推荐微信扫码登录以获得更好的体验!另:🎉建议更新到最新版,以体验新功能!🎉 版本更新记录→

不假思索的力量|马尔科姆:如何通过潜意识做出精准判断

字幕摘录

时间英文中文
0:00I'm glad you could all join us this afternoon.很高兴你们今天下午能加入我们
0:04I'm not mic'd.我没有麦克风。
0:07Am I mic'd now?我现在有麦克风了吗?
0:10Did you just see that usage of technology?你刚才看到技术的用法了吗?
0:13I'm very proud of myself.我为自己感到骄傲
0:15My name's Tamara Pesic.我叫塔玛拉·佩西奇
0:16This is the Visiting Speaker Series.这是客座演说家系列。
0:18Our guest today is Malcolm Gladwell.今天的客人是马尔科姆·格拉德韦尔
0:20I've promised to keep this very short.我答应过要保持很短的
0:23He is the author of the amazingly popular book,他是这本令人惊叹的书的作者,
展开字幕全文(1396 条)
序号英文中文
1I'm glad you could all join us this afternoon.很高兴你们今天下午能加入我们
2I'm not mic'd.我没有麦克风。
3Am I mic'd now?我现在有麦克风了吗?
4Did you just see that usage of technology?你刚才看到技术的用法了吗?
5I'm very proud of myself.我为自己感到骄傲
6My name's Tamara Pesic.我叫塔玛拉·佩西奇
7This is the Visiting Speaker Series.这是客座演说家系列。
8Our guest today is Malcolm Gladwell.今天的客人是马尔科姆·格拉德韦尔
9I've promised to keep this very short.我答应过要保持很短的
10He is the author of the amazingly popular book,他是这本令人惊叹的书的作者,
11The Chipping Point, and is also the author of the soon-to-be芯片点,同时也是即将到来的作者
12popular book, Blink, which is all about making decisions流行的书,Blink, 这一切都是做决定
13in an incredibly fast method.以惊人的快速方法。
14And he explains it in such a wonderful left-brained way他用如此美妙的左脑来解释
15that you might actually agree with him.你也许同意他的意见
16And I'm really excited to hear what he has to say我真的很兴奋听到他说什么
17and to hear the discussion afterwards.并听到讨论之后。
18Please help me welcome the brilliant genius,请帮我欢迎这位天才天才
19Malcolm Gladwell.马尔科姆·格拉德韦尔.
20Thank you very much.谢谢
21I'm neither brilliant or genius, but I'll let that slide.我既不聪明也不天才 但我会放轻松的
22It's great to be back here.回来真好
23I was here several years ago for The Chipping Point,几年前,我在这里为"芯片点",
24although someone just told me, someone ominously,虽然有人刚刚告诉我, 有人不祥,
25that my appearance back then had been taped and archived.当时的我外表被录音和存档
26And I always feel slightly nervous when I hear that,我总是觉得有点紧张 当我听到这个,
27because I just think, well, what if I因为我只是想,嗯,如果我
28said something several years ago that几年前说过
29is utterly incompatible with what I'm going to say today,这完全不符合我今天要说的话
30which is entirely possible, because my mind changes这完全有可能,因为我的思想改变
31constantly.不断的
32And so you can't hold me to anything I said before.那样你就不能按住我之前说的话
33That's my only request before we go anywhere.这是我去任何地方之前的唯一要求
34My new book, Blink, is about rapid cognition.我的新书"闪闪闪"是关于快速认知的
35And by that, I mean the kind of thinking我指的是那种想法
36that takes place in the blink of an eye,那是在眨眼中发生的,
37as opposed to the kind of thinking而不是那种思维
38that we do consciously and deliberately我们自觉和故意的
39over some period of time.在一段时间内。
40And I use the word thinking, because I我用这个词思考,因为我
41think that what goes on in the kind of decisions想想在决定中会发生什么
42we make in the blink of an eye represent thinking.我们一眨眼就想着
43It's rational.理则理也.
44It's just that it's operating below the level of awareness只是它运作在意识水平以下
45and operating by slightly different rules运行规则略有不同
46than the other kind of thinking, which we're very familiar with.而不是我们熟悉的另一种思维
47And the book is a call to kind of understand and appreciate这本书是需要理解和欣赏的
48the enormous power, both for good and ill,巨大的力量,无论好坏,
49of that kind of thinking.这种想法。
50And I tell all kinds of different stories.我讲述了各种各样的不同的故事。
51And rather than try and summarize the book, what而不是试图总结这本书,什么
52I thought I would do is just tell you我想我会做的只是告诉你
53one story from the book, which I think书上的一个故事 我想
54might be of interest to many of you here,可能你们中很多人都感兴趣
55and also illustrate some of the things也说明一些事情
56that I'm worrying about thinking about in this book.我担心在这本书里会思考
57And it's a story about chairs, in particular这是一个关于椅子的故事,尤其是
58about a guy named Bill Stumpf.一个叫比尔·斯通夫的人
59And Bill Stumpf is a very, in a chair world,Bill Stumpf是一个非常,在一个椅子世界,
60Bill Stumpf is sort of the Michael Jordan.比尔·斯通普夫是迈克尔·乔丹
61If you were all in the chair business,如果你都是在做椅子生意的话
62you would all know who he is.你们都知道他是谁
63He's this legendary figure who worked a lot with Herman他是赫尔曼的传奇人物
64Miller.弥勒.
65And over the years, in the 1980s,多年来,在1980年代,
66he designed for them two really breakthrough chairs他为他们设计了两个真正突破的椅子
67called the Ergon and the Equa.叫做埃贡和埃夸
68And they were these sort of new ideas in office chairs.这些是办公室里的新想法。
69And in the late 80s, Herman Miller went to him and said,80年代末,赫尔曼·米勒去找他,说:
70we'd like you to design a truly amazing, like the greatest我们希望你设计一个真正神奇的, 像最伟大的
71office chair ever.办公室椅永远。
72And just start with a blank sheet of paper.从一张空白纸开始
73So Stumpf went back to his lab, and he lives in Minneapolis,所以斯坦普夫回到实验室 他住在明尼阿波利斯
74and started from the beginning.从头开始
75He started over with chairs.他从椅子开始
76And he sort of looked at chairs and realized他看着椅子,意识到
77there were, at that point, all kinds of crazy things那时,有各种疯狂的事情
78about office chairs.关于办公室的椅子。
79It didn't make sense.这没有道理。
80For example, they had one-piece backs.比如说,他们只有一块背
81And if they had any kind of setting to adjust for the back,如果他们有适应背部的设置
82you would adjust the whole thing at once,你会立刻调整整件事,
83which makes no sense, because you have an upper back这根本说不通,因为你有一个上背
84and a lower back, and your upper back and lower back和下背, 你的上背和下背
85have very, very different needs and requirements.有着非常,非常不同的需求和要求。
86And there's no single way of having a single setting which没有一个单一的设定
87will make your entire back happy.会让你整个背部快乐的
88So he decided he wanted to have a two-piece back to the chair.于是他决定自己想把两件拿回椅子上.
89And then he realizes, well, that the way the chairs were built,然后他意识到 椅子的建造方式
90the seat pan and the seat back were锅和后座是
91connected in this very kind of linear fashion,以这种线性的方式连接,
92so that if you tilted back on a chair,所以,如果你倾斜回到椅子上,
93the seat pan would move out, which is insane.这太疯狂了
94Why would you want to lose the support of the seat pan为什么你要失去座位的支撑
95when you lean back on the chair?当你靠在椅子上时?
96They should move independently.他们应该独立行动。
97And that failure to make them move independently无法让他们独立行动
98was causing a great deal of lower back strain.导致背部压力大大降低
99So he fixed that.所以他修好了这个
100And then he realized all kinds of things,然后他意识到各种各样的事情,
101like the biggest problem with office chairs,像最大的问题 与办公椅,
102like the ones you're in right now,就像你现在的一样
103is if I kept you here for four hours,如果我把你留在这里四个小时
104you would, which I won't do, you would get incredibly hot,你会的,我不会的, 你会变得非常热,
105of course, right?当然,对不对?
106You would get sticky.你会变得黏糊糊的。
107That material you're sitting on doesn't breathe very well.你坐着的材料呼吸不好
108So he needed material that breathed.所以他需要呼吸的物质。
109And he came up with this special mesh,他想出了这个特殊的网状,
110which had the ability to stay cool,能够保持冷静,
111even if you sat in it all day.即使你整天坐着
112But of course, mesh is difficult, because it's mesh.但是,当然,网状是困难的,因为它是网状的.
113If you stretch it and then you get up, it'll pinch, right?如果你伸伸,然后你站起来, 它会捏,对不对?
114So he had to make non-pinching mesh,因此,他不得不做非螺丝网,
115which I don't know how many of you are engineers,我不知道你们中有多少人是工程师
116is an engineering task that is actually exceedingly difficult.这是一项实际上极其困难的工程任务。
117So anyway, he did all these things,所以无论如何,他做了所有这些事情,
118and millions of dollars were spent in development.数百万美元用于发展。
119And he presented Herman Miller with this prototype.他向赫尔曼·米勒提出了这个原型.
120And they said, it's fabulous.他们说,这是美妙的。
121Before we take it to market,在上市之前
122we have to do what people do in the chair world,我们必须做别人在椅子上做的事,
123not just the chair world,不仅仅是椅子世界,
124but in fact, all of the corporate world.但实际上,所有的企业世界。
125We're gonna market research it, right?我们要去市场研究,对不对?
126We gotta see what people think of it.我们得看看人们怎么看
127Now in the chair world, you do things,现在在椅子世界, 你做一些事情,
128you do two tests of things.你做两个测试的东西。
129You give people, you make people rate chairs你给别人,你让别人分座椅
130on a scale of one to 10 for comfort,宽裕的,分一至十级;
131where one is hideous, or one is uncomfortable,在那里,一个人是丑陋的,或者一个人是不舒服的,
132and 10 is perfect.和10是完美的。
133And you make them rate it one to 10 on aesthetics,你让他们把美学评分一到十
134where one is hideous and 10 is beautiful.在那里,一个是可怕的, 10是美丽的。
135And they took this chair out,他们把这把椅子拿出来了
136and the comfort scores were everything you would expect,和舒适的分数 是所有你期望,
137sevens, eights, nines even,7、8、9个
138which is unheard of in the chair world.这在座椅上是闻所未闻的。
139And they were very, very happy about that.他们对此非常高兴。
140But then they did the aesthetic scores,但后来他们做了美学分
141and they got a slap in the face.他们的脸被打一巴掌。
142The people came back and said, gave it twos or threes,人民回来说,给它两三个,
143which is, you can't go to market with a two or a three.也就是说 你不能用两三个去市场
144People were saying, this thing is so ugly,人们说,这东西太丑陋了,
145there is no way I would ever,我永远也不会
146it looks like a piece of lawn furniture,它看起来像一块草坪家具,
147it looks like a, one of the,它看起来像一个,一个,
148I saw the results of one of the first focus groups.我看到了第一批焦点小组的结果。
149It was described as the exoskeleton它被描述为外骨骼
150of a giant prehistoric insect.一个巨大的史前昆虫。
151It was described as something off the set of Robocop,被描述为机器警察系统之外的东西,
152which was a big movie back then.那是一部大电影
153It was, people hated it, right?那是,人们讨厌它,对不对?
154And you can't, the rule of thumb in the chair world你不能,椅子世界的拇指规则
155is you really need to score above seven你真的需要分数超过7
156on both those dimensions to be able to sell something,这两个维度 能够卖出一些东西,
157and they didn't have it.他们没有
158So what do they do?他们做什么的?
159Now this kind of dilemma faces companies all the time.现在这种两难境地 总是面对公司。
160They have an idea that they think is really good,他们有一个想法 他们认为真的很好,
161and they go out and try to validate their own intuition他们出去验证自己的直觉
162by asking consumers,通过询问消费者,
163and consumers sometimes deliver a verdict消费者有时会做出判决
164that makes you very unhappy,这让你非常不高兴,
165and the question is, what do you do with that verdict?问题是 你对判决做了什么?
166Well, Herman Miller decided to hell with the consumer verdict.赫尔曼・米勒决定下地狱 对消费者的判决。
167They liked the chair,他们喜欢椅子,
168and they were gonna bring it to market,他们打算把它带到市场,
169so they did just that, they brought it out.所以他们这样做, 他们把它拿出来。
170And in the beginning, no one, predictably enough,一开始,没有人,可以预测,
171liked this chair, didn't sell.喜欢这张椅子,不卖。
172But slowly it began to pick up some support但慢慢地它开始得到一些支持
173from here and there,从这里和那里,
174and really kind of edgy avant-garde designers和真正一种 优雅的前卫设计师
175kind of took to it because it was so kind of weird,有点被接受,因为它是如此的奇怪,
176and then it won some prize from France for new design,然后它获得了法国的新设计奖
177and then it started to show up in television commercials,然后它开始出现在电视广告中,
178and then it began to pick up real traction然后它开始拾起真正的牵引力
179in Silicon Valley, and then suddenly it just took off,在硅谷, 然后突然它刚刚起飞,
180and the sales were mounting by 20 and 30% a month销售额每月上升20%和30%
181until it became not just the best-selling chair直到它成为最畅销的椅子
182in the history of Herman Miller,在赫尔曼·米勒的历史上
183but the best-selling office chair of all time.但最畅销的办公室主席 永远。
184I'm talking, of course, about the Aeron chair,我当然是在说艾隆的椅子
185and I'm sure that many of you even work in an Aeron chair我敢肯定,你们很多人 甚至在Aeron椅子上工作
186or work in something that has been directly inspired或者在被直接启发的东西中工作
187by the Aeron chair.坐在艾龙的椅子上
188The Aeron chair changed the face of chairs as we know it.据我们所知,艾龙椅改变了椅子的面貌。
189It's probably the most influential office chair可能是最有影响力的办公椅
190of the last 35 years.过去35年。
191But that story, I'm quite sure, for most of you,但那个故事,我敢肯定, 对你们大多数人来说,
192presents a problem, right?是个问题,对吧?
193Here was this product, which was absolutely revolutionary,这个产品是革命性的
194which made zillions of dollars for its company给公司赚了几十亿美元
195and made heroes out of its designers,我用它的设计者创造英雄,
196and yet, by the normal rules of corporate operation,然而,根据正常的公司运营规则,
197it should never have come to market, right?不该上市的 对吧?
198The very mechanism that its company had set up公司建立的机制
199to judge whether it was worthy of coming to market判断它是否值得上市
200pronounced it absolutely unworthy.宣布它绝对不值得。
201It's a paradox, right?这是一个悖论,对不对?
202It's a problem more than that.问题不止此.
203It's like a, what do you do?这就像一个,你做什么的?
204Of what usefulness, in other words,换句话说,
205is a mechanism for measuring people's reactions to something是衡量人们对某物反应的机制
206if those reactions aren't ultimately predictive如果这些反应不是最终预测的
207of how they feel.他们的感受。
208And sure enough, just to test this,而且很确定,只是测试一下这个,
209Herman Miller, two years after the Aeron chair came out,赫尔曼・米勒, 两年后,艾龙椅出来,
210went back out and did another round of focus groups回去了 做了另一轮焦点小组
211with people and asked them what they thought of these chairs,问他们怎么看这些椅子,
212and people said, well, we think it's an eight on comfort,人们说,嗯, 我们认为这是一个8 在舒适,
213and by the way, we also think it's an eight on aesthetics.顺便说一句,我们也认为是8的美学。
214They once thought it was ugly,他们曾经觉得很丑陋
215and now they thought it was beautiful.现在他们觉得它很美
216So what usefulness, furthermore,那又有什么用处呢?
217is a test of measuring people's reactions测试人们的反应
218if one year it measures and says it's a two,如果一年它测量 并说它是二,
219and two years later they come back and says it's an eight.两年后,他们回来 说这是8。
220So is the chair beautiful or is it ugly?椅子很漂亮还是丑陋?
221Now, I'm very interested in that story in this book我对这本书里的故事很感兴趣
222because my book is a book about snap judgments,因为我的书是一本关于快速判断的书
223about the kind of thinking we do like this.关于那种想法 我们这样做。
224And when you take a chair out to focus groups,当你把椅子 出来焦点组,
225you're getting people to make a judgment.你让别人做出判断
226Like, they look at it, do you like it, right?就像,他们看着它, 你喜欢它,对不对?
227Now, my question that I ask in this book现在,我在这本书里问的问题
228is how seriously do we take that judgment?我们是否认真对待这种判断?
229What does it mean?这是什么意思?
230We understand if someone took the chair home我们知道如果有人把椅子带回家
231and lived with it for a year and sat in it every day和它一起生活了一年 每天坐在它里面
232and gave us a judgment.给了我们一个判断。
233We understand that kind of judgment,我们理解这种判断
234but we're not doing that.但我们不这样做。
235We're having a focus group.我们有一个焦点小组。
236We have the chair in the center of the room我们把椅子放在房间中央
237and we say, what do you think?我们说,你觉得呢?
238And people say, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.而众生说,.
239Well, what does that mean?这是什么意思?
240What do we know about the accuracy, the strength,我们知道什么是准确的, 力量,
241the whatever of that particular judgment?具体判断是什么?
242And so the book is an attempt to come up所以这本书是想上书
243with some kind of principles for understanding带有某种理解原则
244when that judgment is trustworthy and when it's not.当那个判断是可信的, 当它不是。
245So let's just walk through that story所以,让我们走过这个故事
246and see if we could extract some principles.看看我们能不能提一些原则
247Principle number one is that our preferences,原则一是 我们的偏好,
248as expressed in a snap judgment,如速判决所示,
249are extraordinarily unstable.异常不稳定。
250That's a very important point这很重要
251because it is the assumption of many people因为那是很多人的假设
252in many aspects of our lives,在我们生活的许多方面,
253but let's just talk about market research here.但是,让我们只谈 市场研究在这里。
254The assumption of a lot of market researchers许多市场研究人员的假设
255is that when they measure a preference for something,难道他们以物配主的时候,
256they're measuring some kind of inherent position他们正在测量某种固有的位置
257on that issue or product or thing, right?问题或产品或东西,对不对?
258But in fact, that's wrong.但事实上,这是错误的。
259In fact, when you measure something by a snap judgment,事实上,当你通过快速判断来衡量某件事时,
260what you're measuring is unbelievably volatile.你所测量的是不可思议的不稳定性。
261Let me give you an example.让我举个例子。
262Coke and Pepsi, remember the Pepsi challenge?可乐和百事,还记得百事挑战吗?
263Two cups, one's got Coke, one's got Pepsi.二杯,一服可乐,一服百事.
264You give it to Coke drinkers and you say,你把它给可乐酒商 你说
265take a sip of each, which one do you prefer?每人喝一口,你喜欢哪个?
266And lo and behold, Coke drinkers always prefer Pepsi, right?可乐饮者总是喜欢百事可乐,对吧?
267That's what caused Coke to do the whole new Coke thing所以可乐才开始做新的可乐
26820 years ago because they were getting killed20年前,他们被杀了
269in this seeming extraordinarily objective measure在这个似乎非常客观的措施中
270of what people preferred.以众人所喜爱的事物发誓,
271There's all this internal correspondence in Coke可乐里面有这么多内部通信
272at the time when they were like,当他们像,
273oh my God, maybe we're not the best tasting Coke, right?哦,我的上帝,也许我们不是最好的 可乐,对不对?
274Maybe American tastes have changed也许美国的味道已经变了
275and Cola's not what it once used to be.科拉和以前不一样了
276Maybe we've got to be more like Pepsi.也许我们应该更像百事公司
277After all, we're asking not just five or 10 people,毕竟我们不只问五十个人
278but tens of thousands of people但成千上万的人
279were given the Pepsi challenge.获得了百事可乐的挑战。
280And the result,结果
281that's an extraordinary robust statistical margin.这是一个非常强大的统计比值。
282It's something like 60 or 65% of Coke drinkers像是60%或65%的可乐饮料
283said in the sip test that they preferred Pepsi.在口水测试中说 他们更喜欢百事可乐
284Doesn't that seem to suggest这似乎没有暗示
285that Pepsi is better tasting than Coke, right?百事比可乐好吃,对吧?
286Seems like a very stable way of measuring preferences.似乎是一种非常稳定的衡量偏好的方法。
287Doesn't suggest that at all.这完全没有暗示
288Because the whole test is, in fact, a kind of fraud.因为整个测试,事实上,是一种欺诈。
289It口试.
290When you're sipping any drink,当你喝任何饮料时,
291you will always prefer the sweeter one, right?你总是喜欢甜的,对不对?
292If, on the other hand, you drink the whole can,如果,另一方面,你喝整个罐头,
293the sweetness will start to become cloying甜味会开始凝结
294and your preference will shift back你们的喜悦,将转回来,
295{\fn黑体\fs20\shad2\2aH82\3aH20\4aH33\fscx95\3cH592001\be1}那东西可没那么甜
296Pepsi is sweeter than Coke.百事比可乐甜.
297Pepsi will always win a sip test.百事总能赢一口
298If you make people drink the whole can,如果你让所有人都喝罐子
299they'll prefer Coke, right?他们喜欢可乐,对吧?
300Well, which of those two scenarios那么,这两个假设中的哪一个
301is more like the real world?更像现实世界吗?
302Well, unless people are buying Cola,除非有人买可乐
303taking one sip and throwing it out,喝一口然后扔出来
304you're actually far more interested其实你更感兴趣
305in what they think after tasting the whole can.在他们想的 在品尝整个罐头之后。
306There is a case where the preference,有这样的情况:
307the expression of what people think表达人们的想法
308in a snap judgment, is completely volatile.在快速判断中,是完全不稳定的。
309It is entirely dependent on how you choose to measure it这完全取决于你如何衡量
310and whether you choose to make them sip it你是否选择让他们喝下去
311or drink the whole can.或喝整个罐头。
312I'll give you another example of,我举个例子给你
313I sort of need props for this one.我需要这个道具
314Oh well, I don't have them.哦,好吧,我没有。
315Another example of how I can,又一个我可以举出的例子,
316a demonstration of unstable preferences.一个不稳定偏好的表现。
317Suppose that I gave you, we did a Pepsi challenge,如果我给了你,我们做了一个百事可乐的挑战,
318but I ask a slightly different question,但我问了一个有点不同的问题,
319which is one glass is Coke, one glass is Pepsi.一杯是可乐,一杯是百事可乐
320I just want you to taste them both我只是想让你尝尝它们
321and tell me which is which,告诉我是什么
322which is Coke, which is Pepsi.是可乐 是百事可乐
323Not that hard.没那么难
324I suspect if you did this right now in this room,我怀疑你是否在这间屋子里这样做
325probably 75% of you will be able to distinguish你们75%的人可能可以分辨
326between the two of them.两人之间
327Coke is sweeter and Pepsi, or Coke is not as sweet.可乐更甜和百事可乐,或可乐不如甜.
328Pepsi is sweeter, a little more lemony.百事更甜,柠檬多一点.
329Coke is more of that kind of molasses-y kind of, right?可口可乐更像是那种糖浆,对吧?
330That's easily done.很简单
331All right, now, so now you're all confident好了,现在,你们都有信心了
332that you can successfully make discriminations您可以成功做出歧视
333among the Colas, all right?在科拉斯人中间,好吗?
334You can't.你不能这么做。
335If I change that test in a very subtle way,如果我以非常微妙的方式改变测试
336I will completely obliterate your ability我会完全抹去你的能力
337to make that very simple judgment.做一个非常简单的判断。
338And the test, the change is as follows.而考证,变化如下.
339I give you three glasses.我给你三杯
340One is one of those Colas, the other two are the other.一个是科拉斯人,另一个是另一个
341And this time, I'm gonna make it easier for you.这次,我会让你更轻松
342I'm gonna say, I don't wanna know which is Coke我要说,我不想知道什么是可乐
343and which is Pepsi, I just wanna know百事可乐,我只是想知道
344which one is not like the other two, right?哪一个和另外两个不一样,对吧?
345Sesame Street question.芝麻街问.
346Sound easy?听起来容易吗?
347Totally difficult.完全困难。
348If I did this in this room right now,如果我现在在这个房间里这样做,
349the success rate on what's called the triangle test三角测试的成功率
350would be at one third, it would be chance.将会是三分之一,这将是机会。
351You can't do it.不可为.
352What people do when you do, I've done this so many times别人做什么,当你做, 我做了这么多次
353now that I, what they do is this.现在,我,他们做的是这个。
354They taste the first one, they go, yeah.他们尝到第一个,他们走了,是的。
355Taste the second one, and they go.尝第二人,遂去.
356Taste the third one, and they go.尝见第三人,遂去.
357Then they go, second one.然后他们走了,第二个。
358And then you know you've got them, because.然后你知道你有他们,因为。
359Now, what have I done?现在,我做了什么?
360I've shaken you, right?我吓到你了 对吧?
361You used to be able to have a very clear way你以前有一条很清晰的路
362of establishing a preference.确定优惠。
363You were just comparing these two things.你在比较这两件事
364But by introducing a third element,但是,通过引入第三个要素,
365I've so clouded the picture that you don't know what your,我这样蒙蔽了图片,你不知道什么是你的,
366you can't make a decision anymore, right?你不能再做决定了吧?
367You've lost it.你输了
368Your hold on this question of what is Coke你对什么是可口可乐的问题持之以恒
369and what is Pepsi, which you thought was so strong百事是甚么,你以为如此坚固
370and profound, is incredibly fragile.和深刻的,是极其脆弱的。
371I can shake it just by introducing a third element.我可以通过引入第三个要素来动摇它。
372And that's the first lesson of these things.这是这些事情的第一个教训。
373When you look at how somebody can go from当你看着一个人如何从
374thinking the air on chair is a two one year以为椅子上的空气是两年
375to an eight the next year, that shouldn't be surprising.明年的八点 这不奇怪
376Because when you measure the two,因为当你测量这两个,
377you're not measuring anything robust, right?你没有测量任何强壮的,对不对?
378It's a preference.谓之偏好.
379Preferences can change like that.首选可以这样改变
380Okay, second lesson.好吧,第二课。
381Second lesson has to do with what's called storytelling.第二课与所谓讲故事有关.
382The storytelling problem, as psychologists like to call it.讲故事的问题,作为心理学家喜欢称之为.
383And that is that when you ask people当你问人
384to explain their snap judgments,解释他们的快速判断,
385more often than not, they simply make up stories.他们常常只是编故事
386Now, there's a huge literature on this in psychology.现在,心理学中有一大堆关于这个的文献。
387And it is so utterly daunting for the cause这对事业来说是如此的艰巨
388of explanation gathering.解释收集。
389But basically it says that when we have a snap judgment,但基本上它说,当我们有一个快速判断,
390that is a product of our unconscious.那是我们无意识的产物
391And our unconscious is a locked room, right?我们的昏迷是锁着的房间 对吧?
392It's our unconscious.这是我们的无意识。
393It's outside of our awareness.它在我们的意识之外。
394We have no idea and we cannot have any idea我们不知道,我们不知道
395about what's going on inside that room.关于那个房间里发生的事
396And so when we're asked to come up with explanations,所以当我们被要求 提出解释,
397we just make stuff up.我们只是编造一些东西。
398Very, very famous study that demonstrates this,非常,非常著名的研究 证明了这一点,
399which is, like all these studies,就像所有这些研究一样,
400we could have done them today.我们今天可以做他们今天。
401It would have been great fun if we had several hours.如果我们有几个小时,那会很有趣。
402But you hang two ropes from the ceiling.但你在天花板上挂了两条绳子
403And you have people come in and you say,有人进来说
404there are four possible ways有四种可能的办法
405of connecting these two ropes, right?连接这两条绳子,对吧?
406The ropes are far enough apart that if you grab one rope绳子离得够远了 如果你抓住一根绳子
407and you pull it over like this,你这样拉过来
408you can't reach the second one.你无法到达第二个。
409So the question is, come up with four strategies所以问题是,想出四个策略
410of tying these two ropes together.把这两条绳子绑在一起
411There's all kinds of objects around the room房间里有各种各样的物体
412that you can use as props.用来做道具
413First thing people do is they see a chair, right?人们做的第一件事就是看到椅子,对吗?
414Pull the chair out.把椅子拉出来
415They tie one rope to the one to the chair,他们把一条绳子绑在椅子上
416reach over, grab the other rope, right?抓住另一条绳子,对吧?
417Put them together, that's one.把它们放在一起,这就是一个。
418Then they see there's an extension cord in the corner然后他们看到角落有一条延伸线
419and they go over, tie the extension cord to one end,然后他们过去,把延伸线绑到一端,
420connect the ropes.把绳子连接起来
421Then they see there's like a hoe thing in the corner.然后他们看到角落里好像有蹄子
422They grab the hoe, they pull one rope towards them,他们抓住了蹄子,把一根绳子拉过来,
423grab the other one, put them together.抓住另一个,把它们放在一起。
424And then they're stuck, right?然后他们卡住了,对不对?
425Thinking, okay, I got three, but I know there's four.想想,好吧,我有三个,但我知道有四个。
426They're sitting there and they're thinking and thinking他们坐在那里,他们思考和思考
427and 10 minutes pass and they're starting to think,10分钟后 他们开始思考
428am I stupid?我傻吗?
429I mean, they're starting to doubt themselves.我的意思是,他们开始怀疑自己。
430At that point, the experimenter walks across the room这时候,实验者走过房间
431to get a cup of coffee and as he does,喝杯咖啡,和他一样,
432he brushes one of the ropes with his shoulder他用肩膀刷一根绳子
433and it starts to swing back and forth.然后它开始回旋
434At which point, everyone always goes like this.那时,每个人都这样
435Oh, of course, and they get up and they say,哦,当然,他们站起来说,
436they take one of the ropes他们拿了一根绳子
437and they swing it back and forth like a pendulum他们像摇篮一样摇摆,
438and grab the other one and when it swings over,抓住另一个 当它翻转,
439they connect them.他们连接他们。
440And then the experimenter asks them,然后实验者问他们
441where did you get that idea for the pendulum?你从哪得到这个想法的?
442And they'll always say, you know,他们会说,你知道,
443I had this image of eighth grade physics我有一个八年级物理的图像
444when we were studying.当我们在学习。
445And they'll say, I saw this movie,他们会说,我看过这部电影,
446adult Tarzan, Tarzan swinging on his vine.成人泰山,泰山挥舞着他的葡萄.
447No one ever says, well,从来没有人说,嗯,
448because you brushed it with your shoulder因为你用肩膀刷的
449and I realized that, now, why don't they say that?我意识到,现在, 他们为什么不说?
450Are they lying?他们在撒谎吗?
451Are they embarrassed?他们尴尬吗?
452No, they're not lying, are they embarrassed?不,他们不是在撒谎,他们尴尬吗?
453It's because that was a cue因为那是个提示
454that was picked up by their unconscious.被他们无意识地捡到了
455They don't know where it came from.他们不知道它来自哪里。
456All they know is the outcome, which is,他们只知道结果,那就是,
457their unconscious telling them, pendulum, right?他们不知所措地告诉他们,对吗?
458That's all they know.他们只知道这些
459Well, in that kind of situation,那么,在这种情况下,
460what do we do when we're asked for an explanation?我们被问及解释时怎么办?
461We make up a story.我们编个故事
462And that story has nothing to do那故事没什么好说的
463with the actual reality of the situation.与实际情况。
464I had a long discussion when I was writing my book我写书的时候 已经讨论很久了
465和网球教练Vic Braden,
466who was telling me about,谁告诉我,
467he's obsessed with this issue because he's a coach.他沉迷于这个问题 因为他是教练
468He's trying to explain ways of playing tennis better, right?他试图解释如何打网球更好,对不对?
469So he spends lots of time talking to,所以他花了很多时间和他说话,
470tennis pros, you know, Pete Sampras about their tennis.网球职业选手 Pete Sampras 关于他们的网球
471And what he says is, the explanations that pros give他所说的话是, 专业的解释
472for how they play tennis are never useful.因为他们打网球是没用的
473And he gave me the following example.他举了个例子
474You talk to Pete Sampras,你和皮特·桑普拉斯说话
475let's just use him as our whipping boy.我们把他当鞭子吧
476How does he hit a topspin forehand?他怎么撞到顶尖前臂的?
477This is what he'll say.他会这么说的
478He'll say, at the moment of impact with the ball,他会说,在球撞击的时候,
479you roll your wrist to produce the topspin, right?你摇动手腕 产生顶端,对不对?
480Okay, Vic Braden videotaped Pete Sampras好吧,维克布拉登 录像皮特桑普拉斯
481hitting topspin forehands击打顶端前手
482and slowed the videotape down并减慢了录像
483to, so he's looking at slices of a hundredth of a second.所以他看着一百分之一秒的片子
484And he showed that Pete Sampras never,他证明皮特·桑普拉斯从未
485ever rolled his wrist.曾经滚动他的手腕。
486In fact, he cannot find a single professional tennis player事实上,他找不到一个职业网球运动员
487who rolls his or her wrist摇动手腕的人
488when they hit a topspin forehand.当他们撞上前门时
489You roll your wrist after the ball is gone.球没了后再转手
490If you roll your wrist when at the moment of impact,如果你在撞击时摇动手腕
491you sprain your wrist, right?你扭伤了你的手腕,对不对?
492Now, here are people who know more about topspin forehands现在,这里的人 谁知道更多 关于顶端前手
493than anyone else alive.比任何人都活着。
494They hit the topspin forehand better他们撞到顶端前臂更好
495than anyone in human history.比人类历史上的任何人都强
496Yet they do not know why they do it or how,然而,他们不知道他们为什么这样做,也不知道如何这样做,
497they do not know how they do it.他们不知道他们怎么做到的。
498And to ask them to provide an explanation请他们解释一下
499is to come up with an explanation是想出一个解释
500that is more than in this case useless.这比这更无用
501It is to come up with an explanation是想出一个解释
502that is actively harmful.这很有害
503That's what we do as human beings这就是我们作为人类所做的
504when we're asked to account for our snap reactions.当我们被要求解释 我们的突然反应。
505We make stuff up.我们编的
506And yet society, as far as I can tell,但社会,据我所知,
507is rife with people who have this naive faith充满了这种天真信仰的人
508that somehow as individuals不知何故作为个人
509we're capable of actively representing.我们有能力积极代理
510The reasons for those decisions that are made in the moment.目前作出这些决定的原因。
511Last point, third lesson from all of this.最后一点,第三课 从这一切。
512And that is that it is not just the case这不仅仅是事实
513that when we ask someone to explain themselves当我们要求别人解释
514in the moment, they come up with nonsense.现在,他们想出胡说八道。
515It is also the case that the act of asking someone询问某人的行为也是这样
516to explain themselves actually changes来解释自己的实际变化
517under certain circumstances what people believe.在某些情况下,人们相信什么。
518There's a large body of literature on this,有很多关于这个的文献
519but the simplest explanation is something但最简单的解释是
520is this famous experiment called the poster test.这个著名的实验叫做海报测试
521And the poster test is,而海报测试是,
522suppose I divide this room in half, right down here, right?假设我把这个房间分成一半,就在这里,对不对?
523And I have across this wall all these posters,我穿过这面墙,这些海报,
524tons of posters.数吨海报。
525And I say to this half of the room,我对这半个房间说,
526you guys can have any poster you want.你们可以有任何海报你想要的。
527Take it, take it home, it's yours, right?拿着,带回家,是你的,对吗?
528Very simple.非常简单。
529Pick the best, pick the one you like the most.选最好的 选最喜欢的
530To this half of the room I say, same thing.我对这半个房间说了同样的话
531Pick the poster you like the best, take it home.选你最喜欢的海报,带回家
532But before, by the way, you take it home,但在你带回家之前
533could you just write out a couple of paragraphs你能写几段吗?
534of explanation of why you like that poster?你为何喜欢那张海报?
535Then, six months from now, I call you all up.六个月后,我打电话给你们
536And I say, that poster, remember that poster?我说,那张海报,还记得那张海报吗?
537How do you like your poster?你喜欢你的海报吗?
538This half loves the poster.这一半喜欢海报
539Loves it, it's up in the corner of my bedroom.喜欢它,它在我的卧室角落。
540Love it, what a great poster.喜欢它,多么棒的海报。
541This half is like, I hate it.这一半就像, 我讨厌它。
542I threw it out.我把它扔了出来。
543And then I look at your poster choices然后我看着你的海报选择
544and I find that this half,我发现这一半,
545the ones who are required to choose posters,那些必须选择海报的人,
546chose different posters.选择不同的海报。
547They didn't choose the same one as you.他们没有选择和你一样的
548I'm guessing that this half, randomly speaking,我猜这半个,随机来说,
549is roughly the same as this half.和这一半差不多
550Chose very different.选择非常不同。
551Then I look at the kind of posters you chose我看你选的海报
552and I realize that there is a pattern in the difference.我意识到 区别是有规律的
553That the posters on the back wall were of two varieties.后面墙上的海报有两个品种
554Some were impressionist paintings有些是印象派画
555and some were really cutesy ones of like kittens有些像小猫一样可爱
556on, you know, balance bars and stuff.在,你知道,平衡的栏杆和东西。
557You guys all chose the kittens.你们都选了小猫
558You chose the impressionist posters.你选择了印象主义海报。
559Now why is that?为什么?
560Because the act of asking you to explain your preference因为要求你解释你的偏好
561biased you towards things that you could explain.偏执你的事情,你可以解释。
562I'm guessing that only a small number of people here我猜这里只有一小部分人
563feel confident in their ability to write相信他们的写作能力
564meaningfully and intelligently about impressionist art.对印象主义艺术有意义和智慧.
565So as a result, what did you do?所以,结果,你做了什么?
566You went with the kitten.你和小猫一起去了
567Because you said, on an unconscious level,因为你说,在无意识的层面,
568well I can talk about why I like kittens.我可以说为什么我喜欢小猫
569I had a kitten when I was young, you know what I mean?我年轻的时候有只小猫,你知道我的意思吗?
570So the act of making you explain your preference,所以让你解释你偏好的行为
571not just led you away from the thing不只是引导你远离事物
572that made you most happy, from your true preference,这让你最快乐, 从你真正的偏好,
573but it biased you in favor of the thing但它偏向于你 喜欢的东西
574that was most conservative, right?这是最保守的,对不对?
575It biased you in favor of the safe choice你偏爱安全选择
576and against the thing that was strange and unusual.并且反对奇怪和不寻常的东西。
577And that, to me, is the single most scariest这对我来说是最可怕的
578and most dangerous part of approaching snap judgments和最危险的 接近快速判断
579in this naive way.这种天真的方式。
580And that is by asking for explanations.这就是要求解释。
581We create a situation where people turn away我们造就了一种人转身
582from what is radical and a little bit strange从激进和有点奇怪的东西
583and towards the things that are safe.以安全的东西盟誓,
584So think of this in the context of the Aeron chair.因此,在艾龙椅上考虑一下这一点。
585People are faced with this chair这把椅子是人们面对的
586and they're asked to explain what they think about it.他们被要求解释他们的想法。
587And they don't have the language to describe this thing.他们没有语言来描述这件事情。
588It's totally unlike any chair they've seen before.这完全不像他们见过的椅子
589So what are they left to do?那他们还能做什么呢?
590They have to come up with some kind of explanation.他们必须想出某种解释
591And the only words they can find他们唯一能找到的词
592are words that have all kinds of negative connotations.是各种负面含义的词。
593I hate it, right?我恨它,对不对?
594But what do they really mean?但他们到底是什么意思?
595They didn't hate it at all.他们一点都不讨厌
596They loved that chair.他们喜欢那把椅子。
597Or they had within their heart或他们心中有
598the capacity to love that chair once they got used to it.一旦他们习惯了 就会爱上那把椅子
599What they really meant was not that I hate that chair,他们真正的意思不是我讨厌那把椅子
600but that chair is unusual.但那个椅子很不寻常
601I don't know what I think of that chair yet.我不知道我对那把椅子怎么想
602I've never seen a chair like that.我从来没有见过这样的椅子。
603That chair is different from all the chairs这把椅子和所有椅子不一样
604I've had in my life.我曾经有过
605Now that reaction is profoundly different现在的反应很不一样
606from the reaction that I hate that chair.因为我讨厌那把椅子
607In fact, it's on this end of the spectrum事实上,它是在光谱的这一端
608whereas hate is on that end of the spectrum.而仇恨则存在于这一端。
609And yet, by using this simple mechanism然而,通过使用这个简单的机制
610of requiring people to explain their preferences,要求人们解释他们的喜好,
611we have come up with a system我们找到了一个系统
612that is incapable of distinguishing无法区分
613between objects that people truly hate在人们真正讨厌的物体之间
614and objects that people actually will end up loving以及人们真正爱的东西
615and have the capacity to transform a marketplace.并有能力改变市场。
616That is the danger of taking a snap judgment at face value.这就是对表面价值作出快速判断的危险。
617About understanding that when we leap关于理解 当我们跳跃
618to a conclusion like this,这样的结论,
619there is a whole world of complexity below the surface.地表下有一个复杂的世界。
620And that this particular conclusion that we reach to而我们达成的具体结论
621is not robust.并不健全。
622It's fragile.这是脆弱的。
623And it can be corrupted or biased也可能是腐败或偏见
624in all kinds of complicated ways.在各种复杂的方式。
625Unless we understand those sources of corruption and bias,除非我们了解这些腐败和偏见的根源,
626then we're helpless in the face of making sense面对理智,我们无能为力
627of this very critical part of human decision making.人类决策的关键部分
628So that's a little pricey所以这有点贵了
629of one of the many, many arguments in Blink.Brink的众多论据之一
630And I'd be happy to answer any questions.我很乐意回答任何问题
631Standing up.站起来
632What do you suggest?你有什么建议?
633What do I suggest instead?我有什么建议?
634Yes.对
635Well, I don't hate all market research.我不讨厌所有的市场研究
636I hate market research that I feel that is naive我讨厌市场研究 我觉得那很天真
637and literal.和字迹。
638So in the case of, say, the Aeron chair, for example,因此,比如说,在艾隆的椅子上,
639suppose instead of asking people what we thought of it,而不是问人们我们的想法,
640we just gave them the chair我们刚刚给了他们椅子
641and we just observed them for a couple months.我们只观察了几个月
642That's fine, right?这很好,对不对?
643Just have them, or suppose that we waited six months只要有他们,或者假设 我们等了六个月
644to get the reaction.要得到的反应。
645Why, what's the hurry?为什么这么着急?
646Why try to, you know, this is a chair为什么要试着,你知道, 这是一个椅子
647that you spend millions of dollars per, you know,你花费数百万美元 每,你知道,
648it's clearly unusual.这显然很不寻常。
649It's gonna take some getting used to.需要一些习惯。
650People have to sort of incorporate its aesthetic人们必须吸收它的美学
651into their worldview.进入他们的世界观。
652That's gonna take time.这需要时间。
653And actually Herman Miller understood all of this intuitively.实际上,赫尔曼·米勒直觉地理解了这一切。
654That's why they went ahead with the project,所以他们才开始这个项目
655even in the face of such overwhelming.即使面对如此压倒性。
656So I don't mind observational stuff,所以我不介意观察的东西,
657stuff that has some kind of, you know,有些东西,你知道,
658if people interpret what people say如果人们解释人们说的话
659as opposed to taking it at face value.而不是把它在面值。
660If there is some kind of intermediary step,如果有某种中间步骤
661then I think it's fine.那就没事了
662But too often, there's no interpretation.但太常无释.
663It's that what we heard was X, Y, and Z我们听说的是 X Y和Z
664without realizing that that can mean many different things.却没有意识到,这可能意味着很多不同的事情。
665You know, in being, really, you make a five你知道,在做,真的, 你做了一个5
666to 10 second judgment.至10次第二次判决。
667So I'm wondering if that falls within所以我想知道这是否属于
668the snap judgment range and would therefore be,快速的判断范围,因此,
669you know, you interviewed the same person two days ago,你两天前采访过同一个人
670you make a different opinion.你的看法不同
671And also the fact that by forcing someone还有通过强迫某人
672to make a decision about the interview,就面试作出决定,
673which Microsoft does, you know, famously,微软做的,你知道, 著名的,
674you're actually biasing people away from the more radical你实际上在偏见人们 远离更激进
675but possibly better person.但也许更好的人。
676Well, this is, I have very, very strong feelings嗯,这是,我有 非常,非常强烈的感情
677about interviews, although I, for reasons that I关于采访,虽然我, 原因我
678am now kicking myself, I don't actually have,现在踢我自己, 我没有,
679I have a little bit on interviews in the book,我在书里有些采访
680but not a lot.但没什么
681I should have perhaps put in more.我也许应该多放点
682You're quite right.你说得对
683You know, if you talk to psychologists,如果你跟心理学家说话
684they will tell you that there is no more flawed他们会告诉你,没有更多的缺陷
685methodology in American life than the job interview.美国生活中的方法 而不是面试
686It's an absurd process, which nearly everybody botches.这是一个荒谬的过程, 几乎每个人都会跳。
687And nearly everyone believes, by the way,而且几乎每个人都相信,顺便说一句,
688they're not botching as they are botching.他们不是装瓶,因为他们是装瓶。
689There are a very limited number of things东西数量有限
690you can learn about somebody in a face-to-face encounter.你可以在面对面的交往中了解某人
691They are real, right?他们是真实的,对不对?
692But they're limited.但他们是有限的。
693So you can learn that somebody is,这样你就可以知道有人是,
694you can learn how energetic they are.你可以知道他们有多活跃。
695You can learn how extroverted they are.你可以知道他们有多外向
696You can learn, you can have some measure你可以学,可以量一些
697of their self-confidence in that encounter.他们自信的遭遇。
698So if you're hiring someone to do lots of job interviews,所以如果你雇人做很多工作面试
699you can learn something about how they approach it.你可以了解一下他们是如何处理的
700So it'd be very, very useful.因此,这将是非常,非常有用。
701You can also learn whether you're attracted to that person你也可以知道你是否被那个人吸引
702and whether that person's attracted to you.以及那个人是否被你吸引
703Another potentially interesting, you know, important thing还有一件可能很有趣的事,你知道的,很重要的
704if your main motivation in hiring is to, you know,如果你在招聘中的主要动机是,你知道,
705come up with employees who you can later hit on.找些你以后可以找的员工来
706But there are all kinds of other things但还有各种各样的事情
707that you think you can find out, which you can't, right?你觉得你可以发现,你无法发现,对不对?
708You cannot learn from an hour conversation with someone你不能从一个小时的谈话中吸取教训
709how open-minded that person is, can't.这个人多么开明,不能。
710Can't learn how conscientious they are,不知道他们有多自负
711how hardworking they are.他们有多努力
712Can't know anything about their ability to function根本不知道他们的能力
713in very different contexts, right?在非常不同的环境,对不对?
714I was talking to an academic group recently我最近跟一个学术团体谈过
715and I was, you know, in the academic world,而我,你知道, 在学术界,
716typically before they hire you, you give a job talk.通常在他们雇你之前 你就会说些工作
717Insanity.无常.
718What is a job talk?什么是工作谈话?
719It's a case where I take somebody这件案子我带了个人
720and I force them very early in their career早年我强迫他们
721to stand up before a group of incredibly站在一群令人难以置信的
722discriminating critics, all of whom are senior to them,歧视批评者, 他们都是他们的高级,
723and with their entire career in the balance,和他们的整个职业生涯 在平衡,
724give a successful lecture.作一个成功的演讲。
725Now, none of the traits that you are testing in that moment现在,你没有测试的特征 在那一刻
726are at all relevant to the life of an academic.完全与学者的生活有关。
727In fact, an academic is someone who chose academia事实上,一个学者是选择学术的人
728in large part because they aren't very good at performing大部分是因为他们不擅长表演
729in high-pressure situations and don't want to在高压情况下,不想
730and have no interest in so doing, right?并且对此没有兴趣,对不对?
731It's crazy.太疯狂了
732It's like if you were the general manager就像你是总经理一样
733of like the Seattle Seahawks and you made everyone就像西雅图海鹰队,你让所有人
734who was trying out for the offensive line do crocheting.试图攻下进攻线的人 总是在编织
735You think, because, well, so-and-so can't crochet.你觉得,因为,嗯, 所以,所以不能缠绕。
736I don't know if we can.我不知道我们能不能
737Why would you be interested in that, right?你为什么对这个感兴趣?
738Why test for things you don't care about?为什么测试你不在乎的东西?
739Yet we do this kind of constantly.然而,我们经常这样做。
740The job interview for, if you're hiring someone工作面试,如果你雇用某人
741to work the perfume counter at Saks,去萨克斯的香水柜台工作
742then by all means do a job interview,然后通过一切手段 做一个工作面试,
743but a classic face-to-face job interview.但典型的面对面面试。
744But if you're not, then I think you sort of have但是如果你不是,那么我想你有点
745to come up with better strategies.提出更好的策略。
746Sure.当然
747In the book, you make a distinction在书中,你做一个区分
748between experts and non-experts and specifically专家和非专家之间,特别是
749that we can rely on experts to be able to articulate我们可以依靠专家来阐明
750in hopefully some sort of an accurate way希望有某种准确的方式
751the reasons why something is good versus something is bad.东西是好的还是坏的
752And we've seen through the talk you've given today我们从你今天的演讲中看到了
753that there are experts you can trust and experts you can't.有专家你可以信任,有专家你不能信任。
754The sports star, for example,比如说运动明星
755versus the executives at Herman Miller.与赫尔曼·米勒的高层对决.
756Is there some sort of a way that we can tell externally是否有某种方法,我们可以从外部看出来
757whether somebody else is an expert别人是不是专家
758without being an expert ourselves?没有成为专家自己?
759That's a good question.问曰.
760Experts, just to take a step backwards for a moment.专家,只是向后退一步
761Most experts, yes, you're quite right,大多数专家,是的,你说得对,
762that one of the, I talk a lot about this in the book,其中一个,我在书中说了很多关于这个,
763one of the fruits of experience and expertise经验和专门知识的成果之一
764is that you do get better at knowing how to explain是,你确实得到更好的 知道如何解释
765where your snap judgments come from,在那里,你的快速判断,
766or at least you're less susceptible或者至少你不那么容易受伤害
767to the kind of biases and corruption偏见和腐败
768that I've been talking about.我一直在谈论。
769Now, I gave the example of tennis stars现在,我举了网球明星的例子
770not being able to do this,无法做到这一点,
771but that's actually a specific case但其实那是个具体的案子
772because a tennis star who's 25 years old and playing因为一个25岁的网球明星
773is actually actively uninterested其实是积极无趣的
774in that version of their expertise, right?他们的专长,对不对?
775They don't think about, they're experts in playing tennis,他们不考虑, 他们是打网球的专家,
776not in teaching tennis, so that it makes sense不是在教网球,这样才有意义
777that they wouldn't have mastered yet他们还没有掌握
778the ability to understand precisely what they're doing能够准确理解他们在做什么
779if they're doing it in a kind of unconscious mode.如果他们在某种无意识的状态下
780But I am very, I do think there are striking differences但我非常,我确实认为 有惊人的区别
781between the kind of, between those who have specific那种人之间,
782knowledge in a field and have a snap judgment知识在一个领域 并有一个快速判断
783and those who don't.及不见者.
784And there's no perfect way to measure that, of course,而且没有完美的方法来衡量, 当然,
785but we've moved, this whole project is to move但我们已经搬家了 整个工程都要搬走
786decision making from the false security利用虚假担保进行决策
787of the kind of deliberate, conscious world那种深思熟虑的世界
788into something that is by definition a lot fuzzier.变成一个从定义上说是很多fuzier。
789And I think we just have to learn to live我觉得我们只需要学会活下去
790with the fuzziness, and that means we don't always know和模糊, 这意味着我们并不总是知道
791right away whether somebody is expert.马上就有人是专家了
792Herman Miller trusted Bill Stump赫尔曼·米勒信任比尔·斯通普
793because Bill Stump had a history with them.因为比尔·斯坦普和他们有过一段历史
794That's why they were willing to say,这就是为什么他们愿意说,
795you know, he did the ergon on the equa,你知道,他做了ergon 在等离子,
796they made us a lot of money,他们给我们赚了很多钱
797he's probably right this time too.这次他可能是对的
798So there is a kind of, we're getting into judgment所以有种,我们正在得到判断
799as opposed to this area of human judgment,而不是人类的判断,
800which is a necessity, something that cannot be这是必要的, 的东西不可能是
801beautifully calibrated and described.精美的校准和描述。
802True.没错
803And in that same vein, are experts dangerous同样的,专家是危险的
804because they do maybe know more,因为他们知道更多,
805and that changes the way they think about the issue改变他们思考这个问题的方式
806versus the average man and woman.对一般的男女。
807Well, this gets into, I don't know,嗯,这是进入,我不知道,
808Jim Suricki来过这里吗?
809with The Wisdom of Crowds?与乌鸦的智慧?
810He's my colleague at The New Yorker who's written this book,他是《纽约客》里我的同事 他写了这本书
811which is sharply critical of a lot of expert judgment这对很多专家的判断是尖锐的
812and saying that aggregated decision making并说,综合决策
813by groups of non-experts can be superior由非专家组成的团体可以发挥优势。
814to experts in many forms.以多种形式提交专家。
815And I'm actually profoundly sympathetic我其实很同情你
816to a lot of his arguments.他的很多争论。
817And so my, I should be careful to kind of specify,所以,我,我应该小心 某种具体,
818what both Jim and I are trying to do吉姆和我都在试图做什么
819is to say that the kind of standard model,就是说那种标准模型,
820the notion that an expert working rationally专家合理工作的概念
821and deliberately and logically, consciously并且有意识和有意识地
822through a series of choices通过一系列选择
823is always the best way to resolve a problem.总是解决问题的最佳途径。
824We're both, we both have problems with that.我们俩都有问题
825We think that that works for some things,我们认为这对一些事情是有用的,
826but it's, you know, it's crazy to assume但是,你知道,这是疯狂的假设
827that that model actually is the best那个模型其实是最好的
828for all manner of decisions.以各种方式决定。
829And he critiques it from this side他从这边批评它
830to say actually groups are better than individuals说团体比个人更好
831in many situations.在很多情况下。
832And I critique from the other side to say我批评对方说
833there are moments when the kind of,有些时候...
834this kind of unconscious decision making这种无意识的决策
835has real advantages.有真正的优势。
836If that's an advanced issue.如果这是高级问题的话
837So some people seem to be better所以有些人似乎比较好
838at making answers now judging this than others.现在比别人更能判断答案
839I'm wondering in your studies,我在想,在你的学习,
840do you notice any patterns or learn something about你是否注意到任何规律或学到什么
841at an outside direct versus the one?在外线直接对着那个?
842Well, the common pattern,嗯,共同的模式,
843rather than focusing on differences in individuals,而不是专注于个人的差异,
844I like to focus on differences in environments.我想强调环境的差异。
845So to give you an example, I have a chapter in the book举个例子,我书中有一章
846that talks about the classical music world.讲的是古典音乐世界
847And for years and years and years,多年来, 和多年,
848classical orchestras were entirely male.古典乐团完全为男性.
849And if you asked people in the business,如果你问别人在生意,
850Maestros 为什么你只雇男人?
851They would say, well, men are better musicians than women.他们会说 男人比女人更擅长音乐
852They are fundamentally inherently better.从根本上说,它们本身就更好。
853And you say, well, why do you think that?你说,为什么你会这么想?
854And they'd say, well, we have auditions, open auditions,他们会说,我们有试镜,公开试镜,
855and women come and they play alongside men女人会来和男人一起玩
856and the men always play better.男人总是玩得更好
857So, you know, what could be a more transparent所以,你知道,什么可以是一个更透明
858and objective way of measuring musical ability?以及衡量音乐能力的客观方法?
859And if men are always winning, you know,如果男人总是赢,你知道,
860women only ever win the competition for the harp.女人只能赢得竖琴比赛
861And so, you know, clearly there's a problem with women here.所以,你知道,很明显 这里有女人的问题。
862Well, then for a variety of reasons in the 80s,那么,出于各种原因 在80年代,
863they started to put up screens in auditions.他们开始在试镜中放屏幕。
864So you could only hear, you couldn't see.所以你只能听,你看不见。
865And immediately, they start to hire women.立即,他们开始雇用妇女。
866And now, in the last 25 years,现在,在过去的25年里,
867orchestras have gone from being about 5% female管弦乐团已经从大约5%的女性
868to being roughly 50-50,大约是50 -50,
869which says that since the imposition of the screen,上面写着 自从屏幕被安装以来
870women had disproportionately won more auditions than men,女选手比男选手赢得的多
871which would suggest actually这实际上意味着
872that if anyone is inherently better musician, it's a woman.如果有谁天生是更好的音乐家 那就是女人
873But put that aside.但把那个放在一边。
874What that says is that in ways that they did not realize,上面写着 他们没有意识到
875the evidence of their eyes他们的眼睛的证据
876and their unconscious feelings about women以及她们对女人的无意识感情
877were prejudicing the snap judgment,伤害了迅速的判决,
878because an audition is a snap judgment,因为试镜是一时的判断
879the snap judgment that kind of maestros were making那种迷宫的判断
880about people playing music.关于人们演奏音乐。
881That they were, their judgment was corrupted他们的判断被破坏了
882by this enormously apparently powerful thing由这个非常强大的东西
883called, you know, sexism.被称为,你知道,性别歧视。
884And when we put the screen up,当我们把屏幕,
885what we did is we took the maestro我们所做的就是拿下大师
886who was a very bad snap decision maker,他是一个非常糟糕的快速决策者,
887and we made him a good one again, right?我们又让他成为好人了,对吧?
888Now, that says to me that people make good snap decisions现在,这告诉我 人们做好的快速决定
889in environments where some attempt has been made在已作出某种努力的环境中
890to clean up sources of contamination.清理污染源。
891And what's interesting about that story, of course,那故事有什么有趣的,当然,
892as well is that it's a case这也是个案子
893where we made someone a better decision maker我们让一个人成为更好的决策者
894by taking away information.获取信息。
895That's another key, very interesting thing,这是另一个关键, 非常有趣的事情,
896that snap decisions are better快速决定更好
897when we've gotten rid of sources of contamination,当我们摆脱了污染源,
898and also where we have simplified以及我们简化的地方
899the kind of decision making palette.那种决策调色板。
900And I talk a lot about that in the book as well.我在书里也谈到过很多这个问题。
901So that is where I would like to see,所以这就是我想看到的,
902rather than try and identify individuals而不是尝试和识别个人
903who have this special ability,他们有这种特殊的能力,
904I much prefer to think of it in terms of environments我更喜欢从环境的角度来考虑
905where people who have the ability拥有能力的人
906to make successful snap judgments* 做出成功的快速判决;
907are allowed to exercise that ability freely and openly.允许自由和公开地行使这种能力。
908And that's to me the key.这对我来说是关键
909Can you talk about it?你能谈谈吗?
910Oh, sorry.对不起
911Sure, I'll get to it.当然,我会得到它。
912So at Microsoft, we do a lot of usability testing.所以在微软公司,我们做了很多可用性测试。
913We get people in and they try a feature in our lab,我们让人们进来,他们尝试一个特征 在我们的实验室,
914and sometimes it's buggy or it's a demo,有时候是杂乱无章,或者是演示
915and so it's not the real circumstance.所以这不是真的
916Are we wasting our time?我们在浪费时间吗?
917I would never suggest anything to Microsoft, right?我绝不会向微软提建议,对吧?
918No, I mean, it depends what you,不,我的意思是, 这取决于你,
919it's like, think about, I'm from New York,想想,我来自纽约
920so this is a topic, Manhattan,所以这是一个话题,曼哈顿,
921it's a topic, of course, that's near and dear to my heart,这当然是一个话题, 这对我来说是亲切的,
922maybe of no cultural relevance to any of you at all.也许跟你们没有任何文化关系
923You're at your shrinks.你在你的心理医生。
924You're lying on a couch, right?你躺在沙发上,对吧?
925And you say, I hate my mother.你说,我恨我的母亲。
926Now, what does a shrink do in response to that statement?现在,心理医生对这个说法的反应是什么?
927They have one response is to say, Malcolm hates his mother.他们有一个回答是说,马尔科姆讨厌他的母亲.
928Another response is to say,另一种回答是说,
929Malcolm at the moment is saying he hates his mother,马尔科姆现在在说他恨他的母亲
930but he actually means something else,但他其实有别的意思
931and we're gonna spend the next 10 years接下来的十年里,我们会度过
932getting to the bottom of this.说到底
933Now, so a usability study, it depends, right?现在,所以一个可用性研究, 它取决于,对不对?
934It depends how you're interpreting that, right?这取决于你是如何解释的,对不对?
935If you're looking at what people are doing and saying,如果你在看人们在做什么 并说,
936and you're interpreting it like a shrink does,你就像心理医生一样解释
937it's very useful.这是非常有用的。
938If you're not, it's not useful at all.如果你不是,这根本不有用
939Now, that may seem a really obvious point,现在,这似乎是一个非常明显的观点,
940but you would be amazed at how few people do the,但你会惊讶 很少有人这样做,
941take the kind of shrink approach.采取那种收缩方法。
942When I was doing this book,我写这本书的时候
943I was talking to all these guys in Hollywood我跟好莱坞的那些人谈过了
944who do, you know, user studies of movies,谁做,你知道,用户 电影研究,
945like do pre-market screening of movies.就像在市场前放映电影一样
946And so I had an actual conversation with a guy who said,所以我和一个说
947he said, you know, one of the weird things他说,你知道,一个奇怪的事情
948about testing comedies is that you'll watch the audience关于测试喜剧是 你会看观众
949while they're watching a comedy,当他们在看喜剧时
950and they'll be laughing their guts out.他们会笑出他们的胆量。
951And then you ask them afterwards, did you like that movie?然后你问他们之后, 你喜欢那部电影吗?
952You think it was funny?你觉得这很有趣吗?
953And they'll say, now it wasn't funny at all.他们会说,现在这一点都不好笑
954And I said to that, oh, so which of those two versions我说,哦,所以这两个版本中的哪一个
955do you believe?你相信吗?
956And the guy said, well, what they say, of course.那家伙说,嗯,他们说什么,当然。
957Now, what if I'm wrong?如果我错了呢?
958Is that not backwards?这不是倒着吗?
959Like, I just sort of looked at the guy and I just said,喜欢,我只是有点 看的家伙,我只是说,
960you know, I don't know what to make of that.我不知道该怎么解释
961Like, that's just really deeply puzzling.喜欢,这只是 深深的困惑。
962This is Hollywood, they're not dumb,这是好莱坞,他们不是哑巴,
963but they're just not interested in,但他们只是不感兴趣,
964to him it was a kind of, the actual laughter对他来说,那是一种真实的笑声,
965that you would experience in the moment was a kind of,你将经历的时刻 是一种,
966was noise in the system, right?系统里有噪音,对吧?
967It's crazy.太疯狂了
968That might go back to the focus.这可能回到焦点。
969The question I was gonna ask about focus groups,我想问的焦点小组的问题,
970which is, that guy sells tickets也就是说,那家伙卖票
971not based on the laughing people in the theater,不是因为戏院里的笑人
972but the buzz they get afterwards但后来他们又会发声
973as to whether that person tells other people关于他是否告诉别人
974that it's a funny movie or not.这是一部有趣的电影与否。
975And my actual question is,我真正的问题是,
976we do focus groups with multiple people,我们做焦点小组 多人,
977and is there value to that because they pollute each other?因为他们互相污染,所以有价值吗?
978You talk about polluting issues out of a room.你在房间里谈论污染问题
979One strong personality, one compelling personality一个强壮的个性 一个强壮的个性
980can basically turn the whole room.基本上可以把整个房间翻过来
981You think maybe one-on-one or kind of more focused,你认为也许一对一 或者那种更集中,
982focus groups with individuals is more valuable以个人为重点群体更为宝贵
983than throwing a group of people,或抛下一群人,
984but then again, that goes against the wisdom of crowds.这又违背了人群的智慧
985Yeah.对
986No, I think any kind of,不,我想任何类型的,
987I think any step away from the kind of standard我认为任何一步 离那种标准
988focus group methodology is probably a good one.焦点小组的方法也许是好的。
989So, I'm short of throwing them out altogether,所以,我还没有把他们扔出去,
990which would be my dream.这将是我的梦想。
991Sure, like mixing it up and doing all kinds of,当然,像混在一起 做各种各样的,
992viewing people and people's experiences观看人和人的经验
993in the greatest possible range of situations在尽可能广泛的情况下
994is probably all good.也许一切都很好
995On your movie point, it's very interesting you say that.在你的电影点上,你这么说很有趣
996That is where you go, that's what they would say.你去那里,他们会这么说的。
997They would say, I actually care more what they say他们说,其实我更关心他们说的话
998about the movie than what they did有关电影比他们做了什么
999because I want this movie talked up.因为我希望这部电影能说清楚
1000But then that assumes that what,但是,然后假设,什么,
1001the way they describe the movie to a friend他们描述电影的方式 一个朋友
1002is similar as the way they describe it to you,就像他们对你的描述一样
1003and that's wrong.这是错误的。
1004The problem is that the form of asking someone问题是 问人的形式
1005formally after the movie is a powerfully distorting form.电影之后正式成为了一种强大的扭曲形式.
1006It's not the same as over beers with Jim, telling Jim.和吉姆的啤酒不一样 告诉吉姆
1007I have a question on this point.我有一个问题。
1008This is something that's been irking me这件事让我很烦恼
1009and fascinating me for a long time,并吸引我很久,
1010and I've been looking for studies retrospectively我一直在寻找研究 追溯
1011that look at how well the focus group predict看看焦点小组的预测
1012what actually happens.到底发生了什么
1013So do you and how well do the market studies你和市场研究做得如何
1014actually predict outcomes?实际预测结果?
1015And I cannot find anything.我找不到任何东西。
1016So maybe it came across something in your research所以也许在你的研究中发现了一些东西
1017that you can, or something.你可以的,或东西。
1018No, there's precious little data不,有宝贵的小数据
1019because if you were in the focus group business,因为如果你在焦点组业务,
1020would you produce such data?你会提供这些数据吗?
1021Why would you?为什么?
1022But I will say this, that the bias, the problem is,但我会说, 偏见,问题在于,
1023the further you move away from things that are你离这些东西越远
1024in the mainstream, the more trouble you have.在主流,你的麻烦越多。
1025So imagine that you have just produced a movie,想象一下你刚刚制作了一部电影,
1026Die Hard Five, right?死难五,对不对?
1027And you want to know, is Die Hard Five你想知道,是死难五
1028as good as Die Hard Four?和死硬四号一样好?
1029Can you predict that, find that out from a focus group?你能预测一下,从焦点小组中找出来吗?
1030Absolutely.当然
1031Why?为什么?
1032Because your focus group will be full of people因为你的焦点小组 将充满人
1033who saw Die Hard's one through four.他看到"硬死"一到四。
1034They're completely familiar with the genre.他们完全熟悉流派.
1035They have no difficulty explaining their feelings他们没有困难地解释他们的感受
1036about Die Hard.关于死硬。
1037How hard can it be, right?有多难,对不对?
1038So, and also Die Hard Five is an utterly known quantity.所以,还有Die Hard Five 是一个完全已知的数量。
1039That's not the problem.这不是问题所在。
1040The problem is, you know, you get something like问题是,你知道, 你得到的东西喜欢
1041All in the Family, which had terrible focus group.所有的家庭, 有可怕的焦点小组。
1042You should have never made it to air.你不应该让它升空。
1043Only made it to air by a kind of chit.只有一种气味才能飞到空中
1044Yeah, and all these things that do,是啊,所有这些事情,
1045that's something that's a radical departure那是个激进的转变
1046from the mainstream.从主流。
1047That's where the focus group is gonna have焦点小组就在那里
1048increasing little validity.越来越少的有效性。
1049Now, so much that comes onto the marketplace现在,这么多 进入市场
1050is purely derivative that you could probably纯粹的衍生物,你可能
1051pop up your numbers on focus groups在焦点组中弹出数字
1052if that's all you're testing.如果你只是测试。
1053And if, you know, so, and for people who traffic如果,你知道,这样, 对于交通的人
1054only in derivative products, then not so bad.只在衍生产品中,那么没那么糟糕。
1055But I'm assuming that right here,但我假设在这里,
1056your interests run beyond purely derivative products, right?你的兴趣超出了纯粹的衍生产品,对吧?
1057You actually, occasionally, more than occasionally,其实,偶尔,不止偶尔
1058come out with products that challenge people,拿出挑战人类的产品
1059that require them to reorganize their mental universe.这要求他们重组 自己的精神宇宙。
1060You can't focus group that, right?你不能把注意力集中到这个组,对吧?
1061That's where it would really fall down.在那里它会真正下降。
1062Implications of snap judgments.快速判决的影响。
1063Yeah.对
1064Are people in the voting booth making a snap judgment投票亭里的人在做一个快速的判断
1065or have they been taking in months and months或者他们几个月或几个月以来
1066of information and careful consideration?资料和仔细考虑?
1067I get that question every time I talk in the Northwest.我每次在西北区说话都会问这个问题
1068And I always have the same answer,我总是有同样的答案,
1069which is that I am a Canadian.我是一个加拿大人。
1070And I have absolutely no understanding我绝对不明白
1071of the American political process.美国的政治进程。
1072And each year that passes in this country,在这个国家的每一年
1073I find myself having less and less understanding我发现自己越来越不理解
1074of the American political process.美国的政治进程。
1075So I have no clue.┮иぃ笵
1076I don't think it doesn't, the notion,我不认为它没有,这个概念,
1077there is a notion in the political world政治界有个概念
1078that I find utterly puzzling,我感到很困惑,
1079which is that it is a snap judgment.也就是说这是个快速判断
1080And that there are somehow large percentage of voters选民比例很高
1081up for grabs right up to November, you know, second.11月之前,你知道的,第二。
1082How could you be up for, I don't,你怎么会高兴呢?
1083I don't understand, the notion of undecided我不明白,没有决定的概念
1084is so weird to me.对我来说太奇怪了
1085And that you would actually,而且你实际上,
1086you would actually be in the booth and you'd be like, whoa.你其实是在摊位上, 你会喜欢,哇。
1087You know, like, you know, oh, it's an election.你知道,就像,你知道, 哦,这是一个选举。
1088I gotta just, you know.我必须...
1089So I steer clear, with the exception of telling the story所以除了讲故事之外,我还是走得很清楚
1090of Warren Harding in my book,我书中的沃伦·哈丁
1091who I think is a wonderfully emblematic figure.我认为他是一个出色的象征人物。
1092I don't say, I really have nothing to say about politics.我不说,我真的没什么要说的政治。
1093Not a political person.不是个政治人物
1094I've been biased against this side.我对这边有偏见
1095So how about a similar thing that you do have in Canada,那么,一个类似的事情 你在加拿大,
1096I think, like juries.我想,像陪审团。
1097Yeah.对
1098Does, did you, I mean, does any of your research你是否做过研究?
1099sort of relate to how decisions are made in the jury room?和陪审团如何做出决定有关?
1100Well, I don't have any stuff on juries我没有陪审员
1101because we're just getting there.因为我们刚刚到那里。
1102Like, the core of psychological research就像心理学研究的核心
1103that I was interested in in this book我对这本书感兴趣
1104is a bunch of people who are examining things是一群正在检查事物的人
1105like our levels of,就像我们的水平,
1106what attitudes do we carry with us unconsciously?我们无意识地带着什么态度?
1107And what impact do we have in our behavior?我们的行为有什么影响?
1108And what we, we've gotten to the point now而我们,我们已经到了重点
1109where we understand that there is a clear distinction我们明白有明确的区别
1110between our unconscious and our conscious attitudes.我们的无意识和有意识的态度之间
1111They have nothing in common with each other.他们之间没有任何共同点。
1112That you can consciously be, for example,举例来说,你可以有意识的
1113an extraordinarily liberal person自由主义者
1114and yet simultaneously harbor quite retrograde views并同时隐藏相当倒退的视图
1115on those same subjects.同样的主题。
1116And that those unconscious beliefs will affect things那些无意识的信仰会影响事物
1117like how you spontaneously behave around someone.就像你自发在别人身边的行为
1118So let's say that I'm someone who has,这么说吧,我是一个有...
1119who's consciously very liberal and unconsciously not.他自觉地非常自由 和无意识地不是。
1120So I might be perfectly open to所以,我可能 完全开放
1121taking applications and seriously considering认真对待申请
1122African Americans for a position in my company.非裔美国人要我公司的职位
1123But when I actually meet them,但当我遇到他们时,
1124my spontaneous, unplanned, unconscious behavior我自发的,无计划的,无意识的行为
1125might be quite hostile.也许很敌对
1126And I would be totally unaware of that.我将完全不知道这一点。
1127But it would significantly distort但它会严重扭曲
1128the outcome of the interview.采访结果。
1129So that's where we are right now.这就是我们现在的位置。
1130We understand these things exist.我们知道这些东西是存在的。
1131And now we're trying to figure out, are we?而现在我们正试着想个办法 是吗?
1132Psychologists are trying to figure out心理学家们正在想办法
1133precisely what does that,这到底是怎么回事?
1134what difference does that make in settings like这有什么区别,在像
1135jury trials?陪审团审判?
1136The presumption so far appears to be,迄今为止的推定似乎是,
1137it's gotta make a big difference.这会有很大的改变。
1138And I would love to see, you couldn't do this, of course,我很想看,你无法做到这一点,当然,
1139because no profession is more deeply resistant因为没有职业更能抵抗
1140to the findings of science or the findings even of reason科学结论或甚至理性结论
1141than the legal profession.比法律专业。
1142But you know, let's just do a simple series of experiments但你知道,我们只是做一系列简单的实验
1143where we put a screen up where you can either see我们放一个屏幕 在那里你可以看到
1144nor listen to the accent of the person charged, right?也不听被告的口音 对吧?
1145Let's just have, let's put the defendant,让我们只是, 让我们把被告,
1146give him a screen, let the defendant email with the jury,给他一个屏幕, 让被告电子邮件与陪审团,
1147or email with his responses or her responses或电子邮件及其答复
1148to the lawyers, the prosecutor.给律师 检察官
1149And let's see if that makes a difference.让我们看看这有什么区别。
1150I would be very surprised if it didn't.如果不是这样,我会非常惊讶。
1151And I would think that if we were trying to construct我想如果我们试图构建
1152a sort of more just society,一种更公正的社会,
1153we would start to seriously consider我们开始认真考虑
1154those kind of considerations.那种考虑。
1155Nicole.妮科尔。
1156So I found the most fascinating thing about your book我发现你的书最吸引人
1157is this idea that we have to restrict the information是这个想法,我们必须限制信息
1158that we have available to us.已经为我们提供了。
1159And I wonder if that also could apply at a societal level.我想知道这是否也可以在社会层面适用。
1160Recently there's been people talking,最近有人在说话
1161you know, the Harvard guy who mentioned,你知道,哈佛的家伙 谁提到,
1162something that's fairly well-established,某种相当成熟的东西,
1163there's differences between men and women男女之间有差别
1164on certain kinds of activities,关于某些种类的活动,
1165but maybe it's a society we're trying to say,但也许这是一个社会 我们试图说,
1166we don't wanna know what's actually gonna lead us我们不想知道什么才是真正的线索
1167to making a bad decision that we don't wanna make.做一个我们不想做的不好的决定
1168So let's just, is it quite possible所以,让我们只是, 这是相当可能的
1169that some things we're just better off the side有些事情,我们只是更好 边上
1170of not knowing about because we know不知道,因为我们知道
1171it's gonna lead to us making wrong decisions?这会导致我们做出错误的决定?
1172The question's a very interesting one,这个问题非常有趣
1173and that is about the benefits of information restriction.这就是信息限制的好处。
1174And I would make a distinction between,我要区分一下
1175in the book I talk about specific kinds of decisions在书里,我谈到 具体类型的决定
1176that are, snap decisions, that are markedly improved即即时决定,这些决定明显改进
1177by deliberate attempts to restrict蓄意试图限制
1178the quantity of information that's on the table.上面的信息数量
1179And that's pretty clear, that as human beings很明显,作为人类
1180one of the things we do is systematically overestimate我们做的其中一件事 是系统高估
1181the value of marginal pieces of information.边际信息值。
1182And time and time again you can see一次又一次的,你可以看到
1183that people making predictions,以预测者发誓,
1184the classic study of this is,经典研究是,
1185you take a group of psychologists,你带一群心理学家
1186and you say, we would like you to make a diagnosis你说,我们想请你做个诊断
1187about a patient, and we're gonna see关于病人,我们会看到
1188how accurate your diagnosis is, right?你的诊断有多准确?
1189So you start out and you give them,所以你开始给他们,
1190the psychologist, a paragraph about the patient.心理学家,关于病人的一段
1191Then you come back and you give them然后你回来给他们
1192and you see what they say, and then you say,你看见他们说的,你就说:
1193well how confident are you in your diagnosis?你对诊断有多有信心?
1194You measure confidence and you measure你测量信心,你测量信心,
1195what the diagnosis is.什么诊断。
1196Then you give them a page, then you give them five pages,然后给他们一页 然后给他们五页
1197and then you give them 10 pages of information.然后给他们10页的信息。
1198And what you find is that regardless你所发现的,是无论
1199of how much information you give them,你给他们多少信息
1200the accuracy of the diagnosis remains exactly the same.诊断的准确性完全不变。
1201What changes is their confidence in the diagnosis, right?什么变化是他们对诊断的信心,对不对?
1202With a paragraph, they have very little confidence有了一段,他们几乎没有信心
1203in what they're doing.他们在做什么。
1204With 10 pages of information,有了10页的信息,
1205they think they're absolutely right.他们认为他们完全正确。
1206As it turns out, their success rate,结果发现他们的成功率
1207their accuracy rate is very, very low in all cases.他们的准确率在所有情况下都非常非常低。
1208But, so our attraction to more data但是,所以我们吸引更多的数据
1209is not about improving the accuracy of our conclusion,这不是要提高我们结论的准确性,
1210it's about just improving our psychological state, right?只是想改善我们的心理状态,对不对?
1211About our confidence in the decision that we're making.关于我们对决定的信心
1212So that's a very important case on a case by case basis.所以,这是一个非常重要的案件 逐个案例。
1213There are instances where we may want有些情况下我们可能想要
1214to clear the playing field.来清理比赛场地
1215But to go, I can't resist responding但是,去,我不能抗拒 反应
1216to the Pacific comment about Mr. Summers at Harvard,对哈佛的夏默斯先生的评论
1217and his comment about women.和他对女人的评论。
1218There, what he's making is a kind of classic,他做的是一种经典的
1219I'll even go so far to use the et hominem,我甚至会走这么远 使用与人类,
1220a classic economist there.一个典型的经济学家
1221His assumption is that there is no difference,他的假设是,没有区别,
1222there is no denying that there are differences,不可否认的是,有分歧,
1223substantial differences between men and women.男女差别很大。
1224But the question is, are the differences between men但问题是 男人之间的差别
1225and women greater than the differences within each gender?与性别的差异相比,妇女更强大?
1226And the answer is they're not.答案是他们没有
1227They are, on the scale of things that separate individuals,它们是,在物 分离个人,
1228relatively trivial.相对微不足道。
1229So it's not that you can't say there are differences所以你不能说有区别
1230between men and women, it's just that they're just男人和女人之间,他们只是
1231not that important, and it's not likely to be没那么重要 也不可能
1232the principle difference in explaining解释中的主要区别
1233why women might succeed at a certain field.为什么妇女可以在某个领域取得成功。
1234Especially if you mention it, because the point being,特别是如果你提到它, 因为重点是,
1235if he's mentioning that, you actually mentioned如果他提到这一点, 你真的提到
1236in your book that women are more likely to do worse在你的书中,女人更有可能做坏事
1237than a test of math, if they've mentioned the fact比数学测试, 如果他们已经提到的事实
1238that women do worse than a test of math.女人比数学测试更糟糕
1239As an administrator, it's like it's a particular burden,作为一个管理员,这就像一个特别的负担,
1240even if it were actually true in a substantial way即使事实上是真的
1241not to be mentioning it so that he doesn't disadvantage别提了 这样他才不会不利
1242those people who are, for whom within the group,这些人,为谁 在群体,
1243they can be successful.他们可以成功。
1244No, I think you're right.不,我认为你是对的。
1245Two more questions.又二问.
1246Right ahead.就在前方,我们先走
1247What point do you think the lack of information你觉得缺乏信息有什么意义
1248becomes a bad thing for information?成为坏消息?
1249You can imagine, you send somebody an email,你可以想象,你给别人发邮件,
1250they read it, this scenario you mentioned there,他们读了,你提到的这个情景,
1251emailing the jury back and forth,一遍又一遍地给陪审团发邮件
1252what's lost is a lot of the extra information损失的是很多额外信息
1253that carries in people's voices,那些能传动人们的声音的,
1254even if that could have been used negatively,即使这可以被消极地使用,
1255it could have also been used positively.也可以积极使用。
1256So at which point, online and saying,所以在那个时候 在网上说
1257that's good information to add, that's bad information?这是很好的信息补充, 这是坏信息?
1258Yeah.对
1259Yeah, the question is, what's the floor?问题是,地板是多少?
1260At which point does limiting information何时限制信息
1261start to do more harm than good?开始做更多的伤害 比好?
1262And there absolutely is a floor,绝对有一层楼
1263but I will only say that I think in many of the cases但我只想说,在很多情况下
1264that people are interested in reforming,人们对改革感兴趣,
1265we're a long way from the floor.我们离地板很远
1266I don't think that even if you restricted,我不认为,即使你限制,
1267in a standard criminal jury trial,在标准的刑事陪审团审判中,
1268even if you restricted access to visual or oral information即使限制你获取视觉或口头信息
1269about the defendant, you would be somehow关于被告,你会不知何故
1270lacking for information.缺少信息。
1271You're still flooded with stuff about this person.你仍然被他的东西淹没
1272It's just that it's all confined to a relatively narrow只是,它的所有限制 在一个相对狭小的
1273emotional band and sensory band.情感乐队和感官乐队.
1274I don't have any problem with what I'm losing,我对失去的东西没有任何问题,
1275because like I said, the mistake many patients,因为正如我所说 许多病人的错误
1276many juries make is they end up deciding许多陪审团最后决定
1277whether they like the person or not.不管他们是否喜欢这个人
1278And we are manifestly uninterested而且我们明显没有兴趣
1279in whether you like the defendant.无论你是否喜欢被告
1280The issue is only whether the defendant问题只是被告是否
1281is guilty or innocent.有罪或无罪
1282And so I'm quite happy with what I take off the table所以我很满意我脱下桌子的事
1283in that instance.那样的话
1284But one last question.但最后一个问题。
1285Sure.当然
1286So could you comment on the effect of time?你能评论一下时间的影响吗?
1287Because one of the things that in snap judgment,因为其中之一 在快速判断,
1288the whole notion of a snap judgment快速判决的整个概念
1289is that you're forced to make it immediately.你被迫马上赶到
1290And having both done and been part of user tests既做了也参与了用户测试
1291and things like that, you can definitely see situations和类似的事情,你肯定可以看到情况
1292where someone's like, okay, well what did you think of that?好吧 你觉得呢?
1293And it's very, it's kind of overwhelming.它非常,它有点压倒性。
1294And had you had a day or something,你曾经有过一天什么的,
1295you might respond very differently.你的反应可能很不一样
1296I wonder if anybody's tried to do studies不知道有没有人想学习
1297where they're trying to see like with a chair or something.他们试图看到 像用椅子什么的。
1298Time, this is a, the question is about the effect of time时间,这是a,问题在于时间的效果
1299on snap judgments.快速判断。
1300And it's a shame this is the last question,可惜这是最后一个问题
1301because this is actually a really, really, really huge issue.因为这其实是一个非常,非常,非常大的问题。
1302And I touch on it a number of places in the book.我在书中提到了一些地方。
1303Just to briefly, there's a chapter in the book,简言之 书中有一章
1304I'll just talk about one aspect of this,我只想谈谈这个方面,
1305which is, there's a chapter in the book about cops,书里有一章关于警察
1306police work, about the shooting of Amadou Diallo,警方关于阿马杜·迪亚洛被枪击案的工作
1307in which I talk a lot about the kind of decisions在其中我谈论了很多 什么样的决定
1308that police officers make.这是警察做的。
1309And the question is, cops have to make问题是,警察必须...
1310snap judgments all the time.时不时地做出判断
1311So what distinguishes a good police officer's那么,什么区别 一个好警官的
1312snap judgment from a bad one?从一个坏的判断?
1313And there, it really does seem to be the case在那里,它真的 似乎是这样
1314that to the extent that you can slow down只要能慢下来
1315the situation they're in, they'll make a better他们的处境会更好
1316and better snap judgment.最好快点判断
1317Now, their definition of slow现在,他们定义慢
1318is different from your definition of slow.与你对慢的定义不同
1319So, classic example is the shooting of President Reagan典型的例子就是里根总统被枪杀
1320in 1981, or three, I forgot, three, I think it was.1981年,或者三,我忘了,三,我想是的。
1321You remember this, that John, he's outside你还记得,约翰,他在外面
1322the Washington Hilton, Reagan's giving a speech,华盛顿希尔顿,里根的演讲,
1323he's coming out, John Hinckley's in the crowd,他出来了 约翰·欣克利在人群中
1324they're pressing around Reagan,他们在逼迫里根
1325Hinckley's arm reaches out, he's got a 22,Hinkley的手臂伸出来,他有22,
1326he fires, I think, five shots.他开了五枪
1327The bodyguards grab him, wrestle him to the ground.保镖抓住他,把他摔到地上
1328Now, how long do you think, how much time do you think现在,你认为多久, 你觉得多少时间
1329elapsed between the first moment at which John Hinckley在约翰·欣克利的第一时间
1330was spotted, at which the attack became evident,被发现, 袭击变得很明显,
1331and when all the shots were fired and John Hinckley当枪声响起 约翰·欣克利
1332was lying prone on the ground?躺在地上很容易吗?
1333How much time?多长时间?
13341.8 seconds.1.8秒,我马上回来
1335Now, in 1.8 seconds, this is the answer to the question现在,在1.8秒内, 这是问题的答案
1336of why Reagan got shot.为什么里根中枪了
1337In 1.8 seconds, how good a snap judgment在1.8秒内, 如何好的快速判断
1338can a bodyguard make?保镖能做吗?
1339The answer is, not a good one at all.答案是,不是一个好的。
1340You can't do it, 1.8 seconds, as a bodyguard,你不能做,1.8秒 作为保镖,
1341all you can do is this, they go for their guns.你只能这样 他们要枪
1342Now, if you talk to bodyguards, they will say,如果你和保镖说话 他们会说
1343that's one of the biggest errors in the body,这是身体最大的错误之一,
1344this is a big argument in the bodyguard business,这是保镖生意上的一个大争论
1345and that is, the big argument is,也就是说,最大的争论是,
1346should bodyguards have guns, right?保镖应该有枪吗?
1347Now, we would all say, well, of course,现在,我们都说,当然,
1348but many of them say, actually, no,但其中很多人说,实际上,没有,
1349because attacks take place in such a short period of time,因为袭击发生在这么短的时间内,
1350you have a limited number of time of things you can do你的时间有限 你可以做的事情
1351and decisions you can make, right?和你可以做的决定,对不对?
1352If it's 1.8 seconds and you go like this,如果只有1.8秒 你就像这样走
1353you've squandered your 1.8 seconds, right?你浪费了1.8秒,对吧?
1354You're going for your gun to do what?你要拿枪做什么?
1355The guy's firing shots right now,他正在开枪
1356the damage is being done right now,伤害正在发生
1357your first instinct should rather be你的第一直觉应该
1358to put yourself between the shooter and the target将自己置于枪手与目标之间
1359or to take Reagan and to pull him down to the ground.或将里根拖下地
1360Instead, all these guys go like this,相反,所有这些家伙都这样,
1361and Reagan gets shot, right?里根被枪杀了,对吧?
1362So take away the gun, that's what they always say.所以把枪拿走 他们总是这么说
1363In any case, that's a separate,无论如何,这是单独的,
1364but the whole game there then,但当时的比赛,
1365if you wanna make bodyguards or cops如果你想做保镖或警察
1366make better decisions, is you gotta find some way做更好的决定,是 你必须找到一些方法
1367to inject some time into that process.给这一过程注入一些时间。
1368So that's why now, quite unlike in Reagan's time,这就是为什么现在, 相当不像里根的时间,
1369if you're a bodyguard and guarding the president,如果你是保镖 守卫总统
1370there'll be what they call white space.会有他们所谓的白色空间。
1371There'll be 15 feet between the president总统离这里15英尺
1372and any unknown person at any given time,以及任何不明身份的人,
1373and that's because 15 feet equals,那是因为15英尺的距离
1374yeah, a second or 0.5 of a second,是啊,一秒钟或0.5秒,
1375and that's all the difference in the world.而此一切世间差别.
1376And the same thing with cops,和警察一样,
1377that there's been an enormous amount of research有大量的研究
1378and work and training in recent years近年来的工作和培训
1379in trying to train cops about how to inject time试图训练警察如何注入时间
1380into dangerous situations.进入危险境地
1381So don't leave your vehicle, stay in your vehicle,所以不要离开你的车,留在你的车上,
1382ready for help, never, a cop should,准备好求助,永远不要,警察应该,
1383well, this gets into a whole nother thing,好吧,这进到一个整体 不是她的事情,
1384but the whole thing about cops,但关于警察的整件事
1385the number of situations where they ever chase people他们追逐过多少人
1386should be severely limited,应严格限制,
1387because you don't wanna ever be rushing after someone因为你不想冲着别人
1388because that creates this kind of...因为那样就...
1389But it's a really, really big issue但这是个大问题
1390that there is a kind of balance有一种平衡
1391that you need to snap judgement.你需要做出判断
1392Paradoxically, you need some time to properly germinate.矛盾的是,你需要一些时间 适当的发芽。
1393So, anyway, well thank you all very much.所以,无论如何,非常感谢大家。
1394Anyway, well thank you all very much.总之,非常感谢大家。
1395I don't know.师曰.
1396That was an excellent thing to talk about.说得真好
该视频共有字幕 1396 条。解锁更多字幕为会员功能,请移动到 价格