主人
599in the sense that it can从它能够
600simply commandeer my life.仅仅控制我的生活。
601Because remember,因为记住,
602the first principle we would agree to我们同意的第一项原则
603behind the veil of ignorance在无知的面纱后面
604is the principle of equal basic平等的基本原则
605liberties, freedom of speech,自由,言论自由,
606religious liberty, freedom of conscience宗教自由、良心自由
607and the like.和类似。
608So the only respect因此,唯一的尊重
609in which the idea of self-ownership自我拥有的概念
610must give way必须让路
611comes when we're thinking about当我们想到
612whether是否为
613I own myself in the sense从意义上讲,我是我自己的
614that I have a privileged我有一个特权
615claim on the benefits养恤金索赔
616that come from the那些来自
617exercise of my talents锻炼我的才能
618in a market economy.在市场经济中。
619And Rawls says, on reflection, we don't.罗尔斯说,反省一下,我们没有。
620We can defend rights.我们可以捍卫权利。
621We can respect the individual.我们可以尊重个人
622We can uphold human dignity我们可以维护人的尊严
623without embracing不拥抱
624the idea of想法
625self-possession.自我占有。
626That, in effect, is his reply这实际上是他的答复
627to the libertarian.对自由主义者。
628I want to turn now我现在想转身
629to his reply to the答复
630defender of a meritocratic conception德才主义观念的捍卫者
631who invokes effort他们是勤劳的,
632as the basis作为基础
633of moral desert.道德的沙漠。
634People who work hard to develop their talents努力培养才能的人
635deserve应得的
636the benefits that好处
637come from the exercise of their talents.来自于他们的才能锻炼。
638Well, we've already seen我们已经看过了
639the beginning开始
640of Rawls' answer to that question罗尔斯回答这个问题
641and it goes back它会回到过去
642to that poll we took about birth order.参加我们关于出生令的民意调查
643His first answer is他的第一个答案是
644even the work ethic,甚至职业道德,
645even the willingness即使是意愿
646to strive conscientiously认真努力
647depends on all sorts of取决于各种
648family circumstances and social家庭状况和社会状况
649and cultural contingencies文化紧急情况
650for which we can claim no credit.我们对此不主张任何信用。
651You can't claim credit for the fact that你不能因为
652you, most of you,你们大多数人
653most of us, happen to be first我们大部分人都是第一
654in birth order, and that for some出生顺序, 以及对于一些
655complex psychological复杂心理
656and social reasons, that seems以及社会原因,这似乎
657to be associated with将与
658striving, with achieving,竭力而行,
659with effort.以努力努力,
660That's这是
661one answer.一个答案。
662There's a second有一秒钟
663answer.答问.
664Those of you who invoke你们中谁引用
665effort, you don't really努力,你没有真正
666believe that moral认为道德
667desert attaches to effort.沙漠必须努力
668Take two construction workers.带两个建筑工人
669One is strong and can raise一个强壮,可以升起
670four walls in an hour without一小时内有四面墙
671even breaking a sweat.连汗都流出来了
672And another construction worker is small还有一个建筑工人很小
673and scrawny and has瘦瘦的,已经
674to spend three days花三天时间
675to do the same amount of work.做同样多的工作。
676No defender of meritocracy没有德才主义的捍卫者
677is going to look将会看到
678at the effort of that weak and scrawny以那弱小而瘦弱的努力
679construction worker and say therefore建筑工人,因此说
680he deserves to make more.他应该得到更多的。
681So it isn't really effort.所以这不是真正的努力。
682This is the second reply这是第二次答复
683to the meritocratic至功德者,
684claim.索赔。
685It isn't really这不是真的
686effort that the defender辩护人的努力
687of meritocracy believes才华横溢
688is the moral basis是道德基础
689of distributive shares.分配份额。
690It's这是
691contribution.捐款。
692How much do you你多少钱?
693contribute?贡献?
694But contribution但贡献
695takes us straight back直接带我们回去
696to our natural我们的自然
697talents and abilities, not才华和能力,不是
698just effort.努力点
699And it's not事实并非如此
700our doing, how we came into the我们如何进入
701possession of those talents拥有这些才华
702in the first place.最初.
703I suppose you accepted these arguments我想你接受了这些论点
704that effort isn't everything, that那个努力不是一切,那
705contribution matters捐款事项
706from the standpoint of the从观点来看,
707meritocratic conception.才华横溢
708That effort even isn't那个努力甚至不是
709our own doing.我们自己做的。
710Does that mean,这是否意味着,
711the objection continues,反对继续,
712does that mean that according to Rawls这是否意味着,根据罗尔斯
713moral desert has nothing to do道德沙漠没什么可做的
714with distributive分配
715justice?正义?
716Well, yes.
717Distributive justice分配司法
718is not about moral desert.这不是道德的沙漠。
719Now, here现在,这里
720Rawls 引入一个
721important and a tricky distinction.重要而又棘手的区别
722It's between moral desert在道德的沙漠之间
723on the one hand and一方面
724entitlements to legitimate合法权利
725expectations on the other.对另一方的期望。
726What is the difference between有什么区别
727moral deserts道德沙漠
728and entitlements?权利?
729Consider two different games.考虑两个不同的游戏。
730A game of chance and a game of skill.机会游戏和技能游戏.
731Take a game of玩个游戏
732pure chance.纯粹的机会
733Say I play the Massachusetts State lottery说我玩马萨诸塞州彩票
734and my number comes up.我的号码就出来了
735I'm entitled to my winnings.我有权赢
736But even though I'm entitled但尽管我有权
737to my winnings, there's no我的胜利,没有
738sense in which, because因为...
739it's just a game of luck,这只是一场幸运游戏,
740no sense in which I没有意义,我
741morally deserve to win in the first道德上应该先赢
742place.地点。
743That's an entitlement.这是权利。
744Now contrast the lottery现在对比一下彩票
745with a different kind of game.一种不同的游戏。
746A game of skill.技能游戏.
747Now imagine the Boston Red Sox现在想象一下波士顿红袜
748winning the World Series.赢得世界大赛。
749When they win,当他们赢了,
750they're entitled to the trophy.他们有权获得奖杯。
751But it can be always但总是如此
752asked of a game of skill要求的技巧游戏
753did they deserve他们是否值得
754to win?要赢?
755It's always总是这样
756possible in principle to distinguish原则上可以区分
757what someone's entitled某人的权利
758to under the rules根据规则提交
759and whether they deserve to win以及他们是否值得赢得
760in the first place.最初.
761That's an antecedent standard,这是一个前例的标准,
762moral desert.道德的沙漠。
763Now Rawls says现在罗尔斯说
764distributive justice is not a matter分配公正不是问题
765of moral desert, though道德沙漠,虽然
766it is a matter of entitlements这是一个权利问题
767to legitimate expectations.与正当的期望。
768Here's where he在这里,他
769explains it.解释一下
770A just scheme一个公正的计划
771answers to what men are对男人的答案
772entitled to.权利。
773It satisfies它满足了
774their legitimate expectations他们的合法期望
775as founded upon social社会基础
776institutions.机构。
777But what they are entitled to但是他们应该得到什么
778is not proportional to, nor
779dependent on their intrinsic取决于其内在
780worth.值钱
781The principles of justice司法原则
782that regulate the basic structure规范基本结构
783do not mention moral desert别提道德的沙漠
784and there is no tendency没有倾向
785for distributive shares分配份额
786to correspond to it.来对应它。
787Why does Rawls为什么罗尔斯
788make this distinction?做这种区别?
789What morally is at stake?道德上有什么利害关系?
790One thing morally at stake道德上有一点关系
791is the whole question of effort that we've already是整个问题 的努力,我们已经
792discussed.讨论过。
793But there's但还有
794a second contingency, a second第二次意外情况,第二次
795source of moral arbitrariness道德武断的根源
796that goes beyond超过
797the question of whether it's问题是否是
798to my credit that I have the talents that我的功劳是 我有才能
799enable me to get ahead.让我先走
800And that has to do with the contingency这和意外有关
801that I live in a society我生活在一个社会
802that happens to发生于
803prize my talents.奖励我的才能。
804The fact其实
805that David Letterman那个大卫·莱特曼
806lives in a society that生活在一个
807puts a great premium,付出巨大的代价,
808puts a great value很有价值
809on a certain type of smirky joke,在某个类型的 滑稽笑话,
810that's not his doing.这不是他的作为。
811He's lucky that he happens to live in such他很幸运,他恰好住在这样的地方
812a society.一个社会。
813But this is但这是
814a second contingency.第二次意外情况。
815This isn't这不是
816something that we can claim credit for.值得称道的
817Even if I had sole就算我有独身
818unproblematic claim不成问题的索赔
819to my talents and to my我对我的才能和我的
820effort, it would still be the case努力还是这样
821that the benefits I get from exercising我从锻炼得到的好处
822those talents这些才华
823depend on factors取决于因素
824that are arbitrary from a moral point of从道德角度来说是任意的
825view.视图。
826What my talents我的天赋
827will reap in a market economy, what does that将在市场经济中收获,
828depend on?依赖?
829What other people还有什么人
830happen to want or like in this society?碰巧是想还是喜欢在这个社会?
831It depends on the law of supply and这取决于供应法和
832demand.需求。
833That's not my doing.这不是我做的。
834Certainly not the basis当然不是依据
835for moral desert.为了道德的沙漠。
836What counts as contributing贡献
837depends on the qualities取决于品质
838that this or that society happens to prize.这个社会或那个社会碰巧是奖品。
839Most of us are我们大多数是
840fortunate to possess幸运的是拥有
841in large measure, for whatever reason,在很大程度上,无论出于什么原因,
842the qualities that our我们的品质
843society happens社会发生
844to prize.奖励。
845The qualities质量
846that enable us能够让我们
847to provide what society wants.提供社会想要的东西。
848In a capitalist在资本主义
849society it helps to have entrepreneurial它有助于创业
850drive.开车
851In a bureaucratic在官僚主义中
852society it helps to get on easily and帮助社会顺利发展
853smoothly with superiors.与上级顺利相处.
854In a mass democratic society在大众民主社会中
855it helps to look good on television在电视上看起来不错
856and to speak in并发言
857short superficial sound bites.短暂的表面声音咬伤。
858In a litigious society在一个诉讼社会
859it helps to go to law school上法学院有帮助
860and to have the talents和拥有才能
861to do well on LSATs.在LSAT上做得好。
862But none of this is our但这一切都不是我们的
863doing.开始
864Suppose that we with our talents假设我们有才华
865inhabited not our住的不是我们
866society, technologically advanced,社会,技术先进的,
867highly litigious, but a hunting极具诉讼性质,但狩猎
868society or a warrior society.社会或战士社会。
869What would become of our talents then?我们的才能会怎样呢?
870They wouldn't get us very far.他们不会让我们走远的
871No doubt some of us毫无疑问,我们中的一些人
872would develop others.将发展其他技术。
873But would we be less worthy?但是,我们是否更不值得呢?
874Would we be less我们会不会少一点?
875virtuous?善良吗?
876Would we be less meritorious if we lived如果我们活下来,我们会不会更不值得呢?
877in that kind of society rather更何况在这种社会中
878than in ours?而不是我们的?
879Rawls's answer is no.罗尔斯的回答是否定的.
880We might make less money and properly我们可能赚得更少,而且适当
881so.所以说 So.
882But while we would be但当我们是
883entitled to less,权利减少,
884we would be no less worthy.我们同样值得
885No less deserving than we are不亚于我们
886now.现在
887And here's the这是
888point, the same could be said点,也可以这么说
889of those in our society我们社会中的人
890who happen to hold less谁碰巧持有少
891prestigious positions.高贵的职位。
892Who happen to have fewer of the谁碰巧拥有更少的
893talents that our society我们的社会的才能
894happens to reward.恰好是奖励。
895So here's the moral这就是道德
896import of the distinction between的区分
897moral desert and entitlements道德和权利
898to legitimate expectations.与正当的期望。
899We are entitled to我们有权
900the benefits that the rules of the game游戏规则的好处
901promise for the exercise of our承诺我们行使
902talents.天赋
903But it's a mistake但这是个错误
904and a conceit to和自以为是
905suppose that we deserve in the first假设我们在第一个
906place a society that values给一个重视的社会
907the qualities we happen to have我们的特质
908in abundance.富饶的。
909Now we've been talking here现在我们一直在谈这个
910about income and wealth.关于收入和财富。
911What about opportunities机会呢?
912and honors?和荣誉?
913What about the distribution那分配呢?
914of access,进入,
915of seats in elite精英席位数
916colleges and universities?学院和大学?
917It's true.这是真的。
918All of you, most of you你们所有人,你们大多数人
919first born, worked hard,刚出生,努力工作,
920strived,努力奋斗,
921developed your talents培养你的才华
922to get here.到这里。
923But Rawls但罗尔斯
924asks, in effect,问,实际上,
925what is the moral status of道德状况如何?
926your claim to the benefits您的补助金申请
927that attach该附件
928to the opportunities you have?你的机会?
929Are seats是座位
930in colleges and universities在大专院校
931a matter, a kind of一个问题,一种
932reward, an honor赏金 荣誉
933for those who deserve them对那些应得的人,
934because they've worked so hard?因为他们工作这么辛苦?
935Or are those seats还是那些座位
936those opportunities and honors这些机会和荣誉
937entitlements to legitimate合法权利
938expectations期望
939that depend for their justification取决于理由的
940on those of us对于我们的人
941who enjoy them他们喜欢他们,
942doing so in a way在某种程度上
943that works to the benefit受益的
944of those at the bottom下层的
945of society?社会?
946That's the question这就是问题所在
947that Rawls's Difference Principle罗尔斯的分歧原则
948poses.姿势
949It's a question问个问题
950that can be asked of the可以问:
951earnings of Michael Jordan and David迈克尔·乔丹和戴维的收入
952Letterman and Judge Judy,莱特曼和朱迪法官
953but it's also a question that但这也是个问题
954can be asked of opportunities可以要求机会
955to go to前往
956the top colleges顶级学院
957and universities.和大学。
958And that's a debate这是一场辩论
959that comes out出来了
960when we turn to the question of affirmative action当我们谈到扶持行动问题时
961next time.下次再说吧
该视频共有字幕 962 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格

P7 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p07 6. 6.平权行动的争论 (P7)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:03Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
0:07Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
0:29Last time we were discussing the distinction上次我们讨论区别的时候
0:34that Walls draws墙壁画
0:37between two different types of claimsB. 两类不同索赔之间
0:41claims of moral desert on the one hand一方面声称道德沙漠
0:45and of entitlements to legitimate expectations on the other.和享有对另一方的合法期望的权利。
0:52Walls argued that it's a mistake墙壁说这是个错误
0:58to think that distributive justice认为分配公正
1:02is a matter of moral desert是一个道德的沙漠问题
展开字幕全文(1051 条)
序号英文中文
1Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
2Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
3Last time we were discussing the distinction上次我们讨论区别的时候
4that Walls draws墙壁画
5between two different types of claimsB. 两类不同索赔之间
6claims of moral desert on the one hand一方面声称道德沙漠
7and of entitlements to legitimate expectations on the other.和享有对另一方的合法期望的权利。
8Walls argued that it's a mistake墙壁说这是个错误
9to think that distributive justice认为分配公正
10is a matter of moral desert是一个道德的沙漠问题
11a matter of rewarding people according to their virtue.以功报恩
12Today we're going to explore that question今天我们要探讨这个问题
13of moral desert and its relation to distributive justice道德沙漠及其与分配正义的关系
14not in connection with income and wealth与收入和财富无关
15but in its connection with opportunities但与机会有关
16with hiring decisions and admission standards.包括雇用决定和录取标准。
17And so we turn to the case of affirmative action.因此,我们谈谈平权行动的情况。
18你读过Cheryl Hopwood的案子
19She applied for admission to the University of Texas Law School.她申请进入德克萨斯大学法学院.
20Cheryl Hopwood had worked her way through high school.谢丽尔·霍普伍德在高中时很努力
21She didn't come from an affluent family.她不是出身富裕的家庭
22She put herself through community college她把自己通过社区大学
23and California State University at Sacramento.和加州国立大学萨克拉门托分校
24She achieved a 3.8 grade point average there.她在那里的平均成绩是3.8分。
25Later moved to Texas, became a resident后来搬到德克萨斯,成为一名居民
26took the law school admissions test, did pretty well on that考了法学院的录取考试 成绩不错
27and she applied to the University of Texas Law School.她申请了德克萨斯大学法学院
28She was turned down.她被拒绝了。
29She was turned down at a time when the University of Texas德州大学时她被拒绝了
30was using an affirmative action admissions policy使用平权行动招生政策
31a policy that took into account race and ethnic background.一项考虑到种族和族裔背景的政策。
32The University of Texas said德克萨斯大学说
3340% of the population of Texas德克萨斯州40%的人口
34is made up of African Americans and Mexican Americans.由非裔美国人和墨西哥美国人组成
35It's important that we, as a law school我们作为法学院很重要
36have a diverse student body.拥有不同的学生身体。
37And so we are going to take into account所以我们要考虑
38not only grades and test scores不仅成绩和考试成绩
39but also the demographic makeup of our class我们这个阶级的人口组成
40including its race and ethnic profile.包括种族和族裔概况。
41The result, and this is what Hopwood complained about结果,这就是霍普伍德抱怨的
42the result of that policy政策的结果
43is that some applicants to the University of Texas Law School德克萨斯大学法学院的一些申请人
44with the lower academic index学术指数较低
45which includes grades and test scores包括成绩和考试分数
46then hers were admitted and she was turned down.之后她被录取 被拒绝了
47She said, she argued, I'm just being turned down她说,她争吵,我只是被拒绝
48because I'm white.因为我是白人。
49If I were a member of a minority group如果我是少数群体的成员
50with my grades and test scores I would have been admitted.以我的成绩和考试成绩 我本可以被录取
51And the statistics, the admissions statistics统计 录取统计
52that came out in the trial confirmed审判中证实的
53that African American and Mexican American美国黑人和墨西哥裔美国人
54applicants that year who had该年申请人
55her grades and test scores were admitted.她的成绩和考试成绩都被录取了
56It went to federal court.它去了联邦法院。
57Now, put aside the law, let's consider it现在,放下法律,让我们考虑一下
58from the standpoint of justice and morality.从正义和道德的角度
59Is it fair or is it unfair?公平还是不公平?
60Cheryl Hopwood有案子吗?
61Is a legitimate complaint?投诉合法吗?
62Were her rights violated by the admissions policy她的权利受到侵犯吗?
63of the law school?法学院?
64How many would rule for the law school有多少会统治法学院
65and say that it was just to consider并说这只是考虑
66race and ethnicity as a factor in admissions?种族和族裔作为录取因素?
67How many would rule for Cheryl Hopwood谢丽尔·霍普伍德的统治者有多少
68and say her rights were violated?并说她的权利受到侵犯?
69So here we have a pretty even split.因此,我们有一个相当平分。
70All right, now I want to hear from a defender好吧,现在我想听到一个捍卫者
71of Cheryl Hopwood.谢丽尔·霍普伍德
72Yes.
73You're basing something on that's an arbitrary factor.你根据的是这个因素
74Cheryl couldn't control the fact that she was white谢丽尔无法控制她是白人的事实
75or not in a minority.或者不是少数
76And therefore it's not as if所以,这不像是
77it was a test score that she worked hard to try她努力尝试测试成绩
78and show that she could put that out there,并显示她可以把 在那里,
79that she had no control over her race.她无法控制她的种族
80Good.不错
81And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
82Brie.布丽
83Okay, Brie, stay right there.好吧,布丽,呆在那里。
84Now let's find someone who has an answer for Brie.现在让我们找个能为布丽找到答案的人
85Yes.
86There are discrepancies in the educational system.教育系统存在差异。
87And majority of the time, I know this in New York City,大部分时间,我知道这一点 在纽约市,
88the schools that minorities go to are not as well funded,少数群体就读的学校经费不足,
89are not as well supplied as white schools.供应不如白人学校。
90And so there is going to be a discrepancy naturally所以自然会出现差异
91between minorities and between whites if they go to better schools.少数群体之间和白人之间,如果他们去更好的学校。
92And they will not do as well on exams because they haven't had他们不会在考试上做得那么好,因为他们没有
93as much help because of the worse school system.也因为学校制度恶化了 需要很多帮助
94Let me just interrupt you.我打断你一下
95Tell me your name.告诉我你的名字。
96Anisha.阿尼沙(原变种).
97Anisha, you're pointing out that minority kidsAnisha,你是在指出少数派的孩子
98may have gone, in some cases, to schools在某些情况下,可能去学校
99that didn't give them the same educational opportunity并没有给他们同样的教育机会
100as kids from affluent families.作为富裕家庭的孩子
101Yes.
102And so the test scores they got所以测试结果
103may actually not represent their true potential.可能实际上并不代表他们的真正潜力。
104Because they didn't receive the same kind of help因为他们没有得到同样的帮助
105that they might have received had they gone to a school with better funding.他们可能已经得到 如果他们去学校 有更好的资金。
106Good.不错
107All right.好吧,我们走。
108Anisha has raised the point阿尼莎已经提出这一点
109that colleges still should choose学院还是应该选择
110for the greatest academic scholarly promise,为最大的学术承诺,
111but in reading the test scores and grades,但是在阅读考试成绩和成绩时
112they should take into account the different meaning它们应考虑到不同的含义。
113those tests and grades have考试和成绩
114in the light of educational disadvantage in the background.考虑到教育背景的不利地位。
115So that's one argument in defense所以这是个辩护理由
116Anisha的论点:
117correcting for the effects of unequal preparation,纠正不平等准备的影响,
118educational disadvantage.教育劣势。
119Now, there are other arguments.现在,还有其他的论点。
120Suppose, just to identify假设,只是为了识别
121whether there is a competing principle here,无论这里是否有相互竞争的原则,
122suppose there are two candidates假设有两位候选人
123who did equally well做同样出色的人
124on the tests and grades,测试和成绩,
125both of whom went to first-rate schools.两人都上过一流的学校。
126Two candidates.两个候选人。
127Among those candidates,在这些候选人中,
128would it be unfair这不公平吗?
129for the college or university, for Harvard,学院或大学,哈佛大学,
130to say, we still want diversity可以说,我们仍然想要多样性
131along racial and ethnic dimensions,种族和族裔方面,
132even where we are not correcting即使我们没有纠正
133for the effects on test scores对测试分数的影响
134of educational disadvantage?教育劣势?
135What about in that case, Bree?那样怎么样 Bree?
136If it's that one thing that puts someone over the edge,如果有一件事让某人陷入困境
137then I guess that would be justifiable.那么我猜这是有道理的。
138If everything else about the individual first,如果一切关于个人的第一,
139everything they consider about that person's talents他们考虑的关于他的才能的一切
140and where they come from and who they are他们来自哪里,他们是谁
141without these arbitrary factors is the same.没有这些任意因素,是相同的。
142Without these arbitrary factors, you call it.没有这些任意因素,你叫它。
143But before, you were suggesting, Bree,但是之前,你建议,布瑞,
144that race and ethnicity are arbitrary factors种族和族裔是任意的因素
145outside the control of the applicants.不受申请人控制。
146And your general principle is that admissions你的一般原则是 录取
147shouldn't reward arbitrary factors,不应该奖励任意因素,
148over which people have no control.他们不能控制一切。
149Who else would like to thank you both?还有谁想感谢你们俩?
150Who else would like to get into this?还有谁想参与进来?
151What do you say?你说什么?
152Well, first of all, I'm for affirmative action temporarily,首先 我暂时支持平权行动
153but for two reasons.但有两个原因
154First of all, you have to look at the university's purpose.首先,你必须看看大学的目的。
155It is to educate their students.教育他们的学生。
156And I feel that different races,我觉得不同的种族,
157people coming from different races have different backgrounds来自不同种族的人有不同的背景
158and they contribute differently to the education.她们对教育的贡献不同。
159And second of all, when you say they have equal backgrounds,第二,当你说他们有同样的背景,
160that's not true when you look at the broader picture你从更广阔的视角看,那不是真的
161and you look at slavery, and this is kind of a reparation.你看看奴隶制,这是种补偿。
162I think affirmative action is a temporary solution我认为平权行动是暂时的解决办法
163to alleviate history以缓解历史
164and the wrongs done to African Americans in particular.特别是对非裔美国人犯下的错误。
165And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
166David.大卫
167You say that affirmative action is justified, at least for now,你说平权行动是正当的 至少现在
168as a way of compensating for past injustice,以补偿过去的不公正,
169the legacy of slavery and segregation.奴役和隔离的遗产。
170Who wants to take on that argument?谁想接受这个论点?
171We need now a critic of affirmative action.我们现在需要一位肯定行动的批评者。
172Yes, go ahead.说吧
173I think that what happened in the past has no bearing on what happens today,我认为过去发生的事 与今天发生的事无关
174and I think that discriminating based on race should always be wrong,我认为基于种族的歧视应该永远是错误的,
175whether you're discriminating against one group or another.无论你歧视的是哪个群体
176Just because our ancestors did something只是因为我们的祖先做了一些事情
177doesn't mean that that should have any effect on这不代表那应该对
178what happens with us today.我们今天怎么了?
179All right, good.好吧,不错。
180I'm sorry, your name is?对不起,你的名字是?
181Kate.凯特
182All right, who has an answer for Kate?好吧,谁有凯特的答案?
183Yes.
184I just wanted to comment and say that... Tell us your name.我只是想说... 告诉我们你的名字。
185My name is Mansour.我叫曼苏尔
186Because of slavery, because of past injustices,因为奴隶制,因为过去的不公正,
187today we have a higher proportion of African Americans who are in poverty今天,贫困的非裔美国人比例更高
188who face less opportunities than white people.他们面对的机会比白人少
189And so because of slavery 200 years ago因为二百年前的奴隶制
190and because of Jim Crow and because of segregation,并且因为吉姆・克劳和 因为隔离,
191today we have injustice based on race.今天,我们有基于种族的不公正待遇。
192Kate.凯特
193I think that there are differences, obviously,我认为有分歧,很明显,
194but the way to fix those differences is not by some artificial fixing但修补这些差异的方法 不是通过一些人工修补
195of the result.结果。
196You need to fix the problem.你需要解决这个问题。
197So we need to address differences in education所以我们需要解决教育方面的分歧
198and differences in upbringing和养育的差异
199with programs like Head Start and giving more funding拥有 " 开始 " 和提供更多资金等方案
200to lower income schools rather than trying to just fix the result而不是仅仅试图修正结果
201so it makes it look like it's equal when really it isn't.所以它让它看起来像是平等的 当它真的不是。
202Well, with regard to affirmative action based on race, I just want to say关于基于种族的平权行动 我只想说
203that white people have had their own affirmative action in this country白人在国内有自己的平权行动
204for more than 400 years.超过400年。
205It's called nepotism and quid pro quo.所谓任人唯命与报.
206So there's nothing wrong with correcting the injustice and discrimination所以纠正不公正和歧视是没有问题的
207that's been done to black people for 400 years.这已经对黑人做了400年。
208Good.不错
209Tell us your name.告诉我们你的名字。
210Hannah.汉娜
211All right, who has an answer for Hannah?好吧,谁有汉娜的答案?
212And just to add to Hannah's point还有汉娜的观点
213because we need now someone to respond,因为我们现在需要有人回应,
214Hannah, you could have also mentioned汉娜,你也可以提到
215legacy admissions.传统录取。
216Exactly.没错
217I was going to say, if you disagree with affirmative action,我想说 如果你不同意平权行动
218you should disagree with legacy admission because it's obvious from looking around here你应该不同意传统承认 因为从这里看很明显
219that there are more white legacies than black legacies in the history of Harvard University.在哈佛大学历史上 白人遗产比黑人遗产还多
220And explain what legacy admissions are.并解释什么是遗产承认.
221Well, legacy admissions is giving an advantage to someone who has an arbitrary那么,遗产的承认 给一个有任意性
222privilege of their parent having attended父母的特权
223the university to which they're applying.他们申请的大学。
224All right, so a reply for Hannah.好吧,给汉娜一个答复
225Yes, in the balcony.是的,在阳台上。
226Go ahead.来吧。
227First of all, if affirmative action is making up首先,如果扶持行动正在形成
228for past injustice, how do you explain minorities对于过去的不公正,你如何解释少数
229that were not historically discriminated against在历史上没有受到歧视
230in the United States who get these advantages?在美国谁得到这些优势?
231In addition, you could argue that affirmative action此外,你可以认为平权行动
232perpetuates divisions between the races使种族之间的分歧永久化
233rather than achieve the ultimate goal of race being an irrelevant factor in our society.而不是实现种族成为我们社会无关因素的最终目标。
234And tell us your name.并告诉我们你的名字。
235Danielle.丹妮尔
236Hannah.汉娜
237I disagree with that because I think that by promoting diversity我不同意,因为我认为通过促进多样性
238in an institution like this, you further educate all of the students,在这样的机构,你进一步 教育所有的学生,
239especially the white students who grew up in predominantly white areas.特别是白人学生 他们主要在白人地区长大
240It's certainly a form of education to be exposed to people from different这当然是教育的一种形式 接触不同的人
241backgrounds.学问
242And you put white students at an inherent disadvantage而你却让白人学生处于固有的劣势
243when you surround them only with their own kind.当时,你们只用他们的同类包围他们。
244Why should race necessarily be equated with diversity?为什么种族必须等同于多样性?
245There are so many other forms.有很多其他形式。
246Why should we assume that race makes people different?我们为什么要假设种族让人们不同?
247Again, that's perpetuating the idea of racial division再说一遍,这延续了种族分裂的思想
248within our universities and our society.在我们的大学和社会。
249Hannah.汉娜
250With regard to African-American people关于非裔美国人
251being given a special advantage, it's obvious被赋予特殊优势 很明显
252that they bring something special to the table他们带来了一些特殊的东西在桌子上
253because they have a unique perspective just as someone from a different religion因为他们有独特的视角 就像来自不同宗教的人
254or socioeconomic background would as well.或社会经济背景也会。
255As you say, there are many different types of diversity.如你所说,多样性有很多种。
256There's no reason that racial diversity should be eliminated from that criteria.种族多样性没有理由从这个标准中去除.
257Yes.
258Go ahead.来吧。
259Racial discrimination is illegal in this country.种族歧视在该国是非法的。
260And I believe that it was African-American leaders themselves我相信是非裔美国领导人自己
261when Martin Luther King said he wanted to be judged not on the color of his skin当马丁・路德・金说,他不想 被评判他的肤色
262but by the content of his character, his merit, his achievements.他的性格、功绩、成就
263And I just think that to decide solely based on someone's race我只是认为 仅仅根据某人的种族来决定
264is just inherently unfair.本来就是不公平的
265I mean, if you want to correct based on disadvantaged backgrounds,我的意思是,如果你想纠正 基于不利背景,
266that's fine, but there are also disadvantaged white people as well.也有一些白人处于劣势
267It shouldn't matter if you're white.白衣应否.
268Tell us your name.告诉我们你的名字。
269{\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}Ted {\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}泰德 {\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}你觉得呢
270Ted, think of Hopwood.泰德,想一想霍普伍德
271It's unfair to count race数种族是不公平的
272or I assume you would also say ethnicity or religion.或者我猜你也会说种族或宗教
273Yes.
274Do you think she has a right to be considered你认为她有权被考虑
275according to her grades and test scores alone?单凭成绩和考试成绩?
276No, there is more to it than that.不,还有更多的。
277Universities need to promote diversity.大学需要促进多样性。
278So you agree with the goal of promoting diversity?你同意促进多样性的目标吗?
279There's ways to promote diversity besides除此以外,还有促进多样性的方法
280discriminating against people solely based on a factor纯粹基于某一因素的歧视
281that they cannot control.他们不能控制。
282All right, so what makes it wrong is that she can't control her race.好吧,所以是什么 使它错了是 她不能控制她的种族。
283She can't control the fact that she's white.她不能控制自己是白人的事实.
284That's the heart of the unfairness to her.这是对她不公平的核心
285Brie made a similar point.布里也提出了类似的观点.
286That basing admissions on factors that people can't control基于人们无法控制的因素
287is fundamentally unfair.这根本是不公平的。
288What do you say?你说什么?
289There's a lot of things you can't control and if you're going to go有很多事情你无法控制 如果你要去
290through it based on merit, like just based on your test scores,通过它基于功绩, 就像仅仅根据你的测试分数,
291a lot of what you can achieve has to do with the family background你能够做的很多事情 都与家庭背景有关
292that you raised and if both your parents were scholarly,如果你的父母是学者,
293then you have more of a chance of actually being more scholarly yourself那你就有更多的机会 成为更多的学者自己
294and getting those grades.和获得这些成绩。
295And you can't control what kind of family you were born into.你无法控制你所生的家庭
296All right, good.好吧,不错。
297That's a great rejoinder.这是伟大的复辩。
298What's your name?你叫什么来着?
299Da.达曰.
300Ted, are you against advantages that come from the family you were born into?Ted 你反对你生下来的家庭的好处吗?
301What about legacy admissions?遗产的录取呢?
302I mean, I do believe that in terms of a legacy admission我的意思是,我确实相信 从遗产承认
303you shouldn't have a special preference.你不应该有特别的偏好。
304I mean, there is a legacy admission you could argue is another part我的意思是,有一个遗产承认 你可以认为是另一部分
305of diversity.多样性。
306You could say it's important to have a small percentage你可以说,有一小部分很重要
307of people that have several generation family有几代家庭的人
308attendance at a place like Harvard.就读于哈佛等地.
309However, that should not be然而,这不应该是
310an advantage factor like race.像种族一样的优势因素
311That should just be这应该只是
312another part of promoting diversity.促进多样性的另一个部分。
313Should it count at all?这算不算?
314Alumni status, should it count at all, Ted?校友身份,这算不算,泰德?
315Yes, it should count.是的,应该算数
316All right, I want to step back for a moment from these arguments.好吧,我想退一步 从这些论点。
317Thank you all for these contributions.感谢大家的贡献。
318We're going to come back to you.我们会回来找你的
319If you've listened carefully,如果你仔细听了
320I think you will have noticed three different arguments我想你会注意到三个不同的论点
321emerge from this discussion从这次讨论中产生的
322in defense of considering为考虑辩护
323race and ethnicity种族和族裔问题
324as a factor in admissions.作为录取的一个因素。
325One argument has to do with一个论点和
326correcting for the effects纠正影响
327of educational disadvantage.教育劣势。
328这是Anisha的论点。
329This is what we might call这就是我们可以称为
330the corrective argument.纠正的论据。
331Correcting更正
332for differences in educational background,由于教育背景的差异,
333the kind of school people went to, the opportunities they had那种学校的人去, 他们的机会
334and so on.诸如来.
335That's one argument.这是一个争论。
336What's worth noticing, though, is that that argument is consistent值得注意的是,这个论点是一致的
337in principle with the idea原则上讲
338that only academic promise and scholarly potential只有学术承诺和学术潜力
339should count in admissions.应计入入院人数。
340We just need to go beyond test scores and grades我们只需要超越考试成绩和成绩
341alone to get a true estimate一个人去得到一个真实的估计
342of academic promise and scholarly ability.学术承诺和学术能力。
343That's the first argument.此是初辩.
344Then we heard a second argument that said然后我们听到第二个论点说
345affirmative action is justified扶持行动是合理的
346even where there may not be即使没有
347the need to correct for educational disadvantage需要纠正教育方面的不利因素;
348in a particular applicant's case,在具体申请人的案件中,
349it's justified as a way of compensating for这是正当的补偿方式
350past wrongs, for historic injustices.过去的错误, 历史的不公正。
351So that's a compensatory argument.所以,这是一个补偿性的论点。
352Compensating for past wrongs.弥补过去的错误。
353Then we heard a third, a different然后我们听到第三个,另一个
354argument for affirmative action扶持行动的理由
355from Hannah and others that argued汉纳和其他人的争论
356in the name of diversity.以多样性的名义。
357Now the diversity现在,多样性
358argument is different from the compensatory论据不同于补偿
359argument because it makes a certain参数,因为它可以确定
360appeal to the social purpose or the对社会目标或社会目标
361social mission of the college or university.学院或大学的社会使命。
362There are really two aspects to the diversity多样性确实有两个方面
363argument.参数。
364One says一个说
365it's important to have a diverse student body for the sake of the拥有一个多样化的学生身体很重要
366educational experience for everyone.每个人的教育经历。
367Hannah made汉娜做的
368that point.这一点。
369And the other talks about the其他人谈到
370wider society.更广阔的社会。
371This was the argument made by the University of这是法国大学提出的论点。
372Texas in the Hopwood case.德克萨斯州霍普伍德案
373We need to我们需要
374train lawyers and judges and培训律师和法官
375leaders, public officials who will领导人、政府官员
376contribute to the strength, the贡献力量和力量
377civic strength of the state of Texas and the country德克萨斯州和国家的公民力量
378as a whole.整体而言。
379So there are two different aspects to the所以,有两个不同的方面
380diversity argument.多样性论点。
381But both are但两者都是
382arguments in the name of the social purpose以社会目的为名的论据
383or the social mission or the common good社会使命或共同利益
384served by the institution.由机构提供服务。
385Well what about the那么,怎么样
386force of these arguments?这些论点的力量?
387We've also heard objections我们也听到有人反对
388to these arguments.这些论点。
389The most powerful objection最强大的反对
390to the compensatory argument is补偿性论点是:
391is it fair to ask Cheryl问谢丽尔公平吗?
392Hopwood today to make the sacrifice霍普伍德今天要牺牲
393to pay the compensation for an injustice赔偿不公正行为
394that was admittedly committed and was egregious in the past被承认是犯罪 和令人发指的过去
395but in which she was not implicated.但是她并没有卷入其中。
396Is that fair?公平吗?
397So that's an important所以这很重要
398objection to the compensatory argument对补偿性论点的异议
399and in order to meet that objection并为了反对
400we would have to investigate whether there is我们必须调查是否有
401such a thing as group rights or collective集体权利或集体权利
402responsibility that reaches over time.长期的责任。
403So having identified that issue let's set it aside所以,在找出了这个问题之后,让我们把它搁置起来
404to turn to the diversity argument.转向多样性论点。
405The diversity argument doesn't have to worry多样性的论点不必担心
406about that question, about collective responsibility关于该问题,关于集体责任
407for past wrongs.对于过去的错误。
408Because it says因为它说
409for reasons Hannah and others pointed out由于汉娜和其他人指出的原因
410that the common good即共同利益
411is served, is advanced服务,高级
412if there is a racially and ethnically如果有种族和族裔
413diverse student body.不同的学生身体。
414Everyone benefits.每个人都有益处。
415And this indeed was the argument that Harvard made这确实是哈佛大学提出的论点
416when it filed a Friend of the Court brief当它提交法院之友书状时
417to the Supreme Court in the 1978 case在1978年案件中提交最高法院
418Affirmative Action case, the Bakke case.平权行动案 巴克案
419And the Harvard brief, the Harvard rationale和哈佛简介,哈佛的理由
420was cited by Justice Powell鲍威尔法官引用
421who was the swing vote in the case upholding谁是案件摇摆投票 维护
422affirmative action.平权行动。
423He cited that as providing the他举出这一点,即:
424rationale that he thought was constitutionally他认为是宪法上的理由
425acceptable.可接受的。
426Harvard's argument in its brief哈佛大学在其简介中的论点
427was this.是这个
428We care about diversity.我们关心多样性。
429Scholarly excellence alone光靠学者才能
430has never been the criterion of admission从未成为录取标准
431the sole criterion of admission to Harvard College.进入哈佛大学的唯一标准
432Fifteen years ago diversity meant students十五年前 多样性意味着学生
433from California and New York and Massachusetts来自加州、纽约和马萨诸塞州
434city dwellers and farm boys, violinists城市居民和农场男孩,小提琴手
435painters and football players, biologists, historians画家和足球运动员、生物学家、历史学家
436and classicists.和经典主义者。
437The only difference now现在唯一的区别
438Harvard argued is that we're adding racial哈佛大学的论点是,我们增加种族
439and ethnic status to this long list of这一长长的清单的族裔地位
440diversity considerations.多样性的考虑。
441When reviewing审查时
442the large number of candidates able to do well in our classes我们班上能做得很好的考生
443Harvard wrote, race may count as a plus哈佛写道,种族可能算作一个附加
444just as coming from Iowa may count就像来自爱荷华州一样
445or being a good middle linebacker或是一个很好的中线后卫
446or pianist.或者钢琴家
447A farm boy from Idaho一个爱达荷州的农场男孩
448can bring something to Harvard College that a可以给哈佛大学带来一个
449Bostonian cannot offer.波士顿人无法提供。
450Similarly类似
451a black student can usually bring something a white student黑人学生通常可以带东西给白人学生
452cannot offer.无法提供。
453The quality of the educational教育质量
454experience of all students depends in part所有学生的经历部分取决于
455on these differences in the background关于这些背景差异
456and outlook that students bring with them.以及学生带来的前景。
457That was Harvard's argument.这是哈佛大学的论点。
458Now what about the diversity那么多样性呢?
459argument?辩论?
460Is it persuasive?有说服力吗?
461If it's to be狦琌
462persuasive it has to meet one very powerful说服它必须遇到一个非常强大的
463objection that we've heard voiced我们听到有人反对
464here by Ted, by Brie在这里,泰德,布丽
465unless you're a utilitarian除非你是功利主义者
466you believe that individual rights你相信个人的权利
467can't be violated.不能被侵犯。
468And so the question is所以问题是
469is there an individual right是否有个人权利
470that is violated?被侵犯了?
471Is Cheryl Hopwood's right谢丽尔·霍普伍德说得对
472also violated?也违反了?
473If she is used so to speak如果她是用来说话的
474denied admission for the sake被拒签了
475of the common good and the social mission公益和社会使命
476that the University of Texas Law School has defined for itself德克萨斯大学法学院为自己确定了
477does she have a right?她有权利吗?
478Don't we deserve to be considered according to我们不应该被考虑 根据
479our excellences, our achievements, our accomplishments我们的卓越成就,我们的成就,我们的成就
480our hard work?我们的辛勤工作?
481Isn't that the right at stake?这不就是关键吗?
482Now we've already heard an answer to that现在我们已经听到一个答案
483argument.参数。
484No, she doesn't have a right.不,她没有权利。
485Nobody deserves to be admitted.没有人应该被接纳。
486Notice how this gets us注意这对我们有什么好处
487back to the issue of desert versus entitlement?回到沙漠与权利的问题?
488They're arguing there is no他们认为没有
489individual right that Hopwood has.个人的权利,霍普伍德有。
490She doesn't她没有
491deserve to be admitted according to any particular有权根据任何特定
492set of criteria that she believes to be important一套她认为重要的标准
493including criteria that have only to do包括只须遵守的标准
494with her efforts and achievements.她的努力和成就。
495Why not?为什么不呢?
496I think implicit in this argument我觉得这个论点是隐含的
497is something like Rawls's和罗尔斯一样
498rejection of moral desert as the basis of拒绝道德沙漠作为
499distributive justice.分配正义。
500Yes, once是的,曾经
501Harvard defines its mission哈佛大学确定了它的使命
502and designs its admission policy in the light of its mission并根据其使命制定接纳政策
503people are entitled, who人的权利,谁
504fit those criteria, they are entitled to be根据这些标准,他们有权
505admitted.承认
506But according to this argument但根据这个论点
507no one deserves that Harvard没人配得上哈佛大学
508College define its mission and design its学院确定使命和设计
509admission criteria in the first place in a way录取标准从某种意义上说
510that prizes the qualities they happen奖励他们的品质
511to have in abundance.有丰富的。
512Whether those qualities are test scores这些品质是否是测试分数
513or grades or the ability to play the piano或成绩或弹钢琴的能力
514or to be a good middle linebacker或成为优秀的中后卫
515or to come from Iowa or to come或来自爱荷华州或来
516from a certain minority group.属于某一少数群体。
517So you see这么说吧
518how this debate about affirmative action, especially关于扶持行动的辩论,特别是
519the diversity argument takes us back to the question多样性的论调让我们回到问题上来
520of rights which in turn takes us back to the question权利,这反过来又使我们回到问题中来
521of whether moral desert是否道德沙漠
522is or is not the basis是或不是基础
523for distributive justice.为分配正义。
524Think about that考虑一下
525over the weekend and we'll continue this discussion next time.周末再继续讨论
526Suppose we're distributing flutes.假设我们在分发笛子。
527Who should get the best ones?谁应该得到最好的?
528What's何谓
529the answer is the best flutes should go to the best flute players答案是最好的笛子应该去最好的笛手
530because that's what flutes are因为那就是笛子
531for.为.
532When we ended last time我们上次结束的时候
533we were considering arguments for and against我们考虑过支持和反对
534affirmative action, counting race平权行动,计种族
535as a factor in admissions.作为录取的一个因素。
536And in the course of the discussion在讨论过程中
537three arguments emerged, three arguments出现了三个论点,三个论点
538for affirmative action.为平权行动。
539One of them was其中一个是
540the idea that race and ethnic background种族和族裔背景的概念
541should count as a way of correcting应算作纠正的方法
542for the true meaning of test scores测试分数的真实含义
543and grades, getting a more accurate和成绩,获得更准确
544measure of the academic potential衡量学术潜力
545those scores, those numbers represent.那些分数,那些数字代表。
546Second was what we called the第二,我们称之为
547compensatory argument, the idea补偿性论证,这个想法
548of writing past wrongs, past写过去错误,过去错误
549injustice.不公正。
550And the third was the diversity第三是多样性
551argument.参数。
552And when Cheryl当谢丽尔
553Hopwood in the 1990s challenged1990年代的霍普伍德挑战
554the University of Texas law schools德克萨斯大学法学院
555affirmative action program in the federal courts联邦法院的平权行动方案
556the University of Texas made another version德克萨斯大学做了另一个版本
557of the diversity argument saying that多样性的论点,
558the broader social purpose, the social mission社会使命
559of the University of Texas law school is德克萨斯大学法学院
560to produce leaders in the legal培养法律界领袖
561community, in the political community, among judges社区、政治界、法官中
562lawyers, legislators律师、立法者
563and therefore it's important that因此,重要的是,
564we produce leaders who reflect我们产生领袖 思考
565the background and the experience背景和经验
566and the ethnic and the racial composition of the state民族和种族构成
567of Texas.德克萨斯州。
568It's important这很重要
569for serving our wider social mission服务于我们更广泛的社会使命
570and that was the University of Texas law school's argument.这就是德克萨斯大学法学院的论点。
571Then we considered an objection后来我们考虑反对
572to the diversity argument which after all多样性论点,毕竟
573is an argument in the name of the social以社会为名
574mission, the common good.任务,共同利益。
575We saw that Rawls does not simply believe我们看到罗尔斯并不只是相信
576that arguments of the common good or the general共同利益或一般利益的论点
577welfare should prevail if individual rights如果个人权利
578must be violated in the course of promoting在宣传过程中必须违反
579the common good.共同利益。
580You remember that was the你还记得那是
581question, the challenge to the diversity多样性面临的挑战
582rationale that we were considering when we finished我们完事后考虑的理由
583last time and we began to discuss上次我们开始讨论
584the question, well what right might be at stake?问题是什么权利?
585Maybe the right to be considered也许是被考虑的权利
586according to factors根据因素
587within one's control.在自己控制的范围内
588Maybe this也许这个
589是Cheryl Hopwood的论点
590implicitly was making.隐含在制造。
591She can't help她帮不上忙
592the fact that she's white.她是个白人
593Why should为什么
594her chance at getting into law school她上法学院的机会
595depend on a factor she can't control?取决于她不能控制的因素?
596And then Hannah, who was advancing然后汉娜,谁在进步
597an argument last time, said上次有一次说
598Harvard has the right to define its mission哈佛大学有权确定其使命
599any way it wants to, it's a private institution不管它想怎样,它都是私人机构
600and it's only once Harvard defines its mission只有一次哈佛大学确定了它的使命
601that we can identify我们可以确定
602the qualities that count.质量是最重要的。
603So no rights are being violated.因此,没有侵犯任何权利。
604Now, what about that argument?那这个争论呢?
605What I would like to do is to hear objections我想做的是听到反对
606to that reply and then对答复,然后
607see whether others have an answer.看看别人有没有答案
608Yes, and tell us your name.是的,告诉我们你的名字。
609Da.达曰.
610Right, you spoke up last time.是的,你上次说话。
611All right, how do you answer that argument?好吧,你怎么回答这个论点?
612Well, I think there was two things in there.我觉得里面有两件事
613One of them was that a private其中一个是私人
614institution could define its mission however it wants,机构可以随意确定其使命,
615but then that doesn't make however it defines it right.但这并不能说明它是否正确
616Like, I could define my personal mission as I want to collect喜欢,我可以定义 我的个人任务,因为我想收集
617all the money in the world, but does that make it even a good mission?世界上所有的钱,但 这是否使它甚至是一个好的任务?
618So you can't say that just because所以你不能这么说 只是因为
619a college is a private institution, it could just define it whatever it wants.大学是私人机构,它可以随便定义它
620We still have to think about the way it's defining it.我们仍然要思考它如何定义它.
621Right, and in the case of affirmative action,对,就平权行动而言,
622a lot of people have said that since there's a lot of other factors很多人说,因为有很多其他因素
623involved, why not race?参与,为什么不比赛?
624Like, we already know that the system is imperfect.譬如,我们已经知道这个系统是不完善的。
625I want to stick with your first point, Da.我想坚持你的第一点,爸爸。
626Here's Da's objection.此处达人反对.
627Can a college or university学院或大学
628define its social purpose any way it wants to,以任何方式界定其社会目的,
629and then define admissions criteria accordingly?然后据此界定录取标准?
630What about the University of Texas Law School,那德克萨斯大学法学院呢?
631not today, but in the 1950s?不是今天 而是1950年代吗?
632Then there was another Supreme Court case后来又发生了一起最高法院案件
633against the admissions反对录取
634policy of the University of Texas Law School德克萨斯大学法学院的政策
635because it was segregated.因为它被隔离。
636It only只不过
637admitted whites, and when the case went to court承认白人,当案件上法庭
638back in the 50s, the University of Texas50年代的德克萨斯大学
639Law School also invoked its mission.法学院也援引其使命。
640Our mission as a law school我们作为法学院的使命
641is to educate lawyers教育律师
642for the Texas bar, for Texas law firms.德州律师事务所
643And no Texas law firm没有德州律师事务所
644hires African Americans.雇佣非裔美国人。
645So to fulfill our mission, we only admit为了完成我们的使命,我们只承认
646whites.白头狼
647Or consider Harvard或者考虑哈佛
648in the 1930s, when it had在1930年代,当它有
649anti-Jewish quotas.反犹太人配额。
650President Lowell, president of Harvard in the洛威尔总统,哈佛大学校长
6511930s, said that he had nothing1930年代,说他什么都没有
652personally against Jews, but he invoked他个人反对犹太人,但他援引
653the mission, the social purpose of Harvard, he said,他说,任务,哈佛的社会目的,
654which is not only to train intellectuals.这不仅是为了培养知识分子
655Part of the mission of Harvard, he said,他说,哈佛大学的部分任务
656is to train stockbrokers for Wall Street,就是为华尔街训练股票经纪人
657presidents and senators, and there are very few总统和参议员很少
658Jews who go into those professions.进入这些职业的犹太人.
659Now, here's the challenge.现在,这是挑战。
660Is there a principal distinction是否有主要区别
661between the invocation of the援引《公约》与
662social purpose of the college or university学院或大学的社会目的
663today, in the diversity今天,在多样性中
664rationale, and the invocation of the理由和援引
665social purpose or mission of the university大学的社会目的或使命
666by Texas in the 1950s, or Harvard1950年代德克萨斯州或哈佛
667in the 1930s?在20世纪30年代?
668Is there a difference in principle?原则上有什么区别吗?
669What's the reply?何等为答.
670Hannah?汉娜?
671Well, I think that the principle that's different here我觉得这里的原则不同
672is basically the distinction between inclusion基本上就是包容之间的区别
673versus exclusion.相对于排斥。
674I think that it's morally wrong我觉得这在道德上是错误的
675of the university to say,大学说,
676we're going to exclude you on the basis of your religion我们要以你的宗教为由排斥你
677or your race.或者你的种族。
678That's denial on the basis of arbitrary factors.这是基于任意因素的否定.
679What Harvard is trying to do today with its diversity initiatives哈佛大学今天想用它的多样性倡议做什么
680is to include groups that were excluded包括被排除在外的群体
681in the past.过去
682Good.不错
683Let's see if, stay there,让我们看看,如果,呆在那里,
684let's see if someone would like to reply.看看有没有人想回答
685Go ahead.来吧。
686Actually, this was kind of in support of Hannah,其实,这是种支持汉娜,
687rather than a reply, but I was going to say another而不是一个答复, 但我要说另一个
688principle difference can be based on malice being原则差异可以基于恶意
689the justification, I guess, for the我想,这是为
690historical segregation act.历史隔离法。
691So it's saying这么说
692that we're not going to let blacks or Jews in我们不会让黑人或犹太人进来
693because they're worse as people因为他们比人还糟糕
694or as a group.或者作为一个团体。
695Good.不错
696So the element of malice所以恶意的元素
697is in presence.是在场。
698And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
699Stevie.史蒂维
700Stevie says that in the史提夫说
701historic segregationist, racist,种族主义、种族歧视、仇外心理和
702anti-Semitic quotas or prohibitions,反犹配额或禁令,
703there was built into them a certain他们中有一部分人,
704kind of malice, a certain kind of judgment某种恶意,某种判断
705that African Americans or Jews美国黑人或犹太人
706were somehow less worthy than everybody else.比其他人更没有价值
707Whereas present day affirmative action当今的平权行动
708programs don't involve or imply方案不涉及或暗示
709any such judgment.任何这样的判断。
710What it amounts to saying is so long as a policy这相当于说, 如此长的政策
711just uses people in a way利用别人的方式
712as valuable to the social purpose对社会目标有价值的
713of the institution,该机构,
714it's okay, provided it doesn't judge them⊿闽玒狦⊿Τ
715maliciously, as Stevie might add,恶意地,正如史提夫可能补充说,
716as intrinsically less worthy.内在的不值得。
717I'd like to raise a question.我想提个问题
718Doesn't that concede that这不承认
719all of us, when we compete for所有人,当我们竞争
720positions or for seats in colleges职位或大学席位
721and universities, in a way和大学,在某种程度上
722are being used, not judged, but used正在使用,不是判断,而是使用
723in a way that has nothing to do以无所事事的方式
724with moral desert.与道德的沙漠。
725Remember we got into this whole discussion of affirmative action记得我们开始讨论平权行动
726when we were trying to figure out当我们试图找出
727whether distributive justice是否分配司法
728should be tied to moral desert or not.是否应该和道德的沙漠联系在一起
729And we were launched on that question而我们被启动的问题
730by Rawls and his denial,以罗尔斯和他的否认发誓,
731his rejection of the idea, the distributive justice,他拒绝这个想法, 分配正义,
732whether it's positions or places in the class无论是班级中的位置还是位置
733or income and wealth,或收入和财富,
734is a matter of moral desert.是一个道德的沙漠问题。
735Suppose that were the moral basis假设那是道德基础
736of Harvard's admissions policy.哈佛大学招生政策
737What letters would they have to write他们要写什么信?
738to people they rejected or accepted for that matter?他们否认或接受此事的人,
739Wouldn't they have to write something like this?他们不用写这样的东西吗?
740Dear unsuccessful applicant,亲爱的失败的申请人,
741we regret to inform you that your application for admission has been rejected.我们遗憾地通知你 你的入院申请被拒绝了
742It's not your fault that when you came along来的时候不是你的错
743society happened not to need the qualities you had to offer.社会碰巧并不需要 你必须提供的品质。
744Those admitted instead of you were not themselves被录取的人不是你们自己
745deserving of a place,值得一个地方,
746nor worthy of praise for the factors that led to their admission.也不值得称赞导致他们被接纳的因素。
747We are in any case only using them and you总之,我们只是用他们和你
748as instruments of a wider social purpose.作为更广泛的社会目的的工具。
749Better luck next time.祝你下次好运
750What was the letter you actually got when you were admitted?你被录取时收到的信是什么?
751Perhaps it should have read something like this.也许它应该读 类似的东西。
752Dear successful applicant,亲爱的成功申请者,
753we are pleased to inform you that your application我们高兴地通知你 您的申请
754for admission has been accepted.现已接受录取。
755It turns out, lucky for you,原来你走运了
756that you have the traits that society needs at the moment你拥有社会目前需要的特质
757so we propose to exploit your assets所以我们建议利用你的资产
758for society's advantage.为了社会的利益
759You are to be congratulated,恭喜你们
760not in the sense that you deserve credit for having the qualities不代表你拥有这些品质值得表扬
761that led to your admission,这导致了你的承认,
762but only in the sense that the winner of a lottery is to be congratulated但只有彩票的得票者才能得到祝贺
763and if you choose to accept our offer如果你愿意接受我们的提议
764you will ultimately be entitled to the benefits您最终将有资格享受
765that attach to being used in this way.以这种方式使用
766We look forward to seeing you in the fall.我们期待着在秋季见到你。
767Now there is something a little odd, morally odd,现在有些事情有点奇怪 道德上有些奇怪
768if it's true that those letters如果那些信是真的的话
769do reflect the theory, the philosophy反映理论和哲学
770underlying the policy.政策的基础。
771So here's the question they pose.这就是他们提出的问题。
772And it's a question that takes us back to a big issue这个问题让我们回到一个大问题
773in political philosophy.在政治哲学中。
774Is it possible and is it desirable有可能还是可取的
775to detach questions of distributive justice解决分配公正问题
776from questions of moral desert从道德沙漠问题出发
777and questions of virtue?和道德问题?
778In many ways, this is an issue在许多方面,这是一个问题
779that separates modern political philosophy将现代政治哲学分开
780from ancient political thought.从古代的政治思想。
781What's at stake in the question of whether we can我们能否
782put desert, moral desert aside?把沙漠,道德的沙漠放在一边?
783It seemed when we were reading Rawls好像我们读罗尔斯的时候
784that the incentive, the reason he had奖励,他的原因
785for detaching distributive justice from moral desert将分配正义从道德沙漠中分离出来
786was an egalitarian one,是一个平等的,
787that if we set desert to one side如果我们把沙漠放在一边
788there's greater scope for the exercise锻炼的范围更大
789of egalitarian considerations,平等考虑,
790the veil of ignorance, the two principles,无知的面纱 两项原则
791the difference principle, helping the least well off,差别原则,帮助最不富裕的人,
792redistribution and all that.重新分配和所有这一切。
793But what's interesting is if you look但有趣的是,如果你看着
794at a range of thinkers we've been considering在各种思想家 我们一直在考虑
795there does seem to be a reason they want to似乎有他们想要的理由
796detach justice from desert that goes well beyond将正义从沙漠中分离出去 远远超出
797any concern for equality.任何对平等的关注。
798Well, libertarian rights oriented theorists自由主义者的理论家
799of the kind we've been studying我们一直在研究的那种
800as well as egalitarian rights oriented theorists以及平等权利理论家
801including Rawls and for that matter包括罗尔斯公司和为此
802also including Kant, all agree还有康德,大家都同意
803despite their disagreements over distributive justice尽管他们对于分配公正有分歧
804and the welfare state and all of that,以及福利状况和这一切,
805they all agree that justice is not a matter他们都同意正义不是问题
806of rewarding or honoring奖励或荣誉
807virtue or moral desert.美德或道德的沙漠。
808Now why do they all think that?他们为什么都这么想?
809It can't just be for egalitarian reasons,不能只是因为平等的原因
810not all of them are egalitarians.并不是所有人都是平等的。
811This gets us to the big philosophical question这让我们到了哲学的大问题
812we have to try to sort out.我们必须设法解决。
813Somehow they think tying justice to moral merit or virtue不知何故 他们认为正义与道德或美德挂钩
814is going to lead away from freedom,将远离自由,
815from respect for persons as free beings.不尊重作为自由生命的人。
816Well in order to see为了看
817what they consider to be at stake他们认为其中的利害关系,
818and in order to assess their shared assumption评估它们的共同假设
819we need to turn to a thinker, to a philosopher我们需要转向思想家 哲学家
820who disagrees with them,他们和他们争论,
821who explicitly ties justice明确将司法联系起来的人;
822to honor, honoring virtue荣誉,荣誉
823and merit and moral desert.和功绩和道德的沙漠。
824And that thinker is Aristotle.那个思想家是亚里士多德
825Now in many ways现在,在许多方面
826Aristotle's idea of justice is intuitively亚里士多德的正义思想是直觉的
827very powerful.非常强大。
828In some ways it's strange.在某些方面,这是奇怪的。
829I want to bring out both its power,我想拿出它的力量,
830its plausibility and its strangeness其可信度和奇异性
831so that we can see what's at stake in this whole debate这样我们就能看到这场辩论的利害关系
832about justice and whether it's tied to desert关于正义和它是否与沙漠相连
833and virtue.还有美德
834So what is那么,这是
835Aristotle's answer to the question亚里士多德对问题的回答
836about justice?关于正义?
837For Aristotle为亚里士多德
838justice is a matter of giving people what they deserve,正义是给人民应有的,
839giving people their due.给人们他们应得的。
840It's a matter这件事情
841of figuring out the proper fit找到合适的适合
842between persons with their virtues与有美德的人之间
843and their appropriate social roles.及其适当的社会作用。
844Well what does this picture of justice look like这个正义的画面是什么样子的?
845and how does it differ from the conception和它如何区别 概念
846that seems to be shared among libertarian这似乎被自由主义者分享
847and egalitarian rights oriented theorists alike?以及平等的权利理论家?
848Justice means giving正义意味着给予
849each person his or her due, giving people每个人的应得,给人
850what they deserve.他们应得的
851But what is a person's due?但一个人应该做什么?
852What are the relevant grounds of merit or desert?功绩或沙漠有哪些相关理由?
853Aristotle says that depends on the sort of亚里士多德说这取决于
854things being distributed.东西正在分配。
855Justice involves司法涉及
856two factors, things两个因素,事情
857and the persons to whom the things are assigned.和那些被派去的人。
858In general we say, Aristotle writes,总的来说,我们说,亚里士多德写道,
859that persons who are equal should have equal平等者应享有平等的权利
860things assigned to them.交给他们的事
861But here但在这里
862there arises a hard question.有个很棘手的问题
863Equals等数
864in what respects?在什么方面?
865Aristotle says亚里士多德说
866that depends on the sort of thing we're distributing.那要看我们分配的是什么
867Suppose we're distributing flutes.假设我们在分发笛子。
868What is the relevant merit相关的优点是什么?
869or basis of desert for flutes?还是笛子的沙漠基础?
870Who should get the best ones?谁应该得到最好的?
871What's Aristotle's answer?亚里士多德的答案是什么?
872Anyone?有人吗?
873The best flute players, right.最好的笛手,没错。
874Those who are best谁是最好的
875in the relevant sense, the best flute players.在相关意义上,最好的笛手。
876Is it just to discriminate in allocating flutes?在分配笛子方面是否只是歧视?
877Yes, all justice involves discrimination,是的,所有司法都涉及歧视,
878Aristotle says.亚里士多德说.
879What matters有什么关系?
880is that the discrimination be according to the relevant歧视是根据《公约》第16条(a)项和(b)项的规定。
881excellence, according to the virtue优秀,根据美德
882appropriate to having flutes.适合长笛。
883He says it would be unjust to discriminate on some other他说歧视别人是不公平的
884basis in giving out the flutes.以释放笛子为基础
885Say wealth, just giving the best flutes说财富,只是给最好的笛子
886to the people who can pay the highest price.给那些能付出最高代价的人
887Or nobility of birth, just giving flutes to或贵族出身,只是给笛子
888aristocrats.贵族.
889Or physical beauty,或身体的美丽,
890giving the best flutes to the most handsome.给最帅的笛子
891Or chance, having a lottery.或者机会,有彩票。
892Aristotle says亚里士多德说
893wealth and beauty may be greater goods财富和美丽可能是更大的财富
894than the ability to play the flute.而不是弹笛子的能力
895And those who possess them may surpass the flute拥有它们的人,或许超越笛子,
896player more in these qualities than he surpasses玩家在这些品质上胜过他
897them in his flute playing.在他的笛子演奏。
898But the fact remains但事实依然如此
899that he is the person who ought to get the best flute.他才是应该得到最好的笛子的人
900It's a strange idea, this comparison这个比喻真是奇怪
901by the way, that I mean, could you say顺便说一句,我是说,你能说
902am I more handsome我更帅吗?
903than she is a good lacrosse player?比她还会打曲棍球?
904It's a strange kind of comparison.比较起来很奇怪
905Putting that aside, Aristotle says把那个放在一边,亚里士多德说
906we're not looking for the best overall, whatever that might mean.我们不是在寻找最好的整体 不管那是什么意思
907We're looking for the best musician.我们正在寻找最好的音乐家。
908Now why, this is important to see,现在,为什么,这很重要 看到,
909why should the best flutes go to the best flute players?为什么最好的笛子会去最好的笛手?
910Well, why do you think?你觉得呢?
911Anybody?有人吗?
912What?你说什么?
913They'll produce the best music?他们会产生最好的音乐?
914Well, and everybody will enjoy it more.好吧,每个人都会更享受它。
915That's not Aristotle's answer.这不是亚里士多德的答案。
916Aristotle is not a utilitarian.亚里士多德不是功利主义者.
917He's not just saying他不只是说
918that way there will be better music and everyone will enjoy it,这样会有更好的音乐 每个人都会喜欢它,
919everyone will be better off.每个人都会更好。
920His answer is他的答案是,我们...
921the best flutes should go to the best flute players最好的笛子应该去最好的笛手
922because that's what flutes are for,因为这就是笛子的目的
923to be played well.来好好玩
924The purpose of flute playing,吹长笛的目的
925the purpose is to produce excellent music目的是制作优秀的音乐
926and those who can best perfect that purpose以及那些最能达到目的的人
927ought properly to have the best ones.应该有最好的。
928Now it may also be true现在也可能是真的
929as a welcome side effect作为受欢迎的副作用
930that everyone will enjoy listening to that music.每个人都会喜欢听那音乐
931So that answer is true enough所以这个答案就足够了
932as far as it goes, but it's important to see that Aristotle's reason但重要的是要看到亚里士多德的理由
933is not a utilitarian reason.这不是功利主义的理由。
934It's a reason that looks这是一个理由看起来
935here's where you might think it's a little bit strange.你可能觉得这里有点奇怪
936It looks to the purpose, the point,它着眼于目的, 要点,
937the goal of flute playing.吹笛子的目标
938Another way of describing this另一种说法
939looking to the goal to determine the目标
940chest allocation, the Greek for goal胸腔分配,希腊为目标
941或结束是telos。
942So Aristotle says you have to consider所以亚里士多德说 你得考虑一下
943the point, the end, the goal,重点,终点,目标,
944the telos of the thing, in this case of flute playing在吹笛子的时候
945and that's how you define这就是你如何定义
946a just allocation, a just discrimination.公正分配 公正歧视
947So this idea of reasoning所以这个推理的想法
948from the goal, from the telos从球门, 从泰洛斯
949is called teleological reasoning.被称作心灵推理。
950Teleological moral reasoning.腾讯道德推理.
951And that's Aristotle's way.这是亚里士多德的方式。
952Reasoning from the goal, from the end.由是入球,从末.
953Now this may seem, as I said,现在,这也许看起来,正如我说的,
954a strange idea that we're supposed to reason一个奇怪的想法,我们应该有道理
955from the purpose, but it does have a certain不过它确实有某种
956intuitive plausibility.直观之理.
957Consider the allocation, let's say, at Harvard考虑一下在哈佛的拨款
958of the best tennis courts or squash courts.最好的网球场或壁球场
959How should they be allocated?如何分配这些资源?
960Who should have priority谁应优先
961in playing on the best courts?在最好的法庭上玩?
962Well, you might say those你可以这么说
963who can best afford them,他们最能负担他们,
964set up a fee system, charge money for them.建立收费制度,为他们收费.
965Aristotle would say no.亚里士多德会拒绝的
966You might say, well,你可能会说,嗯,
967Harvard big shots, the most influential people at Harvard,哈佛大人物 哈佛最有影响力的人
968who would they be?他们会是谁?
969The senior faculty should have priority高级教职员工应该优先
970in playing on the best tennis courts.在最好的网球场上打球
971No, Aristotle would reject that.不,亚里士多德会拒绝的
972Some scientists may be a greater scientist than some一些科学家可能比一些科学家更伟大
973But still, the tennis player is the one不过,网球选手就是那个
974who should have priority应优先处理
975for playing on the best tennis court.在最好的网球场打球
976There is a certain intuitive plausibility有某种直觉的道理
977to this idea.对这个想法。
978Now, one of the things that makes it strange现在,其中一件事 使它变得奇怪
979is that in Aristotle's world, in the ancient world,在亚里士多德的世界, 在古代的世界,
980it wasn't only social practices不只是社会习俗
981that were governed, in Aristotle's view,在亚里士多德看来,
982by teleological reasoning以语言推理
983and teleological explanation.和心灵感应的解释。
984All of nature was understood to be a meaningful order所有自然被理解为一个有意义的秩序
985and what it meant to understand nature,以及了解自然的意义,
986to grasp nature, to find our place in nature,抓住大自然 找到我们在大自然中的地位
987was to inquire into and read out调查并宣读
988the purposes or the telos of nature.自然的目的或主题。
989And with the advent of modern science,随着现代科学的出现,
990it's been difficult to think of the world that way很难想象这个世界是这样
991and so it makes it harder, perhaps,所以它使得它更难,也许,
992to think of justice in a teleological way.以心灵的方式思考正义
993But there is a certain naturalness但有一点自然
994to thinking about even the natural world思考着自然世界
995as teleologically ordered, as a purpose of whole.整个目的
996In fact, children have to be educated事实上,儿童必须接受教育
997out of this way of looking at the world.从此观世音.
998I realized this when my kids were very young我小时候就意识到了
999and I was reading them a book, Winnie the Pooh.我在读一本书,维尼
1000Winnie the Pooh gives you a great idea维尼给你一个好主意
1001of how there is a certain natural,如何有一个自然,
1002childlike way of looking at the world像孩子一样看世界的方式
1003in a teleological way.以心灵学的方式。
1004You may remember a story你可能记得一个故事
1005of Winnie the Pooh walking in the forest one day.有一天维尼在森林里散步
1006He came to a place in the forest他来到森林的一个地方
1007and from the top of a tree there came a loud buzzing noise.从一棵树的顶部发出响亮的声音。
1008Winnie the Pooh sat at the foot of the tree,维尼坐在树脚下
1009put his head between his paws and began to think.把他的头放在爪子之间 开始思考
1010Here's what he said to himself.这就是他对自己说的话。
1011That buzzing noise means something.那个叫声意味着什么
1012You don't get a buzzing noise like that,你可没听到那种叫声
1013just buzzing and buzzing, without its meaning something.只是嗡嗡声和嗡嗡声, 没有意义的东西。
1014If there's a buzzing noise, somebody's making a buzzing noise.如果有嗡嗡声 有人在发出嗡嗡声
1015And the only reason for making a buzzing noise唯一的理由 发出噪音
1016that I know of is because you're a bee.我知道是因为你是个蜜蜂
1017Then he thought for another long time and said,然后他又想了很久 然后说
1018then the only reason for being a bee成为蜜蜂的唯一原因
1019that I know of is making honey.我知道这是做蜂蜜。
1020And then he got up and he said,然后他站起来说,
1021and the only reason for making honey和唯一的理由 制造蜂蜜
1022is so I can eat it.这样我才能吃它。
1023So he began to climb the tree.于是他开始爬树.
1024This is an example这是一个例子
1025of teleological reasoning.以语言推理
1026It isn't so implausible after all.毕竟也不是那么不可思议
1027Now, we grew up and we're talked out of this way,现在,我们长大了,我们被说服了出去,
1028of thinking about the world.思考这个世界。
1029But here's the question.但问题是...
1030Even if teleological explanations就算是心理解释
1031don't fit with modern science,不适应现代科学,
1032even if we've outgrown them in understanding nature,即使我们在了解自然方面 超越了他们
1033isn't there something still intuitively是不是还有 直觉上的东西
1034and morally plausible, even powerful,和道德上可信的,甚至强大的,
1035about Aristotle's idea关于亚里士多德的想法
1036that the only way to think about justice这是思考正义的唯一方法
1037is to reason from the purpose,从目的出发
1038the goal, the telos of the social practice,目标, 社会实践的调子,
1039and isn't that precisely what we were doing这正是我们在做什么
1040when we were disagreeing about affirmative action?当我们不同意平权行动时?
1041You could almost recast that disagreement你几乎可以重塑这种分歧
1042as one about what the proper,如一个关于什么是正当的,
1043appropriate purpose or end适当目的或目的
1044of a university education consists in.大学教育包括:
1045Reasoning from the purpose目的的原因
1046or from the telos or from the end,或从调音器或从结尾,
1047Aristotle says that's indispensable亚里士多德说这是不可或缺的
1048to thinking about justice.思考正义。
1049Is he right?他说得对吗?
1050Think about that question as you turn to Aristotle's politics.想想这个问题 当你转向亚里士多德的政治。
1051Additional funding provided by...由.提供的额外资金。
该视频共有字幕 1053 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格

P8 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p08 7. 7.是否雇佣顶替自己服役的人 (P8)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:03We were discussing Locke's idea of government by consent, and the question arose, what are我们当时在讨论洛克关于同意政府的想法 问题是,什么是
0:42the limits on government that even the agreement of the majority can't override?对政府的限制,即使多数人同意也不能推翻?
0:49That was the question we ended with.这是我们最后的问题。
0:56We saw, in the case of property rights, that on Locke's view, a democratically elected在财产权方面,我们看到洛克认为,一个民主选举产生的
1:07government has the right to tax people.政府有权向人民征税。
1:12It has to be taxation with consent, because it does involve the taking of people's property它必须是经同意的税收,因为它确实涉及夺取人民的财产。
1:18for the common good, but it doesn't require the consent of each individual at the time但并不需要每个人当时的同意
1:27the tax is enacted or collected.制定或征收税款。
1:30What it does require is a prior act of consent to join the society, to take on the political它确实需要事先征得同意,才能加入社会,承担政治责任。
1:41obligation.义务。
展开字幕全文(643 条)
序号英文中文
1We were discussing Locke's idea of government by consent, and the question arose, what are我们当时在讨论洛克关于同意政府的想法 问题是,什么是
2the limits on government that even the agreement of the majority can't override?对政府的限制,即使多数人同意也不能推翻?
3That was the question we ended with.这是我们最后的问题。
4We saw, in the case of property rights, that on Locke's view, a democratically elected在财产权方面,我们看到洛克认为,一个民主选举产生的
5government has the right to tax people.政府有权向人民征税。
6It has to be taxation with consent, because it does involve the taking of people's property它必须是经同意的税收,因为它确实涉及夺取人民的财产。
7for the common good, but it doesn't require the consent of each individual at the time但并不需要每个人当时的同意
8the tax is enacted or collected.制定或征收税款。
9What it does require is a prior act of consent to join the society, to take on the political它确实需要事先征得同意,才能加入社会,承担政治责任。
10obligation.义务。
11But once you take on that obligation, you agree to be bound by the majority.但一旦你承担了这项义务,你同意受多数的约束。
12So much for taxation.税费就够了
13But what you may ask about the right to life, can the government conscript people and send但你可以问什么 关于生命权, 政府可以征召人民和发送
14them into battle?他们投入战斗?
15What about the idea that we own ourselves?我们自己的想法呢?
16Isn't the idea of self-possession violated if the government can, through coercive legislation如果政府能够通过强制立法, 自我占有的想法不是受到侵犯吗?
17and enforcement powers, say, you must go risk your life to fight in Iraq?以及执法权,比如,你必须冒着生命危险去伊拉克作战?
18What would Locke say?洛克会怎么说?
19Does the government have the right to do that?政府有权这样做吗?
20Yes.
21In fact, he says in 139, he says, what matters is that the political authority or the military事实上,他在139年说, 重要的是政治权威或军队
22authority not be arbitrary.权威不是任意的。
23That's what matters.这才是最重要的。
24And he gives a wonderful example.他给出了一个很好的例子。
25He says a sergeant, even a sergeant, let alone a general, a sergeant can command a soldier他说一个军士,甚至一个军士, 更别说一个将军,一个军士可以指挥一个士兵
26to go right up to the face of the cannon where he's almost sure to die.直奔大炮的正面 他几乎肯定会死
27That the sergeant can do.军士可以做的。
28The general can condemn the soldier to death for deserting his post or for not obeying将军可以因为士兵逃职或不服从命令 判他死刑
29even a desperate order.甚至一个绝望的命令。
30But with all their power over life and death, what these officers can't do is take a penny但凭着他们对生死的支配力 这些军官不能做的就是拿一分钱
31of that soldier's money because that has nothing to do with the rightful authority.那士兵的钱 因为那和合法权力无关
32That would be arbitrary and it would be corrupt.这样做是任意的,是腐败的。
33So consent winds up being very powerful in Locke.所以同意在洛克变得非常强大
34Not consent of the individual to the particular tax or military order.个人不同意特定税收或军事命令。
35But consent to join the government and to be bound by the majority in the first place.但同意加入政府,并首先受多数人的约束.
36That's the consent that matters.这才是最重要的同意
37And it matters so powerfully that even the limited government created by the fact that这很重要,甚至连有限的政府 由事实:
38we have an unalienable right to life, liberty and property.我们拥有不可剥夺的生命、自由和财产权利。
39Even that limited government is only limited in the sense that it has to govern by generally即使这种有限的政府也只是从它必须普遍治理的意义上来说是有限的。
40applicable laws, the rule of law, it can't be arbitrary.这不能是任意的。
41That's Locke.这是洛克。
42Well this raises a question about consent.这引起了同意的问题。
43Why is consent such a powerful moral instrument in creating political authority and the obligation为什么同意是建立政治权威和义务的强大道德工具?
44to obey?服从?
45Today we begin to investigate the question of consent by looking at a concrete case.今天,我们开始调查同意问题,研究一个具体案例。
46The case of military conscription.征兵问题。
47Now some people say if we have a fundamental right that arises from the idea that we own现在有些人说,如果我们有一个基本权利 产生于我们自己的思想
48ourselves, it's a violation of that right for a government to conscript citizens to我们自己,这是侵犯政府征召公民
49go fight in wars.去打仗,战争。
50Others disagree, others say that's a legitimate power of government, of democratically elected其他人不同意,其他人说,这是政府的合法权力, 民主选举
51governments anyhow, and that we have an obligation to obey.无论如何,政府,我们有义务服从。
52Let's take the case of the United States fighting a war in Iraq.以美国在伊拉克作战为例.
53News accounts tell us that the military is having great difficulty meeting its recruitment新闻报导告诉我们 军队很难应付征兵
54targets.目标。
55Consider three policies that the US government might undertake to deal with the fact that考虑美国政府可能采取的三项政策,以应对以下事实:
56it's not achieving its recruiting targets.它没有达到招募目标。
57Solution number one, increase the pay and benefits to attract a sufficient number of第一解决方案,增加薪资和福利,以吸引足够数量的
58soldiers.士兵们
59Option number two, shift to a system of military conscription.第二选择,转向征兵制度。
60Have a lottery and whosoever numbers are drawn, go to fight in Iraq.有彩票,无论谁抽到数字,都去伊拉克战斗。
61System number three, outsource.系统三号,外包。
62Hire what traditionally have been called mercenaries.雇用传统上称为雇佣军的人。
63People around the world who are qualified, able to do the work, able to fight well and全世界有资质,能干能干,能打能打能打能打
64who are willing to do it for the existing wage.他们愿意为现有的工资这样做。
65So let's take a quick poll here.因此,让我们在这里做一个快速的民意调查。
66How many favor increasing the pay?多少人喜欢增加工资?
67Huge majority.绝对是多数
68How many favor going to conscription?征召多少人?
69Alright, maybe a dozen people in the room favor conscription.好吧,也许一打人 在房间里赞成征兵。
70What about the outsourcing solution?那外包方案呢?
71Okay, so there may be about two, three dozen.好吧,大概有两,三打。
72During the Civil War, the Union used a combination of conscription and the market system to fill国共内战期间,国联采用征兵制和市场制相结合的方式填补.
73the ranks of the military to fight in the Civil War.在内战中参战的军衔。
74It was a system that began with conscription, but if you were drafted and didn't want to这是一种从征兵开始的制度 但如果你被征召而不愿
75serve, you could hire a substitute to take your place and many people did.服务,你可以雇一个替补 来代替你的位置,很多人也做了。
76You could pay whatever the market required in order to find a substitute.你可以为寻找替代品而支付任何市场所需的费用。
77People ran ads in newspapers, in the classified ads, offering five hundred dollars, sometimes人们在报纸上,在分类广告上, 提供500美元,有时
78a thousand dollars for a substitute who would go fight the Civil War in their place.1000美元 一个替身 要代替他们去打内战
79In fact, it's reported that Andrew Carnegie was drafted and hired a substitute to take事实上,据报道,安德鲁·卡内基是被征召的,并聘请了一名替补人选来接收.
80{\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}他那份钱比他一年的花费少一点 {\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}他那份钱
81fancy cigars.漂亮的雪茄烟。
82Now I want to get your views about the Civil War system.现在我想了解你对内战制度的看法
83Call it the hybrid system, conscription but with a buyout provision.称之为混合制,征兵制 但有一个买断条款。
84How many think it was a just system?有多少人认为这是一个公正的制度?
85How many would defend the Civil War system?有多少人会保卫内战系统?
86Anybody?有人吗?
87One, anybody else?一个,还有谁?
88Two, three, four, five.二三四五门.
89How many think it was unjust?有多少人认为这是不公正的?
90Most of you don't like the Civil War system.你们大多不喜欢内战制度
91You think it's unjust.你觉得这不公平吗?
92Let's hear an objection.让我们听到一个反对。
93Why don't you like it?何故不乐.
94What's wrong with it?有什么不对吗?
95Well by paying three hundred dollars to be exempt one time around, you're really putting好吧,通过支付300美元 豁免一次左右,你真的把
96a price on valuing human life and we established earlier that's really hard to do so they're我们早些时就建立了 很难做到
97trying to accomplish something that really isn't feasible.试图完成一些不可行的事
98Good, so paying someone three hundred or five hundred or a thousand dollars.不错,所以支付一个人 300或500或1000美元。
99You're basically saying that's what their life is worth to you.你根本就是说 他们的生命对你来说是值得的
100That's what their life is worth.这就是他们生命的价值。
101It's putting a dollar value on life.令众生得一钱.
102That's good.这是很好的。
103And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
104Liz.丽兹
105Well, who has an answer for Liz?谁知道丽兹的答案?
106You defended the Civil War system.你为内战制度辩护
107What do you say?你说什么?
108If you don't like the price then you have the freedom to not be sold or hired so it's如果你不喜欢价钱 那你有不被出售或雇用的自由
109completely up to you and I don't think it's necessarily putting a specific price on you完全由你决定,我不认为 它一定给你一个具体的代价
110and if it's done by himself I don't think there's anything necessarily morally wrong如果这是自己做的 我觉得在道德上没什么不对的
111with that.还有那个
112So the person who takes the five hundred dollars, let's say, he's putting his own price on his所以,谁拿走500美元的人, 让我们说,他把自己的价格
113life or on the risk of his life and he should have the freedom to choose to do that.他应该有选择这样做的自由。
114Exactly.没错
115What's your name?你叫什么来着?
116Jason.贾森
117Jason, thank you.杰森 谢谢你
118Now we need to hear from another critic of the Civil War system.现在我们需要听到另一位内战制度的批评者。
119Yes.
120It's a kind of coercion almost to people who have lower incomes.这几乎是对收入较低的人的一种胁迫.
121For Carnegie he can totally ignore the draft.对卡内基来说,他可以完全忽略草案。
122Three hundred dollars is irrelevant in terms of his income.三百元与其收入无关.
123For someone of a lower income they're essentially being coerced to be drafted or I mean it's对于一个收入较低的人来说 他们基本上被胁迫被征召 或者我的意思是
124probably they're not able to find a replacement.也许他们找不到替补
125Tell me your name.告诉我你的名字。
126Sam.萨姆
127When a poor laborer accepts three hundred dollars to fight in the Civil War he is in当一个穷苦的工人接受三百元 参加内战时
128effect being coerced by that money given his economic circumstances whereas Carnegie can鉴于卡内基的经济情况,
129go off, pay the money and not serve.走开,付钱,不服务。
130I want to hear if someone has a reply to Sam's argument that what looks like a free exchange我想听听如果有人回应了Sam的论点 说这看起来像自由交换
131is actually coercive.实际上是强迫性的。
132Who has an answer to Sam?谁对萨姆有答案?
133Go ahead.来吧。
134I'd actually agree with him in saying that it is coercion in the sense that it robs the我其实同意他的说法,即这是胁迫,因为它抢劫
135individual of his ability to reason.个人的理性能力
136Okay.摆
137And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
138Raul.劳尔。
139Alright so Raul and Sam agree that what looks like a free exchange, free choice, voluntary好吧,所以劳尔和山姆同意 这看起来像一个自由交换, 自由选择,自愿
140act is actually it involves coercion.行为实际上是胁迫。
141It's profound coercion of the worst kind because it falls so disproportionately upon one segment这是最恶劣的强迫 因为它不成比例地落在一个部分
142of the society.社会。
143Alright.还好
144So Raul and Sam have made a powerful point.於是劳尔和萨姆提出了强有力的观点.
145Who would like to reply?谁想回答?
146Who has an answer for Sam and Raul?谁对萨姆和劳尔有答案?
147Go ahead.来吧。
148I just I don't think that these drafting systems are really terribly different from you know我只是不认为这些起草系统 与你知道的非常不同
149volunteer army sort of recruiting strategies.志愿军的招募策略
150The whole idea of you know having benefits and pay for joining the army is you know sort你知道有福利和为参军付出代价的整个想法是 你知道排序
151of a coercive strategy to get people to join.强制策略,让人们加入。
152It is true that military volunteers come from disproportionately you know lower economic军队的志愿兵确实来自 经济水平低的人群
153status and also you know from certain regions of the country where you can use like the并且您还知道,从该国某些地区,您可以使用例如:
154patriotism to try and coerce people to feel like it's the right thing to do to volunteer爱国主义试图强迫人们觉得志愿工作是正确的
155and go over to Iraq.并去伊拉克。
156And tell me your name.告诉我你的名字。
157Emily.艾米丽。
158Alright Emily says and Raul you're going to have to reply to this so get ready.好吧,艾米丽说和劳尔 你将不得不回答这一点 所以准备。
159Emily says fair enough there is a coercive element to the civil war system when the laborerEmily说当工人在内战制度下 有强制因素
160takes the place of Andrew Carnegie for $500.以500美元取代安德鲁·卡内基
161Emily conceives that but she says if that troubles you about the civil war system shouldn't艾蜜莉想的,但她说 如果这困扰你 关于内战制度,不应该
162that also trouble you about the volunteer army today?今天志愿军的事也让你烦恼了?
163And let me and before you answer how did you vote on the first poll?让我和在你回答你是如何投票 第一次投票?
164Did you defend the volunteer army?你保护志愿军了吗?
165I didn't vote.我没有投票
166You didn't vote?你没投票?
167By the way you didn't vote?你没有投票?
168Did you sell your vote to the person sitting next to you?你把你的选票卖给坐在你旁边的人了吗?
169No alright.没事
170So what would you say to that argument?那么,你会对这个争论说什么?
171I think that the circumstances are different and that there was conscription in the civil我认为,情况不同,民事部门有征兵制度。
172war.战争。
173There is no draft today and I think that the volunteers for the army today have a more今天没有草案,我认为今天的志愿军
174profound sense of patriotism that is of an individual choice than those who were forced深厚的爱国感是个人的选择,而不是强迫的
175into the military in the civil war.在内战中进入军队
176Somehow less coerced.不知何故,不那么被胁迫。
177Less coerced.少为逼迫.
178Even though there is still inequality in American society.尽管美国社会仍然存在不平等.
179Even though as Emily points out the makeup of the American military is not reflective虽然Emily指出 美国军队的构成并不反映
180of the population as a whole.人口总数。
181Let's just do an experiment here.我们在这里做个实验
182How many here have either served in the military or have a family member who has served in这里有多少人在军队服役 或有一个家庭成员曾经在
183the military?军队?
184In this generation.此辈中.
185Not parents.不为父母.
186Family members.诸眷属.
187In this generation.此辈中.
188And how many have neither served nor have any brothers or sisters who have served?有多少人没有服务过,也没有任何兄弟姐妹服务过?
189Does that bear out your point Emily?这证实了你的观点吗 Emily?
190Alright.还好
191Now we need to hear from, most of you defended the idea of the all-volunteer military overwhelmingly.现在,我们需要听到来自, 你们多数人 捍卫了这个想法,全志愿军压倒一切。
192And yet overwhelmingly people considered the civil war system unjust.但绝大多数人认为内战制度是不公正的。
193Sam and Raoul articulated reasons for objecting to the civil war system.Sam和Raoul阐述了反对内战制度的理由。
194It took place against a background of inequality and therefore the choices people made to buy这是在不平等的背景下发生的,因此人们选择购买
195their way into military service were not truly free but at least partly coerced.他们服兵役并非真正自由,至少是部分胁迫。
196Then Emily extends that argument in the form of a challenge.然后艾米莉以挑战的形式扩展了这一论点.
197Alright everyone here who voted in favor of the all-volunteer army should be able, should好吧,这里的每一位投票赞成 全志愿军,应该能够,应该
198have to explain, well what's the difference in principle?得解释一下,原则上有什么区别?
199Doesn't the all-volunteer army simply universalize the feature that almost everyone found objectionable全志愿军不就是普遍化吗? 几乎所有人都觉得不妥
200in the civil war buyout provision?在内战买断条款?
201Did I state the challenge fairly Emily?我说的是艾米丽的挑战吗?
202Yes.
203Okay so we need to hear from a defender of the all-volunteer military who can address好吧,所以我们需要听到 一个捍卫者 全志愿军 谁可以解决
204Emily's challenge.艾米丽的挑战。
205Who can do that?谁能如此?
206Go ahead.来吧。
207The difference between the civil war system and the all-volunteer army system is that内战制度和全志愿军制度的区别是:
208in the civil war you're being hired not by the government but by an individual and as在内战中 你受雇的不是政府 而是个人
209a result different people who get hired by different individuals get paid different amounts.因此,被不同个人雇用的人得到不同的报酬。
210In the case of the all-volunteer army everyone who gets hired is hired by the government and对于全志愿军,每个被雇佣的人都是政府雇佣的
211gets paid the same amount.得到同样的金额。
212It's precisely the universalization of essentially paying your way into the army that makes the这正是普遍 支付你的方式进入军队
213all-volunteer army just...所有志愿军...
214Emily?艾米丽?
215I guess I'd frame the principle difference slightly differently.我想我会把原则区别 设计得有点不同
216On the all-volunteer army it's possible for somebody to just step aside and not really在全志愿军中,有人可以袖手旁观,而并非真的
217think about the war at all.想想战争吧
218It's possible to say well I don't need the money, I don't need to have an opinion about说得好,我不需要钱,我不需要意见
219this, I don't need to feel obligated to take my part and defend my country.这个,我不需要觉得有义务 参与和捍卫我的祖国。
220With a coercive system or with an explicit draft then there's the threat at least that有了强制系统或明确的草案 就会有威胁
221every individual will have to make some sort of decision regarding military conscription每个人必须就征兵问题做出某种决定
222and perhaps in that way it's more equitable.也许这样比较公平
223It's true that Andrew Carnegie might not serve in any case but in one he can completely step安德鲁·卡内基绝对不会服役 但他可以完全步入
224aside from it and in the other there's some level of responsibility.除了它, 而在另一个 有一些程度的责任。
225While you're there Emily, so what system do you favor, conscription?你在的时候Emily,你喜欢什么制度?
226I would be hard pressed to say but I think so because it makes the whole country feel我很难说 但我想是因为它让全国感觉
227a sense of responsibility for the conflict instead of having a war that's maybe ideologically一种对冲突的责任感 而不是一场也许在意识形态上的战争
228supported by a few but only if there's no real responsibility.有少数支持 但只有在没有真正责任的情况下
229Good.不错
230Who wants to reply?谁想回答?
231Go ahead.来吧。
232So I was going to say that the fundamental difference between the all-volunteer army所以我想说, 根本的区别 在所有志愿军
233and then the army in the Civil War is that in the all-volunteer army if you want to volunteer内战中的军队是全志愿军中 如果你想志愿
234that comes first and then the pay comes after whereas in the Civil War system the people先是工资,然后是工资,而内战时期的人民
235who are accepting the pay aren't necessarily doing it because they want to, they're just接受报酬的人不一定这样做,因为他们想要,他们只是
236doing it for the money first.先为了钱
237What motivation beyond the pay do you think is operating in the case of the all-volunteer你认为除了工资之外,什么动机 运作对于全志愿者
238army?军队?
239Like patriotism for the country.如爱国为国.
240Patriotism.爱国主义.
241Well, what about pay?那么,那报酬呢?
242And a desire to defend the country.及欲护国.
243I mean, there is some motivation in pay but the fact that it's first and foremost an all-volunteer我的意思是,有一些动机 报酬,但事实上,它 首先是一个全志愿
244army will motivate them, I think, personally.我认为军队会亲自激励他们
245Do you think it's better, and tell me your name.你觉得这样更好吗 告诉我你的名字
246Jackie.城
247Jackie, do you think it's better if people serve in the military out of a sense of patriotismJackie,你觉得在军队服役的人 最好有爱国感吗?
248than just for the money?不只是为了钱?
249Yes, definitely because the people who, that was one of the main problems in the Civil是的,肯定因为 人民谁,这是 主要问题之一 在公民
250War army is that the people that you're getting to go in it or to go to war aren't necessarily战争军队是,你得到的人 进入它或去打仗 不一定
251people who want to fight and so they won't be as good soldiers as they will be had they想要打仗的人 就不会像他们那样好
252been there because they wanted to be.在那里,因为他们想要。
253Alright, what about Jackie's, having raised the question of patriotism, that patriotism好吧,那Jackie的, 提出爱国主义的问题, 那爱国主义呢?
254is a better or a higher motivation than money for military service.其动机优于或高于兵役金钱。
255Who would like to address that question?谁想谈这个问题?
256Go ahead.来吧。
257Patriotism absolutely is not necessary in order to be a good soldier because mercenaries爱国是绝对没有必要的 为了成为好士兵 因为雇佣兵
258can do just as good of a job of the job as anyone who waves the American flag around可以做一个工作,就像任何人 谁挥动美国国旗周围
259and wants to defend what the government believes that we should do.并且想为政府 认为我们应该做的辩护
260Did you favor the outsourcing solution?你赞成外包办法吗?
261Yes, sir.是 长官
262And, alright, so let Jackie, let Jackie respond.好吧 让杰姬来回应
263What's your name?你叫什么来着?
264Philip.飞利浦.
265What about that Jackie?那个杰基呢?
266So much for patriotism.爱国主义就够了
267If you've got someone whose heart is in it more than another person, they're going to如果你有个人的心比别人更强 他们就会
268do a better job.做一个更好的工作。
269When it comes down to the wire and there's like a situation in which someone has to put当它下到电线 和有类似的情况 人必须设置
270their life on the line, someone who's doing it because they love this country will be他们的生活在线上, 一个人谁这样做 因为他们爱这个国家
271more willing to go into danger than someone who's just getting paid.比起刚拿到钱的人 更愿意陷入危险
272They don't care.他们不在乎。
273They've got the technical skills, but they don't care what happens because they really他们有技术,但他们不在乎会发生什么,因为他们真的
274have, they have nothing like, nothing invested in this country.他们没有像,没有投资 在这个国家。
275There's another aspect though.还有另一个方面
276Once we get onto the issue of patriotism, if you believe patriotism, as Jackie does,一旦我们谈到爱国主义问题 如果你相信爱国主义 就像杰基那样
277should be the foremost consideration and not money, does that argue for or against应该是首要考虑而不是金钱,
278the paid army we have now?现在的军饷?
279We call it the volunteer army, though if you think about it, that's a kind of misnomer.我们称它为志愿军,不过如果你考虑一下,那是种错误。
280A volunteer army, as we use the term, is a paid army.志愿军,在我们使用这个词的时候,是一支有报酬的军队.
281So, what about the suggestion that patriotism should be the primary motivation for military那么,关于爱国主义应该是军队的主要动机的建议呢?
282service, not money?服务,不是钱?
283Does that argue in favor of the paid military that we have or does it argue for conscription?这是赞成我们拥有的军饷,还是主张征兵?
284And just to sharpen that point, building on Phil's case for outsourcing, if you think以菲尔的外包案例为基础 如果你认为
285that the all-volunteer army, the paid army, is best because it lets the market allocate全志愿军,有薪军, 是最好的,因为它让市场分配
286positions according to people's preferences and willingness to serve for a certain wage,根据人们的喜好和愿意服务以获得一定的工资,
287doesn't the logic that takes you from a system of conscription to the hybrid civil war system并不是从征兵制度到混合内战制度的逻辑
288to the all-volunteer army, doesn't the idea of expanding freedom of choice in the market,对全志愿军来说,这不是扩大市场选择自由的想法,
289doesn't that lead you all the way, if you follow that principle consistently, to a mercenary army?这难道不带你一路, 如果你坚持这一原则, 雇佣军军队?
290And then if you say no, Jackie says no, patriotism should count for something,如果你说不,杰基说不,爱国主义应该算什么,
291doesn't that argue for going back to conscription?这不代表要重新入伍吗?
292If by patriotism you mean a sense of civic obligation, let's see if we can step back如果爱国主义是指公民义务感 让我们看看能不能退后
293from the discussion that we've had and see what we've learned about consent as it applies从我们的讨论 并看看我们学到了什么 关于同意,因为它适用
294to market exchange.到市场交易。
295We've really heard two arguments, two arguments against the use of markets and exchange我们确实听到两个论点,两个反对利用市场和交换的论点
296in the allocation of military service.在兵役分配方面。
297One was the argument raised by Sam and Raoul, the argument about coercion.其中一个是Sam和Raoul提出的论点,关于胁迫的论点。
298The objection that letting the market allocate military service may be unfair and may not反对让市场分配兵役可能是不公平的,而且可能不会
299even be free if there's severe inequality in the society so that people who buy their如果社会上存在严重的不平等,甚至可以自由,这样人们就能够买下他们的
300way into military service are doing so not because they really want to, but because they服兵役不是因为他们真的想要,而是因为他们
301have so few economic opportunities that that's their best choice.经济机会如此之少 才是他们最好的选择
302And Sam and Raoul say there's an element of coercion in that.萨姆和拉乌尔说,这里面有强制的因素.
303That's one argument.这是一个争论。
304Then there is a second objection to using the market to allocate military service.然后,有人第二次反对利用市场分配兵役。
305That's the idea that military service shouldn't be treated as just another job for pay because这就是为什么兵役不应该被当做又一份有报酬的工作
306it's bound up with patriotism and civic obligation.它与爱国主义和公民义务联系在一起。
307This is a different argument from the argument about unfairness and inequality and coercion.这与关于不公平、不平等和胁迫的论点不同。
308It's an argument that suggests that maybe where civic obligations are concerned, we这个论点表明,也许在公民义务方面,我们
309shouldn't allocate duties and rights by the market.市场不应该分配责任和权利。
310Now, we've identified two broad objections.现在,我们已经确定了两个广泛的反对意见。
311What do we need to know to assess those objections?我们需要知道什么来评估这些反对意见?
312To assess the first, the argument from coercion, inequality and unfairness, Sam, we need to为了评估第一点,即胁迫、不平等和不公平的论点,Sam,我们需要
313ask what inequalities in the background conditions of society undermine the freedom of choices问社会背景条件的不平等如何损害选择自由
314people make to buy and sell their labor?人们为了买卖他们的劳动力?
315Question number one.问曰.
316Question number two, to assess the civic obligation patriotism argument, we have to ask, what问题二,为了评估公民义务爱国论,我们必须问:
317are the obligations of citizenship?公民身份的义务是什么?
318Is military service one of them or not?兵役是其中之一吗?
319What obligates us as citizens?我们作为公民负有什么义务?
320What is the source of political obligation?政治义务的来源是什么?
321Is it consent or are there some civic obligations we have, even without consent, for living是同意,还是有些公民义务... ...即使没有同意,我们的生活
322and sharing in a certain kind of society?在某种社会中分享?
323We haven't answered either of those questions, but our debate today about the civil war system我们没有回答这两个问题,但是我们今天关于内战制度的辩论
324and the all-volunteer army has at least raised them, and those are questions we're going志愿军至少把他们养大了 这些是我们要去的问题
325to return to in the coming weeks.将在未来几周内返回。
326Do you think you should be able to bid for a baby that's up for adoption?你觉得你应该买个要领养的孩子吗?
327That's Andrew's challenge.这是安德鲁的挑战。
328Do I think I should be able to bid for a baby?我想我应该能买到孩子吗?
329I'm not sure.我不太确定 说不定
330It's a market.这是一个市场。
331Today, I'd like to turn our attention and get your views about an argument over the今天,我想转移我们的注意力 并获得你的观点 关于一个争论
332role of markets in the realm of human reproduction and procreation.市场在人类生殖和生育领域的作用。
333Now, with infertility clinics, people advertise for egg donors, and from time to time in the现在,在不孕症诊所, 人们广告 鸡蛋捐赠者, 不时在
334Harvard Crimson, ads appear for egg donors.哈佛Crimson,广告出现为鸡蛋捐献者.
335Have you seen them?你见过他们吗?
336There was one that ran a few years ago that wasn't looking for just any egg donor.几年前有一次跑步 不是为了寻找任何捐蛋者
337It was an ad that offered a large financial incentive for an egg donor from a woman who这是一个广告,它提供了一个巨大的经济激励 从一个女性的鸡蛋捐赠者
338was intelligent, athletic, at least 5 foot 10, and with at least 1,400 or above on her聪明,运动,至少5英尺10, 和至少1400或以上她
339SATs (英语).
340How much do you think the person looking for this egg donor was willing to pay for an egg你觉得那个买鸡蛋的人 愿意付多少钱买鸡蛋?
341from a woman of that description?从一个女人的描述?
342What would you guess?你猜怎么着?
343$1,000?1000块?
344$15,000?15,000美元吗?
345$10,000?1万块?
346I'll show you the ad.我给你看广告
347$50,000 for an egg, but only a premium egg.5万块的鸡蛋,但只有高价的鸡蛋。
348What do you think about that?你觉得怎么样?
349Well, there are also sometimes ads in the Harvard Crimson and other college newspapers有时哈佛大学的报纸 和其他大学的报纸也会刊登广告
350for sperm donors.为献精者。
351So the market in reproductive capacities is an equal opportunity market.因此,生殖能力市场是一个平等机会市场。
352Well, not exactly equal opportunity.机会并不均等
353They're not offering $50,000 for sperm.他们不给精子5万元
354But there is a company, a large commercial sperm bank, that markets sperm.但是,有一个公司, 一个大型的商业精子库, 销售精子。
355It's called California Cryobank.其名称取自加利福尼亚州Cryobank.
356It's a for-profit company.以利为业.
357It imposes exacting standards on the sperm it recruits.它对其招募的精子规定了严格的标准。
358And it has offices in Cambridge between Harvard and MIT and in Palo Alto near Stanford.并在剑桥的哈佛和麻省理工学院之间以及斯坦福附近的帕洛阿尔托设有办事处.
359Cryobank's marketing materials play up the prestigious source of its sperm.Cryobank的销售材料 充斥着它的精子的著名来源
360这是Cryobank网站上的信息
361Here they talk about the compensation.他们在这里谈论补偿。
362Although compensation should not be the only reason for becoming a sperm donor,虽然补偿不应该是成为精子捐献者的唯一原因,
363we are aware of the considerable time and expense involved in being a donor.我们意识到,作为捐助国需要花费大量时间和开支。
364So do you know what they offer?你知道他们提供什么吗?
365Donors will be reimbursed $75 per specimen, up to $900 a month if you donate three times a week.捐赠者每个标本可报销75美元,如果每周捐赠三次,每月可报销900美元。
366And then they add, we periodically offer incentives such as movie tickets然后他们又说,我们定期提供奖励 比如电影票
367or gift certificates for the extra time and effort expended by participating donors.或关于参与捐助者所花额外时间和努力的礼品证书。
368It's not easy to be a sperm donor.当精液捐献者不易.
369They accept fewer than 5% of the donors who apply.申请的捐助者不到5%。
370Their admission criteria are more demanding than Harvard's.他们的录取标准比哈佛更严格.
371The head of the sperm bank said the ideal sperm donor is six feet tall,精子库的负责人说理想的精子捐献者高六英尺
372with a college degree, brown eyes, blonde hair, and dimples,有大学学位 棕色的眼睛 金发 酒窝
373for the simple reason that these are the traits that the market has shown the customers want.原因很简单 这些是市场显示客户想要的特征
374Quoting the head of the sperm bank,引用精子库的负责人,
375if our customers wanted high school dropouts, we would give them high school dropouts.如果我们的顾客想要高中辍学, 我们会给他们高中辍学。
376So here are two instances, the market in eggs for donation and the market in sperm,这里有两个例子: 捐卵市场和精子市场
377that raise a question.这引起了一个问题。
378A question about whether eggs and sperm should or should not be bought and sold for money.关于鸡蛋和精子是否应该为了钱而买卖的问题.
379As you ponder that, I want you to consider another case involving a market想想看,我要你再考虑一起涉及市场的案子
380and in fact a contract in human reproductive, in the human reproductive capacity.事实上,这是人类生殖能力的契约。
381And this is the case of commercial surrogate motherhood.这就是商业代孕母亲的情况。
382And it's a case that wound up in court some years ago.这案子是几年前在法庭上结的
383It's the story of Baby M.这是婴儿M的故事。
384It began with William and Elizabeth Stern, a professional couple, wanting a baby,一开始是威廉和伊丽莎白・斯特恩 职业夫妇想要个孩子
385but they couldn't have one on their own, at least not without medical risk to Mrs. Stern.但他们不能自己拥有一个 至少不给斯特恩夫人带来医疗风险
386They went to an infertility clinic where they met Marybeth Whitehead,他们去了一个不孕症诊所 在那里他们遇到了玛丽贝丝·怀特黑德,
387a 29-year-old mother of two, the wife of a sanitation worker.29岁的母亲 两个, 一个卫生工人的妻子。
388She had replied to an ad that the center had placed, seeking the service of a surrogate mother.她答复了中心张贴的广告,寻求代孕母亲的服务。
389They made a deal.他们做了个交易
390They signed a contract in which William Stern agreed to pay Marybeth Whitehead a $10,000 fee,他们签了一份合同 威廉·斯特恩同意向玛丽贝斯·怀特黑德支付一万美元的费用
391plus all expenses, in exchange for which Marybeth Whitehead agreed to be artificially inseminated再加上所有费用 作为交换 玛丽贝丝·怀特黑德同意人工注射
392with William Stern's sperm to bear the child and then to give the baby to the Sterns.带着威廉·斯特恩的精子生孩子,然后把孩子交给斯特恩夫妇.
393Well, you probably know how the story unfolded.嗯,你也许知道 故事是如何展开的。
394Marybeth gave birth and changed her mind.玛丽贝斯生下孩子,改变了主意.
395She decided she wanted to keep the baby.她决定要保留孩子
396The case wound up in court in New Jersey.案件在新泽西州的法庭上结束.
397So let's put aside any legal questions and focus on this issue as a moral question.因此,让我们把任何法律问题放在一边,把这个问题作为一个道德问题集中起来.
398How many believe that the right thing to do in the Baby M. case would have been to uphold the contract,有多少人认为在Baby M. 的案子里应该做的是维持合同
399to enforce the contract, and how many think the right thing to do would have been not to enforce that contract?有多少人认为不该执行合同?
400So it's about the majority say enforce.多数人说执行
401So let's now hear the reasons that people had either for enforcing or refusing to enforce this contract.现在让我们来听听人们有 执行或拒绝执行这个合同的理由。
402First from those, I want to hear from someone in the majority.首先,我想听到多数人的声音。
403Why do you uphold the contract?你为什么坚持合同?
404Why do you enforce it?为什么要强制执行它?
405Who can offer a reason?谁能提供理由?
406Yes, stand up.是的,站起来。
407It's a binding contract.这是一份具有约束力的合同。
408All the parties involved knew the terms of the contract before any action was taken.所有有关当事方在采取任何行动之前都知道合同的条款。
409It's a voluntary agreement.自愿协议.
410The mother knew what she was getting into.母亲知道她要卷入什么
411All four, intelligent adults, regardless of formal education, whatever.四者,聪明的成年人,不论正规教育,无论什么.
412So it makes sense that if you know what you're getting into beforehand and you make a promise, you should uphold that promise in the end.所以,如果你知道你事先进到什么 并做出承诺,你应该坚持这个承诺。
413Okay.摆
414A deal is a deal, in other words.换句话说,交易就是交易。
415Exactly.没错
416And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
417Patrick.派屈克 派屈克 派屈克
418Is Patrick's reason the reason that most of you in the majority favored upholding a contract?你们多数人赞成维持合同 是因为帕特里克的原因吗?
419Yes?是吗?
420All right.好吧,我们走。
421Let's hear now someone who would not enforce the contract.让我们听听谁不会执行合同。
422What do you say to Patrick?你怎么跟帕特里克说?
423Why not?为什么不呢?
424Yes.
425Well, I mean, I agree.我是说 我同意
426I think contracts should be upheld when all the parties know all the information.我认为,当所有各方都知道所有信息时,合同就应当得到维护。
427But in this case, I don't think there's a way a mother before the child exists could actually know how she's going to feel about that child.但是在这种情况下,我认为在孩子存在之前,母亲不可能真正知道她对孩子的感受.
428So I don't think the mother actually had all the information.所以我不认为母亲真的有所有的信息。
429She didn't know the person that was going to be born and didn't know how much she would love that person.她不认识将要出生的人,也不知道她会有多爱他.
430So that's my argument.这就是我的论点。
431So you would not.所以你不会。
432And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
433Evan Wilson.埃文・威尔逊。
434Evan says he would not uphold the contract because when it was entered into, the surrogate mother couldn't be expected to know in advance how she would feel.埃文说,他不会支持合同,因为签订合同时,不能期望代孕母亲事先知道她的感受.
435So she didn't really have the relevant information when she made that contract.所以当她签订合同时,她并没有真正掌握相关信息.
436Who else?还有谁?
437Who else would not uphold the contract?还有谁不支持合同?
438Yes?是吗?
439I also think that a contract should generally be uphold, but I think that the child has an inalienable right to its actual mother.我也认为,合同一般应该得到维护,但我认为,孩子对其实际母亲拥有不可剥夺的权利。
440And I think that if that mother wants it, then that child should have the right to that mother.我想如果那个母亲想要的话 那那个孩子应该有权接近那个母亲
441You mean the biological mother, not the adoptive mother.你是说生母 不是养母
442Right.
443And why is that?为什么?
444First of all, tell me your name.首先,告诉我你的名字。
445Anna.安娜,请问安娜
446Why is that Anna?为什么是安娜?
447Because I think that bond that is created by nature is stronger than any bond that is created by a contract.因为我认为大自然创造的纽带 比契约创造的任何纽带都要强大
448Good.不错
449Thank you.谢谢
450Who else?还有谁?
451Yes?是吗?
452I disagree.我不同意这个观点。
453I don't think that a child has an inalienable right to her biological mother.我不认为孩子对生母有不可剥夺的权利.
454I think that adoption and surrogacy are both legitimate tradeoffs.我认为收养和代孕都是合法的权衡。
455And I agree with the point made that it's a voluntary agreement, an individual made it's a voluntary agreement, and you can't apply coercion to this argument.我同意这个观点,即这是自愿协议,个人是自愿协议,你不能对这个论点施加强制.
456You can't apply the objection from coercion to this argument.你不能把强制的反对 应用到这个论点。
457Correct.没错
458What's your name?你叫什么来着?
459Kathleen.凯瑟琳
460Kathleen, what do you say to Evan that though there may not have been...凯瑟琳 你怎么跟埃文说 虽然可能没有...
461Evan claimed that the consent was tainted not by coercion, but by lack of adequate information.埃文声称,同意不是受到胁迫,而是缺乏充分的信息。
462She couldn't have known the relevant information, namely how she would feel about the child.她不可能知道相关信息 也就是她对孩子的感受
463What do you say to that?你说呢?
464I don't think the emotional content of her feelings plays into this.我并不认为她感情中的情感内容会起到作用.
465I think in a case of law, in the justice of this scenario, her change of feelings are not relevant.我认为,在法律案件中,在这种情况下的正义中,她的改变感情无关紧要.
466If I give up my child for adoption and then I decide later on that I really want that child back, too bad.如果我把孩子送去收养,然后我决定 我真的想要孩子回来,太糟糕了。
467It's a tradeoff.谓取舍.
468It's a tradeoff that the mother has made.母已作是权衡.
469So a deal is a deal.所以说交易就是交易
470Well, you agree with Patrick.你同意帕特里克的观点
471I agree with Patrick.我同意帕特里克的意见。
472A deal is a deal.一言为定
473Yes.
474I would say that though I'm not really sure if I agree with the idea that the child has a right to their mother,我会说,虽然我不确定 我是否真的同意这个想法, 即孩子有权与他们的母亲,
475I think the mother definitely has a right to her child.我觉得母亲对孩子有权利
476And I also think that there are some areas where market forces shouldn't necessarily penetrate.我也认为,有些领域 市场力量不应该渗透到。
477I think that the whole surrogate mother area smacks a little bit of dealing in human beings, seems dehumanizing.我认为整个代孕母亲区 拍了一点点 人类交易, 似乎非人性化。
478And it doesn't really seem right.似乎不太对劲
479So that's my main reason.所以这就是我的主要原因。
480And what is – tell us your name.告诉我们你的名字
481I'm Andrew.我是安德鲁
482Andrew, what is dehumanizing about buying and selling the right to a child for money?安德鲁,买买买买买买买买买买买买买买孩子的权利,有什么非人性化的?
483What is dehumanizing about it?何谓非人道.
484Well, because you're buying someone's biological right.因为你在买别人的生物权利
485I mean, you can't – in the law, as it's said, you can't sell your own child.我的意思是,你不能——在法律中,正如它所说的,你不能出卖自己的孩子.
486Like, were you to have a child, I believe that the law prohibits you selling it to another person.喜欢,如果你要有一个孩子, 我相信法律禁止 你卖给另一个人。
487So this is like baby selling.这就像卖婴儿。
488Right.
489To a certain extent.在某种程度上
490I mean, though there is a contract with another person, you've made agreements and whatnot,我的意思是,虽然有一个合同 与另一个人,你已经达成协议什么的,
491there is an undeniable emotional bond that takes place between a mother and a child.母亲和孩子之间有着不可否认的情感纽带。
492And it's wrong to simply ignore this because you've written out something contractually.而忽略这一点是错误的, 因为你已经写出了一些合同。
493You want to reply to Andrew?你想回答安德鲁吗?
494Stay there.别动
495You point out there's an undeniable emotional bond.你指出有一种不可否认的情感联系.
496I feel like in this situation, we're not necessarily arguing against adoption or surrogacy in itself.我觉得在这种情况下,我们并不一定反对收养或代孕本身.
497We're just sort of pointing out the emotional differences.我们只是指出情绪上的差异。
498Well, but wait.好吧,不过等等。
499I mean, it's easy to break everything down to numbers and say, oh, we have contracts like you're buying and selling a car.我的意思是,这是很容易 打破所有的数字 说,哦,我们有合同 像你正在买卖一辆车。
500But there are underlying emotions.但有内在的情绪
501I mean, you're dealing with people.我的意思是,你处理的人。
502I mean, these are not objects to be bought and sold.我的意思是,这些不是要买卖的物品。
503All right.好吧,我们走。
504What about Andrew's claim that this is like baby selling?安德鲁声称这就像卖婴儿?
505I believe that adoption and surrogacy should be permitted.我认为,应当允许收养和代孕。
506Whether or not I actually will partake in it is not really relevant.不管我是否真的会参与其中 都无关紧要
507But I think that the government should give its citizens the rights to allow for adoption and surrogacy.但我认为政府应该赋予公民允许收养和代孕的权利.
508But adoption is not according to the law.但收养不依法进行。
509Is adoption baby selling?领养婴儿卖吗?
510Well, do you think you should be able to bid for a baby that's up for adoption?你觉得你应该买个要领养的孩子吗?
511That's Andrew's challenge.这是安德鲁的挑战。
512Do I think I should be able to bid for a baby?我想我应该能买到孩子吗?
513I'm not sure.我不太确定 说不定
514It's a market.这是一个市场。
515I mean, I feel like the extent to which it's been applied, I'm not sure if the government should be able to permit it.我的意思是,我觉得它应用的程度, 我不知道政府是否应该允许它。
516And I have to think about it more.我必须多考虑一下
517But all right.但没关系。
518Fair enough.不错
519Are you satisfied, Andrew?你满意了吗,安德鲁?
520Well, yeah, I mean, I just I think surrogacy should be permitted.嗯,是的,我的意思是,我只是觉得 应该允许代孕。
521I think that people can do it.我认为人们可以做到这一点。
522But I don't think that it should be forced upon people that once the contract is signed, it's it's absolutely like the end all.但我不认为应该强迫人们 一旦签约, 这是绝对像结束的一切。
523I think that it's unenforceable.我认为这是不可执行的。
524So people should be free, Andrew, to enter into these contracts.因此人们应该有自由,安德鲁,来签订这些合同.
525But it should not be enforceable in a court.但它不应在法庭上强制执行。
526Not in the court.不在宫中.
527No.没有
528Who would like to join on one side or the other?谁愿意加入一方或另一方?
529Yes.
530I think I have an interesting perspective on this because my brother was actually one of the people who donated to a sperm bank and he was paid a very large amount of money.我对这件事的看法很感兴趣 因为我哥哥其实是向精子银行捐钱的人之一 他得到很多钱
531He was six feet tall, but not blonde.他身高六英尺,但不是金发
532He had dimples, though.不过他有酒窝
533So he actually has I'm an aunt now and he has a daughter.所以他真的把我当姑妈了 他有个女儿
534He donated his sperm to a lesbian couple in Oklahoma and he has been contacted by them and he has seen pictures of his daughter.他把自己的精子捐给了俄克拉荷马州的一对女同性恋夫妇,他也得到了他们的联系,他还看到了他女儿的照片.
535But he still does not feel an emotional bond to his daughter.但是他仍然感觉不到他女儿的感情纽带.
536He just has a sense of curiosity about what she looks like and what she's doing and how she is.他只是对她长什么样子 在做什么 以及她是如何的好奇心
537He doesn't feel love for his child.他对孩子不感兴趣
538So from this experience, I think the bond between a mother and a child cannot be compared to the bond between the father and the child.因此从这个经验来看,我认为母亲和孩子之间的纽带不能与父亲和孩子之间的纽带相比.
539That's really interesting.这真的很有趣。
540What's your name?你叫什么来着?
541Vivian.维维亚
542So we've got the case of surrogacy, commercial surrogacy, and it's been compared to baby selling.因此,我们有了代孕,商业代孕的案例,被比作卖婴儿.
543And we've been exploring whether that analogy is apt.我们一直在探索这个类比是否合适。
544And it can also be compared, as you point out, to sperm selling.正如你所指出,它也可以与精子销售相比较。
545But you're saying that sperm selling and baby selling or even surrogacy are very different.但你的意思是 精子卖和婴儿卖 甚至代孕是截然不同的
546Yes, they're unequal services.是的,他们是不平等的服务。
547They're unequal services.他们是不平等的服务。
548And that's because, Vivian, you say that the tie, the bond...这是因为,薇薇安,你说的领带,纽带...
549Yes, and also the time investment that's given by a mother, nine months, cannot be compared to a man going into a sperm bank, looking at pornography, depositing into a cup.对,还有母亲给予的时间投资,九个月,不能与进入精子库,看色情,存入杯子的人相比.
550I don't think those are equal.我不认为这些是平等的。
551Good.不错
552All right.好吧,我们走。
553So we...所以我们...
554Because that's what happens in a sperm bank.因为精子库就是这样的
555So this is really interesting.所以这真的很有趣。
556We have...我们...
557Notice the arguments that have come out so far.注意目前为止的争论
558The objections to surrogacy, the objections to enforcing that contract, are of at least two kinds.反对代孕,反对执行该合同,至少有两种。
559There was the objection about tainted consent, this time not because of coercion or implicit coercion, but because of imperfect or flawed information.有人反对错误的同意,这次不是因为胁迫或隐含的胁迫,而是因为信息不完善或有缺陷。
560So tainted or flawed consent can arise either because of coercion or because of a lack of relevant information, at least according to one argument that we've heard.因此,有污点或有缺陷的同意可能是由于胁迫或缺乏相关信息,至少根据我们听到的一个论点。
561And then a second objection to enforcing the surrogacy contract was that it was somehow dehumanizing.然后,对执行代孕合同的第二个反对意见是,它不知何故非人性化。
562Now, when this case was decided by the courts, what did they say about these arguments?当这个案子被法院裁决时, 他们对这些论点怎么说?
563The lower court ruled that the contract was enforceable.下级法院裁定合同可以执行。
564Neither party had a superior bargaining position.任何一方都不具备高级谈判地位。
565A price for the service was struck and a bargain was reached.服务价格被打破,并达成了交易。
566One side didn't force the other.一方没有强迫另一方。
567Neither had disproportionate bargaining power.也没有过大的讨价还价能力。
568Then it went to the New Jersey Supreme Court.之后它去了新泽西州最高法院.
569And what did they do?他们做了什么?
570They said this contract is not enforceable.他们说这份合同不能执行.
571They did grant custody to Mr. Stern as the father because they thought that would be in the best interest of the child.他们确实将监护权授予作为父亲的Stern先生,因为他们认为这样做符合孩子的最大利益。
572But they restored the rights of Marybeth Whitehead and left it to lower courts to decide exactly what the visitation rights should be.但他们恢复了玛丽贝特·怀特黑德的权利,并留给下级法院确切决定探视权应该是什么.
573They invoked two different kinds of reasons along the lines that Andrew proposed.他们按照安德鲁提出的思路,引用了两种不同的理由.
574First, there was not sufficiently informed consent, the court argued.首先,法院辩称,没有足够的知情同意。
575Under the contract, the natural mother is irrevocably committed before she knows the strength of her bond with her child.根据合同,生母在知道自己与孩子的关系力之前,是不可撤销的。
576She never makes a truly voluntary informed decision.她从来没有做出一个真正的自愿知情的决定。
577For any decision prior to the baby's birth is, in the most important sense, uninformed.对于婴儿出生前的任何决定,从最重要的意义上来说,都是不知情的.
578That was the court.那是法庭
579Then the court also made a version of the second argument against commodification in this kind of case.之后,法院又对此类案件中的第二个反对商品化的论点做了一个版本.
580This is the sale of a child, the court said.法院说,这是买卖儿童。
581Or at the very least, the sale of a mother's right to her child.或至少卖母权于子.
582Whatever idealism may motivate the participants, the profit motive predominates, permeates, and ultimately governs the transaction.无论理想主义可能激发参与者,利润动机占主导地位、渗透并最终支配交易。
583And so regardless, the court said, regardless of any argument about consent or flawed consent or full information,因此,无论法院说,无论关于同意或有缺陷的同意或充分信息的任何论点,
584there are some things in a civilized society that money can't buy.在一个文明的社会中,有些东西是钱买不到的.
585That's what the court said in voiding this contract.朝廷在废除这份合同时也是这么说的.
586Well, what about these two arguments against the extension of markets to procreation and to reproduction?那么,这两个反对扩大市场 生育和繁殖的论点呢?
587How persuasive are they?他们有多有说服力?
588There was, it's true, a voluntary agreement, a contract struck between William Stern and Mary Beth Whitehead.威廉·斯特恩和玛丽·贝丝·怀特黑德之间签了合同
589But there are at least two ways that consent can be other than truly free.但至少有两种方式,同意可以是真正自由的。
590First, if people are pressured or coerced to give their agreement.第一,如果人们受到压力或被迫表示同意。
591And second, if their consent is not truly informed.其次,如果他们的同意没有被真正告知。
592And in the case of surrogacy, the court said, a mother can't know, even one who already has kids of her own,在代孕案件中,法庭说, 一个母亲不能知道, 即使一个已经有 自己的孩子,
593what it would be like to bear a child and give it up for pay.生孩子然后为了报酬而放弃孩子的感受
594So in order to assess criticism, objection number one,所以为了评估批评,反对第一,
595we have to figure out just how free does a voluntary exchange have to be我们必须弄清楚 自愿的交换必须有多自由
596with respect to the bargaining power and equal information.关于讨价还价的能力和平等的信息。
597Question number one, how do we assess the second objection?问题一:如何评估第二次反对?
598The second objection is more elusive, it's more difficult.第二项反对比较难捉摸,比较困难.
599Andrew acknowledged this, right?安德鲁承认了 对吧?
600What does it mean to say there is something dehumanizing to make childbearing a market transaction?说有非人性化的东西 让生育成为市场交易是什么意思?
601我们读过的一个哲学家 Elizabeth Anderson
602tries to give some, bring some philosophical clarity to the unease that Andrew articulated.给安德鲁表达的不安带来一些哲学上的清晰
603She said by requiring the surrogate mother to repress whatever parental love she feels for the child,她说要求代孕母亲 压制她对孩子的爱
604surrogacy contracts convert women's labor into a form of alienated labor.代孕合同将妇女的劳动转化为一种疏远的劳动形式.
605The surrogate's labor is alienated because she must divert it from the end,代孕者的劳动被疏远了 因为她必须把它从最后转移
606from the end which the social practices of pregnancy rightly promote,从怀孕的社会习俗正确提倡的结束,
607namely an emotional bond with her child.也就是和她孩子的感情纽带
608So what Anderson is suggesting is that certain goods should not be treated as open to use or to profit.所以安德森的意思是,某些商品不应该被当作是开放使用或盈利的。
609Certain goods are properly valued in ways other than use.某些货物的价值不以使用的方式适当估价。
610What are other ways of valuing and treating goods that should not be open to use?不应允许使用的商品的估价和处理还有其他哪些方法?
611Anderson says there are many, respect, appreciation, love, honor, awe, sanctity.安德森说有许多,尊重,欣赏,爱,荣誉,敬畏,神圣.
612There are many modes of valuation beyond use and certain goods are not properly valued除了使用之外,有许多估价方式,某些货物没有适当估价。
613if they're treated simply as objects of use.如果它们被简单地当作使用对象。
614How do we go about evaluating that argument of Anderson?我们如何去评估安德森的论点?
615In a way it takes us back to the debate we had with utilitarianism.从某种意义上说,它使我们回到了我们关于功利主义的辩论。
616Is use the only, is utility, is use the only proper way of treating goods,这是唯一的用途,是用途,是处理商品的唯一适当方式,
617including life, military service, procreation, childbearing?包括生命、兵役、生育、生育?
618And if not, how do we figure out, how can we determine what modes of valuation如果不行,我们如何确定,我们如何确定什么估价模式
619are fitting or appropriate to those goods?是否适合这些货物?
620Several years ago there was a scandal surrounding a doctor,几年前有个医生的丑闻
621an infertility specialist in Virginia named Cecil Jacobson.弗吉尼亚州的一个不孕症专家 叫塞西尔·雅各布森
622He didn't have a donor catalog because unknown to his patients,他没有捐赠目录 因为他的病人不知道
623all of the sperm he used to inseminate his patients came from one donor, Dr. Jacobson himself.他用来摄入病人精液的所有精液都来自一个捐献者,雅各布森医生本人.
624At least one woman who testified in court was unnerved至少有一名在法庭上作证的妇女没有感到忧虑
625at how much her newborn daughter looked just like him.她的新生女儿长得像他
626Now, it's possible to condemn Dr. Jacobson for failing to inform the women in advance.现在,可以谴责雅各布森医生没有事先通知妇女.
627That would be the argument about consent.这就是关于同意的论点。
628The columnist Ellen Goodman described the bizarre scenario as follows.专栏作家埃伦·古德曼(英语:Ellen Goodman)将奇异的情景描述如下.
629Dr. Jacobson, she wrote, gave his infertility business the personal touch.她写道,雅各布森博士 给他的不孕症生意 个人的触摸。
630But now the rest of us, she wrote, are in for a round of second thoughts about sperm donation.但是现在我们其他人,她写道, 对于捐赠精子的第二轮想法。
631Goodman concluded that fatherhood should be something you do, not something you donate.古德曼总结道,父亲身份应该是你做的事,而不是你捐赠的东西.
632And I think what she was doing, and what the philosopher Elizabeth Anderson is doing,我认为她在做什么 哲学家伊丽莎白·安德森在做什么
633and what Andrew was suggesting with his argument about dehumanization,安德鲁用他关于非人化的争论所暗示的
634is pondering whether there are certain goods that money shouldn't buy,正在思考是否有 某些商品,钱不应该购买,
635not just because of tainted consent, but also perhaps because certain goods are properly valued不仅因为同意有污点,而且可能因为某些货物有适当的估价
636in a way higher than mere use.以某种方式高于仅仅使用。
637Those at least are the questions we're going to pursue with the help of some philosophers in the weeks to come.这些至少就是我们在未来几周中在一些哲学家的帮助下要追求的问题.
638For other viewers of Justice, join the conversation, take a pop quiz,对于其他的观众,正义,加入对话, 参加一个流行的测验,
639watch lectures you've missed and learn a lot more.看你错过的讲座 学到更多
640请访问justiceharvard.org.
641It's the right thing to do.谓之正法.
642Funding for this program is provided by...本方案的经费由.
643Additional funding provided by...由.提供的额外资金。
该视频共有字幕 648 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格

P9 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p09 8. 8.谎言的教训 (P9)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:03Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
0:07Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
0:29Last time we began上次开始
0:32trying to试图
0:33we began by trying to navigate our way through我们开始试图通过我们的道路
0:37Kant's moral theory.康德的道德理论.
0:41Now,现在,
0:42fully to make sense完全讲道理
0:45of Kant's moral theory in the groundwork康德的道德理论的基础
0:48requires that we be able to answer需要我们能够回答
展开字幕全文(1502 条)
序号英文中文
1Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
2Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
3Last time we began上次开始
4trying to试图
5we began by trying to navigate our way through我们开始试图通过我们的道路
6Kant's moral theory.康德的道德理论.
7Now,现在,
8fully to make sense完全讲道理
9of Kant's moral theory in the groundwork康德的道德理论的基础
10requires that we be able to answer需要我们能够回答
11three questions.三问.
12How can duty and autonomy义务和自主如何
13go together?一起去吗?
14What's the great dignity伟大的尊严是什么
15in answering to duty?在应职?
16It would seem that these two ideas are opposed,似乎这两个想法是对立的,
17duty and autonomy.义务和自主权。
18What's Kant's answer to that?康德对此有何回应?.
19I need someone here to speak up on Kant's behalf.我需要有人来代表康德说话
20Does he have an answer?他有答案吗?
21Yes, go ahead, stand up.是的,继续,站起来。
22Kant believes that you only act autonomously康德认为你只能自主行事
23when you are pursuing当你追求的时候,
24something only in the name of duty只是以职责的名义
25and not because of your own circumstances不是因为你自己的情况
26such as, like, you're only doing something比如说,你只是在做一些事情
27good and moral善与道义
28if you're doing it because of duty如果你这样做是出于职责
29and not because of something of your own personal gains.不是因为你个人的收获
30Now, why is that acting at, what's your name?为什么演戏,你叫什么名字?
31Mine is Matt.我是马特。
32Matt, why is that acting out of freedom?马特,为什么这是出于自由?
33I hear what you're saying about duty.我听到你在说什么 关于职责。
34Because you choose to accept those moral laws in yourself因为你自己选择接受这些道德法则
35and not brought on from outside upon onto you.而不是从外面引到你身上
36Okay, good.好吧,不错。
37Because acting out of duty因为行为失职
38is following a moral law正在遵循道德法则
39that you impose on yourself.你将自己强加于人。
40That's what makes duty compatible with freedom.这使得责任与自由相容.
41Okay, that's good, Matt.好吧,这是很好的,马特。
42That is Kant's answer.这是康德的回答。
43That's great.赞曰.
44Thank you.谢谢
45So, Kant's answer is所以康德的回答是
46it is not in so far现在还没有
47as I am subject to the law因为我受法律约束
48that I have dignity,我有尊严,
49but rather in so far as,但实际上,
50with regard to that very same law,关于同一法律,
51I'm the author.我为作者.
52And I'm subordinated to that law我服从法律
53on that grounds因此,
54that I took it, as Matt just said,我把它,正如马特刚刚说,
55I took it upon myself.是我自负的
56I willed that law.我将遵守法律
57So, that's why, for Kant,所以对康德来说
58acting according to duty根据职责行事
59and acting freely, in the sense of autonomously,在自主的意义上自由行动,
60are one and the same.都是一样的
61But that raises the question,但这引起了一个问题,
62how many moral laws are there?有多少道德法则?
63Because if dignity consists因为如果尊严包含
64in being governed by a law受法律管辖
65that I give myself,我给自己,
66what's to guarantee保证什么
67that my conscience♪ 我的良心♪
68will be the same as your conscience?和你的良心一样吗?
69Who has Kant's answer to that?谁有康德的答案?
70Yes?是吗?
71Because a moral law,因为道德法则
72is not contingent upon subjective conditions,不取决于主观条件,
73it would transcend all particular differences它会超越所有的区别
74between people,人与人之间,
75and so would be a universal law.也是个普遍的法律
76And in this respect,在这方面,
77there would only be one moral law,只有一条道德法则
78because it would be supreme.因为它将是至高无上的。
79That's exactly right.没错
80What's your name?你叫什么来着?
81Kelly.凯莉
82So, Kelly, Kant believes凯莉,康德相信
83that if we choose freely,如果我们自由选择,
84out of our own consciences,出于我们的良心,
85the moral law,道德法则,
86we're guaranteed to come up with我们一定会想出
87one and the same moral law.同一道德法则
88And that's because因为...
89when I choose,当我选择,
90it's not me, Michael Sandel,这不是我,迈克尔·桑德尔,
91choosing, it's not you, Kelly,选择,不是你,凯莉,
92choosing for yourself.自己选择
93What is it exactly?这到底是什么?
94Who's doing the choosing?谁在做选择?
95Who's the subject?主题是谁?
96Who's the agent?谁的经纪人?
97Who's doing the choosing?谁在做选择?
98Reason.缘由.
99Pure reason.纯理故.
100And what you mean by pure reason is what exactly?你所说的纯粹的理由是什么?
101Well, pure reason is,嗯,纯粹的理由是,
102like we were saying before,就像我们之前说过的那样
103not subject to any external不受任何外部影响
104conditions that may可能的条件
105be imposed on us.强制我们。
106Good.不错
107That's great.赞曰.
108So, the reason that does the willing,所以,原因 做自愿,
109the reason that governs my will,支配我意志的原因
110when I will the moral law,当我要道德法则
111is the same reason同样的原因
112that operates when you choose当您选择时运行
113the moral law for yourself.道德法律为你自己。
114And that's why这就是为什么
115it's possible to act autonomously可以自主行动
116to choose for myself,选择我自己,
117for each of us to choose for ourselves,我们每个人都为自己选择,
118as autonomous beings,作为自主的生物,
119and for all of us to wind up和我们所有人的结局
120willing the same moral law.愿意遵守同样的道德法律
121The categorical imperative.绝对必要。
122But then there is one big但有一个大
123and very difficult question left.还有很困难的问题
124Even if you accept即使你接受了
125everything that Matt and Kelly所有马特和凯莉的事
126have said so far,已经说过,到目前为止,
127how is a categorical如何是绝对的
128imperative possible?绝对可能?
129How is morality possible?道德怎么会这样?
130To answer that question,为了回答这个问题,
131Kant says we need to make a distinction.康德说我们需要区分一下
132We need to make a distinction我们要分辨一下
133between介于
134two standpoints.两个观点。
135Two standpoints两个观点
136from which we我们从其中
137can make sense of说得通
138our experience.我们的经验。
139Let me try to explain what he means by these two让我解释一下他俩的意思
140two standpoints.两个观点。
141As an object of experience,作为经验的对象,
142I belong to the sensible world.我属于理智的世界
143There, my actions are determined在那里,我的行动是坚定的
144by the laws of nature,根据自然法则,
145and by the regularities of cause and effect.和因果的规律。
146But as a subject但作为一个主题
147of experience,经验
148I inhabit an intelligible我住着一个聪明人
149world.这个世界
150Here, being independent of the laws of在这里,独立于法律
151nature, I am capable of autonomy.自然,我有能力自治。
152Capable of acting行为能力
153according to a law I give myself.根据我给自己的法律
154Now Kant says that only现在康德说
155from this second从此秒
156standpoint can I regard myself观点,我可以看待自己
157as free, for to be independent自由,独立
158of determination by causes in the根据《公约》第22条和
159sensible world is明智的世界是
160to be free.成为自由。
161If I were wholly an empirical being,如果我是一个完全的经验存在,
162as the utilitarians作为功利主义者
163assume, if I were假设,如果我是
164a being wholly一个完全
165and only subject且仅是主题
166to the deliverances of my senses,以我觉悟的解脱,
167to pain and pleasure and hunger痛苦、快乐和饥饿
168and thirst and appetite, if that's all口渴和胃口,如果是这样的话
169there were to humanity,人类有,
170we wouldn't be capable of freedom,我们不可能有自由
171Kant reasons.康德的理由。
172Because in that case, every因为在这种情况下,每个
173exercise of will行使意愿
174would be conditioned by the desire以欲望为条件
175for some object.对于某个物体。
176In that case, all choice这样的话,所有的选择
177would be heteronomous choice,这将是异端的选择,
178governed by the pursuit of some由追求某些
179external end.外边端.
180When we think of ourselves as free,当我们认为自己是自由的,
181Kant writes, we康德写道,我们
182transfer ourselves into the转身进入
183intelligible world as members知识世界作为成员
184and recognize并承认
185the autonomy of the will.意志的自主性。
186That's the idea就是这样
187of the two standpoints.两个观点。
188So, how are categorical那么,如何是绝对的
189imperatives possible?可能吗?
190Only because只是因为
191the idea of freedom自由思想
192makes me a member of an让我成为一个
193intelligible world.智识世界.
194Now, Kant admits现在,康德承认
195we aren't only我们不只是
196rational beings,理性的生物,
197we don't only inhabit我们不只住
198the intelligible world,知识世界,
199the realm of freedom.自由的范畴。
200If we did,如果是这样
201if we did, then all of our如果我们做到了,那么我们所有的
202actions would行动将
203invariably accord总是同意
204with
205the autonomy of the will.意志的自主性。
206But precisely because we inhabit但正是因为我们住
207simultaneously the two二者同时
208standpoints, the two realms,观点,两个领域,
209the realm of freedom and the realm自由与世界
210of necessity, precisely危急情况
211because we inhabit both因为我们住在一起
212realms, there is always王国,总是有
213potentially a gap潜在差距
214between what之间什么
215we do and what we我们做什么,我们做什么
216ought to do, between之间
217is and ought.是,而且应该。
218Another way of putting另一种说法
219this point, and this is the point这一点,这就是重点
220with which Kant concludes the康德最后决定
221groundwork, morality is基础,道德是
222not empirical.不是经验
223Whatever you see无论你看到什么
224in the world, whatever you discover无论你发现什么
225through science,通过科学,
226can't decide不能决定
227moral questions.道德问题。
228Morality stands at a certain道德有一点
229distance from the world,远离世界,
230from the empirical world.从经验世界。
231And that's why no science这就是为什么没有科学
232could deliver moral能够带来道德
233truth.事实
234Now, I want to test现在,我想测试一下
235Kant's moral theory康德的道德理论
236with the hardest possible case,在最困难的情况下
237a case that he raises,他提出一个案件,
238the case of the murderer杀人犯的案子
239at the door.在门口。
240Kant says that lying is wrong.康德说撒谎是错误的
241We all know that, we've discussed why.我们都知道,我们讨论过为什么。
242Lying is at odds说谎是错的
243with the categorical imperative.绝对必要。
244A French philosopher,一位法国哲学家
245Benjamin Constant,本杰明・康斯坦特
246wrote an article responding写了一篇回应的文章
247to the groundwork, where he到基础,在那里他
248said this absolute prohibition on lying绝对禁止说谎
249is wrong, it can't错了,它不能
250be right.说对了
251What if a如果一个
252murderer came to your door杀人犯来了
253looking for your friend寻找你的朋友
254who was hiding in your house,他躲在你的房子里,
255and the murderer asked you凶手问你
256point blank, is your friend空白点,是你的朋友
257in your house?在你家里吗?
258Constant常数
259says it would be crazy说这太疯狂了
260to say that the moral thing to do in说道德的事情 做在
261that case is to tell the truth.那个案子就是说实话
262Constant says the常说
263murderer certainly doesn't凶手当然不会
264deserve the truth,理应得到真相,
265and Kant wrote a reply.康德写了回信
266And Kant stuck by his康德被他缠住
267principle that lying说谎的原则
268even to the murderer甚至对凶手
269at the door is wrong.在门是错的。
270And the reason it's wrong,和原因它是错误的,
271he said, is他说,是
272once you start taking consequences一旦你开始承担后果
273into account to考虑
274carve out exceptions to the categorical规定断然例外
275imperative, you've given up你放弃了
276the whole moral framework.整个道德框架
277You've become a consequentialist,你成为了一个后果主义者,
278or maybe a rule utilitarian.或者是规则实用主义者
279But most of you但你们大多数人
280and most of Kant's和康德的大部分
281readers think there's something读者认为有东西
282odd and implausible奇怪又不可思议
283about this answer.关于这个答案。
284I would我会
285like to try to defend喜欢试图捍卫
286Kant on this point.康德说到这一点。
287And then I want to see whether you然后我想看看你有没有
288think that my defense认为我的辩护
289is plausible.说得没错
290And I would want to defend him我想为他辩护
291within the spirit of his own在自己的精神范围内
292account of morality.道德的考虑。
293Imagine that someone想象一个人
294comes to your door.来到你的门。
295You were asked a question有人问你
296by this murderer.由这个杀人犯。
297You're hiding你躲起来了
298your friend.你的朋友 朋友 朋友 朋友 朋友
299Is there a有没有一个
300way that you could你这样可以
301avoid telling a避免告诉一个
302lie without说谎
303selling out your friend?出卖你的朋友?
304Does anyone have an idea of有没有人知道
305how you might be able to do that?你怎么可以做到这一点?
306Yes.
307Stand up.站起来
308I was just going to say if I were我只是想说,如果我
309to let my friend in my让我的朋友在我的
310house to hide in the first place,房子隐藏在第一,
311I'd probably make a plan with them.我可能会和他们一起计划
312So I'd be like, hey, I'll tell所以我会说,嘿,我会说
313the murderer you're here, but escape.你在这里的凶手,但逃跑。
314And that's这是
315one of the options mentioned.其中一个选项
316But I'm not sure that's a Kantian但我不肯定那是个康德
317option.选项。
318You're琌
319like, because he's in the house, but喜欢,因为他在房子里,但
320he won't be.他不会的
321Oh, I see.原来如此
322All right.好吧,我们走。
323Good enough.够好了
324One more try.再试一次
325If you just如果你刚刚
326say you don't know where he is because说你不知道他在哪里 因为
327he might not be locked in the closet,他可能不会被锁在衣柜里
328he might have left the closet.他可能离开了衣柜。
329You have no clue where he could be.你根本不知道他会在哪
330So这么说
331you would say I don't know, which wouldn't你会说我不知道, 这不会
332actually be a lie because其实是谎言 因为
333you weren't at that very你没有在那个非常
334moment looking in the closet.看着壁橱里
335Exactly.没错
336So it would be strictly所以,这将是严格的
337speaking true.说真的
338Yes.
339And yet possibly不过可能
340deceiving, misleading.欺骗,误导。
341But still true.但还是真实的。
342What's your name?你叫什么来着?
343John.约翰
344All right.好吧,我们走。
345John has约翰有
346now John may be on to something.现在约翰可能有事
347John, you're really offering us约翰,你真的给我们
348the option of a clever聪明的选择
349evasion that is逃避,这是
350strictly speaking true.严格地说,是的。
351This raises the question,这引起了一个问题,
352whether there is a moral是否有道德
353difference between差异间
354an outright lie谎言
355and a misleading和误导者,
356truth.事实
357From Kant's从康德那里
358point of view, there actually观点,实际上
359is a world是一个世界
360of difference between差额
361a lie谎言
362and a misleading truth.和错误的真理。
363Why is that?为什么?
364Even though虽然
365both might have the same consequences.两者都可能产生同样的后果。
366But then remember,但是,然后记住,
367Kant doesn't base康德没有基地
368morality on consequences.道德对后果的影响。
369He bases it on formal他以形式为基础
370adherence to the moral遵守道德准则
371law.诸法.
372Now sometimes in ordinary现在,有时是普通的
373life we make我们的生活
374exceptions for the general rule一般规则的例外情况
375against lying with a white以白衣盟誓,
376lie.说谎
377What is a white lie?什么是白话?
378It's a lie to make, well这是骗人的,好吧
379to avoid hurting someone's feelings避免伤害别人的感情
380for example.举个例子
381It's a lie说谎
382that we think of as justified by the我们认为,
383consequences.后果。
384Now Kant could not现在康德不能了
385endorse a white lie,承认一个谎言,
386but perhaps he could endorse但也许他可以认可
387a misleading truth.一个误导性的事实。
388Suppose someone gives you a tie如果有人给你打领带
389as a gift, and作为礼物,和
390you open the box, and你打开盒子,和
391it's just awful.这太可怕了。
392What do you say?你说什么?
393Thank you.谢谢
394You could say thank you.你可以说谢谢你。
395But they're waiting to see what you think of it.但他们等着看你的看法
396Or they ask you, what do you think或者他们问你 你觉得呢?
397of it?是吗?
398You could tell a white lie and你可以说白话
399say, it's beautiful.说,这是美丽的。
400But that wouldn't be但不会
401permissible from Kant's point of view.康德认为是允许的
402Could you say你能说
403not a white lie, but a misleading不是白话,而是误导
404truth?事实?
405You open the box你打开盒子
406and you say, I've never你说,我从来没有
407seen a tie like that before.之前见过这样的领带
408Thank you.谢谢
409You shouldn't have.你不该这样
410That's good.这是很好的。
411Can you think of你能想到吗?
412a contemporary political当代政治
413leader who engaged已订婚的领导人
414you can?你能吗?
415Who are you thinking of?你在想谁?
416Remember the whole记住整个
417carefully worded denials仔细的文字否定
418in the Monica Lewinsky在莫妮卡莱温斯基
419affair of Bill Clinton?比尔·克林顿的事?
420Now, those现在,这些
421denials actually became否认实际上变成了
422the subject of very主题非常
423explicit debate and argument明确的辩论和论点
424during the impeachment在弹劾期间
425hearings.听证会。
426Take a look看一看,看一看
427at the following在以下各节
428excerpts from Bill Clinton.比尔·克林顿的摘录.
429Is there something, do you think,有没有什么,你觉得,
430morally at stake in the distinction在道德上与区别有关
431between介于
432a lie and谎言和
433a misleading,一个误导者,
434carefully couched truth?仔细的讲真话?
435I want to say one thing我想说一件事
436to the American people.对美国人民。
437I want you to listen to me.我要你听我说
438I'm going to say this我要说这个
439again.再来
440I did not我没有
441have sexual做爱
442relations with that woman,和那个女人的关系
443Ms. Lewinsky.莱温斯基女士
444I never我从来没有
445told anybody it's a lie, not告诉别人这是谎言,不是
446a single time, never.一次,从来没有。
447These allegations are false.这些指控是虚假的。
448Did he lie他说谎吗?
449to the American people when he给美国人民
450said, I never had sex with that说,我从来没有做爱
451woman?女人吗?
452You know, he你知道吗,他
453doesn't believe he did, and because不相信他这样做,因为
454of the... Let me explain, may I explain,那个... 让我解释一下,请允许我解释,
455Congressman?议员?
456What he said was他说的
457to the American people that he did not have对于美国人民 他没有
458sexual relations.性关系。
459And I understand you're not going to like我知道你不会喜欢的
460this, Congressman, because you will see it这个,议员,因为你会看到它
461as a hair-splitting, evasive是一种分毛, 避风头
462answer.答问.
463But in his own mind,但在他自己的想法中,
464his definition was not他的定义不是
465Okay, I understand that argument.好吧,我理解这个论点。
466Okay.摆
467So there you have原来如此
468the exchange.交换。
469Now, at the time,现在,当时,
470you may have thought你可能认为
471this was just a legalistic,这只是个法律主义的,
472hair-splitting exchange between aa/ 换发
473Republican who wanted to impeach想弹劾的共和党人
474Clinton and a lawyer who was trying to克林顿和一个律师试图
475defend him.保护他
476But now,但现在
477in the light of Kant,鉴于康德
478do you think there你觉得那里
479is something morally是道德上的东西
480at stake in the distinction与区别利害攸关
481between aa 之间
482lie and谎言和
483an evasion, a true一个逃避,一个真理
484but misleading statement?却作误导性陈述?
485I'd like to hear from我想听一个
486defenders of人权维护者
487Kant, people who think there is a distinction.康德,认为有区别的人。
488Are you ready to你准备好
489defend Kant?保护康德?
490Well, I think我觉得
491when you try to say that lying and misleading当你试图说 谎言和误导
492truths are the same thing, you're basing事实是一回事,你在打基础
493it on a consequentialist argument, which is以结果论论论,即
494that they achieve the same thing.{\fn华文楷体\fs16\1cHE0E0E0}他们实现同样的目标
495But the fact of the matter is, you told the但事实是,你告诉
496truth, and you intended that people would believe真相,你打算 人们相信
497what you were saying, which was the truth,你说的,这是事实,
498which means it is not morally the same as telling也就是说,这在道德上和说
499a lie and intending that they believe他们妄言,而且妄言,
500it is the truth, even though it's not true.这是事实,尽管它不是真的。
501Good.不错
502What's your name?你叫什么来着?
503Diana.戴安娜 戴安娜 戴安娜
504So Diana says that所以戴安娜说
505Kant has a point here.康德说得有道理
506And it's a point that might even come to这一点,甚至可能会出现
507the aid of Bill Clinton.比尔·克林顿的援助。
508And that is,也就是说,
509well, what about that?那怎么样?
510Someone有人吗?
511over here.在这里。
512For Kant, motivation对康德来说,动机
513is key.关键。
514So if you所以,如果你
515give to someone because primarily给别人是因为
516you want to feel good about yourself, Kant would say that has no moral康德会说那没有道德
517worth.值钱
518Well, with this, the motivation有了这个动机
519is the same.一样
520It's to sort of mislead someone.这是一种误导某人。
521It's to lie.是为虚妄.
522It's to sort of throw them off是用来甩掉他们
523the track.赛道。
524And the motivation is the same.动机是一样的
525So这么说
526there should be no difference.不应该有区别。
527Okay, good.好吧,不错。
528So here, isn't the motive所以,在这里,不是动机
529the same, Diana?同样,戴安娜?
530What do you say to this argument that你对这个论点怎么说?
531well, the motive is the same.动机是一样的
532In both两者
533cases, there is the attempt, or at least案件,有企图,或至少
534the hope, that希望,那个
535one's pursuer will be misled.追逐者会被误导
536Well, that那个
537I think that the fact is that我认为事实是
538your immediate motive is that they should believe你的直接动机是 他们应该相信
539you.你们
540The ultimate consequence of that最终后果
541is that they might be deceived and not find out可能是他们被欺骗了 却不知道
542what was going on.发生什么事了?
543But your immediate但你现在
544motive is that they should believe you动机是他们会相信你
545because you're telling the truth.因为你说的是实话
546May I help a little?我能帮忙吗?
547Sure.当然
548You and你还有
549Kant.康德(原变种).
550Why don't you say你为什么不说
551and what's your name?还有你叫什么名字?
552I'm sorry.对不起
553Why don't you say to Wesley你为什么不对卫斯理说
554it's not exactly不是那样的
555the case that the motive in案件动机
556both cases is两个案子都是
557to mislead.要误导。
558They're hoping, they're hoping他们希望,他们希望
559that the person will be misled被误导的人
560by the statement, I don't根据声明,我不
561know where they are, or知道他们在哪里,或
562I never had sexual我从来没有性爱
563relations.关系
564You're hoping that they will be你希望他们会是
565misled, but in the被误导,但在
566case where you're telling the truth,如果你说的是实话
567your motive is to你的动机是
568mislead while at the same time同时误导
569telling the truth and honoring说出真相和荣誉
570the moral law and staying within the bounds道德法则和不超出范围
571of the categorical imperative.绝对必要。
572I think我觉得
573what do you think Kant's answer would be?你觉得康德的答案是什么?
574Diana, yes?戴安娜,是吗?
575You like that?你喜欢吗?
576Okay, so好吧,这样吧
577I think Kant's answer would be我认为康德的答案是
578unlike a falsehood,不像一个谎言,
579unlike a lie,不像一个谎言,
580a misleading truth pays a误导性事实可以
581certain homage to向各位致以敬意
582duty.职责。
583And the homage it敬礼
584pays to duty is what报到就是
585justifies that the work of说明:
586even the work of evasion.甚至是逃避
587Diana, yes?戴安娜,是吗?
588Okay, and so好吧,这样
589there is something,有东西,
590some element of respect某些尊重因素
591for the dignity维护人的尊严
592of the moral law道德法原则
593in the careful evasion在谨慎的逃避中,
594because Clinton could have told因为克林顿可以告诉
595an outright lie, but he didn't.但他没有
596And so I think Kant's所以我认为康德
597Kant's insight here is康德的见解是
598in the carefully在仔细的
599couched but true evasion躺着但真的逃避
600there is a kind有种东西
601of homage to the dignity of the moral law尊重道德法的尊严
602that is not present不存在
603in the outright lie.在直截了当的谎言。
604And that,还有
605Wesley,卫斯理,
606is part of the motive.是动机的一部分。
607It's part of the motive.这是动机的一部分。
608Yes,
609I hope he will be misled.我希望他会被误导。
610I hope the murderer我希望凶手能来
611will run down the road or会跑在路上,或者
612go to the mall looking for my friend instead去商场找我的朋友
613of the closet.在衣橱。
614I hope that我希望这样
615will be the effect.将是效果。
616I can't control我无法控制
617that.那个
618I can't control我无法控制
619the consequences.后果。
620But what但怎样
621I can control我能控制着
622{\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}就站在一边 恭敬地
623however I pursue the不过,我追求
624trends I hope will unfold我希望会有所发展
625to do so in a way以某种方式这样做
626that is consistent with符合
627respect for the moral对道德的尊重
628law.诸法.
629Wesley, I don't卫斯理,我没有
630think is entirely persuaded.认为是完全说服。
631But at least this brings out,但至少这能带来
632this discussion brings out这场讨论带来了
633some of what's at stake, what's morally有一些关系,什么道德
634at stake in Kant's notion在康德的观念中处于危险之中
635of the categorical imperative.绝对必要。
636As long as any只要有时间
637effort is involved, I would我将付出很多努力
638say that the contract is说合同是
639valid and it should有效,而且应当
640take effect.生效。
641But why?为什么?
642What was, what morally can you point是什么,什么道德 你可以指出
643to?给?
644For example, two people比如说两个人
645agree to be married and one同意结婚和结婚
646suddenly calls the other in two minutes say,两分钟后突然打电话给另一个说
647I changed my mind.我改变主意了
648Does the这是否
649contract have obligation on合同义务
650both sides?两边?
651Well, I'mи琌
652tempted to say no.试图说不。
653Fine.还好
654Last time we talked about Kant's categorical上次我们讨论康德的绝对性
655imperative紧急事项
656and we considered the way he applied我们考虑了他的申请方式
657the idea of the categorical imperative绝对必要的想法
658to the case of lying.至於说谎,
659I want to turn briefly to我想简单谈谈
660one other application其他应用程序
661of Kant's moral theory and that's康德的道德理论
662his political theory.他的政治理论。
663Now, Kant says现在康德说
664that just laws仅仅法律
665arise from a certain由某种
666kind of social contract.一种社会契约。
667But this contract, he tells us,但这份合同,他告诉我们,
668is of an exceptional是个例外
669nature.性质。
670What makes为什么
671the contract exceptional合同例外
672is that it's这是
673not an actual contract非实际合同
674that happens发生的事情
675when people come together当人们走到一起
676and try to figure out what试着找出什么
677the Constitution should be.宪法应该如此。
678Kant points out that康德说
679the contract合同
680that generates justice产生正义的
681is what he calls他是这么叫的
682an idea of reason.一个理性的想法。
683It's not an actual contract这不是真正的合同
684among actual men and women实际男女人数
685gathered in a constitutional convention.在一个宪法大会上聚集。
686Why not?为什么不呢?
687I think Kant's reason is我觉得康德的理由是
688that actual men and women gathered in a real真正的男人和女人聚集在一个真正的
689constitutional convention宪法会议
690would have different interests, values,会有不同的利益,价值,
691aims, and there would also be目标,还有
692differences of bargaining power谈判能力的差异
693and differences of knowledge among them.和他们之间知识的差别。
694And so, the laws所以,法律,我们
695that would result from their deliberations讨论的结果
696wouldn't necessarily不一定会
697be just, wouldn't necessarily正义, 不一定
698conform to principles of符合下列原则:
699right, but would simply没错,但只是
700reflect the differences反映差异
701of bargaining power, the special谈判能力,特别
702interests, the fact that some might利益,有些人可能
703know more than others比别人更了解
704about law or about politics.关于法律或政治
705So Kant says所以康德说
706a contract that generates生成合同
707principles of原则
708right is merely权利只是
709an idea of reason, but一个理性的想法,但
710it has undoubted practical这无疑是实用的
711reality because it can因为它可以
712oblige every legislator to要求每个立法者
713frame his laws in such a way that they以这样的方式制定他的法律
714could have been produced by the united本来可以由联合军
715will of the whole nation.整个国家的意志。
716So Kant is a contractarian,所以康德是个契约主义者
717but he doesn't但他没有
718trace the origin追踪来源
719or the rightness of law或法律的正确性
720to any actual到任何实际
721social contract.社会契约。
722This gives rise to an obvious question.这引起了一个显而易见的问题。
723What is the moral force什么样的道德力量
724of a hypothetical假设
725contract, a contract that合同,一个合同
726never happened?没发生过吗?
727That's the question we take up today.这就是我们今天要处理的问题。
728But in order to investigate it,但为了调查
729we need to turn to我们需要转向
730a modern philosopher, John现代哲学家约翰
731Rawls, who worked out劳尔斯,谁工作
732in his book A Theory of Justice在他的著作《正义理论》中
733in great detail十分详细
734an account of a hypothetical假设的叙述
735agreement as协议为
736the basis for justice.正义的基础。
737Rawls' theory of justice罗尔斯的正义理论
738in broad outline大纲
739is parallel to Kant's in和康德在一块
740two important respects.两个重要的方面。
741Like Kant,像康德一样,
742Rawls罗尔斯
743was a critic of utilitarianism.曾批评功利主义.
744Each person每个人
745possesses an inviolability拥有不可侵犯性
746Rawls写道:
747that even the welfare of society甚至是社会福利
748as a whole cannot override.整体上无法推翻。
749The rights secured by justice司法保障的权利
750are not subject to political不受政治影响
751bargaining or to the calculus讨价还价或计算
752of social interests.社会利益。
753The second respect第二条尊重
754in which Rawls's theory罗尔斯的理论
755follows如下
756Kant's,康德 康德 康德 康德
757is on the idea that考虑的是
758principles of justice司法原则
759properly understood正确理解
760can be derived from a hypothetical可以从假设中得出
761social contract,社会契约;
762not an actual one.不是真实的
763And Rawls works this outRawls解决了这个问题
764in fascinating detail以迷人的细节
765with the device带设备
766of what he calls他所喊的,
767the veil of ignorance.无知的面纱。
768The way to arrive到达的路
769at the rights,在权利,
770the basic rights基本权利
771that we must respect,我们必须尊重,
772the basic framework of rights and duties,权利和义务的基本框架,
773is to imagine来想象一下
774that we were gathered together我们聚集在一起
775trying to choose尝试选择
776the principles to govern our collective lives指导我们集体生活的原则
777without knowing不知不觉
778certain important某些重要的东西
779particular facts特定事实
780about ourselves.关于我们自己。
781That's the idea of the veil of ignorance.这就是无知面纱的想法.
782Now what would happen if we现在,如果我们
783gathered together集合起来
784just as we are here就像我们在这里一样
785and tried to come up with并试图想出
786principles of justice to govern our collective life?指导我们集体生活的公正原则?
787There would be a cacophony会有恶作剧
788of proposals, of suggestions审议各项提案、提案和建议
789reflecting people's different反映人的不同
790interests.权益。
791Some are strong, some are weak.有强有弱.
792Some are rich, some are poor.有的有钱,有的穷.
793So Rawls says,所以罗尔斯说,
794imagine instead想象着
795that we are gathered in an original我们被集合在原始的,
796position of equality.平等的地位。
797And what assures和什么保证
798the equality平等
799is the veil of ignorance.是无知的面纱。
800Imagine that we are all behind想象一下,我们都落后
801the veil of ignorance which temporarily暂时无知的面纱
802abstracts from摘自:
803or brackets, hides from us或括号,躲我们
804who in particular we are.尤其是我们是谁
805Our race, our class,我们的种族,我们的阶级,
806our place in society,我们社会的地位,
807our strengths, our weaknesses,我们的优势,我们的弱点,
808whether we're healthy or unhealthy.不管是健康还是不健康
809Then,接下来
810and only then,只有这样,
811Rawls says, the principles罗尔斯说,原则
812we would agree to would be principles我们同意原则
813of justice.正义。
814That's how the hypothetical contract假设合同就是这样
815works.工作时
816What is the moral force什么样的道德力量
817of this kind of hypothetical这种假设
818agreement?同意吗?
819Is it stronger or weaker than a real agreement?它比真正的协议更强大还是更弱?
820An actual social一个真正的社交
821contract.合同。
822In order to answer that question,为了回答这个问题,
823we have to look hard我们要好好看看
824at the moral force在道德的力量
825of actual contracts.实际合同。
826There are really two questions here.这里真的有两个问题。
827One of them is,其中一个是,
828how do actual contracts实际合同如何
829bind me绑住我
830or obligate me?还是强迫我?
831Question number one.问曰.
832And question number two, how do actual第二问题,如何实际
833real life contracts实际生活合同
834justify the terms that they produce?证明他们生产的条件是合理的吗?
835If you think about it,如果你考虑一下
836this is in line with这符合
837Rawls and Kant,罗尔斯和康德
838the answer to the second question,对第二个问题的回答,
839how do actual contracts justify实际合同如何证明
840the terms that they produce?他们生产的条件?
841The answer is, they don't.答案是,他们没有。
842At least not on their own.至少不是靠他们自己
843Actual contracts are not实际合同不是
844self-sufficient moral instruments.自我满足的道德工具。
845Of any actual任何实际
846contract or agreement,合同或协议,
847it can always be asked,它总是可以问,
848is it fair公平吗?
849what they agreed to?他们同意什么?
850The fact of the agreement never guarantees协议的事实从来不保证
851the fairness of the agreement.协议的公正性。
852And we know this by我们知道这一点
853looking at our own constitutional convention.看看我们的宪法会议
854It produced a constitution它产生了一部宪法
855that permitted slavery允许奴役
856to persist.坚持下去。
857It was agreed to.经同意。
858It was an actual contract.这是一个实际的合同。
859But that doesn't establish但这不能证明
860that the laws agreed to,法律同意,
861all of them, were just.他们都只是...
862Well then, what is the moral force那么,什么是道德力量
863of actual contracts?实际合同?
864To the extent that they bind us,只要它们能束缚我们
865they obligate in two ways.他们以两种方式承担义务。
866Suppose, maybe here it would help假设,也许在这里会有所帮助
867to take an example.举个例子。
868We make an agreement,我们达成协议,
869a commercial agreement.商业协议。
870I promise to pay you a hundred dollars我答应你一百块
871if you will go如果你愿意去的话
872harvest and bring to me收割,带给我
873a hundred lobsters.一百只龙虾
874We make a deal.我们做个交易
875You go out and harvest them你出去收割他们
876and bring them to me.把它们带给我
877I eat the lobsters, serve them to my friends,我吃龙虾,为我的朋友服务,
878and then I don't pay.然后我不付钱。
879And you say, but you're obligated.你说,但你有义务。
880And I say, why?我说,为什么?
881What do you say?你说什么?
882Well, we had a deal.我们说好的
883And you benefited.你从中获益了
884You ate all those lobsters.你吃了所有的龙虾。
885Well, that's a pretty strong嗯,这是一个相当强大的
886argument.参数。
887It's an argument that depends, though,不过,这是个争论
888on the fact that I benefited关于我受益的事实
889from your labor.从你的劳动。
890So, contracts所以,合同
891sometimes bind us有时会束缚我们
892insofar as they就他们而言
893are instruments是乐器
894of mutual benefit.互惠互利。
895I ate the lobsters, I owe you the hundred我吃了龙虾,欠你一百块
896dollars for having gathered them.收了他们的钱
897But suppose, now take a second但是,假设,现在用一秒钟
898case, we make this deal.我们做个交易
899I'll pay you a hundred dollars for a我付你一百块
900hundred lobsters.百条龙虾.
901And two还有两个
902minutes later, before you've gone几分钟后,在你离开之前
903to any work, I call you back任何工作,我给你回电话
904and say I've changed my mind.说我改变主意了
905Now, there's no benefit.现在,没有好处。
906There's no work on your part.没有你的工作。
907So, there's no element所以,没有元素
908of reciprocal exchange.相互交换。
909What about in that case?那样怎么样?
910Do I still我还在吗?
911owe you?欠你钱?
912Merely in virtue仅凭美德
913of the fact that we had an agreement?我们有协议的事实?
914Who says, those of you who谁说,你们谁
915say yes, I still owe you?答应我,我还欠你?
916Why?为什么?
917Okay, stand up.好吧,站起来。
918Why do I owe you?为什么我欠你?
919I call我打电话
920you back.你回来。
921After two minutes, you两分钟后,你
922haven't done any work.没有做任何工作。
923I think I spent a time and effort我想我花了很多时间和精力
924in drafting this contract起草本合同
925with you.和你们一起
926And also I have emotional我还有情感
927expectation that I'll go through期待我会经历
928the work.这工作。
929So, you took time所以,你花时间
930to draft the contract, but we did it very起草合同,但我们做了非常
931quickly.快点
932We just chatted on the phone.我们刚在电话里聊天
933That wouldn't be a formal form那不会是正式的形式
934of contract, though.合同,虽然。
935Well, I faxed it我传真了
936to you.给你的。
937It only took a minute.只需要一分钟
938As long as any effort只要尽力
939is involved, I would牵扯进来,我会
940say that the contract is说合同是
941valid and it有效且其内容
942should take effect.应该生效。
943But why?为什么?
944What morally can you你在道德上还能做什么?
945point to that obligates指出这项义务
946me?我吗?
947I admit that I我承认我
948agreed, but you didn't go答应了,但你没去
949to any work.给任何工作。
950I didn't我没有
951enjoy any benefit.享受任何好处。
952Because因为
953one might mentally go through all the work一个人可能会经过所有的工作
954of harvesting the lobsters.捕捉龙虾。
955You mentally went through the work你的精神经过了工作
956of harvesting the lobsters.捕捉龙虾。
957That's nothing, is it?没什么,是吗?
958It's not much.亦无甚处.
959Is it worth a hundred值一百块吗?
960dollars that you were imagining yourself你想象中的美元
961going and collecting up?去收集吗?
962It may not worth a hundred dollars, but也许不值100美元,但
963it may worth something to some people.这对有些人来说是值得的
964Alright, I'll give you a buck for it.好吧,我给你一块钱。
965For that.为了这个
966So, you're still所以,你还是
967pointing, what's interesting, you're still pointing指点,有意思的是,你还在指点
968to the reciprocal dimension对等层面
969of contracts.合同的终止。
970You did没错
971or imagined that you did or looked forward或想象你曾经或期待
972to doing something on my behalf.代表我做点什么
973For example, two people agreed to be married例如,两个人同意结婚
974and one suddenly calls the other in two一个突然呼唤另一个
975minutes say, I changed my mind.几分钟后 我改变主意了
976Does
977the contract have obligation合同有义务
978on both sides?在两边?
979Nobody has paid没有人付钱
980any work or nobody has任何工作或没有人
981benefited yet.已经受益了
982Well, I'm tempted to say no.我很想说不
983Fine.还好
984What's your name?你叫什么来着?
985- 朱利安 - 朱利安 - Julian.
986Thank you, Julian.谢谢你,朱利安。
987Alright, that was good.好吧,这是很好的。
988Now, is现在,是
989there anyone who has,有谁,
990who agrees with Julian that I still谁同意朱利安 我仍然
991owe the money?欠钱?
992For any other reason now, I have因为任何其他原因,我现在有
993go ahead, stand up.来吧,站起来。
994I think if you back out我想如果你退后的话
995it sort of cheapens the institution of contracts.它会降低合同的金额
996Good, but why?很好,但为什么?
997Why does it?为什么?
998Well, I think this is kind of Kantian, but there's嗯,我想这是一种康德,但有
999almost, there's a certain intrinsic value差不多有内在价值
1000in being able to make contracts能够签订合同
1001and having, you know, knowing that people will并且,你知道,知道 人们会
1002expect that you'll go through with that.期待你会通过。
1003Good, there is some,好,还有一些
1004it would cheapen the whole它会降低整个
1005idea of contracts, which has to合同的概念,必须
1006{\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}因为我承担了义务
1007Is that这是
1008the idea?这个主意?
1009Yeah, I think so.是的,我想是这样。
1010What's your name?你叫什么来着?
1011Adam.亚当
1012So Adam points instead, not所以,亚当的指针,而不是
1013to any reciprocal benefit对等利益
1014or mutual或相互间
1015exchange, but to the交换,但
1016mere fact of the agreement itself.仅仅是协议本身的事实。
1017We see here there are really我们看到这里真的有
1018two different ways in which两种不同的方式
1019actual contracts实际合同
1020generate obligations.产生债务。
1021One has to一个人必须
1022do with the act of consent同意行为
1023as a voluntary act.作为自愿行为。
1024And it points, Adam said它指出,亚当说
1025this was a Kantian idea这是康德的主意
1026and I think he's right, because it我觉得他是对的,因为...
1027points to the ideal of autonomy.指出自主的理想。
1028When I make a contract,当我做一个合同,
1029the obligation is one that is义务是:
1030self-imposed.自我强加。
1031And that carries a certain moral weight这具有一定的道德价值
1032independent of other considerations.不论其他考虑。
1033And then there's a second还有一秒钟
1034element of the moral道德因素
1035force of contract arguments.(b) 合同论据的效力。
1036Which has to do with the sense这和感觉有关
1037in which actual contracts实际合同
1038are instruments of mutual benefit是互利的工具;
1039and this还有这个
1040points toward the ideal of reciprocity.指向对等的理想。
1041That obligation这一义务
1042can arise,可能发生,
1043I can have an obligation to you我可以对你承担义务
1044in so far as就目前而言
1045you do something你做点什么
1046for me.对我来说。
1047Now, we're investigating现在,我们正在调查
1048the moral force and also道德力量,以及
1049the moral limits道德限制
1050of actual contracts.实际合同。
1051And here还有这里
1052I would like to advance an argument我想提出一个论点
1053about the moral limits关于道德限制
1054of actual contracts.实际合同。
1055Now that we know现在我们知道了
1056what moral什么样的道德
1057ingredients do the work when people做人的时候,做人做人
1058come together and say, I will do this一起来说,我会的
1059if you do that.如果你这样做。
1060I would like to argue first我想先说
1061that the fact that two people agree两人同意的事实
1062to some exchange does not切换到某些交换
1063mean that the terms意味着这些术语
1064of their agreement are fair.他们的协议是公平的。
1065When my当我
1066two sons were young, they collected两个儿子还年轻,他们收集
1067baseball cards and traded them.棒球卡和交易。
1068And one was一个是
1069there was a two year age, there is a two year两岁,两岁
1070age difference between them.他们之间的年龄差异。
1071And so I had to institute所以我必须建立
1072a rule about关于
1073the trades that交易
1074no trade was没有交易
1075complete until I had approved it.直到我批准它为止
1076And the reason is obvious.而其理显.
1077The older one旧的
1078knew more about the value of these更了解这些价值
1079cards and so纸牌等
1080would take advantage of the将利用
1081younger one.年轻的
1082So that's why所以,这就是为什么
1083I had to review it to make sure that the我不得不审查它,以确保
1084agreement, that the agreements协议,协议
1085were fair.这很公平
1086Now you may say, well this is现在你可以说,这是
1087paternalism.家长制。
1088Of course it was.当然了
1089That's what paternalism这就是家长制
1090is for, that kind of就是因为,那种
1091thing.东西。
1092So what does this这算什么?
1093show?显示?
1094What does the baseball card example show?棒球卡的例子显示什么?
1095The fact of an agreement协议的事实
1096is not sufficient to establish不足以确定
1097the fairness of the terms.条件的公正性。
1098I read some years ago of a我几年前读到的
1099case in Chicago.芝加哥的个案。
1100There was an elderly有一个老人
1101widow, an 84 year old寡妇,84岁
1102widow named Rose寡妇叫玫瑰
1103who had a problem谁有问题
1104in her apartment with a leaky toilet.在她的公寓里,有一个漏水的厕所。
1105And she还有她
1106signed a contract签订合同
1107with an unscrupulous contractor和一个不道德的承包商
1108who
1109offered to repair her leaky主动提出修补她的漏洞
1110toilet in exchange for 50以厕所换取50
1111thousand dollars.一千块
1112But she不过她
1113had agreed, she was of sound她同意了,她很健全
1114mind, maybe terribly naive头脑,也许非常天真
1115and unfamiliar with the price of plumbing.而且不熟悉管道的价格。
1116She had made this她做的这个
1117agreement.协议。
1118Luckily幸运的是
1119it was discovered, she went to the bank发现她去了银行
1120and asked to并要求
1121withdraw 25 thousand dollars.收回两万五
1122And the teller said, what do you need出纳员说 你需要什么
1123all of that money for?这些钱都是为了什么?
1124And she said, well I have a leaky toilet.她说,我有一个漏水的厕所。
1125And the teller called authorities and they计票员打电话给当局,他们
1126discovered this unscrupulous contractor.发现了这个肆无忌惮的承包商
1127Now现在
1128I suspect that even the most我怀疑这甚至最
1129ardent contractarians热合同工
1130in the room will agree在房间里会同意的
1131that the
1132fact of this woman's agreement这个女人同意的事实
1133is这是
1134not a sufficient condition条件不够充分
1135of the agreement being fair.协议是公平的。
1136Is there anyone who will有谁愿意
1137dispute that?质疑这个?
1138No one.没有人。
1139Am I missing anyone?我想念谁了吗?
1140Alex, where are you?亚历克斯,你在哪里?
1141So这么说
1142maybe there's no dispute then to my first也许没有争议,然后我的第一个
1143claim that an actualA. 实际索赔
1144agreement is not协议不是
1145necessary to their, it's not他们需要的,不是
1146a sufficient condition足够条件
1147of their being an obligation.他们的义务。
1148I want to now make现在我想做
1149a stronger, maybe more controversial一个更强大,也许更有争议的
1150claim about the moral limits of道德限制
1151actual contracts, that实际合同,即
1152a contract or an合同或合同
1153act of consent is同意行为是:
1154not only not sufficient不仅不够
1155but it's not even但还不算
1156a necessary condition必要条件
1157of their being an obligation.他们的义务。
1158And the idea here is这里的想法是
1159that if there is reciprocity, if there如果存在互惠,如果存在
1160is an exchange是交换
1161then接下来
1162a receipt of benefits, there can be an obligation养恤金的领取,可产生义务
1163even without an act of consent.即使没有同意
1164One great example一个伟大的例子
1165of this involves这涉及到
1166the 18th century18世纪
1167philosopher, the Scottish moral哲学家,苏格兰道德
1168philosopher David Hume.哲学家大卫·休姆.
1169When he was young, Hume他年轻的时候,休姆
1170wrote a book arguing against写了一本反对的书
1171Locke's idea of an洛克的想法是一个
1172original social contract.原始社会契约.
1173Hume heapscorned on this轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻轻的轻的轻轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻的轻
1174contractarian idea.契约主义思想.
1175He said他说
1176it was a philosophical fiction,这是一个哲学小说,
1177one of the most mysterious and一个最神秘的...
1178incomprehensible operations that can无法理解的行动
1179possibly be imagined,也许可以想象到,
1180this idea of the social contract.这种社会契约的想法。
1181Many years later, when he was许多年后,当他
118262 years old, Hume had an62岁,休姆有一个
1183experience that put to经验,用于
1184the test his rejection of consent测试他拒绝同意
1185as the basis of obligation.作为义务的基础。
1186Hume had a house in Edinburgh.休姆在爱丁堡有一栋房子.
1187He rented it to his friend他租给他朋友的
1188James Boswell, who in turn詹姆斯·博斯韦尔, 转而
1189sub-led it to a sub-tenant.子引导为子租户.
1190The sub-tenant decided that the house needed副租户决定 房子需要
1191some repairs and a paint job.一些修理和油漆工作。
1192He hired a contractor他雇了一个承包商
1193to do the work.做这个工作。
1194The painter画家
1195did the work and sent the bill做了工作,并寄了账单
1196to Hume.给休姆
1197Hume refused休姆拒绝
1198to pay on the grounds that he付款的理由
1199hadn't consented.没有同意。
1200He hadn't hired他没有雇人
1201the painter.画家。
1202The case办案情况
1203went to court.上堂. 师曰.
1204The contractor承包者
1205said it's true, Hume didn't agree,说是真的 休姆不同意
1206but the house needed a painting但房子需要一幅画
1207and I gave it a very good one.我给了它一个非常好的。
1208Hume thought this was a bad休姆觉得这样不好
1209argument.参数。
1210The only argument唯一的论据
1211this painter makes is that the work was necessary这个画家认为 作品是必要的
1212to be done, but this is no但这不是
1213good answer because by the same rule答得好,因为同样的规则
1214this painter may go through这个画家可能经过
1215every house in Edinburgh爱丁堡的每间房子
1216and do anything proper to be done并做任何适当的事情
1217without the landlord's consent未经房东同意
1218and give the same reason, that the work并给出同样的理由,工作
1219was necessary and that the house有必要,而且房子
1220was the better for it.那样更好
1221So Hume didn't like所以休姆不喜欢
1222the theory that there在那里的理论
1223could be obligation to repay a benefit可能是偿还养恤金的义务
1224without consent, but the defense未经同意 但辩方
1225failed and he had to pay.失败了,他不得不付出代价。
1226Let me give you one我给你一个
1227other example of the distinction区别的其他例子
1228between the consent based双方同意
1229aspect of obligations义务的方面
1230and the benefit based aspect and how和基于效益的方面以及如何
1231they're sometimes run together.他们有时会一起跑
1232This is based这是基于
1233on a personal experience.在个人经历。
1234Some years ago几年前,我说
1235I was driving across我开车过去
1236the country with some friends国家与一些朋友
1237and we found ourselves in the middle of nowhere我们发现自己在荒野中
1238in Hammond, Indiana.在印第安纳州的哈蒙德
1239We stopped at a rest stop我们停在休息站
1240and got out of the car and when下车,什么时候
1241we came back our car wouldn't start.我们的车还没开呢
1242None of us knew much about cars.我们谁都不懂车
1243We didn't really know我们不知道
1244what to do until we noticed怎么办,直到我们注意到
1245that in the parking lot在停车场里
1246driving up next to us开车到我们旁边
1247was a van and on曾经是一辆面包车
1248the side it said Sam's Mobile上面说山姆的手机
1249Repair Van and out修理面包车
1250of the van came a man,车上有个男人
1251presumably Sam,假设山姆,
1252and he came up to us and he said他来到我们身边,说
1253can I help you?有什么事吗?
1254Here's how I work.这就是我的工作方式。
1255I work by the hour我上班的时间
1256for $50 an hour.每小时50美元
1257If I如果说
1258fix your car in five minutes you owe me五分钟后修好你的车,你欠我的
1259the $50 and if I50美元,如果是我的话
1260work on your car for an hour and can't在你的车上工作一个小时,不能
1261fix it you'll still owe me the $50.修好它,你还欠我50美元。
1262So I said well what is所以我说得好
1263the likelihood that you'll be able to fix the可能你能够修复
1264car and he didn't answer车子没接
1265but he did start但他确实开始
1266looking under the, poking around看着下面,四处游荡
1267under the steering column.在引导栏下。
1268Short time passed he emerged from短暂的时间流逝,他从
1269under the steering column and said并说
1270there's nothing wrong with the ignition system点火系统没有问题
1271but you still have 45 minutes但你还有45分钟
1272left should I look under the hood?我该往左边看吗?
1273I said我说
1274wait a minute.单
1275I haven't我没有
1276hired you.雇佣你。
1277We haven't made any我们没有做任何
1278agreement and then he became同意,然后他变成了
1279very angry and he非常愤怒和他
1280said do you mean to say that if I had说,你的意思是说,如果我有
1281fixed your car while I was我修你的车的时候
1282working under the steering column that在指导栏下工作
1283you wouldn't have paid me?你不会付钱给我吧?
1284And I said that's a different我说这不一样
1285question.问题。
1286I didn't我没有
1287go into the distinction between consent进入同意之间的区别
1288based and benefit based obligations以福利为基础的债务
1289but I think he但我觉得他
1290had the intuition that if he had fixed有直觉,如果他已经固定了,
1291讽 Iи
1292would have owed him the $50本来欠他五十块的
1293I shared that intuition.我也有这种直觉
1294I would have.我会的
1295But he不过他
1296inferred from that, this从中推断,
1297was the fallacy and是错的,
1298the reasoning that I think lay behind his我认为他背后的推理
1299anger, he inferred from愤怒,他从
1300that fact that therefore因此,
1301implicitly隐含
1302we had an agreement.我们说好了的
1303But that it seems to me is a mistake.但在我看来,这是个错误。
1304It's a mistake that fails to recognize这是一个错误,没有认识到
1305the distinction between these two different两者的区别
1306aspects of contract arguments.(b) 合同论点的方面。
1307Yes, I agree.是的,我同意这一点。
1308I would have owed him $50 if he had我欠他50块
1309repaired my car during that time.期间修了我的车
1310Not没有
1311because we had made因为我们做了
1312any agreement, we hadn't.任何协议,我们没有。
1313But simply because if he had fixed但只是因为他已经修好了
1314my car he would have conferred on me a benefit我的车,他会给我好处的
1315for which I would have owed him in the name我本该以他的名义欠他的
1316of reciprocity对等原则
1317and fairness.公平无私
1318So here's another example of所以这里还有一个例子:
1319the distinction between these two different两者的区别
1320kinds of arguments, these two different这两种不同的论点
1321aspects of the morality道德方面
1322of contract.合同的终止。
1323Now I want to hear how many think I was现在我想听听我是谁
1324in the right in that case.右侧,在这种情况下。
1325That's reassuring.这是令人放心的。
1326Is there anyone who thinks I was in the wrong?有人认为我错了吗?
1327Anyone?有人吗?
1328You do?是吗?
1329Why?为什么?
1330Go ahead.来吧。
1331Isn't the problem with this is that问题不在于
1332any benefit is inherently任何好处都是固有的
1333subjectively defined?主观定义?
1334I mean, what if you wanted我的意思是,如果你想要的话
1335your car broken and he had fixed it?你的车坏了,他修好了?
1336I mean...我是说...
1337No, I didn't want it broken.不 我不想把它弄断
1338But who would?但谁会呢?
1339Who would?谁会?
1340I don't know, someone.我不知道,有人吗?
1341I mean, what if我是说,如果
1342Hume, you know,休姆,你知道吗,
1343what if the painter had painted his house如果画家画了他的房子
1344blue but he hated the color blue?蓝色 但他讨厌蓝色?
1345I mean, you have to我的意思是,你必须
1346sort of define what your benefit来定义你的好处
1347is before the person does it.是在他动手之前
1348Well, all right, so好吧,这样吧
1349what would you conclude from that你会从中得出什么结论
1350though for the larger issue here?但对于更大的问题?
1351Would you conclude that therefore consent因此,你是否认为同意
1352is a necessary condition必要条件
1353of there being an obligation?是否有义务?
1354Absolutely.当然
1355You would.你会的。
1356What's your name?你叫什么来着?
1357Nate.内特
1358Because otherwise因为不然
1359how can we know, Nate says,我们怎么知道,内特说,
1360whether there has been an exchange是否有交换
1361of equivalent or fair benefits?同等利益还是公平利益?
1362Unless we have除非我们有
1363the subjective valuation, which may vary主观估价,可能有所不同
1364one person to the next一个人到下一个
1365of the situation.情况。
1366All right, that's a fair好吧,这很公平
1367challenge.挑战。
1368Let me put to you让我给你
1369one other example另一个例子
1370in order to以便
1371test the relation between these two测试两者之间的关系
1372aspects of the morality of contracts.合同道德的方面。
1373Suppose I get married, and如果我结婚了,和
1374suppose I discover如果我发现
1375that after 20 years of20年过去了
1376faithfulness on my part,我的忠诚,
1377every year on our trip每年的旅程
1378across the country, my整个国家,我的
1379wife has been seeing another man,妻子和另一个男人约会了
1380a man with a van on the Indiana toll印地安那州有一辆面包车的人
1381road.道路。
1382This part is completely made up, by the way.顺便说一句,这部分是完全编出来的。
1383Wouldn't I have two我没有两个
1384different reasons for moral outrage?道德愤怒的不同原因?
1385One reason could be一个原因可能是
1386we had an agreement.我们说好了的
1387She broke她破产了
1388her promise, referring她的承诺,提及
1389to the fact of her consent.她同意的事实。
1390But I would also have a second但我也会有第二个
1391ground for moral outrage,道德愤怒的理由,
1392having nothing to do with the contract和合同无关
1393as such.就是这样。
1394But I've been但我已经
1395so faithful for my part.如此忠实的我。
1396Surely I deserve better than this.我当然应该比这更好的
1397Is this what I'm due in return?这就是我应得的回报吗?
1398And so on.及诸众生.
1399So that would point to the element因此,这将指出要素
1400of reciprocity.对等原则。
1401Each reason has an每个原因都有
1402independent moral force.独立道德力量。
1403That's这是
1404the general point.一般观点。
1405And you can你会的
1406see this, if you imagine a slight看看这个,如果你想象一下
1407variation on the marriage婚姻变化
1408case.案例。
1409Suppose we hadn't假设我们没有
1410been married for 20 years.结婚20年了
1411Suppose we were just married,假设我们刚结婚
1412and that the betrayal occurred而背叛的发生
1413on the way to our honeymoon in Hammond,在去哈蒙德度蜜月的路上
1414Indiana, after the印第安纳州之后
1415contract has been made,已经签订合同,
1416but before there is any history但是在有历史之前
1417of performance on my part.表现的我。
1418Performance of the预算执行情况
1419contract, I mean.我是说合同
1420I would still...我仍然会...
1421Oh, come on.哦,来吧。
1422Come on.来吧。
1423I would still我仍然会
1424with Julian,与朱利安,
1425I'd be able to say, but you我可以说,但你
1426promised.我保证
1427You promised.你答应过我的
1428That would isolate那会孤立
1429the pure element of consent,纯粹的同意要素,
1430right?对吧?
1431Where there were no没有的地方
1432benefit, never受益,永远不要
1433mind.头脑。
1434You get the idea.你得到这个想法。
1435Here's the main idea.这是主要的想法。
1436Actual contracts实际合同
1437have their moral force有他们的道德力量
1438in virtue of two由于两个
1439distinguishable ideals.可区分的理想。
1440Autonomy and reciprocity.自治与互惠.
1441But不过
1442in real life,在现实生活中,
1443every actual contract每个实际合同
1444may fall short,可能不够,
1445may fail to realize可能无法实现
1446the ideals that give contracts赋予合同的理想
1447their moral force in the first他们的道德力量在第一
1448place.地点。
1449The ideal of理想的理想
1450autonomy may not be realized自治可能无法实现
1451because there may be a difference in the bargaining因为谈判可能不同
1452power of the parties.政党的权力。
1453The ideal of reciprocity互惠的理想
1454may not be realized可能无法实现
1455because there may be a difference of因为可能有区别
1456knowledge between the parties.当事人之间的知识。
1457And so they may misidentify这样他们就会误认
1458what really counts真正重要的东西
1459as having equivalent具有同等效力
1460value.数值。
1461Now,现在,
1462suppose you were to imagine假设你想象
1463a contract合同
1464where the ideals of autonomy自治的理想
1465and of reciprocity和互惠原则
1466were not subject不属于主题
1467to contingency, but应急,但
1468were guaranteed to be realized.保证实现。
1469What kind of contract would that have to be?那会是什么合同?
1470Imagine a contract想象一个合同
1471among parties who were在缔约方中,
1472equal in power and knowledge,在权力和知识方面是平等的,
1473rather than unequal,而不是不平等,
1474who were identically situated rather他们的位置相当相同
1475than differently situated.与位置不同。
1476That is the这是
1477idea behind后脑勺
14782. Rawls的索赔
1479that the way to think about justice思考正义的方式
1480is from the standpoint从观点来看
1481of a hypothetical contract假设合同
1482behind a veil of ignorance在无知的面纱后面
1483that creates a condition of equality创造平等条件
1484by ruling裁决
1485out or enabling us离开或允许我们
1486to forget for the moment暂时忘记
1487the differences in power and knowledge权力和知识的差异
1488that could,这可以,
1489even in principle, lead即使原则上,铅
1490to unfair results.对不公平的结果。
1491This is why,这就是为什么,
1492for content for Rawls, a hypothetical用于 Rawls 的内容,一种假设
1493contract among equals平等契约
1494is the only way只有这样
1495to think about principles考虑原则
1496of justice.正义。
1497What will those principles这些原则将是什么?
1498be?是吗?
1499That's the question we'll turn to这就是我们要面对的问题
1500next time.下次再说吧
1501This program is provided by此程序由
1502additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
该视频共有字幕 1504 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格

P10 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p10 9. 9.小心你的动机 (P10)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:03Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
0:07Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
0:30Now we turn to the hardest philosopher we're going to read in this course.现在我们转向在这个课程中要读的最难的哲学家.
0:39Today we turn to Immanuel Kant who offers a different account今天我们请伊曼纽尔·康德 提供不同的说法
0:45of why we have a categorical duty to respect the dignity of persons我们为何有绝对义务尊重人的尊严?
0:51and not to use people as means merely even for good ends.而不以人为手段 哪怕是为了好的目的
1:01Kant excelled at the University of Königsberg at the age of 16.康德16岁在科尼斯贝格大学表现优异.
1:06At the age of 31 he got his first job as an unsalaryed lecturer paid on commission31岁时,他得到了第一个工作 一个无薪讲师付佣金
1:14based on the number of students who showed up at his lectures.根据参加他讲座的学生人数。
1:17This is a sensible system that Harvard would do well to consider.这是一个明智的系统,哈佛会好好考虑的。
展开字幕全文(679 条)
序号英文中文
1Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
2Additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
3Now we turn to the hardest philosopher we're going to read in this course.现在我们转向在这个课程中要读的最难的哲学家.
4Today we turn to Immanuel Kant who offers a different account今天我们请伊曼纽尔·康德 提供不同的说法
5of why we have a categorical duty to respect the dignity of persons我们为何有绝对义务尊重人的尊严?
6and not to use people as means merely even for good ends.而不以人为手段 哪怕是为了好的目的
7Kant excelled at the University of Königsberg at the age of 16.康德16岁在科尼斯贝格大学表现优异.
8At the age of 31 he got his first job as an unsalaryed lecturer paid on commission31岁时,他得到了第一个工作 一个无薪讲师付佣金
9based on the number of students who showed up at his lectures.根据参加他讲座的学生人数。
10This is a sensible system that Harvard would do well to consider.这是一个明智的系统,哈佛会好好考虑的。
11Luckily for Kant he was a popular lecturer and also an industrious one幸好康德是个受欢迎的讲师 也是一位杰出的讲师
12and so he eked out a meager living.于是他拿出了活下来的小人物
13It wasn't until he was 57 that he published his first major work.直到57岁他才出版了他的第一部主要作品.
14But it was worth the wait.但它值得等待。
15The book was The Critique of Pure Reason,这本书是"纯理性的批评"
16perhaps the most important work in all of modern philosophy.或许是现代哲学中最重要的作品
17And a few years later Kant wrote the groundwork for the metaphysics of morals几年后康德写了道德的元物理学基础
18which we read in this course.我们读了这个课程。
19I want to acknowledge even before we start that Kant is a difficult thinker.甚至在我们开始之前 我想承认康德是个困难的思想家
20But it's important to try to figure out what he's saying但必须想清楚他说什么
21because what this book is about is, well,因为这本书的内容是,嗯,
22it's about what the supreme principle of morality is, number one.这是关于道德的最高原则,第一。
23And it's also, it gives us an account,而且,它给我们一个账户,
24one of the most powerful accounts we have, of what freedom really is.我们拥有的最强大的说法之一, 自由到底是什么。
25So let me start today.所以,让我从今天开始。
26Kant rejects utilitarianism.康德拒绝功利主义.
27He thinks that the individual person, all human beings,他认为个人,所有的人,
28have a certain dignity that commands our respect.有某种尊严,赢得我们的尊重。
29The reason the individual is sacred or the bearer of rights according to Kant康德认为,个人是神圣的或拥有权利的原因
30doesn't stem from the idea that we own ourselves不是因为我们拥有自己
31but instead from the idea that we are all rational beings.而不是认为我们都是理性的人
32We're all rational beings which simply means我们都是理性的生物 那只是意味着
33that we are beings who are capable of reason.我们是有理智的人
34We are also autonomous beings我们也是自主的人
35which is to say that we are beings capable of acting and choosing freely.这就是说,我们是能够自由行事和选择的人。
36Now, this capacity for reason and freedom isn't the only capacity we have.这种理性和自由的能力 并不是我们唯一的能力
37We also have the capacity for pain and pleasure, for suffering and satisfaction.我们还有能力承受痛苦和快乐,能够承受痛苦和满足。
38Kant admits the utilitarians were half right.康德承认功利主义者一半是对的.
39Of course we seek to avoid pain and we like pleasure.当然,我们力求避免痛苦,我们喜欢快乐。
40Kant doesn't deny this.康德不否认这一点.
41What he does deny is Benson's claim that pain and pleasure are our sovereign masters.他否认的是本森声称 痛苦和快乐是我们的主权主人
42He thinks that's wrong.他认为这是错误的。
43Kant thinks that it's our rational capacity that makes us distinctive,康德认为这是我们理性的能力 使我们与众不同
44that makes us special, that sets us apart from and above mere animal existence.这让我们变得特别, 把我们与动物的存在分开。
45It makes us something more than just physical creatures with appetites.这让我们不只是有食欲的生物
46Now, we often think of freedom as simply consisting in doing what we want现在,我们经常认为自由只是 做我们想要的
47or in the absence of obstacles to getting what we want.或无障碍获得我们想要的东西。
48That's one way of thinking about freedom.这是对自由的一种思考方式.
49But this isn't Kant's idea of freedom.但这不是康德的自由思想.
50Kant has a more stringent, demanding notion of what it means to be free.康德对自由的意义有更严格,更严格的观念.
51And though it's stringent and demanding, if you think it through虽然很苛刻,很苛刻,如果你想清楚
52it's actually pretty persuasive.其实很有说服力
53Kant reasons as follows.康德的理由如下.
54When we, like animals, seek after pleasure or the satisfaction of our desires当我们像动物一样 追求快乐或满足我们的欲望
55or the avoidance of pain, when we do that we aren't really acting freely.或避免痛苦, 当我们这样做,我们不是真正 自由行动。
56Why not?为什么不呢?
57и痷琌 thosecm impulse
58I didn't choose this particular hunger or that particular appetite.我没有选择这种特殊的饥饿 或那种特殊的食欲。
59And so when I act to satisfy it, I'm just acting according to natural necessity.所以当我行动满足它, 我只是根据自然的需要。
60And for Kant, freedom is the opposite of necessity.而对于康德来说,自由与必要性相反.
61There was an advertising slogan for the soft drink Sprite a few years ago.几年前出现了软饮料Sprite的广告口号.
62The slogan was, obey your thirst.口号是 顺从你的口渴
63There's a Kantian insight buried in that Sprite advertising slogan.有康德的洞察力埋藏在 斯普拉蒂广告口号里
64That in a way is Kant's point.这在某种程度上是康德的观点。
65When you go for Sprite or Pepsi, you're really, you might think that you're choosing freely当你去Sprite或百事可乐, 你真的,你可能会认为 你自由选择
66Sprite versus Pepsi, but you're actually obeying something, a thirst,Sprite对百事公司, 但你实际上在服从一些东西, 一个渴,
67or maybe a desire manufactured or massaged by advertising.或者是广告制造或按摩的欲望
68You're obeying a prompting that you yourself haven't chosen or created.你在服从一个提示,即你自己没有选择或创造。
69And here it's worth noticing Kant's specially demanding idea of freedom.这里值得注意康德特别要求的自由思想.
70What way of acting, how can my will be determined if not by the promptings of nature怎样行动,如果没有大自然的启示,我的意志如何决定?
71or my hunger or my appetite or my desires?还是我的饥渴或欲望?
72Kant's answer, to act freely is to act autonomously.康德的回答,自由行动就是自主行动.
73And to act autonomously is to act according to a law that I give myself,自主行动就是按照我给自己的法律行事
74not according to the physical laws of nature or to the laws of cause and effect,不符合自然实体法或因果法则,
75which include my desire to eat or to drink or to choose this food in a restaurant over that.包括我想吃 喝 或在餐厅里选择这种食物
76Now, what is the opposite?现在,什么是相反的?
77What is the opposite of autonomy for Kant?康德的自治权又有什么反面呢?
78He invents a special term to describe the opposite of autonomy.他发明了一个特殊术语来描述自治的相反.
79Heteronomy is the opposite of autonomy.异体性与自主性相反.
80When I act heteronomously, I'm acting according to an inclination当我行为异常时,我表现的倾向
81or a desire that I haven't chosen for myself.或者我还没有为自己选择的欲望
82So freedom as autonomy is the specially stringent idea that Kant insists on.因此,作为自主的自由是康德所坚持的特别严格的想法.
83Now, why is autonomy the opposite of acting heteronomously or according to the dictates of nature?现在,为什么自主性与异端行为或自然规律相反?
84Kant's point is that nature is governed by laws, laws of cause and effect, for example.康德的观点是,自然受到法律,因果法的制约,比如说.
85Suppose you drop a billiard ball.如果你掉了个台球的话
86It falls to the ground.坠于地.
87We wouldn't say the billiard ball is acting freely.我们不会说台球是自由的
88Why not?为什么不呢?
89It's acting according to the law of nature, according to the laws of cause and effect, the law of gravity.依自然之法行,因果之法,重力之法.
90And just as he has an unusually demanding and stringent conception of freedom,就像他对自由有异乎寻常的要求和严格的概念一样,
91where freedom as autonomy, he also has a demanding conception of morality.在自由作为自主的地方,他也有严格的道德观念。
92To act freely is not to choose the best means to a given end.自由行动不是选择达到某一目的的最佳手段。
93It's to choose the end itself for its own sake.是为自性而自选终.
94And that's something that human beings can do and that billiard balls can't.这是人类可以做的, 和台球不能。
95Insofar as we act on inclination or pursue pleasure,只要我们按倾向行事或追求快乐
96we act as means to the realization of ends given outside us.我们作为实现我们之外的目标的手段。
97We are instruments rather than authors of the purposes we pursue.我们是文书而不是我们所追求宗旨的作者。
98That's the heteronomous determination of the will.这就是意志的异质决定.
99On the other hand, insofar as we act autonomously, according to a law we give ourselves,另一方面,只要我们按照我们赋予自己的法律自主行事,
100we do something for its own sake as an end in itself.我们做一些事情是为了它本身的目的。
101When we act autonomously, we cease to be instruments to purposes given outside us.当我们自主行动时,我们不再是实现我们以外赋予我们的目的的工具。
102We become, or we can come to think of ourselves, as ends in ourselves.我们变成,或者我们可以来思考我们自己,作为我们自己的目的。
103This capacity to act freely, Kant tells us, is what gives human life its special dignity.康德告诉我们,这种自由行动的能力使人的生命具有其特殊尊严。
104Respecting human dignity means regarding persons not just as means but also as ends in themselves.尊重人的尊严不仅意味着对人采取的手段,而且也意味着目的本身。
105And this is why it's wrong to use people for the sake of other people's well-being or happiness.这也是为什么为了他人的福祉或幸福而利用他人是错误的.
106This is the real reason, Kant says, that utilitarianism goes wrong.康德说,这是功利主义错误的真正原因。
107This is the reason it's important to respect the dignity of persons and to uphold their rights.这就是尊重人的尊严,维护其权利的重要性所在.
108So even if there are cases, remember John Stuart Mill said,所以即使有案子 记住约翰·斯图尔特·米尔说过
109well in the long run if we uphold justice and respect the dignity of persons, we will maximize human happiness.从长远来看,如果我们坚持正义和尊重人的尊严,我们将最大限度地实现人类幸福。
110What would Kant's answer be to that?康德的答案是什么?
111What would his answer be?他的答案会是什么?
112Even if that were true, even if the calculus worked out that way,即使这是真的, 即使微积分是那样的,
113even if you shouldn't throw the Christians to the lions because in the long run fear will spread, the overall utility will decline.即使你不应该把基督徒扔给狮子 因为从长远来看,恐惧会蔓延, 整体效用会下降。
114The utilitarian would be upholding justice and rights and respect for persons for the wrong reason,功利主义者将维护正义和权利,并因错误的理由尊重人,
115for a purely contingent reason, for an instrumental reason.纯粹的或有原因, 一个重要原因。
116It would still be using people, even where the calculus works out for the best in the long run,它仍然会使用人, 即使其中的微积分工作 在长期最好的,
117it would still be using people as means rather than respecting them as ends in themselves.它仍将利用人民作为手段,而不是尊重他们本身的目的。
118So that's Kant's idea of freedom as autonomy.这就是康德将自由作为自治的思想.
119And you can begin to see how it's connected to his idea of morality.你可以开始看到它是如何与他的道德观念联系在一起的。
120But we still have to answer one more question.但我们还需要回答一个问题。
121What gives an act its moral worth in the first place?什么让一个行为 它的道德价值 首先?
122If it can't be directed at utility or satisfying wants and desires, what gives an action its moral worth?如果它不能被指向效用或满足欲望和欲望,那它是什么让行动具有道德价值?
123This leads us from Kant's demanding idea of freedom to his demanding idea of morality.这使我们从康德要求自由的观念,到他要求道德的观念.
124What does Kant say?康德怎么说?
125What makes an action morally worthy consists not in the consequences or in the results that flow from it.使一项行动具有道德价值的不是后果,也不是由此产生的结果。
126What makes an action morally worthy has to do with the motive, with the quality of the will,道德上值得采取的行动与动机、意志的质量有关,
127with the intention for which the act is done.行为意图。
128What matters is the motive.重要的是动机
129And the motive must be of a certain kind.而动机必须是某种类型的.
130So the moral worth of an action depends on the motive for which it's done.所以一个行动的道德价值取决于它为之而作的动机.
131And the important thing is that the person do the right thing for the right reason.而重要的是,人为了正确的理由做正确的事情.
132A good will isn't good because of what it affects or accomplishes, Kant writes.康德写道:
133It's good in itself.其义自在.
134Even if by its utmost effort the good will accomplishes nothing,即使他尽了最大努力 善良的意志一无所获
135it would still shine like a jewel for its own sake as something which has its full value in itself.它仍然会像一颗珠宝一样闪耀着 因为它本身就具有充分的价值
136And so for any action to be morally good, it's not enough that it should conform to the moral law.因此,任何行动要想在道德上是好的,就不足以使其符合道德法则.
137It must also be done for the sake of the moral law.亦须为道德法故.
138The idea is that the motive confers the moral worth on an action.这个想法是,动机赋予一项行动道德价值。
139And the only kind of motive that can confer moral worth on an action is the motive of duty.而唯一能赋予某项行动道德价值的动机就是责任动机.
140Well, what's the opposite of doing something out of a sense of duty because it's right?那么,什么是相反的 做一些事情 出于一种责任感,因为它是正确的?
141Well, for Kant, the opposite would be all of those motives having to do with our inclinations.对康德来说 与我们倾向相关的动机正好相反
142And inclinations refer to all of our desires, all of our contingently given wants, preferences, impulses, and the like.倾向是指我们所有的欲望, 我们所有偶然得到的欲望,喜好,冲动等等。
143Only actions done for the sake of the moral law, for the sake of duty, only these actions have moral worth.只有为了道德法则,为了责任而行动,只有这些行动才有道德价值.
144Now I want to see what you think about this idea.现在我想看看你对这个想法的看法。
145But first let's consider a few examples.但首先让我们考虑几个例子。
146Kant begins with an example of a shopkeeper.康德从一个店主的例子开始.
147He wants to bring out the intuition and make plausible the idea that what confers moral worth on an action is that it be done because it's right.他想展现出直觉 并让这个想法令人信服, 使一个行动具有道德价值的 是因为它是正确的。
148He says suppose there's a shopkeeper and an inexperienced customer comes in.他说,假设有一个店员 和缺乏经验的客户进来。
149The shopkeeper knows that he could give the customer the wrong change, could shortchange the customer and get away with it.店主知道,他可以给客户错误的改变,可以缩短客户的时间并逃脱.
150At least that customer wouldn't know.至少那个顾客不知道
151But the shopkeeper nonetheless says, well, if I shortchange this customer, word may get out, my reputation would be damaged and I would lose business.但是店主还是说 如果我少了这个顾客 消息可能会传出去 我的名声会受损 我就会失去生意
152So I won't shortchange this customer.所以我不会减少这个客户。
153The shopkeeper does nothing wrong.店主没有做错什么
154He gives the correct change.他给了正确的改变。
155But does his action have moral worth?但他的行为有道德价值吗?
156Kant says no.康德说不行
157It doesn't have moral worth because the shopkeeper only did the right thing for the wrong reason out of self-interest.它没有道德价值,因为店主出于自身利益,只出于错误的原因做了正确的事情.
158That's a pretty straightforward case.这案子很直接
159Then he takes another case, the case of suicide.然后他又接了一起自杀案
160He says we have a duty to preserve ourselves.他说我们有责任保护自己
161Now for most people who love life, we have multiple reasons for not taking our own lives.现在,对于大多数热爱生命的人来说,我们有多重理由不夺走自己的生命.
162So the only way we can really tell, the only way we can isolate the operative motive for someone who doesn't take his or her life is to imagine someone who's miserable所以,我们唯一能真正辨别的方法, 唯一能隔离行动动机的人 谁不夺走他或她的生命,是想象一个人谁是悲惨的
163and who despite having an absolutely miserable life, nonetheless recognizes the duty to preserve oneself and so does not commit suicide.尽管生活极其悲惨,但承认有责任保护自己,因此不会自杀。
164The force of the example is to bring out the motive that matters.例子的力量在于提出重要的动机。
165And the motive that matters for morality is doing the right thing for the sake of duty.而对于道德至关重要的动机,是为责任而做正确的事情.
166Let me just give you a couple of other examples.让我举几个其他例子。
167The Better Business Bureau.更好的商业局.
168What's their slogan?他们的口号是什么?
169The slogan of the Better Business Bureau?更好的商业局的口号?
170Honesty is the best policy.诚实是最好的政策。
171It's also the most profitable.亦名最上利乐.
172这是纽约时报的Better Business Bureau的整页广告.
173Honesty is as important as any other asset because a business that deals in truth, openness and fair value cannot help but do well.诚实与任何其他资产一样重要,因为以真理、开放和公允价值交易的企业不能不做好事。
174Come join us and profit from it.来加入我们,从中获利。
175What would Kant say about the moral worth of the honest dealings of members of the Better Business Bureau?康德会怎样评价好商局成员诚实交易的道德价值?.
176What would he say?他会说什么?
177That here's a perfect example that if this is the reason that these companies deal honestly with their customers,这是一个很好的例子 如果这是这些公司 诚实地对待客户的原因
178their action lacks moral worth.他们的行动缺乏道德价值。
179This is Kant's point.这是康德的观点。
180Or a couple of years ago at the University of Maryland there was a problem with cheating.或几年前在马里兰大学发生作弊的问题。
181And so they initiated an honor system and they created a program with local merchants that if you signed the honor pledge,于是他们启动了一个荣誉制度 他们与当地商人创建了一个程序 如果你签署了荣誉保证书
182a pledge not to cheat, you would get discounts of 10 to 25 percent at local shops.保证不作弊,你会得到折扣 10%到25%的地方商店。
183Well, what would you think of someone motivated to uphold an honor code with the hope of discounts?那么,你认为有人 动机 维护荣誉代码 与希望折扣?
184It's the same as Kant's shock keeper.与康德震动持戒者同.
185The point is what matters is the quality of the will, the character of the motive,关键在于遗嘱的质量 动机的特征
186and the relevant motive to morality can only be the motive of duty, not the motive of inclination.道德的相关动机只能是责任的动机,而不是倾向的动机.
187And when I act out of duty, when I resist as my motive for acting inclinations or self-interest, even sympathy and altruism,当我失职时,当我抗拒作为我的动机 表现倾向或自我利益, 甚至同情和利他主义,
188only then am I acting freely, only then am I acting autonomously.只有那时我才能自由行动 只有那时我才能自主行动
189Only then is my will not determined or governed by external considerations.只有这样,我的意志才不是由外部考虑决定或支配的。
190That's the link between Kant's idea of freedom and of morality.这就是康德的自由思想和道德思想之间的联系.
191Now I want to pause here to see if all of this is clear or if you have some questions or puzzles.现在我想在这里暂停一下,看看这一切是否都清楚,或者你是否有一些问题或谜题。
192They can be questions of clarification or they can be challenges.它们可以是澄清问题,也可以是挑战。
193If you want to challenge this idea that only the motive of duty confers moral worth on the action, what do you think?如果你想质疑这个观点,即只有责任的动机才使行动具有道德价值,你觉得呢?
194Yes?是吗?
195Yeah, I actually have two questions of clarification.是的,我实际上有两个问题需要澄清。
196The first is there seems to be an aspect of this that makes it sort of self-defeating第一,这似乎有一个方面 使它有点自负
197in that once you're conscious of what morality is, you can sort of alter your motive to achieve that end of morality.一旦你意识到道德是什么, 你就可以改变你的动机 去达到道德的目的。
198Give me an example of what you have in mind.举个例子说明你在想什么
199The shopkeeper example, if he decides that he wants to give the person the money to do the right thing店主的例子,如果他决定 他想要给一个人的钱做正确的事情
200and he decides that's his motive to do so because he wants to be moral, then isn't that sort of defeating the purity of his action?他决定他这样做的动机 是因为他想要品行道德, 那么这不是那种 击败他的纯洁行为吗?
201If morality is determined by his motive, his motive is then to act morally.如果道德是由他的动机决定的,那么他的动机就是道德行动.
202So you're imagining a case, not of the purely selfish calculating shopkeeper,所以你在想象一个案子, 不是纯粹自私的计算店员,
203but of one who says, well he may consider short-changing the customer,但是,如果有人说, 他可能会考虑 短期改变客户,
204but then he says not, well my reputation might suffer if word gets out,但是他说不行 如果消息传出去 我的名声可能会受损
205but instead he says actually I would like to be the kind of honest person who gives the right change to customers但他却说,实际上我想成为那种诚实的人 给客户带来正确的改变
206simply because it's the right thing to do.只是因为它是正确的事情做。
207Or simply because I want to be moral?还是仅仅因为我想道德?
208Because I want to be moral.因为我想成为道德的。
209I want to be a good person.我想成为一个好人。
210And so I'm going to conform all of my actions to what morality requires.所以我要把我所有的行动 都符合道德要求
211It's a subtle point.微妙之义.
212It's a good question.善问.
213Kant does acknowledge, you're pressing Kant on an important point here.康德确实承认了 你在把康德逼迫到一个重要点上
214Kant does say there has to be some incentive to obey the moral law.康德确实说过 必须遵守道德法则
215It can't be a self-interested incentive that would defeat it by definition.这不可能是一种自利的激励,从定义上来说,是会打败它的.
216So he speaks of a different kind of incentive from an inclination.因此,他提到一种不同的激励 与倾向。
217He speaks of reverence for the moral law.说敬重道德法.
218So if that shopkeeper says, I want to develop a reverence for the moral law,所以如果那个店主说 我要对道德法则保持敬重
219and so I'm going to do the right thing, then I think he's there.所以我会做正确的事情,然后我想他在那里。
220He's there as far as Kant's concerned.在康德处.
221Because he's formed his motive.因为他已经形成了他的动机
222His will is conforming to the moral law once he sees the importance of it.他的意志一旦认识到道德法的重要性就符合道德法则.
223So it would count.这样就算数了
224It would count.它会算数。
225And then secondly, very quickly, what stops morality from becoming completely objective in this point?其次,非常迅速地,是什么阻止了道德在这个时候变得完全客观?
226What stops morality from becoming completely subjective?是什么阻止道德变得完全主观?
227If morality is completely determined by your morals, then how can you apply this?如果道德是完全由你的道德决定的,那么你怎样应用呢?
228That's also a great question.这也是个大问题。
229What's your name?你叫什么来着?
230My name is Amadi.我叫阿玛迪
231Amadi?阿玛迪?
232All right.好吧,我们走。
233If acting morally means acting according to a moral law, out of duty,如果道德行为意味着根据道德法行事,则出于职责考虑,
234and if it's also to act freely in the sense of autonomously,如果它也是在自主的意义上自由行动的,
235it must mean that I'm acting according to a law that I give myself.这一定意味着我的行为符合我给自己的法律
236That's what it means to act autonomously.自主行动就是这个意思.
237Amadi is right about that.阿玛迪说得对
238But that does raise a really interesting question.这确实引起了一个非常有趣的问题。
239If acting autonomously means acting according to a law I give myself,如果独立行事意味着按照我赋予自己的法律行事
240that's how I escape the chain of cause and effect and the laws of nature.这就是我如何逃脱 因果关系链 和自然法则。
241What's to guarantee that the law I give myself when I'm acting out of duty何以能保证我失职时 给自己的法律
242is the same as the law that Amadi is giving himself,和阿玛迪给自己的法律一样
243and that each of you gives yourselves?你们各自捐献吗?
244Well, here's the question.问题是...
245How many moral laws, from Kant's point of view, are there in this room?从康德看,这房间有多少道德法则?
246Are there a thousand, or is there one?有一千个,还是一个?
247He thinks there's one, which in a way does go back to this question.他认为,有一个, 在某种程度上,它确实回到这个问题。
248All right, what is the moral law?好吧,什么是道德法则?
249What does it tell us?它告诉我们什么?
250It sounds like it to act autonomously is to act according to one's conscience,这听起来像它 自主行动 是根据一个人的良心采取行动,
251according to a law one gives oneself.根据法律规定,
252But what guarantees that if we all exercise our reason,但是,什么保证 如果我们都行使我们的理由,
253we will come up with one and the same moral law?我们会想出同样的道德法则吗?
254That's what Amadi wants to know.这就是阿玛迪想知道的。
255Here's Kant's answer.这是康德的答案。
256The reason that leads us to the law we give ourselves as autonomous beings导致我们走向法律的原因 我们把自己作为自主的生物
257is a reason, it's a kind of practical reason that we share as human beings.这是一个原因,这是一个实际的原因 我们作为人类共享。
258It's not idiosyncratic.亦非仪轨.
259The reason we need to respect the dignity of persons is that we're all rational beings.我们需要尊重人格尊严的原因是,我们都是理性的生物.
260We all have the capacity for reason,我们都有理智的能力
261and it's the exercise of that capacity for reason which exists undifferentiated in all of us而正是出于理性而行使这种能力,在我们所有人中都是无差别的。
262that makes us worthy of dignity, all of us,这让我们值得尊严,我们所有人,
263and since it's the same capacity for reason,由於理性的能力是一样的
264unqualified by particular autobiographies and life circumstances,特定自传和生活环境不合格,
265it's the same universal capacity for reason that delivers the moral law.同样的普适能力是理性的,能传递道德法则.
266It turns out that to act autonomously is to act according to a law we give ourselves,事实证明,自主行动就是按照我们赋予自己的法律行事,
267exercising our reason, but it's the reason we share with everyone as rational beings.行使我们的理性, 但这是我们与每个人共享的原因 作为理性生物。
268Not the particular reasons we have given our upbringings, our particular values, our particular interests.并不是我们给予我们教养的特殊原因,我们的特殊价值,我们的特殊利益.
269It's pure practical reason in Kant's terms which legislates a priori,在康德的术语中,这是纯粹的实际原因 立法先验,
270regardless of any particular contingent or empirical ends.不论任何特定或经验目的。
271Well, what moral law would that kind of reason deliver?那么,什么道德法会 那种理由产生?
272What is its content?内容是什么?
273To answer that question, you have to read the groundwork,要回答这个问题,你得读一下基础
274and we'll continue with that question next time.下次我们再继续提问
275For Kant, morally speaking, suicide is on a par with murder.对康德来说,道德上来说,自杀等同于谋杀。
276It's on a par with murder because what we violate when we take a life,这和谋杀是等同的 因为当我们夺去生命时
277when we take someone's life, ours or somebody else's,当我们夺走别人的生命,我们的生命 或者别人的生命,
278we use that person, we use a rational being, we use humanity as a means,我们利用那个人 我们利用理性的存在 我们利用人性作为手段
279and so we fail to respect humanity as an end.因此,我们不尊重人类作为目的。
280Today we turn back to Kant before we do.今天我们回到康德之前
281Remember, this is the week by the end of which all of you will basically get Kant,记住,这是一个周末 你们基本上会得到康德,
282figure out what he's up to.想想他到底想怎样
283You're laughing.你在笑吗?
284No, it will happen.不,它会发生的。
285Kant's groundwork is about two big questions.康德的基础工作涉及两个大问题.
286First, what is the supreme principle of morality?第一,道德的最高原则是什么?
287Second, how is freedom possible?第二,如何实现自由?
288Two big questions.二大问.
289Now, one way of making your way through this dense philosophical book现在,用一种方法 让你通过这个密集的哲学书籍
290is to bear in mind a set of oppositions or contrasts or dualisms that are related.是要记住一系列相关的反对或对比或二元论.
291Today I'd like to talk about them.今天我想谈谈
292Today we're going to answer the question,今天我们要回答这个问题
293what, according to Kant, is the supreme principle of morality?康德认为,道德的最高原则是什么?
294And in answering that question, in working our way up to Kant's answer to that question,在回答这个问题时,在努力完成康德的回答时,
295it will help to bear in mind three contrasts or dualisms that Kant sets out.它将有助于铭记康德提出的三种对比或二元论。
296The first, you remember, had to do with the motive according to which we act.第一个,你记得, 和我们行动的动机有关。
297And according to Kant, only one kind of motive is consistent with morality,康德说 只有一种动机符合道德
298the motive of duty, doing the right thing for the right reason.负责的动机, 做正确的事情为正确的理由。
299What other kind of motives are there?还有什么其他动机?
300Kant sums them up in the category of inclination.康德把它们归为倾斜类
301Every time, the motive for what we do is to satisfy a desire or a preference每次我们这样做的动机 都是为了满足欲望或喜好
302that we may have to pursue some interest.我们可能不得不追求某种兴趣。
303We're acting out of inclination.我们的行为是出于倾向。
304Now, let me pause to see if in thinking about the question of the motive of duty, the good will,现在,让我停下来看看,如果在思考 责任的动机,善意的问题,
305see if any of you has a question about that much of Kant's claim.看看你们有没有人对康德的这大部分要求有疑问
306Or is everybody happy with this distinction?还是每个人都喜欢这种区别?
307What do you think?你觉得呢?
308Go ahead.来吧。
309When you make that distinction between duty and inclination,当你把责任和倾向区分开来
310is there ever any moral action ever?有没有道德行为?
311I mean, you could always kind of probably find some selfish motive, can't you?我的意思是,你总是可以 找到一些自私的动机,不是吗?
312Maybe very often people do have self-interested motives when they act.也许人们在行动时确实有自利的动机.
313Kant wouldn't dispute that.康德不会反对的
314But what Kant is saying is that insofar as we act morally,但康德的意思是 只要我们的行为合乎道德
315that is, insofar as our actions have moral worth,也就是说,只要我们的行动具有道德价值,
316what confers moral worth is precisely our capacity to rise above self-interest赋予道德价值的正是我们超越自身利益的能力
317and prudence and inclination and to act out of duty.以及谨慎和倾向 和不履行职责。
318Some years ago, I read about a spelling bee,几年前,我读到一个拼音蜜蜂
319and there was a young man who was declared the winner of the spelling bee.有个年轻人被宣布为拼音蜜蜂的赢家
320A kid named Andrew, 13 years old,一个叫安德鲁的孩子,13岁
321the winning word, the word that he was able to spell was echolalia.他能够拼写的词是回声拉莉亚
322Does anyone know what echolalia is?有人知道什么是回声拉莉亚吗?
323It's not some type of flower, no?这不是某种花,不是吗?
324It means the tendency to repeat as an echo, to repeat what you've heard.意思是重复作为回声的倾向,重复你听到的.
325Anyhow, he misspelled it, actually.无论如何,他拼错了,其实。
326But the judges misheard him.但法官们听错了他
327They thought he had spelled it correctly and awarded him the championship of the National Spelling Bee.他们认为他拼的正确,并授予他全国拼音蜜蜂的冠军.
328And he went to the judges afterward and said,然后他去找法官说
329actually, I misspelled it.其实我拼错了
330I don't deserve the prize.我不值得奖项。
331And he was regarded as a moral hero.他被视为道德英雄
332And he was written up in the New York Times,他被写在纽约时报,
333Misspeller是拼写蜜蜂英雄.
334There's Andrew with his proud mother.安德鲁带着他骄傲的母亲
335And when he was interviewed afterwards,当他接受采访后,
336listen to this, when he was interviewed afterwards,听着,当他接受采访后,
337he said, quote, the judges said I had a lot of integrity.他说,引用, 法官说我有很多正直。
338But then he added that part of his motive was, quote,但后来他又说 他的部分动机是
339I didn't want to feel like a slime.我不想觉得像粘液。
340All right, what would Kant say?好吧,康德会怎么说?
341Go ahead.来吧。
342I guess it would depend on whether or not that was a marginal reason我想这要看这是否是一个次要原因
343or the predominant reason in why he decided to confess that he didn't actually spell the word correctly.或者是他为什么决定承认 他拼的不正确
344Good.不错
345And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
346Vasco.- 瓦斯科 - 瓦斯科 - Vasco.
347That's very interesting.这很有趣。
348Is there anyone else who has a view about this?还有谁对此有看法吗?
349Does this show that Kant's principle is too stringent, too demanding?这是否表明康德的原则太严格,要求太高?
350What would Kant say about this?康德会怎么说?
351Yes.
352I think that Kant actually says that it is the pure motivation that comes out of duty我认为康德其实说 纯粹的动机就是出于职责
353which gives the action moral worth.这使得行动道德价值。
354So it's like, for example, in this case, he might have more than one motive.所以,比如说,在这种情况下,他可能有不止一个动机.
355He might have the motive of not feeling like a slime,他的动机可能是 感觉不像粘液
356and he might have the motive of doing the right thing in and of itself out of duty.而且他可能有动机 做正确的事情 和本身的失职。
357And so while there's more than one motivation going on there,所以,虽然有 不止一个动机在那里,
358it does not mean that the action is devoid of moral worth just because he has one other motive.这并不意味着,仅仅因为他有另一个动机,这一行动就没有道德价值。
359Because the motive which involves duty is what gives it moral worth.因为涉及责任的动机 给了它道德价值
360Good.不错
361And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
362Judith.朱迪丝
363Well, Judith, I think that your account actually is true to Kant.嗯,朱迪思,我认为你的帐户 是真的康德。
364It's fine to have sentiments and feelings that support doing the right thing有支持做正确事情的感情和感觉是好的
365provided they don't provide the reason for acting.只要他们不提供 行动的理由。
366So I think Judith actually has mounted a pretty good defense of Kant所以我认为朱迪思确实为康德做了很好的辩护
367on this question of the motive of duty.关于责任动机的问题。
368Okay, thank you.好的 谢谢
369Now, let's go back to the three contrasts.现在,让我们回到三个对比点。
370It's clear at least what Kant means when he says康德说得很清楚
371that for an action to have moral worth,为了有道德价值的行动
372it must be done for the sake of duty, not out of inclination.这样做必须出于职责,而不是出于倾向。
373But as we began to see last time,但我们上次看到的时候
374there's a connection between Kant's stringent notion of morality康德的严格道德观念有联系
375and his specially demanding understanding of freedom.以及他对自由特别要求的理解。
376And that leads us to the second contrast,这导致我们的第二个对比,
377the link between morality and freedom.道德与自由之间的联系。
378The second contrast describes two different ways that my will can be determined,第二个对比点描述了两种不同的方式 我的意志可以被确定,
379autonomously and heteronomously.自主和无节制。
380And according to Kant,康德说
381I'm only free when my will is determined autonomously,我只有在意志自主决定时才自由
382which means what?这是什么意思?
383According to a law that I give myself.根据我给自己的法律
384We must be capable, if we're capable of freedom as autonomy,我们必须有能力,如果我们能 自由作为自治,
385we must be capable of acting according not to a law that's given or imposed on us,我们一定能够不按照 法律的行为 给我们或强加于我们,
386but according to a law we give ourselves.但根据法律,我们给自己。
387But where could such a law come from?但这种法律从何而来?
388A law that we give ourselves.我们给自己的法律。
389Reason.缘由.
390If reason determines my will,如果理智决定了我的意志
391then the will becomes the power to choose independent of the dictates of nature然后意志就成为了 独立于自然支配的力量
392or inclination or circumstance.或倾向或情况。
393So, connected with Kant's demanding notions of morality and freedom所以,与康德要求的道德和自由观念有关
394is a specially demanding notion of reason.这是一个特别严格的理性概念。
395Well, how can reason determine the will?那么,如何理性决定遗嘱?
396There are two ways, and this leads to the third contrast.有两种方式,这导致了第三种对比.
397Kant says, there are two different commands of reason.康德说,理性有两个不同的命令.
398In a command of reason, Kant calls an imperative.在理智的命令中,康德称必须.
399An imperative is simply an ought.当务之急是应当做到的。
400One kind of imperative, perhaps the most familiar kind,一种必须的,也许最熟悉的,
401is a hypothetical imperative.这是一项假设的当务之急。
402Hypothetical imperatives use instrumental reason.假设的必须用工具性的理由。
403If you want X, then do Y.如果你想要X,那就做Y.
404Its means ends reasoning.它意味着结束推理。
405If you want a good business reputation,如果你想要一个良好的商业声誉,
406then, don't shortchange your customers,那么,不要缩短你的客户,
407word may get out.话会说出去的
408That's a hypothetical imperative.这是一个假设的必然。
409If the action would be good,如果这个动作不错的话
410solely as a means to something else,仅仅作为一种手段 对于别的东西,
411Kant writes the imperative as hypothetical.康德将责任写成假设
412If the action is represented as good in itself如果行动本身是好的
413and therefore as necessary for a will因此,作为遗嘱的必要条件
414which of itself accords with reason,这与理同理,
415then the imperative is categorical.那么,当务之急是绝对的。
416That's the difference between a categorical imperative and a hypothetical one.这就是绝对必要和假设的区别.
417A categorical imperative commands categorically,绝对必要命令,
418which just means without reference to or dependence on仅意味着不提及或依赖
419any further purpose.任何进一步的目的。
420And so you see the connection所以,你看到了连接
421among these three parallel contrasts.在这三种平行对比中。
422To be free in the sense of autonomous自主意义上的自由
423requires that I act要求我行动
424not out of a hypothetical imperative,并非出于假设的需要,
425but out of a categorical imperative.但出于绝对必要
426And so you see, by these three contrasts,所以,你可以看到, 通过这三个对比,
427Kant reasons his way,康德为什么这么做
428brings us up to his derivation带我们去他那里
429of the categorical imperative.绝对必要。
430Well, this leaves us one big question.这给我们留了一个大问题
431What is the categorical imperative?有什么绝对必要?
432What is the supreme principle of morality?道德的最高原则是什么?
433What does it command of us?它命令我们做什么?
434Kant gives three versions,康德给出了三个版本,
435three formulations of the categorical imperative.绝对必要的三个提法。
436I want to mention two,我想提两个
437and then see what you think of them.然后看看你们是怎么看待他们的。
438The first version, the first formula,第一个版本,第一个公式,
439he calls the formula of the universal law.他称之为普世法的公式。
440Act only on that maxim,照这个准则行事
441whereby you can at the same time will这样你就可以同时
442that it should become a universal law.它应该成为普遍的法律。
443And by maxim, what does Kant mean?以格言来说,康德是什么意思?
444He means a rule that explains他的意思是一条规则来解释
445the reason for what you're doing,你这样做的原因
446a principle.一个原则。
447For example, promise keeping.例如,承诺遵守。
448Suppose I need money, I need a hundred dollars,如果我需要钱,我需要100美元
449desperately,绝望
450and I know I can't pay it back anytime soon.我知道我无法马上还钱
451I come to you and make you a promise,我来向你保证
452a false promise, one I know I can't keep.一个虚假的承诺,我知道我不能遵守。
453Please give me a hundred dollars today,今天请给我一百块
454lend me the money, I will repay you next week.借钱给我,我下周再还你
455Is that consistent with the categorical imperative,这是否符合绝对必要,
456that false promise?那个假承诺?
457Kant says no.康德说不行
458And the test, the way we can determine测试,我们如何决定
459that the false promise is at odds虚假的诺言是不对的
460with the categorical imperative is,绝对必要,
461try to universalize it.尝试普及它。
462Universalize the maxim upon which you're about to act.普及你将要行动的格言
463If everybody made false promises when they needed money,如果每个人都在需要钱的时候 做出虚假的承诺
464then nobody would believe those promises.那么没有人会相信那些承诺。
465There would be no such thing as a promise.誓愿无此.
466And so there would be a contradiction.因而会出现矛盾.
467The maxim universalized would undermine itself.普遍化的原则会损害自己。
468That's the test.这就是测试。
469That's how we can know that the false promise is wrong.这样我们才能知道虚假承诺是错误的.
470Well, what about the formula of the universal law?那么,世界法的公式呢?
471You find it persuasive?你觉得有说服力吗?
472What do you think?你觉得呢?
473Go ahead.来吧。
474I have a question about the difference between categoricalism我有一个问题 关于区别 绝对主义
475and a hypothesis that if you're going to act...假设如果你要采取行动...
476Between categorical and hypothetical imperatives.介于绝对和假设的要务之间。
477Right.
478If you're going to act with a categorical imperative如果你要以绝对的要求行事
479so that the maxim doesn't undermine itself,以免格言自毁
480it sounds like I am going to do X because I want Y.听起来我要做X 因为我想要Y
481I am going to not lie in dire need我不会躺在 急需
482because I want the world to function因为我想让世界运转
483in such a way that promises are kept.以信守诺言的方式。
484I don't want to liquidate the practice of promises.我不想清算承诺的实践。
485Right.
486Sounds like justifying a means by an ends.听上去是目的证明是正当的
487It seems like an instance of consequentialist reasoning.这似乎是一个间接推理的例子。
488Right.
489And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
490Tim.蒂姆 蒂姆 蒂姆 蒂姆
491Well, Tim, John Stuart Mill agreed with you.蒂姆 约翰·斯图尔特·米尔同意你的意见
492He made this criticism of Kant.他这样批评康德.
493He said if I universalize the maxim他说,如果我普及这个格言
494and find that the whole practice of promise keeping并发现 整个实践 遵守承诺
495would be destroyed if universalized,如果普遍化,将销毁,
496I must be appealing somehow to consequences我一定是在呼吁后果
497if that's the reason not to tell a false promise.如果这就是不告诉假承诺的原因
498So John Stuart Mill agreed with that criticism against Kant.因此约翰·斯图亚特·米尔(John Stuart Mill)同意对康德的批评.
499But John Stuart Mill was wrong.但约翰·斯图尔特·米尔错了
500You're in good company though.不过你是好人
501You're in good company, Tim.你关系很好,蒂姆
502Kant has often read, as Tim just read him,康德经常读, 因为蒂姆刚刚读到他,
503as appealing to consequences.对后果有吸引力。
504The world would be worse off if everybody lied如果大家都撒谎 世界会更糟
505because then no one could rely on anybody else's word.因为没有人能相信别人的话
506Therefore, you shouldn't lie.因此,你不应该撒谎。
507That's not what Kant is saying exactly.康德不是这么说的
508Although it's easy to interpret him as saying that.虽然他很容易被诠释为这么说的.
509I think what he's saying is that this is the test.我想他说的是 这是测试
510This is the test of whether the maxim corresponds这是对格言是否对应的检验
511with the categorical imperative.绝对必要。
512It isn't exactly the reason.这不是原因
513It's not the reason.这不是原因。
514The reason you should universalize to test your maxim你应该普及去测试你的格言
515is to see whether you are privileging来看看你是否在倾斜
516your particular needs and desires over everybody else's.你对别人的特殊需求和欲望
517It's a way of pointing to this feature,这是一种指向这个特征的方法,
518this demand of the categorical imperative绝对必要的要求
519that the reasons for your actions shouldn't depend你行动的原因不应该取决于
520for their justification on your interests,为了你们的利益,
521your needs, your special circumstances你的需求,你的特殊情况
522being more important than somebody else's.比别人更重要
523That, I think, is the moral intuition我认为,这是道德直觉
524lying behind the universalization test.站在普遍性测试的背后。
525So let me spell out the second,让我说第二句话
526Kant's second version of the categorical imperative,康德的第二个版本 绝对必要,
527perhaps in a way that's more intuitively accessible也许用一种更直观的方式
528than the formula of universal law.而不是普遍法的公式。
529It's the formula of humanity as an end.是以人道为终.
530Kant introduces the second version康德介绍第二个版本
531of the categorical imperative绝对必要
532with the following line of argument.以下列论据为准。
533We can't base the categorical imperative我们不能把绝对必要作为基础
534on any particular interests, purposes or ends.任何特定利益、目的或目的。
535Because then it would be only relative因为那样只会是相对的
536to the person whose ends they were.他们的目的。
537But suppose there were something但假设有什么东西
538whose existence has in itself它的存在本身
539an absolute value, an end in itself,绝对价值,目的本身,
540then in it and in it alone然后独自在其中,
541would there be the ground有没有地面
542of a possible categorical imperative.可能绝对必要。
543Well, what is there that we can think of那么,有什么 我们可以想到
544as having its end in itself?作为它的目的本身?
545Kant's answer is this.康德的回答是这个.
546I say that man, and in general every rational being,我说那个人, 总的来说,每个理性的存在,
547exists as an end in himself,存在本身是目的,
548not merely as a means for arbitrary use不仅仅是作为任意使用的手段
549by this or that will.由这个或那个意志。
550And here Kant distinguishes而这里康德的区别
551between persons on the one hand人与人之间的关系
552and things on the other.还有别的
553Rational beings are persons.理性众生是众生.
554They don't just have a relative value for us,他们不只是对我们有相对价值
555but if anything has, they have an absolute value,但是如果有的话 他们有绝对的价值
556an intrinsic value.一个内在价值。
557That is, rational beings have dignity.也就是说,理性的人有尊严。
558They're worthy of reverence and respect.他们值得尊敬和尊重。
559This line of reasoning leads Kant这条思路引领康德
560to the second formulation对第二种表述
561of the categorical imperative, which is this.绝对必要,这就是。
562Act in such a way that you always treat humanity,以你对待人类的方式行事
563whether in your own person无论是本人
564or in the person of any other,或以任何其他人的名义,
565never simply as a means,绝不只是一种手段,
566but always at the same time as an end.但总是同时结束。
567So that's the formula of humanity as an end.这就是人类的结局
568The idea that human beings, as rational beings,人类作为理性的生物
569are ends in themselves,这是目的本身,
570not open to use,不开放使用,
571merely as a means.仅仅作为一种手段。
572When I make a false promise to you,当我对你做出虚假承诺时,
573I'm using you as a means to my ends,我利用你来达到我的目的
574to my desire for the hundred dollars.为了我对百元的渴望
575And so I'm failing to respect you.所以我没有尊重你
576I'm failing to respect your dignity.我没尊重你的尊严
577I'm manipulating you.我在操纵你
578Now consider the example现在想想这个例子
579of the duty against suicide.对自杀的责任。
580Murder and suicide谋杀和自杀
581are at odds with the categorical imperative.与绝对必要不符。
582Why?为什么?
583If I murder someone,如果我杀了人
584I'm taking their life for some purpose,我为了某种目的夺走他们的性命
585either because I'm a hired killer要么是因为我是个雇佣杀手
586or I'm in the throes of some great anger or passion.或者我陷入了某种愤怒或激情的折磨之中
587Well, I have some interest, some purpose我有点兴趣,有些目的
588that's particular for the sake of which I'm using them特别是为了我用它们
589as a means.作为手段。
590Murder violates the categorical imperative.谋杀违反了绝对必要。
591For Kant, morally speaking,对康德来说,道德上
592suicide is on a par with murder.自杀等同于谋杀
593It's on a par with murder because what we violate这和谋杀是等同的,因为我们违反了
594when we take a life,当我们夺去生命时,
595when we take someone's life,当我们夺走某人的生命,
596ours or somebody else's,我们或别人的,
597we use that person,我们利用那个人,
598we use a rational being,我们利用理性的存在
599we use humanity as a means.我们利用人类作为手段。
600And so we fail to respect humanity as an end.因此,我们不尊重人道作为目的。
601And that capacity for reason,而这种能力是有原因的,
602that humanity that commands respect,受人尊重的人类,
603that is the ground of dignity,这是尊严的基础,
604that humanity, that capacity for reason,人性 理性的能力
605resides undifferentiated in all of us.在我们所有人中都是没有区别的。
606And so I violate that dignity.所以我违反了那个尊严。
607In my own person, if I commit suicide,就我个人而言 如果我自杀了
608and in murder, if I take somebody else's life,在谋杀中 如果我夺走别人的性命
609from a moral point of view,从道德角度来看,
610they're the same.他们是一样的。
611And the reason they're the same和他们一样的原因
612has to do with the universal character与普遍性有关
613and ground of the moral law.和道德法的基础。
614The reason that we have to respect我们必须尊重的原因
615the dignity of other people人的尊严
616has not to do with anything in particular about them.与他们无关
617And so respect, Kantian respect,敬礼,康德敬礼
618is unlike love in this way.与爱情不同
619It's unlike sympathy.这不像同情心
620It's unlike solidarity or fellow feeling这不像是团结或朋友的感觉
621or altruism.或者利他主义。
622Because love and those other particular virtues因为爱情和其他的美德
623or reasons for caring about other people或照顾他人的理由
624have to do with who they are in particular.和他们的身份有关
625But respect for Kant.但尊重康德.
626Respect is respect for humanity,尊重就是尊重人类
627which is universal,这是普遍的,
628for a rational capacity which is universal.为了一个普遍合理的能力。
629And that's why violating it, in my own case,这就是为什么违反它, 在我个人的情况下,
630is as objectionable as violating it和违反它一样令人反对
631in the case of any other.在任何其他情况下。
632Questions or objections?问题还是反对?
633Go ahead.来吧。
634I guess I'm somewhat worried about Kant's statement我有点担心康德的话
635that you cannot use a person as a means你无法利用一个人作为手段
636because every person is an end in and of themselves.因为每个人都是终极目标
637Because it seems that every day,因为似乎每天都
638in order to get something accomplished for that day,为了在那天完成一些事情
639I must use myself as a means to some end.我必须用自己来达到某种目的。
640And I must use the people around me我必须用周围的人
641as a means to some end as well.作为达到某种目的的手段
642For instance, suppose that例如,假设
643I want to do well in a class我想在课堂上做得很好
644and I have to write a paper.我必须写一篇论文。
645I have to use myself as a means to write the paper.我得用自己来写论文
646Suppose I want to buy something, food.如果我想买点东西,食物。
647I must go to the store and use the person我必须去商店用那个人
648working behind the counter as a means在柜台后面工作
649for me to purchase my food.我买我的食物。
650Right.
651That's true.没错
652You do.没错
653What's your name?你叫什么来着?
654Patrick.派屈克 派屈克 派屈克
655Patrick, you're not doing anything wrong.帕特里克 你没做错什么
656You're not violating the categorical imperative你没违反绝对的要求
657when you use other people as means.以他人为手段
658That's not objectionable provided说得没错
659when we deal with other people当我们和别人打交道时
660for the sake of advancing our projects为了推进我们的项目
661and purposes and interests,宗旨和利益,
662which we all do,我们都这样做,
663provided we treat them in a way只要我们用某种方式对待他们
664that is consistent with respect for their dignity.这符合尊重他们的尊严。
665And what it means to respect them尊重他们意味着什么
666is given by the categorical imperative.绝对必要。
667Are you persuaded?你被说服了吗?
668Do you think that Kant has given你认为康德给了我们
669a compelling account, a persuasive account一个令人信服的陈述,一个有说服力的陈述,
670of the supreme principle of morality?道德的最高原则?
671Reread the groundwork重读基础
672and we'll try to answer that question next time.下次我们会试着回答这个问题
673Join the conversation.加入对话。
674Take a pop quiz.做个流行测验
675Watch lectures you've missed and learn a lot more.看着你错过的讲座 学到更多
676请访问justiceharvard.org.
677It's the right thing to do.谓之正法.
678Funding for this program is provided by...本方案的经费由.
679Additional funding provided by...由.提供的额外资金。
该视频共有字幕 680 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格

P11 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p11 10. 10.好公民 (P11)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:08We turn to Aristotle我们转向亚里士多德
0:13after examining theories,在研究理论后,
0:20modern theories of justice,现代正义理论,
0:24that try to detach试图分离
0:28considerations of justice and rights from questions of moral desert and virtue.从道德和美德的角度考虑正义和权利。
0:34Aristotle亚里士多德
0:37disagrees with Kant and Rawls.与康德和罗尔斯意见不一.
0:42Aristotle argues that justice is a matter of giving people what they deserve.亚里士多德认为,正义是给予人们应得的.
0:49And the central idea和中心思想
0:51of Aristotle's theory of justice亚里士多德的正义理论
展开字幕全文(1099 条)
序号英文中文
1We turn to Aristotle我们转向亚里士多德
2after examining theories,在研究理论后,
3modern theories of justice,现代正义理论,
4that try to detach试图分离
5considerations of justice and rights from questions of moral desert and virtue.从道德和美德的角度考虑正义和权利。
6Aristotle亚里士多德
7disagrees with Kant and Rawls.与康德和罗尔斯意见不一.
8Aristotle argues that justice is a matter of giving people what they deserve.亚里士多德认为,正义是给予人们应得的.
9And the central idea和中心思想
10of Aristotle's theory of justice亚里士多德的正义理论
11is that这是
12in reasoning about justice and rights司法与权利的推理
13we have unavoidably我们有不可避免
14to reason about以解释
15the purpose or the end or the kilos目的或终点或公斤
16of social practices and institutions.社会做法和机构。
17Yes, justice requires giving equal things to equal persons, but the question immediately arises in any debate about justice,是的,正义要求把平等的东西给予平等的人,但任何关于正义的辩论中立即出现这个问题,
18equal in what respect?在什么方面平等?
19And Aristotle says we亚里士多德说
20need to fill in the answer to that question需要填写对该问题的答复
21by looking通过查找
22to the characteristic end到特性端
23or the essential nature or the purpose或基本性质或目的
24of the thing we're distributing.我们分发的东西。
25And so we discussed Aristotle's example of flutes, who should get the best flutes于是我们讨论了亚里士多德的笛子例子,谁应该得到最好的笛子
26and Aristotle's answer was the best flute players.亚里士多德的回答是最好的笛手
27The best flute players should get the best flute最好的笛手应该有最好的笛子
28because that's a way of honoring因为那是一种尊重的方式
29the excellence卓越
30of flute playing.吹着笛子
31It's a way of rewarding the virtue这是奖励功德的方法
32of the great flute player.伟大的笛手。
33What's interesting though,有趣的是,虽然,
34and this is what we're going to explore today,这就是我们今天要探索的
35is that这是
36it's not quite so easy to dispense with teleological reasoning排除心灵推理并不容易
37when we're thinking about当我们在想
38social institutions社会机构
39and political practices.政治实践。
40In general it's hard to do without teleology when we're thinking about一般来说,我们思考的时候,没有心灵感应很难做到
41ethics, justice,道德、正义、
42and moral argument.和道德争论。
43At least that's Aristotle's claim,至少这是亚里士多德的说法,
44and I would like to bring out the force in Aristotle's claim by considering我想把亚里士多德的主张中的力量 找出来
45two examples.两个例子。
46One is an example that Aristotle spends quite a bit of一个是亚里士多德花了很多钱
47time discussing, the case of politics,时间讨论,政治案例,
48how should political offices and honors, how should political rule be distributed.如何分配政治职务和荣誉,如何分配政治统治。
49The second example第二个例子
50is a contemporary是一个当代
51debate辩论
52about golf关于高尔夫球
53and whether是否为
54the Professional Golfers Association高尔夫专业协会
55should be required to allow Casey Martin,应该要求允许凯西·马丁
56a golfer with a disability,有残疾的高尔夫球员,
57to ride in a golf cart.骑高尔夫车。
58Both cases两种情况
59bring out出来
60a further feature另一个特征
61of Aristotle's teleological way of thinking about justice.亚里士多德对正义的思考方式
62And that is这就是
63that when we attend to the telos or the purpose,当我们在看电视时,
64sometimes有时候
65we disagree and argue about what the purpose我们不同意,争论什么目的
66of a social practice社会实践
67really consists in, and when we have those disagreements,真正包括, 当我们有这些分歧,
68part of what's at stake in those disagreements这些分歧的利害关系
69is not just who will get what,不只是谁会得到什么,
70not just a distributive question, but also不仅是一个分配问题,而且
71an honorific question.一个荣誉的问题。
72What qualities,什么样的品质,
73what excellences什么样的优异
74of persons个人资料
75will be honored?将荣耀?
76Debates about purpose and telos关于目的和主题的辩论
77are often simultaneously经常同时出现
78debates about honor.关于荣誉的辩论。
79Now let's see how that works现在让我们来看看如何运作
80in the case of Aristotle's account亚里士多德的账户
81of politics.对政治的思考
82When we discuss distributive justice these days,当我们讨论分配正义 这些天,
83we're mainly concerned with the distribution of income and wealth and opportunity.我们主要关心收入和财富与机会的分配。
84Aristotle took distributive justice亚里士多德接受了分配正义
85to be mainly not about income and wealth,与收入和财富无关
86but about offices and honors.但关于办公室和荣誉。
87Who should have the right to rule?谁应该有权统治?
88Who should be a citizen?谁是公民?
89How should political authority be distributed?政治权威应如何分配?
90Those were his questions.这是他的问题。
91How did he go about answering those questions?他怎么回答这些问题的?
92Well, in line with his嗯,根据他的
93teleological account of justice,司法学的理论,
94Aristotle argues that亚里士多德认为:
95to know how political authority should be distributed,了解应如何分配政治权力,
96we have first to inquire into the我们首先要调查
97purpose, the point,目的,要点,
98the telos of politics.政治的特质。
99So what is politics政治是怎样的
100about?关于?
101And how does this help us decide who should rule?这如何帮助我们决定谁应该统治?
102Well, for Aristotle, the answer to that question is对亚里士多德来说 这个问题的答案是
103politics is about政治问题
104forming character,组成字符,
105forming good character.形成良好的性格。
106It's about cultivating the virtue of citizens.而是培养公民的美德
107It's about the good life.是为善生.
108The end of the state, the end of the political community,国灭,政社灭.
109he tells us in book three of the politics.他在第三本政治书里告诉我们
110It's not mere life.这不仅仅是生活。
111It's not economic exchange only.这不仅仅是经济交流。
112It's not security only.这不仅仅是安全。
113It's realizing the good life.即成就善根众生.
114That's what politics is for, according to Aristotle.根据亚里士多德的说法,这就是政治的目的.
115Now you might worry about this.现在你可能会担心这个
116You might say, well, maybe this shows us why those你可能会说,也许这告诉我们为什么那些
117modern theorists of justice现代司法理论家
118and of politics are right.政治是正确的。
119Because remember, for Kant and for Rawls,因为记住,对于康德和罗尔斯,
120the point of politics is not to shape政治的关键不是塑造
121the moral character of citizens.公民的道德品质。
122It's not to make us good.这不是要让我们好。
123It's to respect our freedom, to choose our goods,这是尊重我们的自由, 选择我们的商品,
124our values, our ends,我们的价值观,我们的目的,
125consistent with a similar liberty for others.与其他人的类似自由相一致。
126Aristotle disagrees.亚里士多德不同意.
127Any polis, which is truly so called,任何波利斯,这是真正所谓的,
128and is not merely one in name, must devote itself to the end of encouraging不仅仅是名义上的,必须致力于鼓励
129goodness.天呐
130Otherwise, political association sinks into a mere alliance.否则,政治结社就会陷入单纯的联盟。
131Law becomes a mere covenant,法律变成一个简单的契约,
132a guarantor of men's rights against one another,保证人的权利,
133instead of being, as it should be, a way of life,而不是应该成为一种生活方式,
134such as will make the members of a polis good and just.使波利斯的信徒们得享幸福和正义。
135That's Aristotle's view.这就是亚里士多德的观点.
136A polis is not an association警察不是协会
137for residents on a common site,供常住居民使用,
138or for the sake of preventing mutual injustice and easing exchange,或为了防止相互不公正和放松交流,
139Aristotle writes.亚里士多德写道.
140The end and purpose of a polis is the good life,一个大都会的终结和目的 是美好的生活,
141and the institutions of social life are means to that end.社会生活体制是实现这一目标的手段。
142Now, if that's the purpose of politics,如果这就是政治的目的
143of the polis,是诸侯的后裔,
144then Aristotle says we can derive from that亚里士多德说我们可以从中得来
145the principles of distributive justice,分配公正原则,
146the principles that tell us who should have the greatest say,原则告诉我们 谁应该有最大的发言权,
147who should have the greatest measure of political authority.他们应该拥有最大程度的政治权威。
148And what's his answer to that question?他对此问题的答案是什么?
149Well, those who contribute the most那些贡献最大的人
150to an association of this character,致此性质之社团,
151namely an association that aims at the good,即一个以福利为目的的协会,
152should have a greater share in political rule,在政治统治中应有更大的份额,
153and in the honors of the polis.和荣誉的波利斯。
154And the reason is, they are in a position原因是,他们处于一个位置
155to contribute most贡献最大
156to what political community is essentially about.政治团体的本质。
157Well, so you can see the link that he draws这样你就能看到他画的链接
158between the principle of distribution for citizenship国籍分配原则之间
159and political authority,和政治权威,
160and the purpose of politics.还有政治的目的
161But why, you'll quickly ask,但为什么,你会很快问,
162why does he claim that political life,为什么他声称政治生活,
163participation in politics is somehow essential参政是至关紧要的
164to living a good life?过上美好的生活?
165Why isn't it possible为什么不可能呢?
166for people to live perfectly good lives,为了人们过上完美的生活,
167decent lives, moral lives,体面的生活,道德生活,
168without participating in politics?不参与政治?
169Well, he gives two answers to that question.他给出了两个答案
170He gives a partial answer, a preliminary answer,他给出了部分答案 初步答案
171in book one of the politics,在书中 政治之一,
172where he tells us that only他只告诉我们
173by living in a polis and participating in politics生活在大都会并参与政治
174do we fully realize our nature我们是否充分意识到我们的本性
175as human beings.作为人类。
176Human beings are by nature人类是天生的
177meant to live in a polis.意为生活在大都会。
178Why?为什么?
179It's only in political life只有在政治生活中
180that we can actually exercise我们实际上可以锻炼
181our distinctly human capacity for language,我们独特的人的语言能力,
182which Aristotle understands as this capacity亚里士多德认为这种能力
183to deliberate about right and wrong,考虑对错,
184the just and the unjust.正义者和不义者。
185And so Aristotle writes in book one of the politics所以亚里士多德在书中写了一篇政治
186that the polis, the political community,警察,政治界,
187exists by nature and is prior to the individual.(b) 自然存在,而且发生在个人之前。
188Not prior in time,之前没有
189but prior in its purpose.但它在目的上是先发制人
190Human beings are not self-sufficient,人不能自给自足,
191living by themselves,独自生活,
192outside a political community.在政治团体之外
193A man who is isolated, who is unable to share一个被孤立,无法分享的人
194in the benefits of political association,政治结社的好处,
195or who has no need to share或不需要分享的人
196because he's already self-sufficient,因为他已经自给自足了
197such a person must be either a beast or a god.这种人必须是野兽还是神
198So we only fully realize our nature.因此,我们只充分认识到我们的本性。
199We only fully unfold our human capacities我们只是充分展示我们的人的能力
200when we exercise our faculty of language,当我们锻炼我们的语言能力,
201which means when we deliberate这意味着当我们考虑
202with our fellow citizens about我们的同胞们
203good and evil, right and wrong,善恶,对与错,
204just and the unjust.正义和不公正的人。
205But why can we only exercise但为什么我们只能锻炼
206our capacity for language?我们的语言能力?
207In political community, you might ask.在政治界,你可能会问。
208Aristotle gives a second part,亚里士多德给出了第二部分,
209a fuller part of his answer更详尽的回答
210in the Nicomachean Ethics, an excerpt of which在尼科马切安伦理学中,摘录
211we have among the readings.我们在读数中都有
212And there he explains他在那里解释
213that political deliberation,那个政治讨论,
214living the life of a citizen,过着公民的生活,
215ruling and being ruled in turn,判决和判决,
216sharing and rule, all of this分享和统治,这一切
217is necessary to virtue.是为了美德
218Aristotle defines happiness亚里士多德定义幸福
219not as maximizing the balance of pleasure over pain,而不是达到快乐和痛苦的平衡
220but as an activity,但作为一种活动,
221an activity of the soul灵魂活动
222in accordance with virtue.根据美德。
223And he says that every student of politics他说每个政治学生
224must study the soul,必须研究灵魂,
225because shaping the soul is one of the objects因为塑造灵魂是其中之一
226of legislation in a good city.在一个好城市的立法。
227But why is it necessary to live in a good city但为什么必须住在一个好城市
228in order to live a virtuous life?为了过上善良的生活吗?
229Why can't we just learn为什么我们不能只是学习
230good moral principles at home,家里的道德原则
231or in a philosophy class, or from a book,或在哲学课上,或从一本书,
232live according to those principles, those rules,根据这些原则和规则生活
233those precepts, and leave it at that?那些戒律,就留在那里吗?
234Aristotle says, virtue isn't acquired that way.亚里士多德说 美德不是那样获得的
235Virtue is only something道德只是东西
236we can acquire by practicing,我们可以通过练习获得,
237by exercising the virtues.通过行使美德。
238It's the kind of thing we can only learn by doing.这是那种我们只能靠做来学的东西.
239It doesn't come from book learning.不从书学.
240In this respect,在这方面,
241it's like flute playing.这就像吹笛子。
242You couldn't learn你学不到的
243how to play a musical instrument well如何弹好乐器
244just by reading a book about it.只读一本书
245You have to practice, and you have to listen to other你必须练习,你必须听别人
246accomplished flute players.完成长笛演奏者。
247There are other practices and skills of this type.还有其他这类做法和技能。
248Cooking.煮饭.
249There are cookbooks,有厨书,
250but no great chef ever learns how to cook但没有一位伟大的厨师会做饭
251by reading a cookbook, only.只读一本厨书
252It's the kind of thing you only learn by doing.这是那种你只能靠做来学的东西.
253Joke telling is probably another example of this kind.说笑是另一个例子
254No great comedian learns to be a comedian没有一个伟大的喜剧演员会学会做喜剧演员
255just by reading a book on the principles of comedy.只是读了一本关于喜剧原则的书
256It wouldn't work.没用的
257Why not?为什么不呢?
258What do joke telling and cooking开什么玩笑?
259and playing a musical instrument have in common演奏乐器是共同的
260such that we can't learn them just by这样我们就不能仅仅通过
261grasping a precept or a rule掌握规则或规则
262that we might learn from a book or a lecture?以便我们从一本书或一个讲座中学习吗?
263What they have in common is that they are all concerned with他们的共同点是 他们都关心
264getting the hang of it, but also获得它,但也
265what is it we get the hang of when we learn how to cook当我们学会烹饪时,我们得到了什么?
266or play a musical instrument or tell jokes well?或者玩乐器 或者说笑话?
267Discerning particulars,令人沮丧的细节,
268particular features of a situation,情况的特殊性,
269and no rule, no precept,没有规则,没有规则,
270could tell the comedian or the cook可以告诉喜剧演员或厨师
271or the great musician还是伟大的音乐家
272how to get in the habit of,如何进入习惯,
273the practice of惯例
274discerning the particular features了解具体特征
275of a situation.一个情况。
276Aristotle says virtue is亚里士多德说美德
277that way too.那样也行
278Now, how does this connect to politics?这与政治有什么联系?
279The only way we can acquire我们能得到的唯一方法
280the virtues that constitute the good life构成美好生活的美德
281is to exercise锻炼
282the virtues to have certain habits inculcated in us给我们灌输某些习惯的美德
283and then接着
284to engage in the practice of deliberating with citizens参与与公民讨论的做法
285about the nature of the good.关于善的本质。
286That's what politics is ultimately about.这才是政治的最终目的.
287The acquisition of civic virtue获得公民美德
288of this capacity to deliberate是否具有这种审议能力
289among equals,和平等者,
290that's something we couldn't get living a life alone那是我们无法独自生活的事情
291outside of politics.在政治之外,
292And so, that's why in order to realize our nature所以,这就是为什么为了实现我们的本性
293we have to engage in politics.我们必须参与政治。
294And that's why those who are greatest in civic virtue,这就是为什么那些最伟大的公民美德,
295就像Pericles一样,是那些
296who properly have the greatest measure他们有最大的尺度
297of offices and honors.职务和荣誉。
298So, the argument about the distribution因此,关于分配的争论
299of offices and honors has this teleological character官职和荣誉 具有这种使命性
300but also an honorific dimension.同时也是一个荣誉的层面。
301Because part of the point of politics is to honor因为政治的一点就是尊重
302像Pericles这样的人
303不只是Pericles应该
304have the dominant say有主言权
305because he has the best judgment and that will lead因为他有最好的判断,那将导致
306to the best outcomes, to the best consequences最佳结果和最佳后果
307for the citizens.给市民
308That's true.没错
309And that's important.这很重要。
310But a further reason people like Pericles但另一个原因,人们喜欢Pericles
311should have the greatest measure应该有最大的尺度
312of offices and honors and political authority and sway职务和荣誉以及政治权威和影响力
313in the polis is that part of the point of politics在大都会是政治的一部分
314is to single out and honor单挑和荣誉
315those who possess the relevant virtue, in this case拥有相关美德的人,在这种情况下
316civic virtue, civic excellence, practical wisdom公民美德、公民优秀、实用智慧
317to the fullest extent.尽其所能。
318That's the honorific dimension bound up with Aristotle's那是亚里士多德的荣誉维度
319account of politics.政治观点。
320Here's an example that shows举个例子
321the link in a contemporary在当代中的联系
322controversy, the link争议, 链接
323to which Aristotle draws our attention between亚里士多德提请我们注意
324arguments about justice and rights关于司法和权利的论点
325on the one hand and figuring out the一边想着
326telos or the purpose of a social practice on the other.或社会实践的目的。
327Not only that,不仅如此,
328the case of Casey Martin and his golf cart凯西・马丁和他的高尔夫球车的案子
329also brings out the link between也带来了联系
330debates about what the purpose关于目的的辩论
331of a social practice or a game社会实践或游戏
332is on the one hand一方面
333and the question of what qualities should be honored以及应当尊重哪些品质的问题
334on the other.在另一个。
335The link between teleology and honor电传学与荣誉之间的联系
336based principles of二、基于原则的
337distributive justice.分配正义。
338Who was Casey Martin?凯西・马丁是谁?
339Well, Casey Martin is a very good golfer凯西・马丁是个很好的高尔夫球手
340able to compete at the highest levels of golf能在最高水平的高尔夫球比赛
341but for one thing,但有一点,
342he has a rare circulatory problem他有一个罕见的循环问题
343in his leg that makes it very difficult for him to walk他的腿上 很难走路
344not only difficult but dangerous不仅困难而且危险
345and so he asked the PGA所以他问PGA
346which governs the Pro Tour in golf管理高尔夫球巡回赛
347to be able to use a golf cart能够使用高尔夫球车
348when he competed in professional当他与众竞争的时候,
349tournaments.比赛
350PGA说不行
351and he sued under the American for Disabilities Act他根据《美国残疾人法》起诉
352he sued in a case that went他起诉了一起案子
353all the way to the United States Supreme Court.一直到美国最高法院
354The question the Supreme Court had to answer最高法院必须回答的问题
355was, does曾经,对
356Casey Martin have a right凯西・马丁有权利
357that the PGA provide him, allow himPGA提供他,允许他
358to use a golf cart on the Tour or not?要不要在巡回赛上用高尔夫球车?
359How many here think that这里有多少人这么认为
360from a moral point of view从道德角度
361Casey Martin should凯西・马丁应该
362have a right to use a golf cart有权使用高尔夫球车
363and how many think that he should not有多少人认为他不该
364have a right to a golf cart in the tournaments?在锦标赛上有高尔夫球车的权利吗?
365So the majority are sympathetic to所以大多数人都同情
366Casey Martin's right though a substantial凯西・马丁说得对,虽然是一个实质性的
367minority disagree.少数派不同意。
368Let's first hear from those of you我们先听听你们
369who would rule against Casey Martin.谁会统治凯西・马丁。
370Why would you not say that the PGA must你为什么不说PGA必须
371give him a golf cart?给他一个高尔夫球车?
372Yes.
373Since the inception of golf自高尔夫球诞生以来
374because it's been part of the sport因为这是运动的一部分
375it's now intrinsically part of golf现在它本来就是高尔夫的一部分
376walking the course and thus because it's intrinsic to golf在赛道上行走 因为它是高尔夫的内在
377I'd argue that not being able to walk the course我主张不能走这条路
378it's just not being able to perform an aspect of the sport只是不能做运动的某个方面
379which is necessary to performing at a professional level.这是在专业一级工作所必需的。
380Good.不错
381Stay there for a minute.留在那里一分钟。
382What's your name?你叫什么来着?
383Tommy.汤米
384Are you a golfer by the way, Tom?你是高尔夫球员吗,汤姆?
385Not so much, but yeah, a little bit.不多,但有点
386Are there any golfers here,这里有高尔夫球手吗?
387I mean real golfers?我的意思是真正的高尔夫球手?
388Thank you, Professor.谢谢你,教授
389No, no.没有,没有。
390I'm just taking我只是带
391{\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}你说的对
392Who are there?是谁?
393Is there someone here on the golf team?高尔夫球队里有人吗?
394Yes?是吗?
395Tell us your name告诉我们你的名字
396and tell us what you think.告诉我们你的想法
397My name is Michael and我叫迈克尔
398I usually take a cart so我通常坐推车这样
399probably the wrong person to ask.可能问错人了
400Is that why your hand went up slowly?这就是为什么你的手慢慢地上升?
401Yes.
402But Tom is saying, let's但汤姆说,我们
403based at the professional level专业人员职等
404walking the course is essential to the game.走路对比赛至关重要
405Do you agree?你同意吗?
406I would, yes.我会,是的。
407You do?是吗?
408Then why do you take a cart?那你为什么要坐推车?
409And you call yourself a golfer?你说自己是高尔夫球手?
410No, no, no, no.释曰.
411I'm kidding.我开玩笑的
412What do you say to that?你说呢?
413When I have walked the course当我走过这条路
414it does add tremendously to the game.这确实给游戏增添了巨大的活力。
415Makes it a lot harder.更难了
416It really does.确实
417Yeah?是吗?
418Alright, let's hear好吧,让我们听听
419Michael and Tom stay there.迈克尔和汤姆呆在那里。
420Let's hear让我们听听
421from people who从人谁
422say that he should have a right to a golf cart.说他应该有权用高尔夫车
423Why?为什么?
424Who's prepared to defend that position?谁准备捍卫这个位置?
425Yes?是吗?
426Well, I think the PGA should definitely be required to give him a golf cart我认为PGA绝对需要给他一辆高尔夫球车
427because they argue in the decision that it's not just a matter of因为他们在决定中争辩 这不仅仅是一个问题
428he's not experiencing fatigue for him.他没有感到疲劳。
429He's still walking about a mile.他还在走一英里
430The cart can't go everywhere with him.车不能随他而去.
431And in that mile he's still在那一英里内,他仍然
432experiencing more fatigue and pain than a healthy player would.比健康球员更疲惫和痛苦
433So it's not as if you're moving the disadvantage.所以,这不像你 移动的劣势。
434What's your name?你叫什么来着?
435Reva(英语:Reva).
436Reva, what do you say to Tom's point that walking the courseReva,你对汤姆说走这条路怎么说?
437is essential to the game?对游戏至关重要吗?
438It would be as if这就像
439a disabled player could play in the禁用玩家可以在
440NBA but not have toNBA 但不是必须
441run up and down the court.跑上跑下宫廷。
442Well, I think there are two responses to that.嗯,我想有两个答案。
443First, I don't think it's首先,我不认为
444essential to the game because most golfers who play因为大多数打高尔夫球的人
445particularly recreationally don't play with a cart.特别是娱乐上 不要玩马车。
446Like Michael.像迈克尔。
447And on several of the tours you can play with a cart.在几次巡演中,你可以玩一个推车。
448On the Senior PGA Tour, on the Nike Tour,在高级PGA巡回赛, 在耐克巡回赛,
449in a lot of the college events.在很多大学的活动。
450And those events are just as competitive赛事也一样有竞争力
451and just as high level as the PGA Tour.和PGA巡回赛一样高
452So really it's just a matter所以,真的,这只是一个问题
453of selective reasoning if you argue that it's有选择性的推理 如果你认为这是
454an important part of the sport.运动的重要组成部分。
455But even if it is,但是,即使这是,
456he still does have to walk.他还是得走路
457He still plays golf standing up.他还是站着打高尔夫
458It's not as if he's playing golf from a wheelchair.他又不是在坐轮椅打高尔夫
459Who else?还有谁?
460Go ahead.来吧。
461I think the whole point of a competition is that it calls out the best我认为比赛的要点是 它呼唤出最好的
462from the second best or from the third best.从第二好或从第三好。
463And when we're talking about the当我们谈论
464national level, we're talking about the highest of the highest.国家层面,我们指的是最高层中的最高层.
465And I think what they're arguing about here我想他们在这里争论什么
466is the purpose of competition.是竞争的目的。
467And I think in the sake of competition我想为了竞争
468you can't change the rules.你不能改变规则。
469So the purpose of the competition所以比赛的目的
470includes walking.包括走路
471That's an essential, you agree with Tom, and what's your name?这是必需的,你同意汤姆,你叫什么名字?
472David.大卫
473The Supreme Court ruled最高法院裁定
474that the PGA did have to accommodate Casey Martin.联盟必须接纳凯西・马丁
475And they did it他们做到了
476on grounds that Reva mentioned.以Reva提到的理由
477That walking isn't really part of, an essential part散步其实不是关键的一部分
478of the game.游戏。
479They cited testimony saying that walking他们引用证词 说步行
480the court consumes no more calories than you get eating宫廷的热量不会超过你吃的东西
481a Big Mac.一个大麦克。
482That's what walking is in golf.这就是高尔夫的行走
483According to the majority,据多数人说,
484Scalia was in dissent.斯卡利亚持不同意见。
485Justice Scalia agreed with David.斯卡利亚法官同意大卫的意见.
486He said, there is no他说,没有
487purpose.目标。
488And it's certainly not当然不是
489for courts to try to figure out the essential purpose of golf.让法院找出高尔夫球的基本目的
490Golf, like any game, is strictly for amusement.高尔夫就像任何游戏一样 完全是为了娱乐
491And if there's a group that wants to have one如果有一个团体想要一个
492version of the game, they can have that version of the game.游戏的版本,他们可以拥有游戏的版本.
493And the market can decide whether people are amused市场可以决定人们是否开心
494and like and show up for that and watch the television喜欢和出现 这一点,看电视
495broadcasts.广播。
496Scalia's dissent was an anti-Aristotelian斯卡利亚的异议是反对阿里斯托特利安
497dissent.反对。
498Because notice因为注意
499two things about the argument.两件事关于争论。
500First,首先,我们...
501we're thrust into a discussion about what the essential我们正深入讨论什么是关键
502nature or purpose or telos of golf really is.自然或目的 或高尔夫的三角形其实是。
503Does it include walking?包括走路吗?
504And,还有,
505here's something I think is rumbling beneath the surface of this这里有些东西,我想是 隆起在这个表面
506debate.辩论。
507Whether walking是否走动
508partly determines whether golf is really an athletic部分决定高尔夫球是不是真正的运动
509competition.竞争。
510After all, the ball sits still.毕竟球坐不动.
511You have to put it in a hole.你必须把它放在洞里。
512Is it more like basketball, baseball and football, golf更像是篮球、棒球、橄榄球、高尔夫球
513is an athletic competition?是运动比赛吗?
514Or is it more like还是更像
515billiards?台球吗?
516The ball sits still球坐稳了
517there too.这里也一样。
518You can be out of shape and succeed.汝能断形而成功.
519It involves skill but not athletic skill.它涉及技能,但不是运动技能。
520Could it be that those professional golfers可能是那些职业高尔夫球员
521who excel at golf擅长高尔夫球的,
522have a stake in golf being honored and与高尔夫球有关
523recognized as an athletic event被认为是体育赛事
524not just a game of skill like不只是一个技巧的游戏
525billiards?台球吗?
526And if that's what's at stake,如果这是关键
527then we have a debate about the purpose,然后我们有一个辩论 关于目的,
528the teleological dimension, and also以及心灵因素
529a debate about honor.关于荣誉的辩论。
530What virtues什么优点
531really does the game of golf高尔夫的比赛真的很成功
532honor and recognize?荣誉和承认?
533Two questions to which问两个问题
534Aristotle directs our attention.亚里士多德引导我们的注意力。
535We'll continue on this case我们继续调查此案
536next time.下次再说吧
537What's strange and seems奇怪,看起来
538paradoxical to me about Aristotle's viewpoint我对亚里士多德的观点很矛盾
539is that if you walk like a pirate and you如果你像海盗一样走路
540talk like a pirate, you shouldn't be an investment banker说话像海盗,你不应该是投资银行家
541because that's not what因为这不是
542you're supposed to do.你应该这样做。
543If you have a peg leg and an eye patch如果你的腿和眼线
544and a disgruntled disposition,和不满的处置,
545you should be on a pirate ship on the high seas.你应该在公海上的海盗船上
546So he doesn't...所以他不会...
547Some would say the distinction有人会说区别
548between the two vocations is not as clear as you suggest.这两种职业之间并不像你建议的那样明确。
549When we ended last time,我们上次结束的时候
550we were talking about whether Casey Martin has a right我们正谈论凯西・马丁是否有权利
551to ride in a golf cart in the PGA在PGA乘坐高尔夫球车
552tournaments.比赛
553And it's worth remembering值得记住
554how we got into this debate and what's at stake for an我们如何进入这场辩论 和什么关系
555understanding of political philosophy.对政治哲学的理解。
556Remember, we were looking at Aristotle's theory记住,我们在看亚里士多德的理论
557of justice and one way of describing his approach to司法,并用一种方式说明他如何
558justice, we called it teleological.正义,我们称它为 心灵学。
559Teleological because he says to allocate rights电传学是因为他说要分配权利
560we first have to figure out the purpose我们首先要找出目的
561or the end of the social practice或结束社会实践
562in question.有疑问。
563Another way of另一种方式
564describing Aristotle's account of justice描述亚里士多德的正义
565is that justice is for him a matter of正义对他来说是一个问题
566fit.合适吗?
567It's a matter of fitting这是适合的问题
568persons with their virtues and个人的美德
569excellences to the appropriate向适当的机构提供最佳服务
570roles.角色。 。 。
571Now, I want to现在,我想
572finish our discussion about Casey Martin结束我们关于凯西・马丁的讨论
573and his claim for a golf cart他的高尔夫球车索赔
574and then go back to one more然后回到一个
575consequential application in Aristotle, namely亚里士多德的相应应用,即
576the question of slavery.奴隶制问题。
577What do you think你觉得呢?
578about Casey Martin's关于凯西・马丁的
579request, should there be an accommodation or not,请求,如果有 住宿与否,
580given the nature of the game鉴于游戏的性质
581and of the tournament and its purposes?和比赛的目的吗?
582Isn't it discrimination if he's not如果他不是,是不是歧视
583provided the golf cart as an accommodation, say some.提供高尔夫球车作为住宿,比如说。
584Others reply, no, if he got a cart其他人回答,没有,如果他有车
585it would be unfair to the other golfers because对其他高尔夫球员不公平 因为...
586they exert themselves, become winded, fatigued,他们能工作,能风能,能疲倦,
587walking the course.沿着路走
588That's where we这就是我们
589left it.离开它。
590What about the fairness公平怎么样?
591argument?辩论?
592Okay, Jenny.好吧,珍妮,你好吗?
593My question was why doesn't the我的问题是,为什么不
594PGA just make the option of a cartPGA只是让一个车的选择
595available to all golfers from our readings?所有高尔夫球员都可以读到吗?
596I learned that there are many golf tournaments我得知有很多高尔夫球赛
597other than the PGA where using a cart is not prohibited除了不禁止使用推车的PGA以外
598and for something like the seniors tournament it's even和一些类似 高年级的比赛,这是平
599allowed and encouraged.允许并鼓励。
600So why所以为什么
601doesn't the PGA just do that?PGA不是就那样吗?
602Let everybody让大家
603use a cart.用推车
604Or give everyone the option of using a或者让每个人选择使用
605cart and let them pick.推车让他们选。
606So the traditionalists所以传统主义者
607can say, well, I still choose to walk the course, but I do可以说,嗯,我仍然选择走 路线,但我做到了
608that knowing that I will be more tired at the知道我会更疲惫
609end than the people who took the cart.而不是那些坐车的人
610Good.不错
611Alright, so what about Jenny's好吧,那么珍妮的怎么样
612solution?解决方案?
613For the sake of fairness,为了公平起见
614don't give Casey Martin an advantage, if indeed不要给凯西・马丁一个优势,如果真的
615there is an advantage to riding in a cart.骑车有优势
616Let everyone让所有人
617who wants to use a cart.谁想用推车。
618Is everyone happy with that solution?大家对这个解决方案满意吗?
619Does it是吗
620put to rest this whole dilemma?结束这整个困境?
621Who has an answer for Jenny?谁有珍妮的答案?
622Yes.
623As was brought up last time, if you上次提起的,如果你
624do that you kind of ruin做你那种毁灭
625some of the spirit of golf as a lot of people like to see it.一些高尔夫精神作为很多人喜欢看到.
626If you let everybody take a cart.如果你让每个人都坐车。
627Even though it gives everybody the same playing虽然它给大家同样的游戏
628feel now, it sort of makes golf现在感觉,它有点 高尔夫球
629less of an athletic game like you pointed out last class.少了一个运动比赛 就像你指出的最后一课。
630It's just like if someone decides就像有人决定
631to go into another sport and they want an advantage like进入另一个运动 他们想要一个优势,比如
632if you have swimming and then you say, okay,如果你有游泳,然后你说,好吧,
633he wants flippers, so why don't we just allow everyone to have flippers doing swimming?他想要翻车 我们为什么不让每个人都有翻车来游泳呢?
634And what would that do to the那会怎样?
635Olympic swimming competition if people were free to use如果人们可以自由使用奥林匹克游泳比赛
636Jenny, and here we better let Jenny reply to this.珍妮,我们最好让珍妮回答这个问题。
637Da says, it would sort of spoil the spirit爸爸说,那会破坏精神
638of the athletic competition as if in运动比赛的成绩
639Olympic swimming you let anyone who wanted to奥运会游泳 你让任何人 谁想
640swim with flippers.与翻转。
641Alright Jenny, what do you好吧,珍妮,你怎么样
642say to Da?对达说?
643It would spoil the spirit of it.它会破坏它的精神。
644You're also ruining the spirit of golf你也毁了高尔夫精神
645by not letting people who are really passionate通过不让真正热情的人
646about the game and very good at it, compete simply关于游戏和非常擅长它, 简单竞争
647because of an aspect of golf which is not,因为高尔夫的某个方面不是,
648the main point of golf is you use this高尔夫球的要点是用这个
649club to make strokes and hit it into a hole.俱乐部会打中它 然后打进洞里
650I'm sorry, I'm not a golfer, but that's对不起,我不是高尔夫球手,但是...
651basically the gist of the game from what I see it.基本上从我所看到的 游戏的要点。
652我在读PJ对Casey Martin的决定
653that was one of the sentences that they said is那是他们说过的一句话之一
654because walking the course is not an inherent因为走这条路不是固有的
655part of golf, only swinging the club is.高尔夫的一部分, 只有摇摆的俱乐部是。
656Good, so Jenny replies to Da.好,所以珍妮回答达。
657Well, it isn't really essential anyhow反正也没什么大不了的
658to walk the course, so we're back to the purpose.沿着路走 所以我们又回到了目的
659I mean, I'm sure there are like wheelchair我的意思是,我相信有 像轮椅
660basketball, there are certain different篮球,有些不同
661competitions that can be made for people who能够为那些
662may only be able to use their arms.可能只能使用他们的手臂。
663Right, yes.对,是的。
664Michael, what do you think?迈克尔,你觉得怎么样?
665And you just said that there's stuff like wheelchair你刚才说有轮椅之类的东西
666basketball where if you can't play basketball,篮球,如果你不能打篮球
667there's another option.还有另一个选择
668I think there's other options我想还有其他选择
669in the PGA Tour, but the PGA Tour is like,在PGA巡回赛, 但PGA巡回赛就像,
670it's the best, it's the pinnacle, and you have to have这是最好的,这是顶峰, 你必须有
671certain requirements fulfilled to perform.达到某些要求。
672All right, Michael, you want to say to Casey Martin好吧,迈克尔,你想对凯西马丁说
673there is such a thing as the Special Olympics特别奥运会就是这样的
674for those who are disabled.给那些残疾的人。
675Go play in the golfing去打高尔夫
676version of the Special Olympics.特别奥运会的版本。
677That's what you would say, Michael.你会这么说的 麦可
678Yeah, I think that walking is part of the sport of golf是的,我认为步行是高尔夫运动的一部分
679and Casey Martin, you know, if you can't walk the course还有凯西・马丁 如果你走不动的话
680then I don't think you should be able to play on the PGA.那我不认为你应该能 玩PGA。
681All right, good.好吧,不错。
682Thank you very much for that exchange.谢谢你的交流
683What comes out of this exchange that goes back这回的交换结果是什么
684to Aristotle's theory of justice?亚里士多德的正义理论?
685Well, one thing is the question is walking好吧,有一件事是 问题是步行
686an essential part of golf?高尔夫的必备部分?
687And the very fact that deciding而决定
688whether there is a right for Casey Martin凯西・马丁是否有权利
689that the PGA must respect seems to depend联盟必须尊重
690as Aristotle suggests it must正如亚里士多德建议的那样
691on debating辩论情况
692and resolving the question并解决问题
693is walking essential to the game of golf?走路对打高尔夫很重要吗?
694That's one moral of the story.这是故事的一个道德。
695But there's a second moral to the story但故事还有第二个道德
696from an Aristotelian point of view.从阿里斯托特利安的角度
697What's at stake here, this is the second事关重大,这是第二次
698Aristotelian stake in this debate,阿里斯托德利安在这场辩论中的利害关系
699is honor.这是荣誉。
700Casey Martin想要住宿 这样他就能
701compete for the honor竞争荣誉
702of winning the best tournaments.赢得最好的比赛。
703Now, why is it为什么?
704that the professional golfers, the great golfers职业高尔夫球手 伟大的高尔夫球手
705testified in this case, Jack Nicklaus,杰克・尼克劳斯在此案中作证
706Tom Kite in the readings读数中的汤姆·基特
707against letting them use a cart反对他们用推车
708and they I suspect would be equally vehement, Jenny,珍妮,我猜他们也会生气的
709in opposing your suggestion反对你的建议
710of letting everyone ride a cart让所有人骑车
711and this goes back in a way to Dodd's point这可以追溯到多德的观点
712how to put this gently.如何轻轻地把这个。
713Professional golfers职业高尔夫球手
714are sensitive敏感
715about whether their sport is really a sport.关于他们的运动是否真的是一种运动。
716Because if everyone rode around in a cart or could因为如果每个人都骑着马车 或可以
717then it would become clear然后它就会变得清晰
718or clearer depending on your point of view或者根据你的观点更清晰
719that golf is not really an athletic competition高尔夫球其实不是运动比赛
720but rather a game, a game of skill而是游戏,技能游戏
721but not a sport.但不是运动
722And so not only the question of debating the purpose所以不只是辩论目的的问题
723the teleological feature电话学特征
724but also from the standpoint of但也从
725viewing debates about the purpose of golf, what's essential观看关于高尔夫球目的的辩论,什么是关键
726to golf, those debates Aristotle suggests对于高尔夫球,那些辩论 亚里士多德建议
727inevitably are also debates也必然是辩论
728about the allocation of honor关于荣誉分配
729because part of the purpose of golf因为高尔夫的部分目的
730is not just to amuse spectators.不只是取笑观众
731Scalia is wrong about that斯卡利亚错了
732from Aristotle's point of view.从亚里士多德的观点。
733It's not just to provide entertainment, it's not just to make people happy.不只是提供娱乐,也不仅仅是让人们快乐.
734It's not mere amusement.不只是娱乐
735It's honoring, it's rewarding, it's recognizing尊崇,赏赏,赏赏
736a certain kind of athletic excellence某种运动优秀
737at least those who have achieved the highest honors至少那些获得最高荣誉的人
738have a powerful stake有强大的利害关系
739in maintaining that view.坚持这一观点。
740Now some of you took the position现在你们中有些人就位了
741about the Scalia position.关于斯卡利亚的位置。
742This is an incredibly difficult and silly question, Scalia said.斯卡利亚说,这是一个非常困难和愚蠢的问题。
743What is the essential nature of golf?高尔夫的本质是什么?
744It's not the kind of thing that the United States Supreme Court这不是那种事情 美国最高法院
745is equipped to decide or should decide有能力决定或应当决定
746that's Scalia.这是斯卡利亚。
747But he only says that但他只说
748because he takes a very strong因为他要非常强壮
749and as it happens anti-Aristotelian position和它发生的反阿里斯托里安的立场
750on what a game is.游戏是什么。
751It is the very nature of a game to have no object游戏的本质就是没有目标
752no point, except amusement没有意义,除了娱乐
753says Scalia.说斯卡利亚。
754That is what distinguishes这就是区别所在
755games, he says, from productive activity.他说,游戏从生产活动。
756You can just imagine what kind of sports fans你可以想象什么样的运动迷
757Scalia must be.一定是斯卡利亚
758And so he says it's impossible to say that any of a game's所以他说不可能说任何游戏
759arbitrary rules is essential.任意规则至关重要。
760And then he quotes Mark Twain's然后他引用马克・吐温的
761disparaging remark about golf.贬低高尔夫的言论。
762He says many consider walking to be the central feature他说许多人认为走路是中心特色
763of golf, hence Mark Twain's classic criticism所以马克・吐温的经典批评
764of the sport, a good walk spoiled.运动,一个好散步 宠坏了。
765But Scalia misses但斯卡利亚错过了
766an important feature of games游戏的重要特征
767and the arguments about rights权利的论点
768and fairness that arise from games游戏产生的公平性
769when he casts games, sports,当他抛下游戏、体育、
770athletic competitions as solely体育比赛
771for the sake of amusement为了娱乐
772as solely a utilitarian activity.纯粹是一种功利主义的活动。
773But an Aristotelian view of sports says但一个阿里斯托德的体育观点说
774no, it's not just about amusement.不,这不只是娱乐。
775Real sports, real athletic events真正的运动,真正的运动
776are also about appreciation, not just amusement.不只是娱乐而已
777And people who follow sports跟着运动的人
778and care about sports and play sports know this.关心运动和游戏运动都知道这一点。
779Which is another way of saying这是另一种说法
780there's a difference between a sport and a mirror运动和镜子是不一样的
781spectacle.场景。
782And the difference is区别在于
783that a sport is a practice运动是一种练习
784that calls forth and honors and prizes呼唤 荣誉和奖赏
785certain excellences, certain某些优秀的,某些
786virtues.功德 功劳
787And the people who appreciate和欣赏的人
788those virtues这些美德
789are the true fans, the informed fans,是真正的粉丝,是知情的粉丝,
790and for them watching the sport is not mere他们不只观察游戏,
791amusement.娱乐。
792But that means that it's但这意味着
793always possible to make sense of a debate总是可以让辩论有意义
794about what feature of a sport关于运动的什么特点
795is essential to it.这一点至关重要。
796We can make sense我们可以说得通
797of these arguments, never mind the question whether the court should这些论点,不管法院是否应
798decide.决定
799The PGA in its own联盟本身
800internal deliberations can make sense内部审议是有道理的
801of that debate, which is why they cared very much所以他们非常关心
802about their view,关于他们的看法,
803insisting on their view, that walking and exertion坚持他们的观点, 步行和锻炼
804and fatigue are essential, not peripheral疲劳是必需的,不是边缘的
805parts of sport.运动的一部分。
806Well, this is all to illustrate这都是为了说明
807the teleological and the honorific和荣誉
808feature of debates about辩论的特征
809rights, which Aristotle says亚里士多德说的权利
810we need to take account of in thinking about我们在考虑
811justice.正义。
812Now,现在,
813I want to begin for us to consider我想开始考虑
814whether Aristotle's theory of justice is亚里士多德的正义理论是否
815right or wrong, whether it's persuasive or unpersuasive.无论是对还是错 无论是说服力还是无说服力
816I want to get your thoughts about that.我想得到你的想法 关于这一点。
817But I want to anticipate one但我想预料到一个
818obvious and important objection.明显而重要的反对。
819If justice is about fit, fitting persons如果正义是合适的,合适的人
820to roles, matching virtues对角色,匹配美德
821to the appropriate honors and recognition,给予适当的荣誉和承认,
822if that's what justice is,如果这就是正义
823does it leave room for freedom?它能给自由留下空间吗?
824And this is one of the main objections这是主要反对意见之一
825to Aristotle's teleological亚里士多德的电报
826account of justice.司法公正。
827If certain roles,如果某些角色,
828social roles, are fitting or appropriate社会角色,适合或适当
829to me, where does that leave对我来说,它会离开
830my right to choose我有权选择
831my social roles, my life我的社会角色,我的生活
832purposes for myself?为了我自己?
833What room does teleology leave for freedom?电传学为自由留下什么房间?
834And in fact, you may remember,事实上,你可能记得,
835Rawls rejects罗尔斯拒绝
836teleological accounts of justice司法学术语
837because he says that teleological因为他说 遥测
838theories of justice司法理论
839threaten the equal basic威胁平等的基本
840rights of citizens.公民权利。
841So let's begin to examine所以,让我们开始检查
842whether Aristotle is right and in particular亚里士多德是否正确,特别是
843whether his teleological无论他的心智
844way of thinking about justice is at odds with对正义的思考方式与
845freedom.自由权。
846Now, one obvious现在,一个明显的
847reason to worry不用担心
848is Aristotle's defense of slavery.是亚里士多德对奴隶制的辩护
849He defends slavery他为奴隶制辩护
850which existed as an institution作为机构存在
851in the Athens of his day.在他的雅典时代。
852Well, what is his defense of slavery?他为奴隶制辩护什么?
853Two things, two conditions have to be met两件事,两个条件必须满足
854for slavery to be just.让奴隶制公正
855First, it has to be necessary.首先,必须这样做。
856And Aristotle says, at least in our society,而亚里士多德说,至少在我们的社会中,
857slavery is necessary.奴役是必要的。
858Why is it necessary?为什么有必要?
859If there are to be citizens如果有公民的话
860who are freed from manual and menial and household chores摆脱体力劳动、体力劳动和家务劳动;
861to go to the assembly去参加大会
862to deliberate about politics,考虑政治,
863there have to be some who look after those menial一定有人会照顾那些下流的
864tasks, the mere necessities of life.任务,仅仅是生活必需品。
865He says unless you could invent他说除非你能发明
866in some science fiction一些科幻小说
867a technological fix,技术修补,
868then there are going to be those who have to do那样的话,就会有人做
869the hard and difficult困难和困难
870and menial labor if there are to be citizens deliberating和体力劳动,如果有公民考虑
871about the good and realizing their nature.了解他们的本性
872So slavery is necessary所以,奴役是必要的
873for the life of the polis, for there to be open to citizens,为大都会的生活, 有开放给公民,
874the life of deliberation,讨论的寿命,
875of argument, of practical wisdom.辩论,实用智慧。
876But there's a further condition that has to be met.但还有另一个条件需要满足.
877Slavery has not only to be necessary奴隶制不仅是必要的
878for the community as a whole to function,让整个社区运作,
879but it also has to be the case,但也必须是这样
880remember the criterion of fit,你们应当谨记适当的标准,
881it also has to be the case that there are some people一定还有一些人
882for whom being a slave is the just or the fitting作为奴隶是正义的,是合适的
883or the appropriate condition.或适当的条件。
884Now, Aristotle agrees that by his own standards现在,亚里士多德同意 根据他自己的标准
885both of those conditions must be met, must be true,这两种条件都必须满足,必须是真实的,
886if slavery is to be just.如果奴隶制是公正的。
887And then in a deplorable passage然后在悲惨的一段
888he says, well it is true that there are some people他说,确实有人
889who are fit by nature, who are cut out to be slaves.自然而然是合适的,被割为奴隶。
890These are people who differ from ordinary这些人和普通人不一样
891people in the same way以同样的方式
892that the body differs from the soul.身体和灵魂不同
893These are people他们是人
894who are meant to be ruled and for them他们注定要被统治,
895their nature is best realized if they're slaves.如果他们是奴隶,他们的本性就最好实现.
896They can recognize reason in others,他们能识别别人的理性,
897but they can't partake of it,但他们不能参与其中,
898they can't exercise it.他们不能锻炼它。
899And somehow we can know this.不知怎的,我们可以知道这一点。
900Now, Aristotle must have known that there was something亚里士多德一定知道有什么东西
901dodgy, something strained about this claim,Dodgy, 这件事很紧张,
902because he quickly acknowledges因为他很快承认
903that those who disagree may have a point分歧者或许有观点,
904out.出来。
905And what those who disagree point out is分歧者指出:
906that there are a lot of people in Athens雅典有许多人
907who are slaves,他们是奴隶,
908not because they were born to be slaves不是因为他们生来就是奴隶
909or fit to be slaves, but because they were captured,或适合成为奴隶, 但因为他们被俘虏,
910they were losers in a war.他们是战争中的失败者。
911And so Aristotle admits that as practiced in ancient Athens,所以亚里士多德承认 在古雅典的实践,
912slavery didn't necessarily line up with奴隶制不一定与
913who actually is fit or born to be a slave真正适合或生来就是奴隶
914because some actual slaves just were slaves因为有些真正的奴隶只是奴隶
915by bad luck, by being captured in a war.在战争中被俘虏
916And on Aristotle's own account, even if it's necessary和亚里士多德自己, 即使它是必要的
917to have slavery for the sake of citizenship,为公民身份而奴役,
918it's unjust if people如果人不义
919who aren't properly slaves are cast in that role.他们不是真正的奴隶 是扮演这个角色。
920There is a misfit.有点不合适
921Aristotle recognizes that slavery for those who aren't fit亚里士多德承认 奴役那些不适合的人
922for the task is a kind of coercion.因为任务是一种强迫。
923The reason slavery is wrong is not because it's coerced.奴隶制错误的原因不是因为它是被胁迫的.
924Coercion is an indicator that it's wrong强迫是错误的迹象
925because it's not natural.因为它不自然。
926If you have to coerce如果你必须强迫
927someone into a role, that's a pretty good indication某个人扮演一个角色 这是个好迹象
928that they don't belong there, that that role isn't他们不属于那里, 那个角色不是
929fitting for them.适合他们。
930And Aristotle亚里士多德
931recognized this.承认这一点。
932So all of this is to say所以这一切就是说
933the example of slavery, Aristotle's defense of it,亚里士多德为奴隶制辩护
934doesn't show that there's anything wrong in principle不显示什么是错的
935with teleological argument or with the idea of justice与心智论或正义思想
936as fit between persons and roles适合个人与角色
937because it's perfectly possible within Aristotle's own terms因为亚里士多德自己的条款是完全可能的
938to explain what's wrong来解释什么是错的
939with this application, this practical application使用此应用程序,此实用应用程序
940that he made of his theory.他的理论。
941I want to turn to the larger challenge我想谈谈更大的挑战
942to Aristotle in the name of freedom, but before I do that以自由的名义去亚里士多德 但在此之前
943I want to see what people think我想看看别人怎么想
944of Aristotle's account of justice as fit,亚里士多德关于正义的叙述,
945his teleological way,他的传奇方式,
946a reasoning about justice, and the honorific关于正义和荣誉的推理
947dimension of rights and of人权及经济、社会、文化权利委员会
948distributive justice that emerged in our discussion我们讨论中出现的分配公正
949of flutes and politics笛子和政治
950and golf.还有高尔夫球
951Questions of clarification澄清问题
952about Aristotle or关于亚里士多德或
953objections to his overall总体反对意见
954account.账户。
955Yes?是吗?
956My objection to Aristotle is that我反对亚里士多德
957he wants to match a person to a role,他想把一个人配成一个角色
958and if you walk like a pirate and you talk like a pirate如果你像海盗一样走路 说话像海盗
959you should be a pirate, and that is what is right.你应该是海盗,这是对的。
960And so what's所以,这是
961strange and seem paradoxical to me about很奇怪,我觉得很荒谬
962Aristotle's viewpoint is that亚里士多德的观点是:
963if you walk like a pirate and you talk like a pirate如果你走路像海盗,你说话像海盗
964you shouldn't be an investment banker, because你不应该是投资银行家,因为
965that's not what you inherently are supposed to do.这不是你本该做的
966If you have a peg leg and an eye patch如果你的腿和眼线
967and a disgruntled disposition, you know,和不满的处置,你知道,
968you should be on a pirate ship on the high seas.你应该在公海上的海盗船上
969Some would say有人会说
970the distinction between the two两者的区别
971vocations is not as clear as you suggest.职业并不像你建议的那样明确。
972But that's good, I take the point.但是,这很好,我理解这一点。
973Yes, go ahead.说吧
974It just seems to ignore individual rights, so I might be这似乎忽略了个人权利 所以我可能
975the perfect janitor in the whole world全世界最完美的清洁工
976and I can do that job the most efficiently out of anybody我能从任何人手中 做到最有效的工作
977that exists right now, but I might not want to do that.但是,我也许不想这样做。
978I might want to do any other number我可能想做其他号码
979of pursuits, and it seems to say that that isn't really a good似乎说这不是真的好事
980option for me.选择对我来说。
981Alright, and what's your name?好吧,你叫什么名字来着?
982Mary Kate.玛丽・凯特
983Good.不错
984Alright, let's好吧,让我们
985take a couple more.再拿两杯
986Yes.
987I think that the golf cart exchange我觉得高尔夫车的交换
988sort of brought up what I see as my main objection提到我的主要反对意见
989to this theological这个神学
990mode of reasoning.推理模式。
991I mean, Michael,我的意思是,迈克尔,
992I think that was your name, right?我想那是你的名字 对吧?
993Believes that walking相信会走路
994is an inherent part of golf.是高尔夫球的固有部分
995Myself, I believe that walking is not an inherent我自己,我相信走路不是内在的
996part of golf, and I feel that no matter高尔夫的一部分,我觉得不管怎样
997how long we debate this particular point我们辩论了多久 这一点
998of contention, we're never going to reach an accord.争论,我们永远不会达成协议。
999The theological framework神学框架
1000of reasoning, I believe, doesn't really allow us推理,我认为,不 真正允许我们
1001to come to any sort of agreement.达成任何协议。
1002Alright, and what's your name?好吧,你叫什么名字来着?
1003Patrick.派屈克 派屈克 派屈克
1004Alright, let me try to address this set好吧,让我试着解决这一套
1005of objections to Aristotle.对亚里士多德的反对。
1006Let me start with Patrick's.让我从帕特里克的。
1007It's an important objection.这是一个重要的反对。
1008We had a debate about whether walking is我们辩论过走路是不是
1009essential to golf, and even in so seemingly对高尔夫球至关重要 甚至看起来如此
1010trivial, or at least contained, the cases that无关紧要的,或者至少是被控制的案件
1011we couldn't agree.我们不能同意。
1012How can we possibly hope to我们怎么可能希望
1013agree when the stakes are higher同意当赌注更高时
1014and when we're debating the fundamental purposes or ends当我们辩论基本目的或目的时
1015of political community?政治团体?
1016And so这样
1017if we can't agree on what the ends如果我们不能就结局达成一致
1018or the goods of our shared public life或我们共同公共生活的利益
1019consist in, how can we base justice我们如何建立正义
1020and rights on some notion权利的概念
1021of what the end or the purpose or the good目的或好处
1022consists in?组成?
1023That's an important objection, so much so这是一个重要反对,所以如此
1024that much modern political theory现代政治理论
1025takes that worry about disagreement担心分歧
1026over the good as its starting point以善为起点
1027and concludes结论
1028that justice正义
1029and rights and constitutions权利与宪法
1030should not be based on any particular不应以任何特定的
1031conception of the good or the purposes行为或目的的概念
1032of political life, but should instead政治生活,但应该
1033provide a framework of rights that leaves people* 提供权利框架,使人们离开
1034free to choose their conceptions of the good,他们可以自由选择自己的善良,
1035their own conceptions of the purposes of life.他们自己的人生目的概念。
1036Now, Mary Kate said,现在,玛丽・凯特说,
1037what if a person is very well suited to having如果一个人非常适合拥有
1038a certain role, like the role of being a janitor,某个角色,比如做清洁工的角色,
1039but wants something else, wants to reach higher,但想要别的东西,想要达到更高的,
1040wants to choose another way of life?想选择另一种生活方式吗?
1041So that goes back to this question about freedom.这又回到自由的问题。
1042If we take our bearing as persons如果我们以个人身份
1043from roles that are said to fit our nature,从据说适合我们本性的角色,
1044shouldn't it at least be up to us to至少应该由我们来决定
1045decide what those roles are?决定这些角色是什么?
1046In fact, shouldn't it be up to us to define事实上,不应该由我们来定义
1047what roles are suitable to us?什么角色适合我们?
1048And that's going to take us back to the confrontation这会带我们回到对抗中
1049between Aristotle on the one hand and Kant亚里士多德和康德之间
1050and Rawls on the other.另一边是罗尔斯
1051Kant and Rawls康德和罗尔斯
1052think Patrick has a point.帕特里克说得有道理
1053They say precisely because people disagree人家说是因为人们不同意
1054in pluralist societies在多元化社会中
1055about the nature of the good life,关于美好生活的性质,
1056we shouldn't try to base justice on any我们不应该试图把正义建立在任何
1057particular answer to that question.请回答这个问题。
1058So they reject teleology, they reject他们拒绝电传,拒绝
1059the idea of tying justice to some conception将正义与某种概念联系起来的想法
1060of the good.诸善者.
1061What's at stake in the debate这场辩论有什么关系?
1062about teleology, say Rawlsian and Kantian罗尔西安和康德
1063liberals, is this.自由主义者,就是这个。
1064If you tie justice to a particular conception of the good,如果你把正义和善良联系起来
1065if you see justice as a matter of fit between如果你把正义看作是一个问题
1066a person and his or her roles, you don't一个人及其角色,你没有
1067leave room for freedom.留下自由的空间。
1068And to be free为了自由
1069is to be independent of将独立于
1070any particular roles任何特定角色
1071or traditions or conventions或传统或公约
1072that may be handed down by my parents可能由我父母下达
1073or my society.或者我的社会
1074So in order to所以,为了
1075decide as between these two broad traditions,在这两种广泛传统之间作出决定,
1076whether Aristotle is right or whether Kant亚里士多德是正确还是康德
1077and Rawls are right, we need to investigateRawls是对的 我们需要调查
1078whether the right is prior to the good, question one,权利是否在善之前,问题一,
1079and we need to investigate what it means我们需要调查它意味着什么
1080to be a free person, a free moral一个自由的人,一个自由的道德
1081agent.探员
1082Does freedom自由吗?
1083require that I stand toward my roles,要求我站在我的角色,
1084my ends and my purposes as an agent of choice我的目的和目的 作为选择的代理人
1085or as someone trying to discover或试图发现
1086what my nature really is?我的本性是什麽?
1087Two big questions and we'll take them up next time.两个大问题,我们下次再讨论
1088Don't miss the chance to interact online不要错过网上交流的机会
1089with other viewers of Justice.与正义的其他观众。
1090Join the conversation.加入对话。
1091Take a pop quiz.做个流行测验
1092Watch lectures you've missed and learn看你错过和学习的讲座
1093a lot more.还有很多
1094请访问justiceharvard.org.
1095It's the这是
1096right thing to do.这是正确的事情。
1097Funding for this program为该方案提供的资金
1098is provided by...由...提供.
1099Additional funding provided by...由.提供的额外资金。
该视频共有字幕 1101 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格

P12 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p12 11. 11.共同责任的辩论 (P12)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:11Today we turn to Kant's reply to Aristotle.今天我们来看康德对亚里士多德的答复.
0:17Kant thinks that Aristotle康德认为亚里士多德
0:22just made a mistake.只是犯了一个错误。
0:25It's one thing这是一件事
0:26Kant says, to support a fair framework of rights康德说,支持公平的权利框架
0:32within which people can pursue their own conceptions of the good life.人们可以在其中追求自己的美好生活理念.
0:38It's something else, it's something that runs the risk of coercion这是别的东西, 它是有被胁迫的风险
0:43to base law or principles of justice以司法为根据的法律或原则
0:47on any particular conception of the good life.任何关于美好生活的具体概念。
0:51You remember Aristotle says in order to investigate the ideal constitution we你记得亚里士多德说过 为了调查理想的宪法
展开字幕全文(1242 条)
序号英文中文
1Today we turn to Kant's reply to Aristotle.今天我们来看康德对亚里士多德的答复.
2Kant thinks that Aristotle康德认为亚里士多德
3just made a mistake.只是犯了一个错误。
4It's one thing这是一件事
5Kant says, to support a fair framework of rights康德说,支持公平的权利框架
6within which people can pursue their own conceptions of the good life.人们可以在其中追求自己的美好生活理念.
7It's something else, it's something that runs the risk of coercion这是别的东西, 它是有被胁迫的风险
8to base law or principles of justice以司法为根据的法律或原则
9on any particular conception of the good life.任何关于美好生活的具体概念。
10You remember Aristotle says in order to investigate the ideal constitution we你记得亚里士多德说过 为了调查理想的宪法
11have first to figure out the best way to live.首先要找出最好的生活方式
12Kant would reject that idea.康德会拒绝这个想法的
13He says that constitutions and laws and rights他说,宪法、法律和权利
14should not不应该
15embody or affirm or promote any particular体现、确认或促进任何特定
16way of life.生活方式。
17That's at odds with freedom.这是与自由相悖的。
18For Aristotle, the whole point of law,对于亚里士多德,整个法律要点,
19the purpose of the polis, is to shape character,波利斯的目的是为了塑造人物
20to cultivate the virtue of citizens, to inculcate civic excellence,培养公民的美德, 灌输公民的卓越,
21to make possible a good way of life.以创造良好的生活方式。
22That's what he tells us in the politics.这是他在政治方面告诉我们的
23For Kant on the other hand, the purpose of law,对康德来说 法律的目的
24the point of a constitution, is not to inculcate or to promote宪法的意义不是灌输或提倡
25virtue.美德。 美德。 。
26It's to set up a fair framework of rights是建立公平的权利框架
27within which citizens may be free to pursue their own conceptions of the公民可自由地追求自己对《公约》的认识。
28good for themselves.对自己有好处。
29So we see the difference in their theories of justice,因此,我们看到他们的正义理论的不同,
30we see the difference in their account of law,我们看到他们的法律上的差异,
31or the role of a constitution, the point of politics,或宪法的作用,政治的要点,
32and underlying these differences are two different accounts of what it means to这些差异背后有两个不同的说法:
33be a free person.成为一个自由的人。
34For Aristotle,对于亚里士多德,
35we're free insofar as we have the capacity to realize只要我们有能力实现自由
36our potential.我们的潜力。
37That leads us to the question of fit.这使我们想到适合的问题。
38Fit between persons and the roles that are appropriate to them.适合个人和适合他们的角色。
39Figuring out what I'm cut out for.找出我该做什么
40That's what it means这就是它的意思
41to lead a free life, to live up to my potential.过着自由的生活 尽我所能
42Kant rejects that idea and instead substitutes his康德拒绝这个想法,代之以他
43famously demanding notion of freedom as the capacity要求自由作为能力的著名概念
44to act autonomously.自动行动
45Freedom means acting自由意味着行动
46according to a law I give myself, freedom as autonomy.根据我赋予自己的法律 自由就是自治
47Part of the appeal, part of the moral force上诉的一部分,道德力量的一部分
48of the view of Kant and of Rawls康德和罗尔斯的观点
49consists in the conception of the person由人的概念构成
50as a free and independent self,作为一个自由和独立的自我,
51capable of choosing his or her能够选择他或她
52own ends.自己的结局。
53The image of the self as free and independent自由与独立的自我形象
54offers, if you think about it, a powerful提供,如果你想想,一个强大的
55liberating vision because what it says is that as free moral persons解放视觉,因为它所说的是 作为自由道德的人
56we are not bound by any ties我们没有任何联系
57of history or of tradition历史或传统
58or of inherited status that we haven't chosen for ourselves.或继承地位 我们没有为自己选择。
59And so we're unbound by any moral ties prior to our choosing them.所以我们在选择他们之前 没有任何道德联系
60And that means, that means that we are这意味着,这意味着我们
61free and independent sovereign selves.自由独立自主
62We're the authors of the only obligations我们是唯一的义务的作者
63that constrain us.这制约了我们。
64The communitarian critics of Kantian and Rawlsian liberalism康德和罗尔斯自由主义的共产主义批评者
65acknowledge that there is something powerful承认有很强的力量
66and inspiring in that account of freedom, the free在自由、自由、
67independent choosing self, but they argue独立选择自己,但他们争论
68it misses something.它错过了什么。
69It misses a whole dimension它错过了整个层面
70of moral life and even political life.道德生活,甚至政治生活。
71It can't make sense of our moral experience because it can't account它不能理解我们的道德经历,因为它不能说明
72for certain moral and political obligations某些道德和政治义务
73that we commonly recognize and even prize.我们通常承认,甚至奖励。
74And these include obligations of membership, loyalty, solidarity包括会员义务、忠诚、团结
75and other moral ties that may claim us for reasons以及可能因故要求我们
76that we can't trace to an act of consent.我们不能追踪到同意的行为。
77Alastair McIntyre gives an account阿拉斯泰尔·麦金泰尔开户
78what he calls a narrative conception of the self.他称之为自我的叙事概念。
79It's a different account of the self.彼说法自性.
80Human beings are essentially storytelling人类基本上是讲故事的
81creatures, McIntyre argues.生物,麦金泰尔争论。
82That means就是说
83I can only answer the question what am I to do我只能回答我该怎么做的问题
84if I can answer the prior question of what story or stories do I find myself如果我能回答前一个问题 是什么故事,我发现自己
85apart.分开
86That's what he means by这就是他的意思
87the narrative conception of the self.自我的叙事概念。
88What does this have to do with the idea of community这与社区的想法有什么关系
89and belonging?和归属?
90McIntyre says this.麦金泰尔这么说的
91Once you accept this narrative aspect一旦你接受了这个叙述方面
92of moral reflection, you will道德反思,你会
93notice that we can never seek for the good注意我们永远无法为善
94or exercise the virtues only as individuals.或只作为个人行使美德。
95We all approach our circumstance as bearers我们都以承载者的身份看待我们的情况
96of particular social identities.特殊社会特征。
97I am someone's我是别人的
98son or daughter, a citizen of this or that city.不管是儿子还是女儿 是这个城市还是那个城市的公民
99I belong to this plan, that tribe, this nation.我属于这个计划 那个部落 这个民族
100Hence, McIntyre argues, what is good for me因此,麦金塔认为,什么对我有好处
101has to be the good for someone who inhabits these一定对住着这些东西的人有好处
102roles.角色。 。 。
103I inherit from the past我继承了过去
104of my family, my city, my tribe, my nation a variety家族、城市、部落、民族
105of debts, inheritances, expectations and obligations.债务、遗产、期望和义务。
106These constitute the given of my life,这些都是我一生的奉献
107my moral starting point.我的道德起点
108This is, in part, what gives my life这是部分地,使我的生命
109its moral particularity.它的道德特性。
110That's the narrative conception of the self.这就是自我的叙事概念.
111And it's a conception that sees the self as claimed or encumbered它是一个概念,认为自己是 声称或作保
112at least to some extent by the history,至少从历史的某种程度上来说,
113the tradition, the communities传统、社区
114of which it's a part.其为部分.
115We can't make sense of our lives我们的生活是没有道理的
116not only as a psychological matter but also as a moral matter in thinking what不仅是心理问题,也是道德问题
117we ought to do我们应该做
118without attending to these features不注意这些特性
119about us.关于我们。
120Now, McIntyre recognizes现在,麦金塔承认
121that this narrative account, this picture of the encumbered self这段叙述,这幅图画的自我
122puts his account at odds with他的账户与
123contemporary liberalism and individualism.当代自由主义和个人主义.
124From the standpoint of individualism, I am从个人主义的角度来说,我是
125what I myself choose to be.我自己选择的
126I may biologically be my father's son but I我也许在生理上是我父亲的儿子 但我
127can't be held responsible for what he did他的所作所为不能负责
128unless I choose to assume such responsibility.除非我愿意承担这种责任
129I can't be held responsible for what my country does我不能为国家所做的事负责
130or has done unless I choose to assume such responsibility.或者已经做了 除非我选择承担这种责任。
131But McIntyre says this reflects a certain kind of moral但麦金泰尔说这反映了某种道德
132shallowness, even blindness.浅薄,甚至失明.
133It's a blindness at odds with the full measure of responsibility which这是盲目 与全方位的责任
134sometimes he says involves有时候他说,涉及
135collective responsibility.集体责任。
136Responsibilities that may flow from historic历史遗留的责任
137memories.回忆
138And he gives some examples.他举了一些例子。
139Such individualism is expressed by those这种个人主义表现为:
140contemporary Americans who deny any responsibility for the当代美国人否认对
141effects of slavery upon black Americans saying I never owned any slaves奴隶制对美国黑人的影响 说我从未拥有过奴隶
142or the young German who believes或年轻的德国人相信
143that having been born after 1945出生于1945年之后
144means that what Nazis did to Jews has no moral relevance意味着纳粹对犹太人所做的 与道德无关
145to his relationship to his Jewish contemporaries.他和他的犹太同龄人的关系
146McIntyre says all of these attitudes麦金泰说所有这些态度
147of historical amnesia amount to a kind of moral历史失忆症相当于一种道德
148abdication.辞退.
149Once you see that who we are一旦你看到我们是谁
150and what it means to sort out our obligations以及解决我们的义务的意义
151can't be separated, shouldn't be separated不能分开,不应该分开
152from the life histories that define us.从生命的历史 定义我们。
153The contrast he says with the narrative account is clear他说的与叙述的对比是清楚的
154for the story of my life is always embedded in the story of those因为我的生活故事 总是嵌入那些故事
155communities from which I derived my identity.我从这些社区获得我的身份
156I am born with the past and to try to cut myself off from that past我生来就与过去同在 试图与过去隔绝
157is to deform my present relationships.就是破坏我现在的关系
158So there you have in McIntyre a strong statement of the idea因此,你在麦金泰尔有一个 强烈的主张
159that the self can't be detached,使自己无法分离,
160shouldn't be detached from its particular不应该脱离它的特殊性
161ties of membership, history,成员关系、历史、
162story, narrative.故事 叙事
163Now I want to get your reactions现在我想得到你的反应
164to the communitarian critique对社区批评
165of the individualist or the voluntrist,个人或自愿者,
166the unencumbered self, but let's make it concrete so that you can react但是让我们让它变得具体些 这样你就可以作出反应了
167to more than just the theory of it by looking at不只是理论 通过观察
168the two different accounts of moral and political obligation that arise关于道德和政治义务的两种不同说法
169depending on which of these conceptions of the person根据这些人的这些概念,
170one accepts.一个接受。
171On the liberal conception关于自由概念
172moral and political obligations arise in one of two ways.道德和政治义务在两个方面产生。
173There are natural duties that we owe human beings as such,我们当然要承担人类的责任
174duties of respect for persons, quay persons.尊重人、准人的义务。
175These obligations are universal.这些义务具有普遍性。
176Then, as Rawls points out,然后,正如罗尔斯指出,
177there are also voluntary obligations,还有自愿义务,
178obligations that we owe to particular others我们对特定其他人的义务
179insofar as we have agreed,根据我们达成的协议,
180whether through a promise or a deal无论是通过承诺还是交易
181or a contract.或合同。
182Now the issue between现在的问题是
183the liberal and communitarian accounts of the self自由主义和共产主义的自我
184is there another category of obligation是否有另一类义务
185or not?还是没有?
186The communitarian says there is.共者说有.
187There is a third category that might be called obligations of solidarity or第三类可称为团结义务或
188membership.成员。
189The communitarian argues that construing共产主义者认为,
190all obligations as either natural duties作为自然义务的所有义务
191or voluntary obligations fails to capture obligations of membership or或自愿义务未能反映成员义务或
192solidarity.团结。
193Loyalties whose moral force consists partly in the fact其道德力量部分构成事实的忠诚
194that living by them is inseparable from understanding ourselves as the生活在他们身边与理解我们
195particular persons we are.特别的人,我们是。
196What would be some examples?有哪些例子?
197And then I want to see how you would然后我想看看你会怎样
198react to them.对他们作出反应。
199Examples实例
200of obligations of membership成员的义务
201that are particular but don't necessarily flow from consent but rather from但不一定来自同意 而是来自
202membership, narrative, community,成员、叙述、社区、
203one situation.只有一个情况
204The most common examples最常见的例子
205are ones to do with the family, the relation between parents and children for家庭、父母与子女的关系
206example.实例。
207Suppose there were two children如果有两个孩子
208drowning.溺毙.
209You could save only one of them.你只能救一个
210One was your child, the other was a stranger's child.一个是你的孩子 另一个是陌生人的孩子
211Would you have an你会有一个
212obligation义务
213to flip a coin or would there be something翻转硬币,或者有什么
214morally obtuse if you didn't rush to save your child?如果你不急于救你的孩子 道德上会犯错吗?
215Now you may say well parents have agreed现在你可以说父母同意了
216to have their children.他们的孩子。
217So take the other case,换个案子
218the case of children's obligation for their parents.儿童对父母的义务。
219Now we don't choose our现在我们不选择
220parents.父母亲。
221We don't even choose to have parents.我们甚至没有选择有父母。
222There is that asymmetry.有这种不对称。
223And yet consider two aging考虑一下两个衰老
224parents, one of them yours, the other a stranger's.父母,其中一个是你的,另一个是陌生人的。
225Doesn't it make moral sense to think that you have a greater obligation认为你负有更大的义务 道德上不合理吗?
226to look after your age of parent than to flip a coin照顾你父母的年龄 而不是翻硬币
227or to help the strangers?还是帮助陌生人?
228Now现在
229is this traceable to consent?这是否可追溯到同意?
230Not likely.可能不会
231Or take a couple of political examples.或举几个政治例子.
232During World War II, French resistance二战期间,法国抵抗运动
233pilots flew bombing raids over occupied France.飞行员在占领的法国上空发动轰炸。
234One day, one of the pilots received his targets有一天,一个飞行员收到目标
235and noticed that the village he was being asked并且注意到有人要问他的村庄
236to bomb was his home village.轰炸是他的家乡
237He refused, not disputing that it was as necessary as the target他拒绝了,没有反驳说这与目标一样必要。
238he bombed yesterday.他昨天轰炸。
239He refused on the ground that he couldn't bring himself.他拒绝,理由是他不能带来自己。
240It这个
241would be a special moral这将是一种特殊的道德
242crime for him to bomb his people,谋杀他的人
243even in a cause that he supported,以至他所拥护的事业,
244the cause of liberating France.解放法国的事业
245Now现在
246do we admire that?我们佩服吗?
247If we do,如果我们这样做,
248the communitarian argues, it's because共产主义争论,因为
249we do recognize obligations of solidarity.我们确实承认团结的义务。
250Take another example.举个例子
251Some years ago there was a famine in Ethiopia.几年前,埃塞俄比亚发生饥荒。
252Hundreds of thousands of people were starving.数十万人正在挨饿。
253The Israeli government organized an airlift以色列政府安排了一次空运
254to rescue Ethiopian Jews.拯救埃塞俄比亚犹太人
255They didn't have the capacity to rescue everyone in Ethiopia.他们没有救出埃塞俄比亚所有人的能力.
256They rescued several hundred他们救了几百人
257Ethiopian Jews.埃塞俄比亚犹太人。
258Now, what's your moral assessment?你的道德评价是什么?
259Is that a kind of morally这是一种道德
260troubling partiality?烦恼的偏执?
261A kind of prejudice?某种偏见?
262Or, as the Israeli government或者,作为以色列政府
263thought, is there a special obligation of solidarity?考虑一下,是否有团结的特殊义务?
264that this airlift properly responded to?这次空运是否做出了正确反应?
265Well, that takes us to the broader question of patriotism.那么,这让我们想到更广泛的爱国主义问题。
266What morally speaking is to be said for patriotism?从道德上讲,爱国主义是什么?
267There are two towns named Franklin.有2个镇名富兰克林.
268One is Franklin, Texas and the other is just一个是富兰克林,德克萨斯,另一个只是
269across the Rio Grande River,穿过里奥格兰德河,
270Franklin, Mexico.墨西哥富兰克林
271What is the moral significance of national boundaries?国界的道德意义是什么?
272Why is it, or is it the case,为什么是,还是它的情况,
273that we as Americans have a greater responsibility我们美国人有更大的责任
274for the health and the education and the welfare and public provision健康和教育以及福利和公共供给
275for people who live in Franklin, Texas给住在德克萨斯州富兰克林的人
276than equally needy people just across the river比河对岸同样贫穷的人
277living in Franklin, Mexico?住在墨西哥富兰克林吗?
278According to the根据
279communitarian account, membership does matter.共产主义的账户, 会员身份确实很重要。
280The reason patriotism is at least potentially爱国主义的理由至少是潜在的
281a virtue is that it is an expression of美德是表达
282the obligations of citizenship.公民义务。
283How many are sympathetic to the idea有多少人同情这个想法
284that there is this third category of obligation,有第三类义务,
285the obligations of solidarity or membership?团结或成员资格的义务?
286How many are sympathetic to that idea?有多少人同情这个想法?
287And how many are critical of that idea?有多少人批评这个想法?
288How many think all obligations有多少人认为所有的义务
289can be accounted for in the first two ways?可以用前两种方式说明?
290All right, let's hear from the critics of the communitarian idea好吧,让我们听听批评 共产主义思想
291first.先说
292Yes?是吗?
293My biggest concern with我最关心的是
294the idea of having obligations because you're a member of拥有义务的想法 因为你是
295something or because of solidarity is that it seems that某事或因为团结 似乎
296if you accept those obligations as being sort of morally binding,如果你接受这些义务 某种道德约束,
297then there's a greater occurrence of overlapping obligations.然后,重叠义务的发生增多。
298A greater occurrence of good versus good.善与善的发生较多.
299And I don't know if this sort of framework allows us我不知道这种框架是否允许我们
300to choose between them.在他们之间做出选择。
301Good.不错
302And what's your name?你叫什么来着?
303Patrick.派屈克 派屈克 派屈克
304So you worry所以你担心
305that if we recognize obligations of membership or solidarity如果我们承认成员资格或团结的义务
306since we inhabit different communities, their claims might conflict既然我们住在不同的社区 他们的主张可能会有冲突
307and what would we do if we have competing obligations?如果我们有相互竞争的义务 我们该怎么办?
308Yes?是吗?
309Well, one solution is that we could view ourselves as一个解决办法是 我们可以把自己看成
310ultimately members of the human community最后是人类社会的成员
311and that then within that we have all these smaller spheres并且在那范围内,我们拥有所有这些较小的领域
312of that, you know, I am an American or I am你知道,我是美国人还是美国人
313a student at Harvard and so the哈佛大学的学生,所以
314most important community to be最重要的社区
315obligated to is the community of社区有义务
316human beings and then from there you can sort of evaluate人类,然后从那里你可以评估
317which other ones are most important to you.其他的对你最重要
318So the most所以最多一个
319and what's your name?还有你叫什么名字?
320Nicola.尼可拉 尼可拉 尼可拉
321So Nicola, you say the most所以,尼可拉,你说最多
322universal community we inhabit, the community of humankind我们居住的世界性社区,人类社区
323always takes precedence.总是优先。
324Yes.
325Patrick,派屈克,你好吗?
326are you satisfied?你满意了吗?
327No.没有
328Why not?为什么不呢?
329It seems rather arbitrary that we should choose我们选择
330the universal obligation over普遍义务
331the more specific obligation.更具体的义务。
332I might also say that I should be我也可以说,我应该
333obligated first to the most specific of my obligations, for instance,以我最具体的义务为例,
334take my family as a small unit of solidarity.把我的家人当成一个小团结单位
335Perhaps I should be first obligated to that unit也许 我该先到那个单位去
336and then perhaps to the unit of my town and then my country and then the human race.然后也许去我镇上的单位 然后去我的国家 然后去人类
337Good, thank you.很好 谢谢
338Let's, I want to hear from让我们,我想听到
339another critic of the communitarian view.另一个批评社区观点的人。
340We have the objection我们反对
341well what if goods collide?如果货物碰撞呢?
342Who objects to the whole idea of it?谁反对这个想法?
343Who sees patriotism as just a kind of prejudice that ideally we should谁把爱国主义看作是一种偏见,我们最好这样做
344overcome?战胜?
345Yes.
346Patriotism reflects a community membership.爱国主义反映出社区成员。
347That's like a given.这就像一个给定。
348I think the problem我认为问题
349is that whereas some是,虽然有些
350memberships are natural narratives,成员是自然的叙述,
351the narrative of citizenship公民身份的叙述
352is a constructed one and I think a false one.是一个构造的,我认为一个错误的。
353Because as the river is just a historical accident,因为河只是个历史意外
354it makes no sense that because the lottery of birth threw me into the因为出生的彩票把我扔进
355United States as opposed to美国与
356Mexico, that that's the membership that I should be a part of.墨西哥,这就是我应该参加的成员。
357Good, and what's your name?好,你叫什么名字来着?
358Elizabeth.伊丽莎白
359Who has a reply?谁有答复?
360Yes.
361I think in general我总觉得
362we have to ask where do our moral obligations arise from anyway?我们必须问,我们的道德义务从何而来?
363I think basically there'd be two places from which they could arise.我想基本上有两个地方可以产生它们
364One would be一个是
365kin, another one would be reciprocity.亲属,另一个将是互惠。
366The closer you are associated to other people, there's a natural reciprocity你和别人的关系越密切 自然是互惠的
367there in terms of说明
368having interactions with those people.和那些人互动
369You interact with the neighbors on your street, with the other people in your你和街上的邻居互动 和别人在你的
370country through economic arrangements.国家通过经济安排。
371I don't know, and you don't know those我不知道,你不知道这些
372people in Franklin,富兰克林的人,
373Texas any more than you know the people in Franklin, Mexico,比你们更了解墨西哥富兰克林的人
374do you?是吗?
375Presumably you're naturally more connected with the people in your own假设你自然地 与自己的人更相关
376country国家
377in terms of interaction and trade than you are with people in other countries.在互动和交易方面 比你和其它国家的人。
378Good, who else?很好,还有谁?
379Go ahead.来吧。
380Yeah, I think that是啊,我觉得
381a lot of the basis for patriotism can be compared to like school spirit许多爱国主义的基础可以和学校精神相提并论
382or even house spirit that we see here, where甚至是我们在这里看到的精神
383freshmen are sorted into houses and then within a day they have developed some新生们被整理成房屋 然后在一天之内 他们开发了一些
384sort of有点
385attachment or pride associated with that house, and so I think that we can probably和那栋房子相关联的感情或骄傲 所以我认为我们可以
386draw a distinction between a moral obligation for communitarian区分社区道德义务
387beliefs and sort of just a sentimental emotional attachment.信仰和感情上的感情
388Good, wait, stay there, what's your name?好,等等,待在那里,你叫什么名字?
389Rena.瑞纳
390What about,怎么样,
391go back to my example about the obligation of the child to the parent,回到我关于孩子对父母的义务的例子,
392would you say the same thing there?你也会这么说吗?
393It's just, it may or may not be a sentimental它只是,它可能或可能不是一个多愁善感
394tie, but it has no moral weight?领带,但它没有道德重量?
395Well, I mean,我是说...
396I'm not entirely certain that accident我不完全确定那场事故
397in the initial stages第一阶段
398is something that will preclude like moral obligations later.这一点以后将排除道德义务。
399So, you know,所以,你知道吗,
400just because we're randomly sorted into a house or just because we don't choose只是因为我们被随机排序到一个房子 或者只是因为我们不选择
401who our parents are or what country we're born into doesn't necessarily mean that we我们的父母是谁 或者我们出生的国家 并不一定意味着我们
402won't不会的
403develop an obligation based on some type of制定基于某种类型的义务
404benefit, I guess, which is sort of shaky.我猜是有点摇晃了
405So your obligation to your所以,你的义务是你的
406aged parent老年父母
407that's greater than to aged parents这比老年父母还要大
408around the world世界各地
409is only because只是因为
410and in so far as并一直到
411you're repaying a benefit你报了恩
412that your parent你的家长
413gave you when you were growing up?你长大的时候给你的?
414Yeah, I mean, I would say that if you look at cases of adoption where, you know,是啊,我的意思是,我会说,如果你 看收养的案例,你知道,
415you have a biological parent somewhere else that you don't interact with and then you你有亲生父母 在别的地方 你不互动,然后你
416have a parent, you know, who adopted you,有个收养你的父母
417most people would say that大多数人会说
418if you had to pick between them in the case of, you know,如果你不得不在他们之间挑拣 以防万一,你知道,
419aging parents that年迈的父母
420your obligation would lie more with the person你的责任更在于这个人
421who raised you and who had exchanges with you meaningfully.他把你养大,他与你进行了有意义的交流。
422May I ask you one more question about the parent?我能再问你一个关于父母的问题吗?
423Sure.当然
424Do you think that a person with a bad parent你觉得一个父母不好的人
425owes them less?欠他们多少?
426I don't know because I've never had a bad parent.我不知道,因为我从来没有一个坏父母。
427I think that's a good place to end.我想这是结束的好地方
428We'll continue with this next time.下次再继续吧
429Thank you.谢谢
430If I were working on an如果我在做一个
431economic problem set, for example,经济问题,例如,
432and I saw that my roommate was cheating,我看到我的室友在作弊,
433that might be a bad thing for him to do, but I wouldn't turn him in.这对他来说可能不好 但我不会告发他
434You would not turn him in?你不告发他?
435I wouldn't turn him in and I think that我不会告发他 我觉得
436I would argue that's the right thing to do because of my obligation to, you know.我认为这是正确的事情 因为我有义务,你知道的。
437You don't have a duty to tell the truth,你没有义务说实话
438to report someone who cheated?报告一个作弊的人?
439Today,今天,我们...
440I'd like to take,我想带
441I'd like to consider the strongest objections to the idea我想考虑一下最强烈的反对意见
442that there are obligations of solidarity or membership.团结或加入的义务。
443Then I want to see if those objections can be met那么我想看看这些反对是否能得到满足
444successfully.成功 。
445One objection emerged in the discussion last time.上次讨论中出现了一个反对意见。
446Patrick said, well,帕特里克说,好吧,
447if obligations flow from community membership and identity, we inhabit如果义务来自社区成员和身份,我们居住
448multiple communities, doesn't that mean that our obligations多个社区,不意味着我们的义务
449will sometimes有时候
450conflict?冲突?
451So that's one possible objection.因此,这是一个可能的反对意见。
452And then Rena然后丽娜
453said,说,
454these examples meant to这些例子意在
455bring out the moral force唤起道德力量
456of solidarity and membership,团结和成员资格,
457examples about实例
458parents and children,父母和子女,
459about the French resistance fighter asked to bomb his own village and drawing关于法国抵抗战士要求轰炸自己的村庄和画画
460back,回来
461about the airlift关于空运
462by Israel of Ethiopian Jews.以埃塞俄比亚犹太人为名。
463These examples, they may be intuitively evocative, Rena said,这些例子,可能是直观的, Rena说,
464but really they're pointing to但实际上他们指
465matters of emotion, matters of sentiment,情感问题 情感问题
466not true moral obligations.不是真正的道德义务。
467And then礛
468there were a number of objections有一些反对
469not necessarily to patriotism as such,不一定是爱国的,
470but to patriotism但为了爱国
471understood as理解为
472an obligation of solidarity and membership团结和成员资格的义务
473beyond consent.未经同意。
474This objection这项反对
475allowed that there can be obligations to the communities we inhabit, including允许对我们居住的社区承担义务,包括:
476obligations to patriotism,对爱国主义的义务,
477but this objection argued that但这一反对意见认为,
478all of the obligations of patriotism or of community or membership are actually爱国主义、社区或成员的所有义务实际上都是
479based on基于
480liberal ideas and perfectly compatible with them.自由主义思想,与它们完全兼容.
481Consent either implicit or explicit默示或明示同意
482or reciprocity.或对等。
483例如,在网站上的Julia Rothau
484said that liberalism can endorse patriotism说自由主义可以认可爱国主义
485as a voluntary自愿参加
486moral obligation.道德义务。
487Patriotism and familial love爱国主义和家庭爱
488both fall under this category两者都属于这一类
489because after all, Julia points out,因为毕竟,茱莉亚指出,
490the Kantian framework关甸框架
491allows people, free rein, to choose to express virtues such as these允许人们自由地选择表达这些美德
492if they want to.如果他们想的话
493So you don't need the idea所以你不需要这个想法
494of a non-voluntary particular moral obligation非自愿的特定道德义务
495to capture the moral force抓住道德力量
496of community社区
497values.数值。
498Where's Julia?茱莉亚呢?
499So, did I summarize所以,我总结
500that fairly?公平吗?
501Julia actually is in line with茱莉亚其实是符合的
502what Rawls says about this very topic.罗尔斯对这个话题的看法
503You weren't aware of that.你不知道这一点。
504You came up with it on your own.你自己想出来的
505That's pretty good.这是相当好的。
506Rawls says when he's discussing political obligation,罗尔斯说当他讨论政治义务时
507he says it's one thing if someone他说如果有人
508runs for office运行到办公室
509or enlist in the military, they're making a voluntary choice,或入伍, 他们正在自愿选择,
510but Rawls says there is, I believe, no political obligation, strictly speaking, for citizens但罗尔斯说,我认为,严格地说,公民没有政治义务
511generally一般情况
512because it's not clear what is the requisite binding action因为它不清楚什么是 必要的约束行动
513and who has performed it.是谁干的?
514So Rawls acknowledges所以罗尔斯承认
515that for ordinary citizens适用于普通公民
516there is no political obligation没有政治义务
517except除外
518insofar as关于
519some particular citizen某些特定公民
520willingly, through an act of consent,自愿通过同意行为,
521undertakes承诺
522or chooses such an obligation.或选择这种义务。
523That's in line这是排队的
524with Julia's point.有茱莉亚的观点。
525It's related to another objection这和另一个反对有关
526that people have raised,是众人所创造的,
527which is这是
528it's perfectly possible to recognize particular obligations to one's family or to one's country,完全可以承认对家庭或国家的特殊义务,
529provided提供
530honoring those obligations doesn't require you to violate any of the natural duties履行这些义务并不需要你违反任何自然义务
531or requirements of universal respect for persons, quay persons.或要求普遍尊重人、准人。
532So that's consistent with the所以,这是符合的
533to express a loyalty to our country or to our people or to our family, provided we don't do any injustice只要我们不犯任何不公
534within the framework, acknowledging the priority that is在框架范围内,承认优先事项
535of the universal联合国
536duties.职责。
537The one objection that I didn't mention is the view of those who say我唯一没提的反对意见 是那些说
538that obligations of membership really are a kind of collective selfishness,成员的义务确实是一种集体自私,
539why should we honor them?我们为什么要尊重他们?
540Isn't it just a kind of prejudice?这不是一种偏见吗?
541So, what I'd like to do, perhaps if those of you所以,我想做什么,也许你们这些
542who have agreed,他们已同意,
543who wrote and who have agreed to press these objections,谁写了,谁同意 这些反对,
544perhaps if you could gather down也许如果你可以聚集下来
545all together, we'll form a team我们一起组成一个团队
546as we did once before, and we'll就像我们以前一样,我们会
547see if you can respond to those who want to defend看看你能不能回应那些想辩护的人
548patriotism conceived as a communal obligation.爱国主义被认为是一项共同义务。
549Now,现在,
550there were a number of people当时有很多人
551who argued in谁是争论
552defense辩护
553of patriotism爱国主义
554as the communitarian作为共产主义者
555view conceives it, so let me go down now and join the critics,所以让我下楼加入批评者行列
556the critics of communitarianism, if there's共产主义的批评者,如果有的话
557a microphone that we could use somewhere.麦克风,我们可以用它
558OK, thanks Kate.好的,谢谢凯特。
559Who, as the critics of patriotism, communal patriotism,作为爱国主义、社区爱国主义的批评者,
560gather their forces here?把他们的军队召集到这里?
561Patrick, if you want to, you can join as well, or Rena,帕特里克,如果你愿意,你也可以加入, 或者蕾娜,
562others who have spoken or addressed this question are free to join in.已经发言或谈到这个问题的其他人可以自由加入。
563But I would like to hear now from those of you who defend但我现在想听听你们中那些
564patriotism爱国主义
565and defend it并捍卫它
566as作为
567a moral obligation道德义务
568that can't be这不可能
569translated back into翻译为
570purely consent-based纯粹基于同意
571terms,条件,
572can't be translated into liberal不能翻译为自由主义
573terms.条件。
574Where's A.J.哪里是A. J. 。 。
575Kumar?库马?
576A. J. , (英语).
577everybody seems to know you.大家都好像认识你
578Alright, let's hear from A.J.好吧,让我们从A. J.
579You said, in the same way I feel I owe more to my family than to the general你说过,同样地,我觉得我欠我家人 而不是将军
580community, I owe more to my country than to humanity in general,我欠我的国家比欠整个人类的还多
581because my country holds a great stake in my identity.因为我国对我的身份有重大关系
582It is not prejudice for me to love my country我热爱祖国是没有偏见的
583unless it is prejudice for me to love my parents more than somebody else's.除非我更爱父母而不是别人的偏见
584So A.J., what would you say to this group?A. J. 你会对这群人说什么?
585Stand up.站起来
586I think that there's some fundamental我认为有些基本
587moral obligation that comes from a communitarian responsibility to由社区对
588people and groups that form your identity.组成你身份的人和团体
589I mean, even,我是说,甚至,
590like I'll give the example that, you know,就像我会举个例子,你知道,
591there are a lot of things about our government right now that I'm not in现在政府有很多事情,我不在
592favor of, but part of my identity is that喜欢,但我的一部分身份是
593America values a free society where we can美国珍视自由社会,我们可以
594object to certain things, and I think that's an expression of patriotism as对某些东西持反对态度,我认为这是爱国主义的表达,
595well.不错
596And,还有,
597you know, I go back to the parent example, or even at Harvard, I think,你知道,我回到父母的例子, 甚至哈佛,我想,
598you know,你知道吗?
599I owe more to my roommates because they make up my identity than I do to the我欠我的室友更多的,因为他们 组成了我的身份比我做
600Harvard community as a whole, and I think that applies to整个哈佛社区 我认为这适用于
601our country, because there are certain things that growing up here, yes, we我们的国家,因为有 某些东西在这里长大,是的,我们
602can't choose it, we can't choose our parents,我们不能选择它,我们不能选择我们的父母,
603things like that, but it makes up part of our identity.类似的事情,但它构成了我们的一部分身份。
604Okay, who would like to take that on?好吧,谁愿意承担呢?
605Mike?迈克?
606Yeah, about the obligation to others,是啊,关于对他人的义务,
607simply by virtue of只是因为
608being in their...在他们...
609being influenced by them.受到他们的影响。
610I'm a German citizen, and if I had been born我是德国公民 如果我出生
61180 years earlier, then80年前,那时
612I would have been a citizen of Nazi Germany, and我本来是纳粹德国的公民,
613for some reason, I just don't think that I would出于某种原因,我只是不认为我会
614have to feel obligated不得不感到义务
615towards Germany德国
616because I benefited from actions of Nazis.因为我从纳粹的行动中获益
617I mean, I guess my response to that would be, you have我的意思是,我想我的反应是,你已经
618hundreds of thousands of protesters in the United States right now现在美国有数十万抗议者
619who hold up signs that say peace is patriotic,他们举出许多迹象,说和平是爱国的,
620and I'm sure there are people in this room who don't agree with that.我敢肯定,在这个房间里 有人不同意这一点。
621I personally do,我个人知道
622and I would say that they're strongly objecting to basically我想说他们强烈反对
623everything the Bush administration is doing right now,布什政府现在所做的一切
624but they still consider themselves loving their country because they're但他们仍然认为自己爱自己的国家,因为他们
625furthering the cause of what they see is best for the country, and I推进他们所见的事业,对全国来说是件好事,我
626tend to agree with that as a patriotic movement.作为爱国运动,人们倾向于同意这一点。
627Well, but how is that then?那怎么样?
628How do you still favor your country?你怎么会还喜欢国家?
629How is that still patriotic?这怎么还爱国呢?
630I mean, isn't that more a sentimental attachment?我的意思是,这不是更 感伤的恋情?
631Where's the obligation there?义务在哪里?
632Not to bring this back to John Locke, but不是为了把这个带回约翰·洛克,但
633I'd like to bring this back to John Locke.我想把这个带回约翰洛克
634So, I mean,所以,我是说,
635in his conception of他的构想
636when people join society,当人们加入社会,
637there's still some outlet.还有些出口
638If you're not satisfied with your society,如果你对自己的社会不满意
639you do have a means of exit,你确实有出路,
640but even though we had a lot of concerns about how但是,尽管我们有很多 担心如何
641you're born in and it's not very feasible,你出生于这里 并不可行
642he still provides that option.他仍然提供这个选择。
643If we want to say that your obligation to society is a moral one,如果我们想说你对社会的义务是道德义务,
644that means that prior to这意味着在
645knowing exactly what that society is going to be like,确切地知道社会会是什么样子,
646or what your position is going to be in that society,或者你在这个社会的地位是什么,
647that means that you have a binding obligation to, like,这意味着你有义务,比如,
648a completely unknown body that could be, you know,一个完全未知的尸体 可能是,你知道,
649completely foreign to all of your personal beliefs or, you know,完全陌生于你所有的个人信仰,或者,你知道,
650what you would hold to be.你会保持什么。
651Do you think that that kind of communal obligation or patriotism你认为这种集体义务或爱国主义
652means writing the community意思是写社区
653a blank moral check?空白的道德检查?
654Basically, yeah.没错
655Like, I think that we can, you know,比如,我认为我们可以,你知道,
656I think it's reasonable to say that我觉得这样说很合理
657as you grow and as you develop within that community当你在社区里成长和发展时
658that you acquire some type of obligation获得某种义务
659based on reciprocity,基于对等原则,
660but to say that you have a moral obligation, I think,但我想说你有道德义务
661requires a stronger justification.需要一个更强有力的理由。
662Well, anyone else like to address that?还有谁喜欢说这个?
663I guess we could say that you could argue that you'reи稱и弧 弧
664morally obliged to society by the fact that社会道德义务,因为
665there is this reciprocity.这是对等的。
666I think it's the idea that, you know, we participate in society,我觉得我们参与社会
667we pay our taxes, we vote.我们交税,我们投票
668This is why we could say that we owe something to society.这就是为什么我们可以说,我们欠社会的东西。
669But beyond that, I don't think there's anything inherent但除此之外,我不认为有什么内在的
670in the fact that we are members of the society itself因为我们是社会本身的成员
671that we owe it anything.我们欠它什么。
672I think insofar as the society gives us something,我认为,从社会给我们的东西,
673gives us protection, safety, security,给我们保护 安全 保障
674then we owe the society something,然后我们欠社会一些东西,
675but nothing beyond what we give the society.但是除了我们给社会的东西外,别无他法。
676Who wants to take that on?谁想穿这个?
677Rahul?拉胡尔?
678I don't think we我不认为我们
679give the community a blank moral check给社区一个空白的道德检查
680in that sense.从这个意义上说
681I think we only give it a blank moral check我想我们只给它一个空洞的道德检查
682when we advocate our sense当我们倡导我们的感觉
683of civic responsibility公民责任
684and when we say that the debate doesn't matter当我们说辩论不重要时
685because patriotism is a vice.因为爱国主义是一种恶习。
686I think that patriotism is important我认为爱国主义很重要
687because it gives us a sense of community,因为它给我们一种社区感,
688a sense of common civic virtue一种共同的公民美德感
689that we can engage in the issues.我们能参与解决问题。
690Even if you don't agree就算你不同意也一样
691with the way the government is acting,政府的行为方式
692you can still你还是可以的
693love your country and hate the way it's acting.爱你的国家,恨它的行为方式。
694And I think because out of that love我想是因为爱情
695of country,国家
696you can debate with other people你可以和其他人辩论
697and have respect for their views,并尊重他们的意见,
698but still engage in the debate.但仍参与辩论。
699If you just say that如果你只是说
700patriotism is a vice,爱国是恶行
701you drop out of that debate你退出辩论
702and you cede the ground to people你让土地给别人
703who are more fundamentalist, who have a他们更原教旨主义, 他们有一个
704stronger view and who may coerce更强的观点和谁可能强迫
705the community.社区。
706Instead, we should engage the other members相反,我们应该让其他成员参与
707of the community on that same社区在同样的情况下
708moral ground.道德基础。
709What we hear from Ajay and Rahul阿杰和拉胡尔的消息
710is a very pluralistic,是一个非常多元化,
711argumentative,争论,
712critically minded patriotism.充满爱国心
713Whereas what we hear from而我们听到的
714Ike and the critics艾克和批评者
715of patriotism here is the worry爱国主义在这里是担心的
716that to take这要拿
717patriotic obligation in a爱国义务
718communal way, seriously,社区的方式, 说真的,
719involves a kind of涉及一种
720loyalty that doesn't忠诚,不
721let us just pick and choose让我们选择
722among the beliefs or actions信仰或行动
723or practices of our country.或我国的做法。
724What more,还有呢
725what's left of loyalty剩下的忠诚
726if all we're talking about,如果我们在谈论的一切,
727Ajay and Rahul, if all we're talking阿杰和拉胡尔,如果我们在谈论
728about is loyalty关于忠诚
729to principles of justice that may happen实现可能发生的正义原则
730to be embodied待编
731in our community or not,无论是否在我们社区,
732as the case may be, and if not, then we can如果不是的话,我们可以
733reject its course.拒绝它的路线。
734I don't know, I've sort of given我不知道,我有点给
735a reply, I got carried away, I'm sorry.回答一下,我心烦意乱,对不起
736Go ahead, Julia.继续,茱莉亚。
737Yeah, I think that是啊,我觉得
738patriotism, you need to define what爱国,你需要定义什么
739that is.这是。
740It sounds like, you know, you would normally这听起来像,你知道, 你通常会
741think that we are given a more weak definition认为我们的定义更弱
742here, patriotism amongst us, but it almost sounds在这里,我们的爱国主义, 但几乎听起来
743like your definition is merely to have就像你的定义 只是拥有
744some sort of civic involvement in debating某种公民参与辩论
745within your society, and I think that that在你的社会中,我认为
746kind of undermines maybe some of the moral worth那种破坏一些道德价值
747of patriotism as a virtue as well.爱国也是一种美德
748I think if you can consent to a stronger我想如果你同意一个强者
749form of patriotism if you want, that's爱国主义的形式,如果你想,这就是
750a stronger, I guess, more obligation than我想比起
751even what you're suggesting.即使是你建议的那样
752What we really need我们真正需要的
753to sharpen the issue is an使问题更加突出
754example from the defenders人权维护者的例子
755of communitarianism社区主义
756of a case where案件,如果
757loyalty can actually忠诚其实可以
758compete with and竞争和
759possibly outweigh可能超过
760universal principles of justice.普遍正义原则。
761Isn't that what,这不是什么,
762that's the test they really need那是他们真正需要的测试
763to meet, isn't it?见面,不是吗?
764Alright, so that's the test you need好吧,这就是你需要的测试
765to meet, or any会见,或任何
766among you who would like to defend你们中谁想辩护,
767obligations of membership成员义务
768or solidarity independent或独立团结
769of ones that happen发生的事情
770to embody一、导 言
771just principles.只是原则。
772Who has an example谁有榜样
773of a kind of loyalty一种忠诚
774that can and should能够而且应该
775compete with
776universal moral claims, respect普遍道德要求、尊重
777for persons?为人?
778Go ahead.来吧。
779Yeah, if I were working是啊,如果我在工作的话
780on a problem set, for example,例如,关于一个问题集,
781and I saw that my roommate was我看见我的室友
782cheating, that might be作弊,这也许是
783a bad thing for him to do,对他来说是个坏事
784but I wouldn't turn him in.但我不会告发他
785You would not你不会
786turn him in.告发他
787I wouldn't turn him in, and I think that我不会告发他,我想
788I would argue that's the right thing to do我会说这是正确的事情
789because of my obligation to him, you know.因为我对他的义务,你知道的。
790It may be wrong, but that's what I would可能是错的,但这就是我要的
791do, and I think that's what most people would do做,我想这是大多数人会做的
792as well.临Τ
793Alright, that's, now there's a好吧,这是,现在有一个
794fair test.公平测试。
795He's not他没有
796slipping out by saying he's invoking溜出去说,他在援引
797in the name of community some universal以社区的名义 一些普遍
798principles of justice.司法原则。
799What's your name?你叫什么来着?
800Stay there.别动
801What's your name?你叫什么来着?
802It's Dan.谓丹曰.
803Dan.丹语.
804So,这么说
805what do people think about Dan's case?人们怎么看待丹的案子?
806That's a harder case for这更难办
807the ethic of loyalty, isn't it?忠诚的道德,不是吗?
808But a truer test?但更真实的测试?
809How many agree with Dan?有多少人同意丹的意见?
810So, loyalty,所以,忠诚,
811Dan, loyalty has its丹,忠心有义
812part, if that's it.部分,如果这是它。
813How many disagree with Dan?有多少人和丹意见不一?
814Peggy.佩吉,你好吗?
815Well, I agree with Dan,我同意丹的话
816but I agree that it's a choice that we但我同意这是我们的选择
817make, but it's not necessarily right做,但不一定对
818or wrong.或错。
819I mean, I'm agreeing that I'm going to我的意思是,我同意 我会
820make the wrong choice because I'm going to做错选择,因为我要
821choose my roommate, but I also recognize选择我的室友 但我也认得
822that choice isn't morally right.这种选择在道德上是不正确的。
823So, you're still translating你还在翻译
824even Dan's loyalty, you're saying, well,即使是丹的忠诚,你说,嗯,
825that's a matter of choice.那是个选择
826But, what's the但是,这是什么
827right thing to do?这样做对吗?
828Most people put up their hands saying大多数人举起手说
829Dan would be right to stand丹应该能站起来
830by his roommate and not被他的室友而不是他们
831turn him in.告发他
832Go ahead.来吧。
833Also, I think as a而且,我认为作为一个
834roommate you have insider information室友,你有内幕信息
835and that might not可能不会
836be something you want to use.成为你想使用的东西。
837That might be这可能是
838something unfair to hold不公平的东西
839against.反对。
840You know, you're spending that much你知道,你花这么多钱
841time with a roommate.时间与室友。
842Obviously, you're going to显然,你会
843learn things about him and了解他的东西
844I don't think it's fair to reveal that我觉得不公道
845to a greater community.给一个更大的社区。
846But, it's loyalty, Vojtek.但是,这是忠诚,沃伊特克。
847You agree with Dan that loyalty你同意丹的忠诚
848is the ethic at stake here.这关系到道德
849Absolutely.当然
850You don't have a duty你没有责任
851to tell the truth, to report someone说出真相,报告某人
852who cheated?谁出轨了?
853Not if you're如果你是的话
854advantaged into getting that kind喜欢得到这种东西
855of information.信息通报。
856Before在此之前
857our critics of我们的批评者
858patriotism leave,爱国主义的离开,
859I want to give you another version,我想给你另一个版本,
860a more public example一个更公开的例子
861of what we, I guess we我想我们...
862should call it Dan's dilemma.应该称之为丹的困境。
863Dan's dilemma of loyalty.丹的忠诚困境.
864And I want to get the reaction of people我想得到人们的反应
865to this.这个
866This came up来了
867a few years ago in Massachusetts.几年前在马萨诸塞州
868Does anyone know who this有人知道这是谁吗?
869man is?是吗?
870Billy比尔
871Bulger.博尔格
872That's right.没错
873Who is
874Billy Bulger?比利・布格?
875He was president of the他是总统
876Massachusetts State Senate for many years.马萨诸塞州参议院多年.
877One of the most powerful politicians in是最强大的政治家之一
878Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州。
879And then he became然后他变成了
880president of the University of Massachusetts.马萨诸塞大学校长.
881Now,现在,
882Billy Bulger 你听说了吗?
883him that bears on Dan's dilemma?他承受着丹的困境?
884Billy Bulger比利・布格
885has a brother有个哥哥
886named Whitey Bulger.名为怀特·布格。
887And this is Whitey Bulger.这是怀特·布格
888His brother Whitey他的弟弟怀特尼,他现在已经...
889is on the FBI's是联邦调查局的
890most wanted list.大部分通缉名单。
891Alleged to be据称
892a notorious gang臭名昭著的黑帮
893leader in Boston.在波士顿的领导。
894Responsible for many负责很多
895murders and now a谋杀,现在
896fugitive from justice.越狱
897But when但何时
898the US attorney美国律师
899they called他们叫
900Billy Bulger比利・布格
901then the president of the University of然后是大学校长
902Massachusetts before the grand马萨诸塞州在盛大之前
903jury and wanted information陪审团和通缉犯
904on the whereabouts of his brother.关于他弟弟的下落
905This fugitive.这个逃犯。
906And he refused他拒绝了
907to give it.给它。
908US attorney said,美国律师说,
909just to be clear, Mr.说清楚点,先生
910Bulger, you feel more loyalty to your brother博格,你对你哥哥更忠诚
911than to the people of the commonwealth比联邦的人民还重要
912of Massachusetts?马萨诸塞州?
913And here's what Billy Bulger said,这是比利·布格说的
914I never thought of it that way.我从来没这么想过
915But I do have a loyalty to my brother.但我对我哥哥有忠诚
916I care about him.我关心他
917I hope that I'm never helpful to anyone我希望我永远不会帮助任何人
918against him.对他不利。
919I don't have an我没有
920obligation to help anyone帮助任何人的义务
921catch my brother.抓住我弟弟 抓住我弟弟 抓住我弟弟
922Dan, you would agree?丹,你同意吗?
923How many would agree with有多少人会同意
924the position of Billy比利的立场
925Bulger?布格吗?
926Let me give one other example让我举个例子
927and then we'll let the critics reply,然后我们让批评者回答,
928the critics of loyalty忠诚的批评者
929as we'll describe it.正如我们将描述它。
930Here's an even more fateful这更是命中注定
931example from a figure图表示例
932in American history.在美国历史上。
933Robert E. Lee.罗伯特·E·李.
934Now, Robert现在,罗伯特
935E. Lee on the eve of the Civil WarE. 李在内战前夕
936was an officer of the Union Army.曾是联合军军官.
937He opposed secession,他反对分离,
938in fact regarded it as treason.事实上,这是叛国罪。
939When war loomed,当战争来临时,
940Lincoln offered Lee林肯给了李
941to be the commanding general of the Union成为联盟的将军
942Army.陆军
943And Lee refused.而李拒绝.
944And he described in a letter to his他在他的一封信中描述了
945sons why he refused.儿子们为什么拒绝
946With all my devotion to the Union以我对联盟的忠诚
947he wrote, I have not been able to make up他写道,我无法弥补
948my mind to raise我养大了
949my hand against my relatives,我的手对着我的亲戚们,
950my children, my home.我的孩子们 我的家
951By which he meant Virginia.他指的是弗吉尼亚
952The Union is dissolved.联盟解散.
953I shall return to my native state我会回到祖国
954and share the miseries of my people,并分舍我的宗族的忧患,
955save in her defense.在她的辩护。
956I will draw my sword我会拔剑
957no more.没有了。
958Now here's a real test,现在有一个真正的测试,
959Dan, for your principle of loyalty.丹,为了你的忠诚原则
960Because因为
961here is the cause这是原因
962of the war against战争结束后
963not only to save the Union but against不仅拯救联盟,而且反对
964slavery.奴隶制。
965And Lee is going to fight for Virginia李会为弗吉尼亚而战
966even though he doesn't share虽然他不分享
967the desire of the人类的愿望
968southern states to secede.南方诸州分封.
969Now the communitarian would say现在共产主义者会说
970there is something admirable有些东西值得钦佩
971in that.在那个。
972Whether or not the decision was ultimately right,无论最终决定是否正确,
973there's something admirable.有件令人钦佩的事
974And the communitarian would say we can't even make sense.共产主义者会说我们根本讲不通
975You know, we can't make你知道,我们不能做
976sense of Lee's李的感觉
977dilemma as a moral dilemma作为道德困境的两难处境
978unless we acknowledge除非我们承认
979that the claim of loyalty忠诚的主张
980arising from his sense of narrative他的叙述感
981of who he is他是谁?
982is a moral, not just是道德的,不仅仅是
983sentimental, emotional情感和情感 情感 情感
984tug.拖车。
985Who would like to respond?谁愿意回应?
986To Dan's loyalty,对丹的忠诚
987to Billy Bulger's loyalty,为了比利·布格的忠诚
988or to Robert E. Lee's loyalty to Virginia?还是为了罗伯特·E·李对弗吉尼亚的忠诚?
989What do you say, Julia?你觉得呢,朱莉娅?
990Okay, well, I think that these are some好吧,我想这是一些
991classic examples of, you know,经典的例子,你知道,
992multiple spheres of influence in that you have你拥有的多重势力范围
993conflicting communities that your family你们家族的矛盾社区
994and your country.还有你的国家
995I think that's one reason why我想这就是为什么
996the idea of choice in your obligation义务中的选择思想
997is so important because how如此重要,因为
998else can you resolve this?否则你能解决吗?
999You have,你有过
1000if you're morally obligated and there's no way如果你有道德义务,没有办法
1001out of this need for loyalty为了忠诚
1002to both communities, you're对两个社区,你
1003trapped.被困着
1004There's nothing you can do.无所施设.
1005You have to你必须
1006make a choice.做出一个选择。
1007And还有
1008I think that being able to choose based on我认为能够根据
1009other characteristics and merely其他特征和仅仅
1010the arbitrary fact that you're a member of this community专横的事实 你是一个社区的成员
1011is important.这一点很重要。
1012Otherwise, it's left, I guess,否则,它就剩了,我想
1013randomness.随机性。
1014Well,那个
1015Julia, the issue isn't whether these,茱莉亚,问题不是这些...
1016whether Dan makes a choice丹是否做出选择
1017or Billy Bulger or Robert E. Lee.或比利·布格或罗伯特·E·李.
1018Of course, they make a choice.当然,他们做出了选择。
1019The question is问题是
1020on what grounds, on what基于什么理由,基于什么
1021principle should they choose?他们应该选择原则吗?
1022The communitarian doesn't deny that there's共产主义者并不否认
1023a choice to be made.做个选择
1024The question is问题是
1025which choice on what哪个选择是什么
1026grounds and should loyalty理由和忠诚
1027as such weigh?这么重?
1028Andre, now you want to,安德烈,现在你想,
1029all right, go ahead.好吧,继续。
1030What do you你怎么样
1031say?说什么?
1032Well, one of the things嗯,其中一个东西
1033we've noticed in the three examples is我们从三个例子中注意到
1034that the people have all chosen the人民都选择了
1035most immediate community of which they're他们最直接的社区
1036a part, the more local one.一个部分,越本地的。
1037And I think there's something to be said for that.我觉得有话要说
1038It's not just random.非唯随机.
1039I mean, there doesn't seem to be a conflict我的意思是,似乎没有冲突
1040because they know which one is more important.因为他们知道哪个更重要
1041And it's their family over他们的家人结束了
1042the Ecten class,埃克滕阶级,
1043their state, over their country,他们的国家,
1044and their family over the Commonwealth和他们的家庭 超越英联邦
1045of Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州
1046┮и
1047think that's the answer to which这才是答案
1048is more important.更重要的是,
1049You think that the local,你觉得本地人
1050the more particular is更特别的是
1051always the weightier morally,总是在道德上更重,
1052Andre?安德鲁?
1053Well, I mean, there seems to be嗯,我的意思是,似乎有
1054a trend in the three cases.这三种情况的趋势。
1055I一、导 言
1056would agree with that, I think.我认为,他同意这一点。
1057And I think most我觉得大部分
1058of us would agree that your family我们同意你的家人
1059takes precedence over优先于
1060the United States, perhaps.也许是美国
1061Which is why you go with Dan.这就是为什么你和丹去。
1062Dan, loyalty丹,忠诚
1063to the roommate over给室友的
1064Ecten and the truth.爱克腾与真言.
1065Yeah, exactly.没错
1066I would, because, I mean,我会,因为,我的意思是,
1067I mean truth-telling, not the truth我是说说真话,不是说真话
1068of Ecten.页:1
1069Yes.
1070All right.好吧,我们走。
1071So, we understand.所以,我们理解。
1072Yes.
1073But on the same example in terms但在同一方面
1074of family, you had cases in the Civil War家庭,你有案件 在内战
1075where brother was pitted against brother on both在那里,弟弟和弟弟都相遇过
1076sides of the war where they chose country战争的一方 他们选择国家
1077instead of family.而不是家人的爱
1078┮и
1079think the exact same war shows that同样的战争表明
1080different people have different means of making不同的人有不同的制作方法
1081these choices and that there is no one这些选择, 没有人
1082set of values or one set of morality一套价值观或一套道德
1083that communitarians can stick to.共产主义者可以坚持。
1084And personally, I think that's the biggest problem with我个人认为这是最大的问题
1085communitarians, that we don't have one共产主义者,我们没有
1086set of standard moral obligations.一套标准道德义务。
1087And tell me your name.告诉我你的名字。
1088Samantha.萨曼莎
1089So, Samantha,所以,萨曼莎,
1090you agree你同意吗?
1091with Patrick, Patrick's point the other和帕特里克,帕特里克的指点 另一个
1092day, that there may be,在那日,或许有,
1093if we allow obligations to be如果我们允许义务
1094defined by community由社区定义
1095identification or membership,身份或成员资格,
1096they may conflict,他们可能会发生冲突,
1097they may overlap,它们可能会重叠,
1098they may compete, and there is他们可以竞争,有
1099no clear principle.没有明确的原则。
1100Andre says there is a clear principle,安德烈说有一个明确的原则,
1101the most particular.最特别的
1102The other day, Nicola, who is sitting前几天,尼可拉,他坐着
1103over here, where is Nicola, said,在这里, 在哪里尼古拉说,
1104the most universal.最普遍的。
1105You're saying, Samantha,你是说,萨曼莎,
1106the scale of the community as社区的规模
1107such can't be the decisive不可能是决定性的
1108moral factor.道德因素。
1109So, there所以,这里
1110has to be some other moral一定有别的道德
1111judgment.判决。
1112Alright, let's first, let's let our好吧,让我们先,让我们
1113critics of communal patriotism,批评社区爱国主义,
1114let's express our让我们表达我们
1115appreciation and thank them for感谢并感谢他们
1116their having stood up and他们站起来,
1117responded to these arguments对这些论点的答复
1118to find the issue.找到问题。
1119Let's turn我们转身
1120to the implications for justice对司法的影响
1121of the positions that we've我们的立场
1122heard discussed here.听到这里的讨论。
1123One of the worries一个担心
1124underlying基础
1125these multiple objections这些多重反对
1126to the idea想法
1127of loyalty or membership忠诚或成员资格
1128as having independent moral weight具有独立道德价值
1129is that it seems to argue是它似乎争论
1130that there is no way没有办法
1131of finding principles of justice找到公正原则
1132that are detached脱落的
1133from conceptions从怀孕开始
1134of the good life过着美好的生活
1135as they may be lived他们可以活着
1136in any particular在任何特定情况下
1137community.社区。
1138Suppose the communitarian argument假设社区论点
1139is right.没错
1140Suppose the priority假设优先
1141of the right over the good can't右边的好,不能
1142be sustained.持续。
1143Suppose instead假设
1144that justice and rights司法与权利
1145unavoidably are难免是
1146bound up with
1147conceptions of the good.善的概念。
1148Does that mean这是否意味着
1149that justice正义
1150is simply很简单
1151a creature of convention公约的产物
1152of the values that happen数值
1153to prevail in any given在任何特定情况下
1154community at any given time?在任何特定时间?
1155One of the一个
1156writings we have我们的著作
1157among the communitarian critics在社区批评者中
1158is by Michael Walzer.是迈克尔·瓦尔泽
1159He draws the implications他画的意味
1160of justice this way.以这种方式伸张正义。
1161Justice is relative to司法相对于
1162social meanings.社会意义。
1163A given给定
1164society is just社会只是
1165if its substantive life如果它的实质性生活
1166is lived in a certain way,以某种方式居住,
1167in a way that is faithful以忠诚的方式
1168to the shared understandings共同谅解
1169of the members.成员名单。
1170So Walzer's account所以瓦尔泽的账户
1171seems to bear out似乎证明
1172the worry that担心
1173if we can't find independent如果我们找不到独立
1174principles of justice, independent司法、司法、独立和
1175that is from conceptions of the good那是从善良的观念出发的,
1176that prevail in any given community,在任何特定社区都占上风,
1177that we're我们是
1178simply left with justice being正义在眼前
1179a matter of fidelity or忠诚问题或
1180faithfulness to the shared忠诚于共同
1181understandings or values理解或价值
1182or conventions that prevail in any given或任何特定公约中
1183society at any given time.社会在任何特定时间。
1184But is that an adequate但是,这是一个适当的
1185way of thinking思维方式
1186about justice?关于正义?
1187Well, let's take好吧,我们走
1188a look at a short一看一个短
1189clip from the剪辑从
1190(原始内容存档于2018-09-21). Documental Eyes on the Prize.
1191It goes back in the 1950s1950年代开始
1192in the South.南边
1193Here are some这里有些
1194situated地点
1195American Southerners美国南方人
1196who believe in the tradition他们信仰传统,
1197in the shared understandings共同谅解
1198of segregation.隔离。
1199Listen to the arguments听这些论点
1200they make about loyalty他们的忠诚
1201and tradition and see以及传统和视觉
1202if they don't make如果他们不做
1203you uneasy烦死了
1204about tying arguments关于绑定参数
1205about justice to the shared关于公道与公道
1206understandings or traditions理解或传统
1207that prevail in any given在任何特定情况下
1208society at the moment.现在的社会。
1209Let's run the让我们运行
1210clip.图标。
1211Now that we mistreated them现在我们虐待他们
1212and that we must change,我们必须改变,
1213and these changes are coming faster这些变化会更快
1214than I expected,比我预期的,
1215and I'm required to而我必须
1216make decisions作出决定
1217on a basis of
1218a new way一条新路
1219of thinking, and it's difficult.思考,这是困难的。
1220It's difficult for me, it's difficult对我来说很困难,很困难
1221for all Southerners.给所有南方人
1222Well, there you have it.好吧,你在这里。
1223Narrative叙述
1224selves, situated selves,自己,定位自己,
1225invoking tradition.引用传统。
1226Doesn't that show us这不表明我们
1227that justice can't正义无法伸张
1228be tied to the shared understandings与共识挂钩
1229of goods that prevail in any货物在任何
1230given community at any given time?在任何特定时间给予社区?
1231Or is there a way of或者有办法
1232rescuing that claim挽救索赔
1233from this example?从这个例子?
1234Think about that question and we'll想想这个问题,我们会
1235return to it next time.下次再来吧
1236A lot more.还有很多
1237访问法官Harvard.org.
1238It's the right thing to do.谓之正法.
1239Funding for this program is provided为该方案提供资金
1240by
1241additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
1242. . ....
该视频共有字幕 1245 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格

P13 · 【哈佛大学】最受B站学生欢迎的课程:公正 # 这堂课对我的价值观和人生观产生了深远影响 p13 12. 12.同性婚姻的争论 (P13)

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:09We ended last time talking about the narrative conception of the self.我们上次讨论自我的叙事概念时结束了。
0:14We were testing我们在测试
0:16the narrative conception of the self and the idea of obligations of solidarity or membership自我的叙述概念和团结或成员资格义务的概念
0:25that did not flow没有流动
0:27from consent拒绝同意
0:29that claimed us for reasons要求我们的原因
0:31unrelated to a contract or an agreement与合同或协议无关
0:35or a choice we may have made.或者我们做了一个选择
0:37And we were debating among ourselves whether there are any obligations of this kind我们自己也在争论 是否有这种义务
0:44or whether all apparent obligations of solidarity and membership can be translated或是否能够将所有明显的团结和成员义务化;
展开字幕全文(1114 条)
序号英文中文
1We ended last time talking about the narrative conception of the self.我们上次讨论自我的叙事概念时结束了。
2We were testing我们在测试
3the narrative conception of the self and the idea of obligations of solidarity or membership自我的叙述概念和团结或成员资格义务的概念
4that did not flow没有流动
5from consent拒绝同意
6that claimed us for reasons要求我们的原因
7unrelated to a contract or an agreement与合同或协议无关
8or a choice we may have made.或者我们做了一个选择
9And we were debating among ourselves whether there are any obligations of this kind我们自己也在争论 是否有这种义务
10or whether all apparent obligations of solidarity and membership can be translated或是否能够将所有明显的团结和成员义务化;
11into输入
12consent同意书
13or reciprocity or universal duty that we owe persons quay persons.或对等或普遍义务,我们欠人
14And then there were those who defended the idea of loyalty and of patriotism.后来有人为忠诚和爱国主义的思想辩护.
15So the idea of loyalty所以,忠诚的想法
16and of solidarity and of membership团结和成员资格
17gathered a certain kind of收集了某种类型的
18intuitive moral force in our discussion我们讨论中的直觉道德力量
19and then as we concluded然后当我们得出结论
20we considered what seems to be a pretty powerful counter example to that idea.我们认为这似乎是一个相当强大的反面例子。
21Namely也就是说
22the film of those southern segregationists这些南方隔离主义者的电影
23in the nineteen fifties十九个五十年代
24and they talked all about他们谈论了很多
25their traditions他们的传统
26their history, the way in which their identities were bound up with their他们的历史,他们的身份与他们的
27life history, do you remember that?人生史,你还记得吗?
28And what flowed from that history, from that narrative sense of identity for those southern从历史中产生的东西, 从那些南方人的描述性认同感
29segregationists?隔离主义者?
30They said we have to defend our way of life.他们说我们必须捍卫我们的生活方式。
31Is this a fatal or a decisive objection to the idea这是致命还是决定性的反对
32of the narrative conception of the self?自我的叙事概念?
33That's the question这就是问题所在
34we were left with.我们被抛弃了
35What I would like to do today今天我想做什么就做什么吗?
36is to advance an argument是要推进一个论证
37and see what you make of it.且见其造化.
38And let me tell you让我告诉你
39what that argument is.这争论是什么。
40I would like to defend我想辩护
41the narrative conception叙事概念
42of the person该人
43as against the voluntary conception.与自愿概念相对应。
44I would likeи稱
45to defend辩护
46the idea that there are obligations of solidarity or membership.认为有团结或成员资格的义务。
47Then礛
48I want to suggest我想建议
49that there being such obligations有这种义务
50lends force to the idea让这个想法生效
51when we turn to justice当我们走向正义
52that arguments about justice关于正义的争论
53can't be detached, cannot be detached after all不能脱离, 毕竟不能脱离
54from questions of the good.从好的问题。
55But I wanted to distinguish two different ways但我想区分两种不同的方式
56in which justice might be tied to the good正义可能与正义联系在一起
57and argue for one of them.并为其中一人辩护。
58Now the现在
59voluntary conception of the person of Kant and Rawls we saw was powerful and liberating.我们所看到的康德和罗尔斯人的自愿概念是强大和解放的。
60A further appeal is its universal aspiration.另一个呼吁是它的普遍愿望。
61The idea of treating persons as persons将人视为人的想法
62without prejudice,不带偏见,
63without discrimination.不歧视。
64And I think that's what我想这就是
65led some among us to argue导致我们当中有人争吵
66that okay maybe there are obligations of membership but they are always subordinate, they must也许有成员义务 但他们总是从属,他们必须
67always be subordinate总是从属
68to the duties that we have to human beings as such, the universal duties.我们对人类的责任,即普遍的义务。
69But is that right?是吗?
70If our encompassing loyalties should always take precedence如果我们的忠诚永远优先
71over more particular ones更特别的
72then the distinction between然后,区分
73friends and strangers朋友和陌生人们
74should ideally be overcome.最好能够克服
75Our special concern for the welfare of friends would be a kind of prejudice,我们特别关注朋友的福利 是一种偏见,
76a measure of our distance from universal衡量我们与世界的距离
77human concern.人类的关心。
78But if you look closely但是如果你仔细看
79at that idea,在那个想法,
80what kind of a moral什么样的道德
81universe, what kind of moral imagination宇宙,什么样的道德想象
82would that lead you to?这能让你找到吗?
83The Enlightenment philosopher Montesquieu启蒙主义哲学家蒙特斯基乌
84gives perhaps the most powerful and I think ultimately the most honest account说不定最有力量的人 最终也是最诚实的人
85of where this这里
86relentless无情
87universalizing普及
88tendency趋势
89leads the moral imagination.领导着道德的想象力。
90Here's how Montesquieu put it, he said, a truly virtuous man这就是Montesquieu说的,他说, 一个真正的正直的人。
91{\fnSIMHEI\fs22\1cHFFFFFF\3cHFF8000}帮助最遥远的陌生人 {\fnSIMHEI\fs22\1cHFFFFFF\3cHFF8000}以及他自己的朋友
92And then he adds,然后他又说,
93listen to this,听着
94if men were perfectly virtuous如果男人是纯洁的,
95they wouldn't have friends.他们不会有朋友。
96But it's difficult to imagine a world但很难想象世界
97in which persons were so virtuous that they had no friends, only a universal在其中,人是如此的善良, 他们没有朋友,
98disposition to friendliness.准备为方便。
99The problem isn't问题不是
100simply简单
101that such a world would be difficult to bring about,这样一个世界将难以实现,
102that it's unrealistic.这是不现实的。
103The deeper problem更深层的问题
104is that这是
105such a world would be difficult to recognize这样的世界是很难承认的
106as a human world.作为一个人类的世界。
107The love of humanity is a noble sentiment人类的爱是一种高尚的情感
108but most of the time但大多数时候
109we live our lives by smaller solidarities.我们靠较小的团结生活
110This may reflect certain limits to the bounds of moral sympathy这可能反映了道德同情限度的某些限制
111but more important但更重要的是,我们...
112it reflects the fact它反映了事实
113that we learn to love humanity, not in general,我们学会爱人,而不是一般的,
114but through its particular但通过它的特殊性
115expressions.表达法。
116So这么说
117these are some considerations.这些都是一些考虑。
118They're not knockdown arguments他们不是倒数辩论
119but moral philosophy但道德哲学
120can't offer knockdown arguments but considerations无法提供倒计时的论据 但考虑
121of the kinds that we've been我们曾经是什么样的人
122discussing and arguing about讨论和争论
123all along.一直这样
124Well suppose假设
125that's right.没错
126One way of assessing whether this picture of the person and of obligation is right is to see评估个人和义务的这一状况是否正确的一个方法是:
127what are its consequences for justice.它对正义的后果是什么?
128And here's where it confronts a serious problem and here we go back to our southern segregationists.我们回到南方的隔离主义者。
129They felt the weight of history.他们感受到了历史的重量。
130Do we admire their character?我们佩服他们的性格吗?
131These segregationists who wanted to preserve their way of life这些隔离主义者想保持他们的生活方式
132are we committed to saying我们承诺要说
133if we accept the idea of solidarity membership are we committed to saying如果我们接受团结会会籍的想法 我们承诺说
134that justice is tied to the good in the sense that justice means正义与正义联系在一起
135whatever a particular community or tradition says it means无论特定社区或传统怎么说
136including those southern segregationists.包括那些南方隔离主义者。
137Here it's important to distinguish two different ways要分辨两种不同的方式
138in which justice can be tied to the good.正义可以和好人联系在一起
139One is a relativist way.一是相对论法.
140That's the way that says就是这样
141to think about rights, to think about justice,思考权利,思考正义,
142look to the values that happen to prevail in any given community at any given time.关注任何特定社区在任何特定时间偶然流行的价值观。
143Don't judge them别评判他们
144by some outside standard根据某些外部标准
145but instead conceive justice as a matter of being faithful to the shared understandings却把正义视为忠实于共识
146of a particular tradition.某种传统
147But there's a problem with this way of tying justice to the good.但这种将正义与善联系起来的方式有问题.
148The problem问题
149is that it makes justice wholly conventional.就是它使正义完全具有常规性。
150A product of circumstance情况的结果
151and this deprives justice of its这剥夺了正义
152critical character.关键人物。
153But there is a second way但还有另一种办法
154in which justice司法权
155can be tied with or bound up with the good.可以和好人捆绑或捆绑在一起
156On this second non-relativist way of linking justice with conceptions of the good,在将正义与善良概念联系起来的第二种非相对主义方式上,
157principles of justice depend for their justification司法原则取决于其理由
158not on the values that happen to prevail at any given moment不是任何特定时刻出现的价值观
159in a certain place在某个地方
160but instead on the moral worth or the intrinsic good of the ends而不是道德价值或者目的的内在好处
161rights serve.权利服务。
162On this non-relativist view the case for recognizing a right depends on showing根据这种非相对主义观点,承认某项权利的理由取决于是否表明
163that it honors or advances some important human good.它尊重或促进一些重要的人类利益。
164The second way第二条路
165of tying justice to the good is not, strictly speaking, communitarian.严格地说,将正义与正义联系在一起并不是社区性的。
166If by communitarian you mean如果说是共产主义者的话
167just giving over to a particular community只是给一个特定的社区
168the definition of justice.正义的定义。
169Now what I would like to suggest that of these two different ways of linking现在我要建议的是 这两种不同的联系方式
170justice to the good,正义为善,
171the first is insufficient.第一条是不够的。
172Because the first leaves justice the creature of convention.因为第一件事是正义是公约的产物
173It doesn't give us enough不够
174moral resources to respond to those southern segregationists who invoke利用道德资源来对付那些援引法律的南方隔离主义者
175their way of life, their traditions,他们的生活方式, 他们的传统,
176their way of doing things.他们做事的方式
177But if justice is bound up with the good in a non-relativist way there's a big但是如果正义以非相对主义的方式 与善相联 就会有大
178challenge,挑战,
179a big question to answer.一个大问题要回答。
180How can we reason about the good?我们怎么解释好?
181What about the fact that people hold different那么,人们持有不同的事实
182conceptions of the good, different ideas about the purposes of key social关于关键社会目的的美好、不同想法的概念
183institutions,机构,
184different ideas不同的想法
185about what social goods and human goods are worthy of honor and recognition.关于哪些社会公益物和人类公益物值得荣誉和表彰。
186We live in a pluralist society, people disagree about the good, that's one of我们生活在一个多元化的社会里 人们对善有不同的看法
187the incentive to try to find principles of justice寻求公正原则的动力
188and rights that don't depend和不依赖的权利
189on any particular ends or purposes or goods.用于任何特定目的或目的或货物。
190So is there a way to reason about the good?那么,有办法解释好事吗?
191Before addressing that question在处理这个问题之前
192I want to address a slightly easier question.我想谈一个稍微简单的问题。
193Is it necessary, is it unavoidable有必要吗,是不可避免的
194when arguing about justice当争论正义时
195to argue about the good?争辩好?
196And my answer to that question我对这个问题的回答
197is yes.没错
198It's unavoidable.这是不可避免的。
199It's necessary.这是必要的。
200So for the remainder of today I want to take up,所以今天剩下的时间 我想谈谈
201I want to try to我想尝试
202advance that claim预付款项
203that reasoning about the good, about purposes and ends is an unavoidable关于善、宗旨和目的的推理是不可避免的
204feature of arguing about justice.关于正义的争论。
205It's necessary.这是必要的。
206Let me see if I can establish that.我看看能不能证明这一点。
207And for that I'd like我很乐意
208for us to begin a discussion让我们开始讨论
209of same-sex marriage.在同性婚姻中,
210Now, same-sex marriage现在,同性婚姻
211draws on借鉴
212and implicates和所涉人员
213deeply contested深有争议
214and controversial ideas和有争议的想法
215morally and religiously.在道德和宗教上。
216And so there's a powerful incentive因此,有一个强大的激励
217to embrace a conception of justice or of rights接受正义或权利的概念
218that doesn't require the society as a whole to pass judgment one way or another不需要整个社会以这样或那样的方式做出判断
219on打开
220those这些
221hotly contested moral and religious questions激烈争论的道德和宗教问题
222about the moral permissibility of homosexuality关于同性恋的道德允许性
223about the proper ends of marriage关于婚姻的适当结束
224as a social institution.作为一个社会机构。
225So clearly if there's an incentive to resolve this question所以很明显,如果有 激励解决这个问题
226to define people's rights界定人民的权利
227in a way that doesn't require the society as a whole以不需要整个社会的方式
228to sort out those moral and religious disputes解决道德和宗教纠纷
229that would be very attractive.这将是非常吸引人。
230So what I would like to do now所以我现在想做什么
231is to see是要看见
232using the same-sex marriage case使用同性婚姻案件
233whether it's possible可能吗?
234to detach切换
235one's views about the moral permissibility of homosexuality and about关于同性恋的道德允许性以及
236the purpose, the end of marriage, to detach目的,婚姻的终结, 拆散
237those questions这些问题
238from the question of whether the state should recognize从国家是否承认
239same-sex marriage or not.无论同性婚姻与否。
240So, let's begin.所以,让我们开始。
241I would like to begin我想开始
242by hearing the arguments of those听取他们的论点
243who believe that there should be no same-sex marriage他们认为不应该有同性婚姻
244but that the state should only recognize marriage between a man and a woman.但国家只应承认男女之间的婚姻。
245Do I have volunteers?我有志愿者吗?
246I had two.我有两个
247There were曾经
248two people I asked我问了两个人
249people who had voiced their views already on the Justice blog.在司法博客上表达自己观点的人,
250Mark Lough马克·劳
251and Ryan McCaffrey.还有瑞安・麦卡弗里
252Where are you?你们在哪?
253Okay.摆
254Mark?马克?
255And where's Ryan?莱恩呢?
256Let's go first to Mark.让我们先去马克。
257I have sort of a teleological understanding我有点心智上的理解
258of页:1
259the purpose of sex and the purpose of marriage.性的目的和婚姻的目的。
260And I think that for people like myself我想对于像我这样的人来说
261who are a Christian and also a Catholic他们是基督徒,也是天主教徒
262the purpose of sex性别目的
263is, one, for its procreative其一,因为它的生殖性
264uses and, two, for用途和二,用于
265a unifying purpose between统一目标
266a man and a woman within the一男一女 身处
267within the institution of marriage.婚姻制度。
268You have a certain conception你有某种概念
269of the purpose or the telos目的或主题
270of human sexuality人类性行为
271which is bound up with procreation与生育相连
272as well as union.还有工会
273And the essence of marriage, the purpose婚姻的本质,目的
274of marriage as a social institution婚姻作为社会制度
275is to give expression表达式
276{\fn黑体\fs22\bord1\shad0\3aHBE\4aH00\fscx67\fscy66\2cHFFFFFF\3cH808080}去那片地盘
277and to honor that purpose, namely the procreative purpose并尊重这一目的,即生殖目的;
278of marriage.结婚
279Is that a fair summary of your view?你的观点是这样总结的吗?
280Where's Ryan?赖安呢?
281Go ahead.来吧。
282Do you agree more or less with Mark's你或多或少同意马克的
283reasons?原因吗?
284Yes, I agree.是的,我同意这一点。
285I think that我觉得
286the ideal of marriage involves procreation.婚姻的理想涉及生育。
287And it's fine that, you know, homosexuals would go off和它的罚款,你知道,同性恋会去
288and
289cohabitate with each other, but the government doesn't have a responsibility to同居,但政府没有责任
290encourage that.鼓励这样做。
291Alright, so the government should not encourage好吧,所以政府不应该鼓励
292homosexual behavior by conferring the通过赋予同性恋行为
293recognition of marriage.承认婚姻。
294Yeah, it would be wrong to outlaw it,是啊,这是错的 违法,
295but encouraging it is not necessary.但鼓励是没有必要的。
296Who has a reply?谁有答复?
297Hannah?汉娜?
298I'd just like to ask a question to Mark.我只想问马克一个问题。
299Let's say you got married to a woman,假设你嫁给了一个女人
300you did not have sex with her before marriage, and then when you became married你婚前没有和她发生性关系,然后你结婚了
301it became evident that you were an infertile couple.很明显你们是一对不育的夫妇
302Do you think that it你觉得
303should be illegal for you to engage in sex if children will not如果孩子不做爱,你应该违法
304result from that act?行为的结果?
305Yeah, I think that it is moral, and that's why I gave the是的,我认为这是道德的, 这就是为什么我给了
306two-fold purpose.两重目的。
307So, like, a woman, say,所以,像,一个女人,说,
308I think older couples can get married, someone, a woman who's beyond,我觉得老夫妇可以结婚, 某人,一个女人谁的超出,
309um, who's already had menopause,嗯,谁已经有更年期,
310and who can't have a child, because I think that和谁不能有一个孩子, 因为我认为
311sex has these,性有这些,
312it has purposes beyond procreation.它的目的不仅仅是生育
313I hate to be uncouth, but have you ever engaged我讨厌不严谨 但你有没有订婚过
314in masturbation?手淫吗?
315Oh, alright.哦,对了。
316You don't have to answer that.你不必回答这个问题。
317You can...你可以...
318Just a minute.请等一下
319Make your...让你的...
320No, I'd like to respond to that.不,我想回答这个问题。
321We've done pretty well我们做得很好
322over a whole semester, and we're doing pretty well now,整个学期 我们表现得很好
323dealing with questions that most people think can't even be discussed in a处理大多数人认为无法在
324university setting.大学环境。
325And,还有,
326Hannah, you've got, you have a powerful point.汉娜,你有, 你有强大的观点。
327Make that point as a general做一个将军
328argument, rather than...争论,而不是...
329rather than as an interrogative.而不是作为审讯。
330But make the point.但说正法.
331What's the principle that you're appealing?你上诉的原则是什么?
332What's the argument you have in mind?你想说什么?
333Alright.还好
334Well, biblically...嗯,圣经上...
335Put it in the third person, rather than...放在第三个人,而不是...
336rather than in the second person.而不是在第二个人。
337Make the argument.作是辩才.
338Go ahead.来吧。
339Okay.摆
340Biblically, masturbation or onanism圣经,自慰或自恋
341is not permissible because it's, you know, spilling your seed on the earth when因为它会把种子洒在地上
342it's not going to result in the birth of a child.它不会导致孩子的诞生。
343But what I'm saying is, you know, you're saying that sex...但是我的意思是,你知道, 你说的是性...
344you know, there's something wrong with sex if it doesn't produce children要知道,如果性爱不生孩子,就有些不对劲
345or reinforce the marriage bond.或加强婚姻关系。
346But then how can you say that但你怎么能这么说
347there's something wrong... that, you know, masturbation is permissible if有点不对劲... 你知道,如果...
348masturbation obviously is not going to, you know, create a child?手淫显然不会,你知道, 创造一个孩子?
349Yeah, I think是啊,我觉得
350marriage结婚
351is society's way to create this separate institution where they say,社会是建立这个独立机构的方法,他们说,
352this is what we hold as a virtue.这是我们所持有的美德。
353Yes, every day we fall short.是的,我们每天都缺钱。
354And people fall short in so many different other ways.人们在很多不同的方面都不足。
355But I think that但我认为
356if you personally如果你个人
357fall short in some moral sphere, as we all do, that doesn't在某些道德领域,我们都是如此,但这并不
358take the right of向右移动
359you to argue.你来争辩吧
360Alright.还好
361I want you to stay there.我要你留在这
362I want to bring in我想带进来
363some other voices and we'll continue.其他的声音,我们会继续。
364Stay there if you would.如果你愿意的话,留在那。
365Go ahead.来吧。
366I think that the response to the masturbation... My name's Steve.我想对自慰的反应... 我叫史提夫,你好吗?
367The response to the masturbation issue is, it's not something that's permissible.对自慰问题的反应是,这不是允许的东西.
368I don't我没有
369think anyone will argue that homosexual sex is impermissible.认为任何人都会认为同性恋是不允许的
370It's just that society has no place in letting you marry yourself if只是社会没有地方让你自己结婚
371masturbation is something that you do.手淫是你们做的事
372Alright, Hannah.好吧,汉娜。
373Alright, Steve has drawn...好吧,史蒂夫已经画...
374Alright, that's a good argument.好吧,这是一个很好的争论。
375Steve has drawn our attention to the fact that there are two issues here.史蒂夫提请我们注意,这里有两个问题。
376One of them is the moral permissibility of various practices.其中之一是各种做法的道德允许性。
377The other is the fit between certain practices,另一种是某些做法之间的吻合,
378whatever their moral permissibility,无论道德上允许什么
379with the honor or recognition荣誉或承认
380that the state should accord国家应同意
381in allowing marriage.允许结婚。
382So Steve has a pretty good所以,史蒂夫有一个相当好
383counter-argument.反辩.
384What do you say to Steve?你对史蒂夫怎么说?
385Well, I think that it's clear that human sexuality is something that is我认为人类的性爱是
386inherent in, I believe, most people.我相信,大部分人都是内在的
387And it's not something you can avoid.而且这不是你能避免的
388And masturbation, I mean,还有自慰,我的意思是,
389yeah, you can't marry yourself, but I don't think that是啊,你不能嫁给自己, 但我不认为
390takes away from the fact that homosexuals are people too.远离同性恋也是人的事实。
391And I can't understand why我不懂为什么
392they wouldn't be able to marry each other.他们不可能结婚
393If you want to marry yourself,如果你想嫁给自己
394I mean, I don't know if you can legally do that.我的意思是,我不知道 你是否能合法这样做。
395That's fine, but I don't think...没关系 但我不觉得...
396Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.慢着,慢着
397Now here we're deciding, here we're deliberating as if legislators, what the现在我们决定,在这里,我们正在考虑 仿佛立法者,什么是
398law should be.法律应该是。
399So you said, Steve, that's fine.你说,史蒂夫,没关系。
400Does that mean as a legislator you would vote这是否意味着作为一个立法者 你会投票
401for a law of marriage that would be so broad婚姻法如此宽泛
402that it would let它会让
403people marry themselves?人们结婚吗?
404Well, I mean,我是说...
405that's really beyond the pale of, like, anything that would really happen, but这真的超越了苍白的,喜欢, 任何事情会真正发生,但
406I don't think that...我不认为...
407But in principle.但原则上
408Yeah, in principle.是啊,原则上。
409Yes.
410Yeah, sure.当然
411I mean, if Steve wants to marry我的意思是,如果史蒂夫想结婚
412himself, I'm not going to stop him.我不会阻止他
413And you would confer state recognition on that你会得到国家承认
414solo marriage.单独结婚
415And while we're at it, what about consensual polygamous marriages?而当我们到了它, 那自愿的多配偶婚姻呢?
416I actually think that if the male and the female, or if the wives我其实认为,如果男女,或者妻子
417and the man and the husband, or the husbands and the wife are consenting, it男人和丈夫, 或丈夫和妻子是同意的,
418should be permissible.应允许。
419Who else?还有谁?
420I know there are a lot of people who...我知道有许多人...
421Yes, okay, down here.是的,好吧,在这里。
422Stand up and tell us your name.站起来告诉我们你的名字。
423Victoria.维多利亚
424So we're talking about the theological reasoning here for marriage, but I think我们谈的是婚姻的神学推理 但我认为
425the problem is that we're talking about it within问题是我们是在谈论它
426the Catholic viewpoint,天主教的观点,
427whereas the theological而神学
428and the point to marriage for another religion or someone who's an atheist和婚姻的意义 对于另一个宗教 或者一个无神论者
429could be completely different.可能会完全不同
430And the government doesn't have a right to impose the theological reasoning for政府没有权利强制推行神学推理
431Catholicism on天主教会
432everyone in the state,州内所有人
433which is what my problem is with not allowing same-sex marriage, because这就是我的问题 不允许同性婚姻,因为
434I mean, your beliefs are your beliefs, and that's fine,我的意思是,你的信仰是你的信仰, 这很好,
435but civil union is not marriage within the Catholic Church.但民事结合不是天主教会内部的婚姻。
436And the state has a right to recognize a civil union between国家有权承认
437whoever it wants,无论它想要谁
438but does not have a right to impose the beliefs of a certain minority or majority但无权将某一少数群体或多数人的信仰强加于人
439or whoever it is不管是谁
440based on a religion基于宗教
441within在内部
442our state.我们的国家。
443Alright, Victoria,好吧,维多利亚,
444good, a question.好,一个问题。
445Do you think the state should recognize same-sex marriage or just你觉得国家应该承认同性婚姻还是
446same-sex civil unions as something同性公民联姻
447short of marriage?结婚?
448Well,那个
449I think that the state doesn't have a right to recognize我认为国家没有权利承认
450it as marriage within作为婚姻内部
451a church, because that is not their place,一个教堂,因为那里不是他们的地方,
452but whereas civil union, I see civil union as essentially the same thing,但尽管民事结合, 我认为民事结合 基本上是一样的,
453except not under a religion, and the state has a right to recognize国家有权承认
454a civil union.民事结合。
455Alright, so Victoria's argument is that the state should not try to好吧,所以维多利亚的论点是 州不应该试图
456decide the question of what the telos of marriage is, that's only something that决定婚姻的特质是什么问题, 那只是一些东西
457religious communities宗教社团
458can decide.可以决定。
459Who else?还有谁?
460My point is, I don't see why我想说的是,我不明白为什么
461we feel like我们觉得
462the state should recognize marriages国家应承认婚姻
463at all.一点也不
464So I'm like one of these seven people who voted that the state should not recognize所以我就像这七个人之一 谁投票 国家不应该承认
465any marriages, because任何婚姻,因为
466I believe it is a union between我相信这是一个结合
467a male and a female,男的和女的,
468or two males or two females,或两雄或两雌;
469but there is no reason to ask the state to give permission to me to但没有理由要求国家允许我
470unite myself, and some might say that团结我,有些人可能会说
471if the state recognizes these marriages,如果国家承认这些婚姻,
472it will help children, it will它会帮助儿童,它会
473have a binding effect, but in reality I don't think it但实际上我不觉得
474actually has a binding effect.实际具有约束作用。
475Alright, tell us your name.好吧,告诉我们你的名字。
476So, Victoria and Cezanne's comments因此,维多利亚和塞桑的评论
477differ from earlier parts of the conversation.与对话的早期部分不同。
478They say他们说
479the state shouldn't be in the business国家不该插手
480of honoring or recognizing or affirming承认或确认
481any particular telos or purpose of marriage, or of human sexuality,* 任何特定婚约或婚姻目的,或人类性行为,
482and Cezanne is among those who says therefore maybe the state should get out of the businessCezanne是其中之一 说,也许国家应该 退出生意
483of recognizing marriage at all.完全承认婚姻。
484Here's the question.问曰.
485Unless you adopt Cezanne's position, no state recognition of any kind of marriage,除非你采取Cezanne的立场, 没有州承认任何类型的婚姻,
486is it possible to choose between,有没有可能选择,
487to decide the question of same-sex marriage决定同性婚姻的问题
488without taking a stand on the moral and religious controversy而不对道德和宗教争议采取立场
489over the property los of marriage.在婚姻的财产。
490Thank you very much to all of you who have participated.非常感谢所有与会人员。
491We'll pick this up next time.我们下次再拿
492You did a great job.你表现得很好
493When we first came together some 13我们第一次见面的时候 大约13个
494weeks ago, I tried to warn you that once the familiar turns几周前,我试图警告你 一旦熟悉的转变
495strange, once we begin to reflect on our circumstance,奇怪,一旦我们开始思考我们的情况
496it's never quite the same again.再也不会变了
497I hope you have by now experienced at least a我希望你已经体验了至少
498little of this unease,一点点的不安,
499because this is the tension that animates critical reflection因为这是引发关键反射的紧张状态
500and political improvement, and maybe even政治进步,甚至可能
501the moral life as well.还有道德生活
502We have two remaining questions to answer.我们还有两个问题要回答。
503First, is it necessary,首先,是否有必要
504is it unavoidable, to take up questions of the good life and thinking about面对美好生活的问题和思考
505justice?正义?
506Yes.
507And is it possible有可能吗?
508to reason about justice?解释正义?
509Yes, I think so.是的,我想是这样。
510Let me try to develop让我试着发展
511those answers to those two questions.回答这两个问题
512Now,现在,
513as a way of addressing those questions, we began last time作为解决这些问题的方法,我们上次开始
514to discuss the question of same-sex marriage.讨论同性婚姻的问题。
515And we heard from those我们听到那些
516who argued against same-sex marriage on the grounds that the purpose or telos以同性婚姻的目的或目的为理由进行辩护
517of marriage is结婚
518at least in part procreation,至少部分生育,
519the bearing and raising of children.生育和抚养子女。
520And then there were those还有那些
521who defended same-sex marriage,他们捍卫同性婚姻,
522and they contested that account of the他们否认
523purpose or telos of marriage, arguing婚姻的目的或动机,
524we don't require as a condition of heterosexual marriage我们不需要作为异性婚姻的条件
525that couples be able夫妇能够
526or willing to procreate.或愿意生育。
527We allow infertile couples我们允许不孕的夫妇
528to marry.结婚。
529This is Hannah's point in the exchange with Mark.这是汉娜在与马克的交流中的点.
530Then there was another position, expressed at the end of our discussion by我们讨论结束时表达的另一种立场是:
531Victoria,维多利亚
532who argued we shouldn't try to decide this question.谁说我们不该决定这个问题
533We shouldn't, at least at the level of the state,我们不应该,至少在州一级,
534at the level of law, try to come to在法律层面,尝试来
535any agreement on those questions about the good任何关于这些问题的协议
536because we live in a pluralist society因为我们生活在多元社会
537where people have different moral and religious convictions.人们有不同的道德和宗教信仰。
538And so we should try to make所以我们应该试着做
539law and the framework of rights neutral法律与权利中立框架
540with respect to these competing moral and religious关于这些相互竞争的道德和宗教问题
541views.视图。
542Now it's interesting that others,现在有趣的是其他人,
543some others, who favor the idea of neutrality另一些人则主张中立
544argued not in favor of restricting marriage不赞成限制婚姻
545to a man and a woman, nor in favor of permitting same-sex marriage.也不赞成允许同性婚姻
546They argued, in the name of neutrality,他们以中立的名义
547for a third possibility, which is that government第三种可能性,即政府
548get out of the business of recognizing any kind of marriage.别管什么婚姻
549That was the third possibility.这是第三种可能性。
550Now现在
551Andrea Mayrose had an interesting contribution to this debate.安德里亚·梅罗斯对这场辩论做出了有趣的贡献.
552She had a她有一个
553rejoinder复辩
554to people who argue for neutrality.敬那些主张中立的人。
555Where is Andrea?安德里亚在哪?
556Alright.还好
557Andrea, would you be willing安德里亚,你愿意吗?
558share with us the view, if we can get you a microphone,和我们分享风景, 如果我们能给你一个麦克风,
559share with us your view.与我们分享你的观点。
560Why do you think你为什么认为
561that it's a mistake那是个错误
562for the state to try to be neutral国家试图保持中立
563on moral and even religious questions like same-sex marriage?关于道德甚至宗教问题 比如同性婚姻?
564I don't know that it is possible because people's lives我不知道这是可能的 因为人们的生活
565are completely embedded in how they完全嵌入他们是如何
566view the world and maybe I just agree with Aristotle that看着世界 也许我同意亚里士多德的观点
567the role of the government is helping people live in a sort of,政府的作用是帮助人们在某种程度上,
568like having a collective understanding of what就像对什么有集体的理解
569is wrong and what is right.错和错
570Is it possible, and one could ask the same有可能吗? 人们也可以问同样的问题
571question of abortion堕胎问题
572that we've been asking of same-sex marriage,我们一直要求同性婚姻,
573do you think it's possible to decide你觉得可以决定吗?
574whether abortion should be permitted是否应当允许堕胎
575or prohibited without taking a stand or making a judgment禁止不发表意见或作出判决
576about the moral permissibility of abortion?关于堕胎的道德允许性?
577No, I don't think it is and I think that's why it's such a controversy because不,我不这么认为 我认为这就是为什么它是一个争议 因为
578people are so人们是如此
579deeply committed to their fundamental beliefs about坚定致力于他们关于
580whether a fetus is a life or if it isn't.胎儿是生命还是不是生命
581So,这么说
582if I believe that a fetus is a living being如果我相信一个胎儿是生命
583and has rights and has fundamentally the right to live,并拥有权利,并从根本上享有生存权,
584then it's very hard for me to say, but I can put that aside and let you do what我很难说 但我可以把那个放在一边 让你做什么
585you want because你想要是因为
586that's like me saying, well despite my beliefs I'm going to let you commit what这就像我说, 好吧,尽管我的信仰 我会让你做出什么
587to me is murder.对我来说是谋杀
588So, and I mean that's just...所以,我的意思是,这只是...
589The analogy in the same-sex marriage case is you said同性婚姻案中的类比就是你说的
590you're a defender of same-sex marriage, but you only came to that view你是同性婚姻的捍卫者, 但你只是来到这种观点
591once you were persuaded on the underlying moral question.曾经你被说服 关于基本的道德问题。
592Right, well I think particularly in the US so many people's对,我想在美国特别多
593beliefs are driven by their religious beliefs and信仰受到宗教信仰的驱使
594like Mark the other day, I'm Christian, I'm Catholic, and I had to decide像马克那天一样 我是基督徒 我是天主教徒 我必须决定
595for myself like on a lot of thought, a lot of prayer, a lot of conversations with other自我喜欢很多的想法, 很多祷告, 和很多对话
596people人员
597that I disagreed with the Catholic standpoint that homosexuality itself is我不同意天主教的观点,即同性恋本身就是
598in a sin.在罪恶中。
599And once I came to that sort of conclusion in my personal relationship当我在私人关系中得出这种结论
600with God,与上帝,
601like I mean that sounds hokey right?就像我意思,这听起来胡说八道对不对?
602That's like, oh religious, but a lot of这就像,哦宗教,但很多
603people are religious and that's where they draw their beliefs and their人们是宗教的, 在那里他们画 他们的信仰和他们的
604views from.从视图。
605That's when I could say, yeah I'm down with the state saying那时我可以说,是的,我下 州说
606go same-sex marriage because I'm okay with that and I去同性婚姻,因为我同意这个,我
607I think that's morally okay.我觉得这在道德上是好的
608Good, thank you.很好 谢谢
609Now现在
610who would like to reply, if you can如果你可以的话,谁愿意回答?
611perhaps hang on there for a moment, who would like to reply等一会,谁想回答?
612to Andrea's idea that in order to decide the question of same-sex marriage为了决定同性婚姻的问题
613it's necessary to sort out the question about the有必要解决关于
614moral status of homosexuality and同性恋的道德地位
615figuring out the purpose, the telos,确定目的, 泰罗斯,
616the proper end of marriage.婚姻的适当结束。
617Who disagrees谁不同意
618with Andrea on that point?和安德里亚在一起吗?
619Yes?是吗?
620Well I think you absolutely can separate your moral opinion我觉得你绝对可以把道德观点分开
621and what you think the law should be.以及你认为法律应该是什么
622For example,举例来说,
623I think abortion is unequivocally,我认为堕胎是明确的,
624morally wrong, but I do not believe that illegalizing abortion makes it go away.道德上是错误的,但我认为,非法堕胎不会使其消失。
625I don't believe illegalizing abortion stops it and therefore I am pro-choice我不相信非法堕胎能阻止它 所以我赞成选择
626and I do believe the woman should have the choice as it gives them more safety我相信这女人应该有选择权 因为这会让他们更加安全
627just as碞钩
628maybe morally I don't want to get married to a man也许道德上我不想嫁给男人
629but I'm not going to try to, you know,但我不会试图,你知道,
630impede someone else's freedom to do what they wish to do阻碍他人自由做他们想做的事
631in terms of the law.以诸法界.
632Andrea?安德里亚?
633Whether the law makes something legal or illegal is法律是合法还是非法
634it's implicitly approving or disapproving something.它含蓄地认可或不认可某件事。
635So if you say所以,如果你说
636like by making abortion legal we're saying就像让堕胎合法一样
637it's okay.没关系。
638As a society collectively we're saying作为一个社会 我们集体说
639it's okay with us in our society to abort我们社会上可以堕胎
640a fetus.a 胎儿。
641If we make it legal, if we make it illegal then we're saying如果我们把它合法化,如果我们把它非法, 那么我们说
642collectively as a society集体作为一个社会
643it's not okay and that's why society says it's not legal.这是不好的, 这就是为什么社会说这是不合法的。
644Tell us your name.告诉我们你的名字。
645My name is Daniel.我叫丹尼尔
646Daniel, what do you say?丹尼尔,你觉得怎么样?
647Are we saying collectively that it's okay?我们一起说没关系吗?
648и琌弧 и癬ぃ辨 穦砆 abortion
649anyway to go to clinics in the side alleys and have不管怎么样,去诊所 在边巷和有
650unsafe conditions.不安全的条件。
651Alright, bring it to the same-sex marriage case.好吧,把它带到同性婚姻案件。
652Why don't you have to decide that which position you're in favor of你为何不决定你赞成什么立场
653same-sex marriage, Daniel, being legally permitted?丹尼尔,是法律允许的同性婚姻?
654I think it absolutely我觉得绝对
655should be legally permitted应依法允许
656because it's not something telling me that I need to marry a man.因为它没有告诉我 我需要嫁给一个男人。
657I don't see if two men are consenting adults and want to get married我看不出两个男人 是否同意成人 想结婚
658I don't see how I could even object to that.我看不出我怎么会反对
659Alright, there's no harm.好吧,没有伤害。
660There's no harm.无碍无碍.
661Either way, even if it is morally wrong according to me.无论哪种方式,即使我认为这在道德上是错误的。
662Alright, let me turn to the way好,让我转过身去
663the Massachusetts court who made this landmark ruling in the same-sex马萨诸塞州法院在同性之间做出这一具有里程碑意义的裁决
664marriage case结婚案件
665grappled with the very issue that Andrea and解决了安德里亚和
666Dan have been discussing here.丹一直在讨论这个问题
667Thanks to both of you very much.非常感谢你们俩
668What did the court say?法庭怎么说?
669This was in the Goodridge case这是古德里奇的案子
670which required the state of Massachusetts这需要马萨诸塞州
671to extend marriage to将婚姻延伸至
672same-sex couples.同性伴侣。
673The court法院
674started out, well, the court was conflicted一开始,法院就发生了冲突
675if you read that opinion carefully, the court was conflicted如果你仔细读了这个意见,法庭就发生了冲突
676as between the two positions we've just been我们刚刚的两个位置之间
677hearing, defended by Andrea and by Dan.由安德里亚和丹辩护
678The court begins, and this is Chief Justice Margaret Marshall's法庭开始,这是首席大法官玛格丽特·马歇尔
679opinion, it begins with an attempt观点,从尝试开始
680at liberal neutrality.在自由中立。
681Many people hold deep-seated religious, moral, and ethical许多人持有根深蒂固的宗教、道德和伦理
682convictions定罪
683that marriage should be limited to the union of one man and one woman婚姻应限于一男一女的结合;
684and that homosexual conduct is immoral.同性恋的行为是不道德的
685Many hold equally strong religious,许多人信奉同样强大的宗教,
686moral, and ethical convictions道德和伦理信念
687that same-sex couples are entitled to be married, that homosexual person should be- 同性伴侣有权结婚;
688treated no differently没有区别
689than their heterosexual neighbors.比他们的异性恋邻居。
690This is the court.此是宫廷.
691Neither view answers the question before us.两种观点都无法回答我们面前的问题。
692What is at stake is, quote, respect for individual关键在于尊重个人
693autonomy and equality under law.法律上的自治和平等。
694At stake is an individual freely choosing the person事关个人自由选择个人
695with whom to share an exclusive commitment.与谁分享独家承诺。
696In other words, an issue换句话说 一个问题
697is not the moral worth of the choice不是道德价值的选择
698but the right of the individual to make it.但个人有权做它。
699So这么说
700this is the liberal neutral strand in the court opinion,这是法院意见中自由中立的部分,
701Bollentra线,一个强调自主,
702choice, consent.选择,同意。
703But the court seemed to realize但法庭似乎意识到
704that the liberal case, the neutral case, for recognizing same-sex marriage自由主义 中立主义 承认同性婚姻
705doesn't succeed, doesn't get you all the way to that position because没有成功,没有 让你一路到那个职位,因为
706if it were only a matter of respect for individual autonomy,如果这只是一个尊重个人自主的问题,
707if government were truly neutral如果政府真正中立
708on the moral worth of voluntary intimate自愿亲密关系的道德价值
709relationships, then it should adopt关系,然后应该通过
710a different policy which is另一种政策是:
711to remove government and the state取消政府和州政府
712altogether from according完全从说
713recognition to certain associations, certain kinds of unions承认某些协会、某些类型的工会;
714rather than others.而不是别人。
715If government really must be neutral,如果政府真的要中立的话
716then the consistent position然后是一成不变的
717is what we here have been describing as the third position,这就是我们在这里描述的第三个位置,
718the one defended in the article by Michael Kinsley who argues迈克尔·金斯利在文章中辩护的人
719for the abolition of marriage at least至少废除婚姻
720as a state function.作为国家职能。
721Perhaps a better term for this is the disestablishment或许一个更好的术语是断绝
722of religion.宗教问题。
723This is Kinsley's proposal.这是金斯利的提议。
724He points out that the reason for the opposition他指出,反对派的理由
725to same-sex marriage is that it would go beyond与同性婚姻是超越
726neutral toleration and give same-sex marriage a government stamp of approval.中立的容忍,并给予同性婚姻政府批准印章.
727That's at the heart of the dispute.这是争议的核心。
728In Aristotle's terms,按亚里士多德的说法
729an issue here is the proper distribution of这里的一个问题是如何正确分配
730offices and honors, a matter of social recognition.办公室和荣誉,一个社会承认的问题。
731Same-sex marriage can't be justified同性婚姻是没有道理的
732on the basis of liberal neutrality or non-discrimination or autonomy rights自由中立或不歧视或自治权利
733alone一个人
734because the question at stake in the public debate因为这个问题在公开辩论中至关重要
735is whether same-sex unions have moral worth, whether they're worthy of是同性结合是否具有道德价值,是否值得
736honor and recognition, and whether they fit the purpose of the social institution荣誉和承认,以及它们是否符合社会制度的宗旨
737of marriage.结婚
738So, Kinsley says金斯利说
739You want to be neutral?你想保持中立吗?
740Then let churches and other religious institutions offer然后让教会和其他宗教机构提供
741marriage ceremonies.结婚仪式。
742Let department stores and casinos get into the act if they want to.百货公司和赌场如果愿意,就让它们参与行动。
743This is Kinsley.这是金斯利。
744Let couples celebrate their union in让夫妇庆祝他们的结合
745any way they choose and consider themselves married任何选择和认为自己结婚了的方式
746whenever they want.随时随地
747And if three people want to get married如果有三个人想结婚
748or if one person wants to marry himself or herself如果一个人想结婚
749and someone else wants to conduct a ceremony for them and declare them married,还有别人想为他们举行仪式 宣布他们结婚了
750let them.让他们。
751If you and your government are implicated,如果你和你的政府被牵连
752what do you care?你关心什么?
753This is Kinsley.这是金斯利。
754But不过
755this is not the position that the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts这不是马萨诸塞州最高法院的立场
756wanted.被通缉了
757They didn't call for the abolition他们没有要求废除
758or for the disestablishment of marriage.或者因为婚姻破裂
759The court did not question法院没有质疑
760government's role in conferring social recognition on some intimate政府在给予一些亲密关系以社会承认方面的作用
761associations rather than others.协会而不是其他人。
762To the contrary, the court waxes eloquent恰恰相反, 宫廷是雄辩的
763about marriage as quote, one of our community's most rewarding and cherished关于婚姻作为引言, 我们社会最有价值和珍惜的之一
764institutions.机构。
765And then it goes on to expand the definition of marriage to然后它继续扩大婚姻的定义
766include partners包括合作伙伴
767of the same sex.同一性别。
768And in doing so,这样一来,
769it acknowledges that marriage它承认婚姻
770is more than a matter of tolerating choices that individuals不仅仅是容忍个人的选择
771make.做起来。
772It's also a matter of social也是社会问题
773recognition and honor.承认和荣誉。
774As Justice Marshall wrote, in a real sense there are正如马歇尔法官所写, 真正意义上,有
775three partners to every civil marriage,每个公证婚姻的3个伴侣,
776two willing spouses and an approving state.两个愿意的配偶和一个批准国
777Marriage is at once a deeply personal commitment but also a highly婚姻既是一种个人的深厚承诺,也是一种高度的
778public celebration of the ideals of mutuality, companionship,公开庆祝相互、陪伴、
779intimacy, fidelity and family.亲密,忠诚和家庭。
780This is the court.此是宫廷.
781Now this is reaching well beyond liberal neutrality.现在,这远远超出了自由中立。
782This is celebrating and affirming marriage这是庆祝和确认婚姻
783as an honorific, as a form of public recognition.作为荣誉,作为一种公开承认的形式.
784And therefore the court found that it couldn't avoid the debate因此法庭认为无法避免辩论
785about the key loss of marriage.关于婚姻的关键损失。
786Justice Marshall's opinion considers and rejects the notion马歇尔法官的意见 考虑和拒绝这个概念
787that the primary purpose of marriage is procreation.结婚的主要目的是生育。
788She points out that there's no requirement that applicants她指出,没有要求申请人
789for a marriage license who are heterosexuals attest to their ability or异性恋者结婚证证明他们的能力或
790their intention to conceive children.他们想生孩子
791Fertility is not a condition of marriage.生育不是婚姻的条件。
792People who cannot stir from their不能从他们身上搅动的人
793deathbed临终
794may marry.可以结婚。
795So she advances all kinds of arguments所以她提出各种论点
796along the lines that we began last time about what the proper and根据我们上次开始的路线 关于什么是适当的和
797the essential nature of the key loss of marriage is.婚姻丧失的关键本质是。
798And she concludes她总结了
799not procreation but the exclusive and permanent commitment of the partners to并非生育,而是合作伙伴对
800one another彼此之间
801is the essential point关键点
802and purpose目标
803of marriage.结婚
804Now nothing I've said我什么都没说
805about关于
806this这个
807court opinion法院意见
808is an argument for or against same-sex marriage, but it is an argument against支持或反对同性婚姻,但反对
809the claim索赔
810that you can favor or oppose same-sex marriage你可以支持或反对同性婚姻
811while remaining neutral保持中立时
812on the underlying说明
813moral and religious questions.道德和宗教问题。
814So all of this is to suggest所以所有这一切都是暗示
815that那个
816at least in some至少在某些
817of the hotly contested热竞者
818debates about justice and rights that we have in our society,关于我们社会中的正义和权利的辩论,
819the attempt to be neutral,企图中立,
820the attempt to say试图说
821it's just a matter只是个问题
822of consent and choice and autonomy,同意、选择和自主,
823we take no stand, that doesn't succeed.我们不采取立场,那不会成功。
824Even the court连法庭也一样
825which wants to be neutral想要保持中立
826on these moral and religious disputes道德和宗教争端
827finds that it can't.发现它不能。
828What then about our second question?那第二个问题呢?
829If reasoning about the good如果关于好的推理
830is unavoidable这是不可避免的
831in debates about justice and rights,在关于司法和权利的辩论中,
832is it possible?有可能吗?
833If reasoning about the good如果关于好的推理
834means表示
835that you must have a single principle or rule or maxim您必须有一个单一的原则或规则或准则
836or criterion或标准
837for the good life为了美好生活
838that you simply plug in every time you have a disagreement你只要每次有分歧
839about morality, then the answer is no.关于道德,那么答案是否定的。
840But having a single但有一个单身
841principle or rule原则或规则
842is not the only way,不是唯一的办法,
843not the best way,不是最好的办法,
844of reasoning推理
845either about the good life或关于美好生活
846or about justice.或关于正义。
847Think back,回想起来
848think back回想起来
849to the arguments that we've been having here我们一直在这里争论
850about justice关于司法
851and about rights权利
852and sometimes about the good life.有时候,关于美好生活。
853How have those arguments proceeded?这些论点如何进行?
854They've proceeded他们开始了
855very much in the way非常麻烦
856that Aristotle suggests亚里士多德建议
857moving back and forth前后移动
858between our judgments about particulars, particular cases, events,我们对于具体案件 事件
859stories, questions,故事,问题,
860back and forth between our judgments about particular cases在我们对特定案件的判决之间
861and more general principles that make sense of our reasons for the positions we take更一般性的原则 说明我们的立场的理由
862on the particular cases.关于特定案件。
863This这个
864dialectical way辩证方法
865of doing moral reasoning进行道德推理
866goes back to the ancients, to Plato and Aristotle,回到古代 柏拉图和亚里士多德
867but it doesn't stop with them但它不停止与他们
868because there is a version of Socratic or dialectical因为有Socratic或辩证法的版本
869moral reasoning道德推理
870that is这是
871defended with great clarity and force以极大的清晰和武力防御
872约翰·罗尔斯(John Rawls)
873in giving an account在提供账户时
874of his method他的方法
875of justifying说明理由
876a theory of justice.一个正义的理论。
877You remember it's not only the veil of ignorance and the principles你记得这不仅仅是无知的面纱和原则
878Rawls主张的
879It's also a method of moral reasoning,这也是一种道德推理的方法,
880reasoning about justice that he calls他所说的正义的推理
881reflective equilibrium.反应平衡
882What is the method of reflective equilibrium?什么是反映平衡的方法?
883It's moving back and forth前后移动
884between our我们之间
885considered judgments about particular cases考虑对特定案件的判决
886and the general principles和一般原则
887we would articulate我们来阐述
888to make sense of those judgments使这些判决有意义
889and not just stopping there而不只是停留在那里,
890because we might be wrong in our initial intuitions,因为我们最初的直觉可能不对
891not stopping there不要停下来
892but then sometimes revising our particular judgments但有时会修改我们的具体判决
893in the light of the principles根据这些原则,
894once we work them out.一旦我们解决了他们。
895So sometimes we revise the principles,所以有时候我们修改原则
896sometimes we revise our judgments and intuitions in the particular cases.有时候,我们修改我们的判断 和直觉 对于特定的案件。
897The general point is this,问题是
898and here I quote Rawls,我在这里引用罗尔斯的话,
899a conception of justice can't be deduced正义的概念不能推论
900from self-evident premises.从不言自明的前提。
901Its justification其理由
902is a matter of the mutual support of many considerations是一个得到许多考虑的相互支持的问题。
903of everything fitting together与一切相适应
904into one coherent view.进入一个连贯的视野。
905And later in A Theory of Justice he writes,他后来在《正义理论》中写道:
906moral philosophy is Socratic.道德哲学是苏克拉底主义.
907We may want to change our present considered judgments我们也许想改变我们目前深思熟虑的判决
908once their regulative principles曾经是他们的规范原则
909are brought to light.被揭发。
910Well,那个
911if Rawls accepts that idea如果罗尔斯接受这个想法
912and advances that notion of reflective equilibrium, the question并推进反映平衡的概念,
913we're left with is我们留下的是
914he applies that他应用
915to questions of justice,司法问题,
916not to questions不问问题
917of morality道德观
918and the good life.还有美好生活
919And that's why这就是为什么
920he remains committed to the priority of the right over the good.他仍然致力于将权利放在好人之上。
921He thinks the method of reflective equilibrium他认为是反射平衡的方法
922can generate shared judgments能够生成共同判断
923about justice and the right,关于正义和权利,
924but he doesn't think但他不认为
925they can generate shared judgments它们可以产生共同的判决
926about the good life,关于美好生活,
927about what he calls comprehensive moral关于他所说的全面道德
928and religious questions.和宗教问题。
929The reason he thinks that他之所以这样想
930is that he says that in modern societies他说在现代社会中
931there is a fact of reasonable pluralism about the good.事实上,在福利方面存在着合理的多元化。
932Even conscientious people who reason well即使是有良心的人 也有理由
933will find that they disagree将发现他们不同意
934about questions关于问题
935of the good life,以幸福的生活盟誓,
936about morality and religion.关于道德和宗教。
937Rawls is likely罗尔斯很可能会
938right about that.没错
939He's not talking about the fact of disagreement他不是说分歧的事实
940in pluralist societies.在多元社会中。
941He's also suggesting他还建议
942that there may be persisting可能存在持续性
943disagreements不同意见
944about the good life关于美好生活
945and about moral and religious questions.以及道德和宗教问题
946But if that's true,但是如果这是真的
947then接下来
948is he warranted in his further claim在进一步申诉中他是否有理由
949that the same can't be said about justice?正义是不能说的吗?
950Isn't it also true这不也是事实吗?
951not only that we as a matter of fact disagree不仅是事实上我们不同意
952about justice in pluralist societies,关于多元社会中的正义,
953but that at least some of those disagreements are reasonable但至少有些分歧是合理的
954disagreements不同意见
955in the same way.同样的方式。
956Some people favor有人喜欢
957a libertarian theory of justice,一个自由主义的正义理论,
958others a more egalitarian theory of justice, and they argue.其他人更平等的正义理论, 他们争论。
959And there is pluralism in our society as between free market laissez-faire我们社会在自由市场之间 存在着多元化 自由放纵
960libertarian theories of justice自由主义司法理论
961and more egalitarian ones.和更加平等的人,
962Is there any difference in principle原则上有没有区别?
963between the kind of moral reasoning在道德推理之间
964and the kind of disagreements that arise when we debate about justice以及我们辩论正义时产生的分歧
965and the meaning of free speech言论自由的意义
966and the nature of religious liberty?宗教自由的性质?
967Look at the debates we have看看我们的辩论
968over结束
969appointees to the Supreme Court.最高法院任命。
970These are all disagreements about justice and rights.这些都是关于正义和权利的分歧。
971Is there any difference between有什么区别吗?
972the fact of reasonable pluralism合理多元化的事实
973in the case情况
974of justice and rights and in the case司法与权利以及
975of morality and religion?道德和宗教吗?
976In principle,原则上,
977I don't think that there is.我不认为有。
978In both cases,在这两种情况下,
979what we do when we disagree我们意见不一时做什么
980is we engage with our interlocutor我们是否与对话者接触
981as we've been doing here for an entire semester.就像我们在这里做了整整一个学期。
982We consider the arguments我们考虑这些论点
983that are provoked by particular cases.由特定案件引起的。
984We try to develop the reasons that lead us to go one way rather than another.我们试图找出导致我们走一条路而不是另一条路的理由。
985And then we listen to the reasons of other people.然后我们听别人的理由。
986And sometimes we're persuaded有时我们被说服
987to revise our view.来修改我们的观点。
988Other times we're challenged at least to shore up and strengthen our view.其它时候我们至少要面对挑战 站出来加强我们的视野
989But this is how moral argument proceeds但道德辩论是这样进行的
990with justice and so it seems to me also正义,所以在我看来
991with questions有问题
992of the good life.幸福的一生,
993Now,现在,
994there remains a further worry还有更担心的事
995and it's a liberal worry.这是自由派的担忧
996What about怎么样
997if we're going to think of our disagreements如果我们要考虑 我们的分歧
998about morality and religion关于道德和宗教
999as bound up with our disagreements about justice?我们对于正义的分歧?
1000How are we ever going to find our way to a society我们怎样才能找到通往社会的道路
1001that accords respect给予尊重
1002to改为:
1003fellow citizens with whom we disagree?我们不同意的同胞们?
1004It depends I think这要看我想
1005on which conception在哪个概念上
1006of respect尊重的权利
1007one accepts.一个接受。
1008On the liberal conception关于自由概念
1009to respect our fellow citizens moral and religious convictions尊重我们的同胞道德和宗教信仰
1010is so to speak这么说吧
1011to ignore them无视他们
1012for political purposes.为了政治目的。
1013To rise above or abstract from or to set aside超越或抽象 从或搁置
1014those moral and religious convictions.这些道德和宗教信仰。
1015To leave them undisturbed让他们不受干扰
1016to carry on our political debate without reference to them.继续我们的政治辩论而不提及它们。
1017But that isn't the only way但这不是唯一的办法
1018or perhaps even the most也许最
1019plausible way说得有道理
1020of understanding the mutual respect理解相互尊重
1021on which democratic life民主生活
1022depends.取决于。
1023There is a different conception of respect尊重的概念不同
1024according to which we respect our fellow citizens我们尊重同胞
1025moral and religious convictions道德和宗教信仰
1026not by ignoring but by engaging them.而不是无视,而是让他们参与。
1027By attending to them照顾他们
1028sometimes by challenging and contesting them有时通过质疑和质疑
1029sometimes有时候
1030by listening通过监听
1031and learning from them.和向他们学习。
1032Now there's no guarantee现在没有保证
1033that a politics of moral and religious一种道德和宗教政治
1034attention and engagement关注和参与
1035will lead in any given case to agreement.在任何特定情况下,都会达成协议。
1036There's no guarantee it will lead even to appreciation连感激都无法保证
1037for the moral and religious convictions of others.为他人的道德和宗教信仰而奋斗。
1038It's always possible after all毕竟永远有可能
1039that learning more about a religious or a moral doctrine更了解一种宗教或道德理论
1040will lead us to like it会让我们喜欢
1041less.少一点
1042But the respect of deliberation但尊重审议
1043and engagement参与
1044seems to me a more adequate more suitable ideal for a pluralist society.在我看来,对于多元社会来说,更合适的理想。
1045And to the extent和程度
1046that our moral and religious disagreements reflect我们的道德和宗教分歧反映了
1047some ultimate plurality of human goods人品的某些最终多元性
1048a politics of moral engagement道德参与政治
1049will better enable us更能让我们
1050so it seems to me to appreciate所以在我看来很欣赏
1051the distinctive goods our different lives express.我们不同生活的独特之处
1052When we当我们
1053first came together some thirteen weeks ago13周前第一次见面
1054I spoke of the exhilaration of political philosophy我说了政治哲学的赞美
1055and also of its dangers及其危险
1056about how philosophy works关于哲学如何运作
1057and has always worked并一直工作着
1058by estranging us因为我们被包围
1059from the familiar从熟悉的
1060by unsettling通过不安
1061our settled assumptions.我们的既定假设。
1062And I tried to warn you我试着警告你
1063that once the familiar turns strange一旦熟悉的人变得奇怪
1064once we begin to reflect on our circumstance一旦我们开始思考我们的情况
1065it's never quite the same again.再也不会变了
1066I hope you have by now experienced at least a little of this unease我希望你已经体验到 至少一点点这种不安
1067because this is the tension因为这就是紧张
1068that animates critical reflection动画 关键反射
1069and political improvement政治改善
1070and maybe even the moral life as well.甚至还有道德生活
1071And so our argument comes to an end in a sense but in another sense goes on.因此,我们的论点在某种意义上已经结束,但在另一种意义上则继续。
1072Why, we asked at the outset,为什么,我们一开始问,
1073why do these arguments keep going为什么要继续这些争论
1074even if they raise questions即使他们提出问题,
1075that are impossible ever finally to resolve?这不可能最终解决?
1076The reason原因
1077is that we live some answer是我们活在一个答案
1078to these questions这些问题
1079all the time.所有的时间。
1080In our public life在我们的公共生活中
1081and in our personal lives以及我们个人生活中
1082philosophy is inescapable哲学是不可避免的
1083even
1084if it sometimes seems如果有时看起来
1085impossible.绝对不可能
1086We began with the thought of Kant我们首先想到康德
1087that skepticism is a resting place for human reason怀疑是人类的宿命
1088where it can reflect upon its dogmatic wanderings在那里它可以反射 它的教条流浪
1089but it is no dwelling place for permanent settlement.但这里不是永久居民点。
1090To allow ourselves simply to acquiesce in skepticism or in complacence,仅仅允许自己默许怀疑主义或合意,
1091Kant wrote,康德写道:
1092can never suffice永远不够
1093to overcome the restlessness of reason.克服理性的不安
1094The aim of this course课程的目的
1095has been to awaken已经醒来
1096the restlessness of reason不安的理性
1097and to see where it might lead.并看看它可能通往何处。
1098And if we have done at least that如果我们至少做到了
1099and if the restlessness假若他们不安,
1100continues to afflict you继续折磨你
1101in the days and years to come未来的日子和岁月
1102then we together然后我们在一起
1103have achieved已经实现
1104no small thing.没什么小事
1105Thank you.谢谢
1106Don't miss the chance to interact online with other viewers of Justice.不要错过与司法界其他观众在线互动的机会.
1107Join the加入到
1108conversation.谈话。
1109Take a pop quiz.做个流行测验
1110Watch lectures you've missed and learn a lot more.看着你错过的讲座 学到更多
1111访问法官Harvard.org.
1112It's the right thing to do.谓之正法.
1113Funding for this program is provided by该方案的资金由下列机构提供:
1114additional funding provided by提供的额外资金
该视频共有字幕 1115 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格